Skip to content

Endomina Controlled Study

A Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of an Endoluminal-suturing Device (Endomina) as an Aid for Endoscopic Gastric Reduction

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03255005
Enrollment
72
Registered
2017-08-21
Start date
2017-09-05
Completion date
2020-03-26
Last updated
2020-05-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Obesity

Keywords

obesity, endoscopy, endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty

Brief summary

The aim of this trial is to evaluate the efficacy of an endoluminal vertical gastroplasty (EVG) using an endoluminal-suturing device. Safety will also be characterized, in particular by the incidence of all Adverse Device Effects (ADEs). A secondary endpoint is to compare a delayed treatment control group (diet alone; crossover at 6 months) with a treatment group (EVG plus diet). Other secondary endpoints include improvements in other obesity measures.

Detailed description

Surgery is currently the only effective treatment for morbid obesity and can be divided into restrictive surgeries (Lap Band and Sleeve gastrectomy), malabsorptive surgeries (Biliary pancreatic deviation and duodenal switch) or a combination of both (RYGBP). This latter technique is the most common and most effective surgical procedure performed worldwide and has been processed to be an effective treatment of morbid obesity and its complications, achieving excess weight loss of 65 to 80 %; 1-2 years after surgery. Vertical gastric plication is a novel surgical approach for reducing the stomach capacity. Anterior surface plication and greater curvature plication are variations of vertical gastric plication that reduce the gastric capacity through infolding of the anterior surface or greater curvature of the stomach, respectively. These approaches have been tested, with positive results. A transoral or endoluminal approach (i.e. a procedure that requires no incision, because access is granted through the mouth) offers the potential for additional benefit to the patient, because the procedures continue to become more and more minimally invasive. Advances in endoluminal devices are now allowing clinicians the ability to begin exploring bariatric procedures performed via flexible endoscopy. Although these procedures may not be as effective as their surgical counterparts, these less-invasive options may relieve patients of the significant risks associated with surgery and might become part of the armamentarium of obesity management. Endomina (Endo Tools Therapeutics, Gosselies, Belgium) is a CE marked device that may be attached to an endoscope inside the body and allows remote actuation of the device during a peroral intervention. It offers the possibilities of making transoral full thickness tissue apposition and may allow performing, via a transoral route, large plications with tight serosa to serosa apposition. After a first trial on pigs (safety), a second trial on human patients was performed. This trial included 11 patients treated with the same technique. There were no complications and the short term results were encouraging with 41% EWL at 6 month. A multicentric trial NCT02582229 entitled: A Prospective Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of an Endoluminal-suturing Device (Endomina TM) as an Aid for Endoscopic Gastric Reduction. is ongoing and inclusion of patients ended in December 2016 with a total of 51 patients included in 3 European centers. Early results of the trial had showed that dietician follow-up is an important part of the success. During that time implementation of the procedure had been done. The aim of this trial is to compare a control group (diet alone) with a treatment group (Endomina procedure plus diet).

Interventions

DEVICEEndomina

Endoscopic sleeve reduction

BEHAVIORALDiet

Multidisciplinary follow-up

Sponsors

Erasme University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SEQUENTIAL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Group A: treatment J0 + Diet 1 year Group B: Diet 6 months - Treatment - Diet 1 year

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Age between 18-65 years; 2. Class I or class II obesity (i.e. BMI between 30 to 40 kg/m²); 3. Must be able to comply with all study requirements for the duration of the study as outlined in the protocol. This includes complying with the visit schedule as well as study specific procedures such as: clinical assessment, endoscopy, radiography, as well as laboratory investigations; 4. Must be able to understand and be willing to provide written informed consent; 5. Must live within 75 km of the treatment site; 6. Had followed the bariatric multidisciplinary workup (blood analyses, dietician, psychologist and doctor appointments).

Exclusion criteria

1. Achalasia and any other esophageal motility disorders; 2. Severe esophagitis; 3. Gastro-duodenal ulcer; 4. Heart diseases: unstable angina, myocardial infarction within the past year, or heart disease classified within the New York Heart Association's Class III or IV functional capacity; 5. Hypertension: uncontrolled hypertension during last 3 months; 6. Diabetes: uncontrolled diabetes (on insulin therapy or oral therapy with Hba1c \> 10%); 7. TBWL \>5% over the last 6 months; 8. Severe renal, hepatic, pulmonary disease or cancer; 9. GI stenosis or obstruction; 10. Pregnancy, breastfeeding or willing to become pregnant in the coming 18 months; 11. Previous bariatric surgery, balloon or other endoscopic obesity-related therapy; 12. Anticoagulant therapy; 13. Impending gastric surgery 60 days post intervention; 14. Currently participating in other study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Incidence of all Adverse Device Effectsone year from procedureSafety will be characterized by the incidence of all Adverse Device Effects (ADEs), non-serious and serious, possibly related to or related to the procedure and/or device that are experienced by study participants.
Weight lossone year from proceduretotal weight loss and excess weight loss

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Quality of lifeone year from procedureSF36
Weight loss at 6 monthsat 6 months after the procedure (treatment group)comparison between diet and treatment group at 6 months
Weight and heightone year from procedureTo calculate the body mass index (BMI)
TBWLone year from procedureMean % total body weight loss (%TBWL)
More than 15% weight lossone year from procedureProportion of patients in the Endomina Group with a loss of weight of more than 15%

Countries

Belgium, France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 17, 2026