Skip to content

Effectiveness of a Decision Aid for Knee Osteoarthritis

Effectiveness of a Decision Aid for Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis Candidates for Primary Total Arthroplasty

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03254771
Enrollment
193
Registered
2017-08-18
Start date
2017-08-16
Completion date
2018-12-31
Last updated
2020-01-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Osteoarthritis, Knee

Keywords

Knee ostheoartritis, Arthroplasty, Clinical trial, Decision aids

Brief summary

The main goal of this study is assess the effectiveness of a DA for patients with knee osteoarthritis candidates to ART

Detailed description

The number of knee total arthroplasty (ART) interventions has increased in the last 10 years in European countries, partly due to the aging of the population and partly because of the increase in the use of these interventions to improve the quality of life among elderly patients. According to the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) 2012, from 2000 to 2010 in Spain the percentage of knee ART has doubled in recent years. . The role of citizens in decisions affecting their health is changing. Individual factors such as improving educational attainment and access to medical information, and collective factors such as training of patient groups and changes in legislation (informed consent, autonomy principle) have motivated the transition from a paternalistic model to a co-responsibility model. Shared decision-making (TDC) has been proposed in recent years as a model of care that promotes users' involvement in the decisions about their treatment, in those situations where there is uncertainty and / or the scientific evidence reports a balance between benefits and risks that is similar for two or more therapeutic options. Decision aids (DA) are tools designed to promote and facilitate patients' involvement in medical decisions concerning their health Objectives: To assess the effectiveness of a DA for patients with knee osteoarthritis candidates to ART Methodology: Randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness of the DA versus usual care in reducing decisional conflict, increasing knowledge of the disease/treatments, informed choice and the satisfaction with the decision making process, and decreasing decisional regret.

Interventions

OTHERDecision aid

Decision aids are tools that enables to promote and facilitate patients' involvement in medical decisions concerning their health

Sponsors

Hospital de Basurto
CollaboratorOTHER
Hospital Donostia
CollaboratorOTHER
Servicio Canario de Salud
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
NONE

Masking description

Open label

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 90 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients with osteoarthritis of the knee * Candidates for arthroplasty

Exclusion criteria

* Patients who have already undergone knee arthroplasty * Patients younger than 18 years

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Decisional conflict, measured by the Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS).Immediately after the intervention; 6 months after the intervention (only non-operated patients)The DCS measures patients' uncertainty about treatment choice. It is composed of five subscales: uninformed, values, support, uncertainty and effectiveness

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Knowledge of the disease and treatmentsImmediately after the intervention; 6 months after the intervention (only non-operated patients)A 7-item scale will be udes to assess patients' knowledge of the disease and treatments
Goals and concernsImmediately after the intervention; 6 months after the intervention (only non-operated patients)A 10-item scale will assess the importance that patients attribute to different characteristics of avaliable treatments
Treatment preferenceImmediately after the intervention; 6 months (only non-operated patients)Patients will be asked the treatment they prefer: AINEs, knee injections or arthroplasty
Satisfaction with the decision making processImmediately after the intervention; 6 monthsThe scale developed by Barry et al. (1997) will be used, composed of 12 items measuring patients' satisfaction with information and care provided
Decisional regret, measured by the Decisional Regret Scale (DRS)6 months (only operated patients)The DRS contains five items measuring patients regret with the treatment decision

Countries

Spain

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026