Skip to content

Rowing Biomechanics - Effects of (In)Stability and Fatigue

Changes of Biomechanical Parameters During Race Simulation Rowing - The Effect of (In)Stability of the Simulator

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03253900
Acronym
RowBio
Enrollment
11
Registered
2017-08-18
Start date
2016-05-01
Completion date
2017-07-31
Last updated
2017-08-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Healthy

Keywords

wobble board, slides, rowing stroke, rowing biomechanics, power output

Brief summary

Rowing simulators are frequently used by rowers, when on-water training is impossible or limited. While such devices are highly valuable to maintain rowers' fitness, a concern was raised about extensive simulator usage. It was postulated that it could lead to technique alterations due to different biomechanical properties compared to on-water rowing. Slide-based rowing simulators were designed to better simulate on-water conditions. The main aim of the study was to compare the differences in various kinematic and kinetic parameters during a short (20 s) all-out rowing bout and during a 2000-m simulated race, to get a better insight into how different rowing simulator designs affect biomechanics of rowing. Three different rowing simulators were used in this study: (1) a standard stable/fixed rowing simulator, (2) a slides based rowing simulator, i.e. horizontal plane unstable, and (3) a tilt board based rowing simulator; i.e. frontal plane unstable. The investigators hypothesised that rowing on different simulators will elicit different biomechanics, including forces, power output, arm and seat movement velocity and amplitude. Each of the participants completed the tests in all three interventions on separate sessions; random order of interventions. The three sessions took place 7-10 days apart. During each session, the participants completed the all-out 20-s trial first, then the simulated 2000-m race. The aforementioned biomechanical parameters were tracked throughout the trials to be compared between interventions later.

Detailed description

The measurements will take place at University of Primorska (Koper, Slovenia) and the subjects will be recruited in close collaboration with Rowing Club Piran. Crossover study design will be used. Each participant will be asked to come for three visits that will be scheduled 7-10 days apart. Prior to measurements onset, the whole protocol will be explained to the participant. Measurement procedure: * 15-min warm-up * 20-s maximal (all-out) rowing * 5-minute break * 2000-m simulated race After both trials, blood lactate will be measured. Blood sample will be taken at the the earlobe by a qualified medical personnel. Maximal performance test: The participant will perform a 20-s interval with maximal effort. The main aim of the measurement is to record the maximal exerted force and power. The custom adapted device (Concept 2 Rowing Simulator) records the positions (seat and handle) and force (legs push and handle pull), which enables for further calculations of segmental and common kinematics and dynamics parameters. Race simulation: the participant will complete the 2000-m simulated race and will be instructed to aim for the best results. The same measurements as in the maximal performance test will be performed. Wireless heart rate monitor will be used to record the heart frequency throughout the trial. Equipment: The custom adapted rowing simulator (Concept 2) allows for the measurements of stoke forces and consequently power outputs, seat and handle velocity, and seat and handle amplitudes. Signals will be transferred to central unit, amplified and converted, and stored on a personal computer. The interventions (i.e. the studied rowing conditions) will be as follows: * a standard stable/fixed rowing simulator, * a slides based rowing simulator, i.e. horizontal plane unstable, and * a tilt board based rowing simulator; i.e. frontal plane unstable.

Interventions

DEVICEStable rowing simulator

a standard stable/fixed rowing simulator

DEVICESlides based rowing simulator

a slides based rowing simulator, i.e. horizontal plane unstable

DEVICETilt board based rowing simulator

a tilt board based rowing simulator; i.e. frontal plane unstable

Sponsors

University of Primorska
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
NONE

Masking description

The investigator who processed the acquired data was blinded for rowing interventions and subject information.

Intervention model description

All participants in the study will complete the measurements for all the three rowing interventions; in a random order.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
15 Years to 30 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Competitive rowers with at least 4 years of experience * Completed the physical examination at sports physician * Parental consent for underage participants

Exclusion criteria

* Injury in last 12 months * Any health issues that may be exacerbated by interventions

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Rowing performanceThree sessions, with randomized order of ergometers (7-10 days apart)Rowing biomechanics on different rowing simulators.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Seat velocityAt the onset of test, at the finish and at the three points in between (at 500, 1000 and 1500 meters of the simulated race) - ref. POM: sessions 7-10 days apart.Change of the average velocity of the seat movement through the rowing stroke.
Arm forceAt the onset of test, at the finish and at the three points in between (at 500, 1000 and 1500 meters of the simulated race) - ref. POM: sessions 7-10 days apart.Change of the average arm force through the rowing stroke.
Handle amplitudeAt the onset of test, at the finish and at the three points in between (at 500, 1000 and 1500 meters of the simulated race) - ref. POM: sessions 7-10 days apart.Change of the average handle through the rowing stroke.
Arm velocityAt the onset of test, at the finish and at the three points in between (at 500, 1000 and 1500 meters of the simulated race) - ref. POM: sessions 7-10 days apart.Change of the average velocity of arm movement through the rowing stroke.
Seat amplitudeAt the onset of test, at the finish and at the three points in between (at 500, 1000 and 1500 meters of the simulated race) - ref. POM: sessions 7-10 days apart.Change of the average amplitude of the seat movement through the rowing stroke.
LactateBefore and immediately after the test, ref. POM: sessions 7-10 days apart. .Change in blood lactate concentration
Leg forceAt the onset of test, at the finish and at the three points in between (at 500, 1000 and 1500 meters of the simulated race) - ref. POM: sessions 7-10 days apart.Change of the average leg force through the rowing stroke.

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026