Skip to content

Gene Therapy for X-linked Retinitis Pigmentosa (XLRP) - Retinitis Pigmentosa GTPase Regulator (RPGR)

An Open Label, Multi-centre, Phase I/II Dose Escalation Trial of a Recombinant Adeno-associated Virus Vector (AAV2/5-hRKp.RPGR) for Gene Therapy of Adults and Children With X-linked Retinitis Pigmentosa Owing to Defects in Retinitis Pigmentosa GTPase Regulator (RPGR)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 1Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03252847
Enrollment
49
Registered
2017-08-17
Start date
2017-07-31
Completion date
2021-11-18
Last updated
2025-01-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

X-Linked Retinitis Pigmentosa

Keywords

XLRP RPGR

Brief summary

Phase 1 of the study is a dose escalation of the subretinal administration of AAV5-hRKp.RPGR vector to assess the safety of this vector in participants with XLRP caused by mutations in RPGR. Participants enrolled in Phase 1 were assigned to a dose group based on when they enrolled (i.e., sequential assignment). Phase 2 of the study is a cohort expansion of the subretinal administration of AAV5-hRKp.RPGR vector to assess the safety and efficacy of this vector in participants with XLRP caused by mutations in RPGR. Participants enrolled in Phase 2 were randomized to immediate or deferred treatment.

Detailed description

This is an open-label phase 1/2 dose-escalation and cohort expansion trial to determine the safety and efficacy of subretinal administration of AAV5-hRKp.RPGR vector in participants with XLRP caused by mutations in RPGR.

Interventions

GENETICAAV5-RPGR

Single, subretinal administration of AAV5-RPGR

Sponsors

MeiraGTx UK II Ltd
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY
Syne Qua Non Limited
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Bionical Emas
CollaboratorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SEQUENTIAL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Biological

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
5 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Key inclusion Criteria: * Males aged 5 years or older * Have X-linked retinitis pigmentosa confirmed by a retinal specialist (CI or PI) Key

Exclusion criteria

• Have participated in another research study involving an investigational medicinal therapy for ocular disease within the last 6 months

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants Meeting the Primary Outcome Defined as Any of the Below Events Occurring During the 9 Weeks Following Administration, at Least Possibly Related to the Advanced Therapy Investigational Medicinal Product (ATIMP), Not Surgery Alone.9 weeksThe primary outcome is defined as any of the below occurring during the 9 weeks following administration, at least possibly related to the Advanced Therapy Investigational Medicinal Product (ATIMP), not surgery alone: * Reduction in visual acuity by 15 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) letters or more * Severe unresponsive inflammation * Infective endophthalmitis * Ocular malignancy * Grade III or above non-ocular Suspected Unexpected Serious Adverse Reaction (SUSAR)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Improvements in Retinal Function as Assessed by Static PerimetryBaseline and Month 6The number of responders in point-by-point data in Static Perimetry within the full visual field over time. A responder at a single time point is defined as a participant with at least 5 of the same loci with ≥7 dB improvement from baseline at the specific time point and one time point prior.
Quality of Life Measured by the Low Luminance Questionnaire (LLQ) Emotional Distress Domain ScoreBaseline and Month 6Change from baseline to Week 26 in LLQ Emotional Distress Domain Score in adults. LLQ uses a scale from 0 to 100, with higher scores reflecting less impairment. A positive change from baseline reflects improvement, and a negative reflects worsening.
Quality of Life Measured by the Low Luminance Questionnaire (LLQ) Extreme Lighting Domain ScoreBaseline and Month 6Change from baseline to Week 26 in LLQ Extreme Lighting Domain Score in adults. LLQ uses a scale from 0 to 100, with higher scores reflecting less impairment. A positive change from baseline reflects improvement, and a negative reflects worsening.
Improvements in Visual Function as Assessed by Visual AcuityBaseline and Month 6Change from baseline to Week 26 in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart letter score. The direction of improvement from baseline is an increase in the number of ETDRS letters read over time.
Quality of Life Measured by the Low Luminance Questionnaire (LLQ) Mobility Domain ScoreBaseline and Month 6Change from baseline to Week 26 in LLQ Mobility Domain Score in adults. LLQ uses a scale from 0 to 100, with higher scores reflecting less impairment. A positive change from baseline reflects improvement, and a negative reflects worsening.
Quality of Life Measured by the Low Luminance Questionnaire (LLQ) Peripheral Vision Domain ScoreBaseline and Month 6Change from baseline to Week 26 in LLQ Peripheral Vision Domain Score in adults. LLQ uses a scale from 0 to 100, with higher scores reflecting less impairment. A positive change from baseline reflects improvement, and a negative reflects worsening.
Quality of Life Measured by the Low Luminance Questionnaire (LLQ) General Dim Lighting Domain ScoreBaseline and Month 6Change from baseline to Week 26 in LLQ General Dim Lighting Domain score in adults. LLQ uses a scale from 0 to 100, with higher scores reflecting less impairment. A positive change from baseline reflects improvement, and a negative reflects worsening.

