Skip to content

Laparoscopic Tubal Preservation Surgery

Clinical Outcome of Laparoscopic Tubal Preservation Surgery for Ectopic Pregnancy

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03253588
Enrollment
100
Registered
2017-08-18
Start date
2017-02-21
Completion date
2017-10-15
Last updated
2019-07-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Ectopic Pregnancy

Brief summary

Traditionally, salpingectomy has been the standard procedure for managing ectopic pregnancy. We would like to evaluate the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic tubal preservation surgery in treating ectopic pregnancies (salpingostomy or salpingotomy) while preserving the fertility outcome of the patients, as well as to identify the factors predicting the presence of persistent ectopic pregnancy after the surgery.

Detailed description

All surgically-treated ectopic pregnancies in women aged 20 and above between 01 January 2009 and 31 December 2016 were identified. Cases receiving laparoscopic salpingostomy or laparoscopic salpingotomy were extracted from the database, patient characteristics and surgical outcomes (changes of serumβ-hcg, presence of persistent ectopic pregnancy and subsequent management, subsequent pregnancy) were reviewed from their medical records. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis were employed to predict the presence of persistent ectopic pregnancy after laparoscopic tubal preservation surgery.

Interventions

PROCEDURElaparoscopic salpingotomy or salpingostomy

A 3-port technique (2 x 5-mm and 1 x 10-mm trocars) was implemented. A diluted solution of vasopressin (20IU in 100 mL saline solution) was initially injected into the mesosalpinx of the affected tube, followed by a linear incision which allowed the removal of the gestational tissue. In case of a ruptured tubal pregnancy, the ectopic mass was evacuated directly from the ruptured site using a combination of forceps and suction device. The tubal lumen was either closed with a single-layer of continuous absorbable suture (salpingotomy) or left to heal by secondary intention (salpingostomy).

Sponsors

Far Eastern Memorial Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_CONTROL
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
20 Years to 50 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* women who had laparoscopic tubal preservation surgery (including salpingostomy and salpingotomy) for ectopic pregnancy between January 2009 and November 2016

Exclusion criteria

* women with ectopic pregnancy at sites other than fallopian tube (i.e. interstitial, ovary, abdomen)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
peri- and post-operative parametersbetween January 2009 and November 2016success rate of tubal preservation surgery (defined by postoperative serum bcg \<5 IU/mL), postoperative complications (number of women who had adverse surgical outcome such as bladder injury, bowel injury, massive bleeding), pregnancy outcome (number of women who conceived successfully following the intervention)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
factors affecting the surgical success ratebetween January 2009 and November 2016relationship between patient's baseline characteristics and rate of persistent ectopic pregnancy (unvariate and multivariate analysis)

Countries

Taiwan

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026