Countries

United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants were recruited from 5 sites (2 in the UK and 3 in the US) between 31 Jul 2017 and 18 Nov 2021. 49 participants were enrolled in the study; 4 participants discontinued before receiving treatment. The study consisted of 2 phases: dose escalation (Phase 1) followed by dose expansion (Phase 2). In Phase 1, 13 participants enrolled in 1 of 3 treatment groups. In Phase 2, 36 participants were randomized to an active treatment arm or a control arm with treatment deferred for 6 months.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Immediate Low Dose AAV5-hRKp.RPGR
Subretinal administration of a single low dose of AAV5-hRKp.RPGR in either Phase 1 or Phase 2 of the study (prespecified pooling). AAV5-hRKp.RPGR: AAV gene therapy for defects in the RPGR gene
11
Immediate Intermediate Dose AAV5-hRKp.RPGR
Subretinal administration of a single intermediate dose of AAV5-hRKp.RPGR in either Phase 1 or Phase 2 of the study (prespecified pooling). AAV5-hRKp.RPGR: AAV gene therapy for defects in the RPGR gene
17
Immediate High Dose AAV5-hRKp.RPGR
Subretinal administration of a single high dose of AAV5-hRKp.RPGR in either Phase 1 or Phase 2 of the study (prespecified pooling). AAV5-hRKp.RPGR: AAV gene therapy for defects in the RPGR gene
4
Deferred Group
Treatment of participants in this Phase 2 study group was deferred for 6 months
13
Total45

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003FG004FG005FG006
Overall StudyOther: Patient decision0000100
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject0010000

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicImmediate Low Dose AAV5-hRKp.RPGRImmediate Intermediate Dose AAV5-hRKp.RPGRImmediate High Dose AAV5-hRKp.RPGRDeferred GroupTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants3 Participants0 Participants0 Participants3 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
11 Participants14 Participants4 Participants13 Participants42 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants2 Participants3 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
11 Participants16 Participants4 Participants11 Participants42 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants2 Participants0 Participants0 Participants3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
10 Participants15 Participants3 Participants13 Participants41 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United Kingdom
8 participants12 participants3 participants8 participants31 participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
3 participants5 participants1 participants5 participants14 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
11 Participants17 Participants4 Participants13 Participants45 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
EG005
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 110 / 170 / 40 / 130 / 70 / 6
other
Total, other adverse events
11 / 1117 / 174 / 41 / 137 / 76 / 6
serious
Total, serious adverse events
2 / 110 / 170 / 40 / 131 / 70 / 6

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants Meeting the Primary Outcome Defined as Any of the Below Events Occurring During the 9 Weeks Following Administration, at Least Possibly Related to the Advanced Therapy Investigational Medicinal Product (ATIMP), Not Surgery Alone.

The primary outcome is defined as any of the below occurring during the 9 weeks following administration, at least possibly related to the Advanced Therapy Investigational Medicinal Product (ATIMP), not surgery alone: * Reduction in visual acuity by 15 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) letters or more * Severe unresponsive inflammation * Infective endophthalmitis * Ocular malignancy * Grade III or above non-ocular Suspected Unexpected Serious Adverse Reaction (SUSAR)

Time frame: 9 weeks

Population: The primary endpoint was analyzed for participants in the dose escalation phase (i.e., study Phase 1) only

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Immediate Low Dose AAV5-hRKp.RPGRNumber of Participants Meeting the Primary Outcome Defined as Any of the Below Events Occurring During the 9 Weeks Following Administration, at Least Possibly Related to the Advanced Therapy Investigational Medicinal Product (ATIMP), Not Surgery Alone.0 Participants
Immediate Intermediate Dose AAV5-hRKp.RPGRNumber of Participants Meeting the Primary Outcome Defined as Any of the Below Events Occurring During the 9 Weeks Following Administration, at Least Possibly Related to the Advanced Therapy Investigational Medicinal Product (ATIMP), Not Surgery Alone.0 Participants
Immediate High Dose AAV5-hRKp.RPGRNumber of Participants Meeting the Primary Outcome Defined as Any of the Below Events Occurring During the 9 Weeks Following Administration, at Least Possibly Related to the Advanced Therapy Investigational Medicinal Product (ATIMP), Not Surgery Alone.0 Participants
Deferred GroupNumber of Participants Meeting the Primary Outcome Defined as Any of the Below Events Occurring During the 9 Weeks Following Administration, at Least Possibly Related to the Advanced Therapy Investigational Medicinal Product (ATIMP), Not Surgery Alone.0 Participants
Secondary

Improvements in Retinal Function as Assessed by Static Perimetry

The number of responders in point-by-point data in Static Perimetry within the full visual field over time. A responder at a single time point is defined as a participant with at least 5 of the same loci with ≥7 dB improvement from baseline at the specific time point and one time point prior.

Time frame: Baseline and Month 6

Population: It was prespecified that the results of participants assigned to the low and intermediate dose groups in study Phase 1 and Phase 2 would be pooled and compared to the results of participants in the deferred group before treatment. Data were available for 23 participants in the Immediate Treatment Group and 10 participants in the Deferred Treatment Group.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Immediate Low Dose AAV5-hRKp.RPGRImprovements in Retinal Function as Assessed by Static Perimetry6 Participants
Immediate Intermediate Dose AAV5-hRKp.RPGRImprovements in Retinal Function as Assessed by Static Perimetry2 Participants
Secondary

Improvements in Visual Function as Assessed by Visual Acuity

Change from baseline to Week 26 in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart letter score. The direction of improvement from baseline is an increase in the number of ETDRS letters read over time.

Time frame: Baseline and Month 6

Population: It was prespecified that the results of participants assigned to the low and intermediate dose groups in study Phase 1 and Phase 2 would be pooled and compared to the results of participants in the deferred group before treatment. Data were available for 25 participants in the Immediate Treatment Group and 13 participants in the Deferred Treatment Group

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Immediate Low Dose AAV5-hRKp.RPGRImprovements in Visual Function as Assessed by Visual Acuity0.6 Number of EDTRS lettersStandard Deviation 4.74
Immediate Intermediate Dose AAV5-hRKp.RPGRImprovements in Visual Function as Assessed by Visual Acuity-3.2 Number of EDTRS lettersStandard Deviation 3.87
Secondary

Quality of Life Measured by the Low Luminance Questionnaire (LLQ) Emotional Distress Domain Score

Change from baseline to Week 26 in LLQ Emotional Distress Domain Score in adults. LLQ uses a scale from 0 to 100, with higher scores reflecting less impairment. A positive change from baseline reflects improvement, and a negative reflects worsening.

Time frame: Baseline and Month 6

Population: It was prespecified that the results of participants assigned to the low and intermediate dose groups in study Phase 2 would be pooled and compared to the results of participants in the deferred group before treatment. Sixteen participants in the Immediate Treatment Group and all 9 participants in the Deferred Treatment Group completed the LLQ at baseline and Week 26.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Immediate Low Dose AAV5-hRKp.RPGRQuality of Life Measured by the Low Luminance Questionnaire (LLQ) Emotional Distress Domain Score2.344 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.1395
Immediate Intermediate Dose AAV5-hRKp.RPGRQuality of Life Measured by the Low Luminance Questionnaire (LLQ) Emotional Distress Domain Score-1.389 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.7152
Secondary

Quality of Life Measured by the Low Luminance Questionnaire (LLQ) Extreme Lighting Domain Score

Change from baseline to Week 26 in LLQ Extreme Lighting Domain Score in adults. LLQ uses a scale from 0 to 100, with higher scores reflecting less impairment. A positive change from baseline reflects improvement, and a negative reflects worsening.

Time frame: Baseline and Month 6

Population: It was prespecified that the results of participants assigned to the low and intermediate dose groups in study Phase 2 would be pooled and compared to the results of participants in the deferred group before treatment. Sixteen participants in the Immediate Treatment Group and all 9 participants in the Deferred Treatment Group completed the LLQ at baseline and Week 26.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Immediate Low Dose AAV5-hRKp.RPGRQuality of Life Measured by the Low Luminance Questionnaire (LLQ) Extreme Lighting Domain Score2.956 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.708
Immediate Intermediate Dose AAV5-hRKp.RPGRQuality of Life Measured by the Low Luminance Questionnaire (LLQ) Extreme Lighting Domain Score-8.059 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.8453
Secondary

Quality of Life Measured by the Low Luminance Questionnaire (LLQ) General Dim Lighting Domain Score

Change from baseline to Week 26 in LLQ General Dim Lighting Domain score in adults. LLQ uses a scale from 0 to 100, with higher scores reflecting less impairment. A positive change from baseline reflects improvement, and a negative reflects worsening.

Time frame: Baseline and Month 6

Population: It was prespecified that the results of participants assigned to the low and intermediate dose groups in study Phase 2 would be pooled and compared to the results of participants in the deferred group before treatment. Sixteen participants in the Immediate Treatment Group and all 9 participants in the Deferred Treatment Group completed the LLQ at baseline and Week 26.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Immediate Low Dose AAV5-hRKp.RPGRQuality of Life Measured by the Low Luminance Questionnaire (LLQ) General Dim Lighting Domain Score4.115 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.9706
Immediate Intermediate Dose AAV5-hRKp.RPGRQuality of Life Measured by the Low Luminance Questionnaire (LLQ) General Dim Lighting Domain Score1.852 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.8056
Secondary

Quality of Life Measured by the Low Luminance Questionnaire (LLQ) Mobility Domain Score

Change from baseline to Week 26 in LLQ Mobility Domain Score in adults. LLQ uses a scale from 0 to 100, with higher scores reflecting less impairment. A positive change from baseline reflects improvement, and a negative reflects worsening.

Time frame: Baseline and Month 6

Population: It was prespecified that the results of participants assigned to the low and intermediate dose groups in study Phase 2 would be pooled and compared to the results of participants in the deferred group before treatment. Sixteen participants in the Immediate Treatment Group and all 9 participants in the Deferred Treatment Group completed the LLQ at baseline and Week 26.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Immediate Low Dose AAV5-hRKp.RPGRQuality of Life Measured by the Low Luminance Questionnaire (LLQ) Mobility Domain Score5.729 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.8753
Immediate Intermediate Dose AAV5-hRKp.RPGRQuality of Life Measured by the Low Luminance Questionnaire (LLQ) Mobility Domain Score0.926 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.5145
Secondary

Quality of Life Measured by the Low Luminance Questionnaire (LLQ) Peripheral Vision Domain Score

Change from baseline to Week 26 in LLQ Peripheral Vision Domain Score in adults. LLQ uses a scale from 0 to 100, with higher scores reflecting less impairment. A positive change from baseline reflects improvement, and a negative reflects worsening.

Time frame: Baseline and Month 6

Population: It was prespecified that the results of participants assigned to the low and intermediate dose groups in study Phase 2 would be pooled and compared to the results of participants in the deferred group before treatment. Sixteen participants in the Immediate Treatment Group and all 9 participants in the Deferred Treatment Group completed the LLQ at baseline and Week 26.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Immediate Low Dose AAV5-hRKp.RPGRQuality of Life Measured by the Low Luminance Questionnaire (LLQ) Peripheral Vision Domain Score1.563 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.8116
Immediate Intermediate Dose AAV5-hRKp.RPGRQuality of Life Measured by the Low Luminance Questionnaire (LLQ) Peripheral Vision Domain Score-1.852 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.1076

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 15, 2026