Skip to content

MRI & MRV in Pelvic Congestion Syndrome in Females

MRI & MRV in Pelvic Congestion Syndrome in Females

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03252041
Acronym
PCS
Enrollment
25
Registered
2017-08-17
Start date
2017-09-01
Completion date
2018-10-31
Last updated
2017-08-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pelvic Pain Syndrome

Keywords

PCS

Brief summary

To investigate the feasibility of MRI and MRV in diagnosis of pelvic congestion syndrome.

Detailed description

In the past, a diagnosis of chronic pelvic pain left many women frustrated with few treatment options and a lack of available resources. Their physicians were likewise perplexed, despite the endless acquisition of negative laboratory and imaging data as well as inconclusive consultations obtained. In the last 10 years, improved scientific understanding and increased physician awareness have lessened the confusion surrounding this condition and its distinct association with pelvic congestion syndrome (PCS). Furthermore, refinements of medical and minimally invasive surgical solutions give affected patients more therapeutic choices today. Since anatomical venous variations in the pelvis are common, it is important to know the anatomy of these vessels for treatment planning. Imaging is critical in the evaluation of pelvic varices, both to differentiate them from other condition and also because pelvic varices may be secondary to serious underlying pathology, such as inferior vena caval obstruction, portal hypertension, increased pelvic blood flow, and vascular malformations. The diagnosis of PCS has usually been suggested by duplex ultrasound (US), but ultrasound imaging does not readily show the gonadal veins. Phlebography is the gold standard for anatomic diagnostic studies. Related mortality and morbidity are low, but patient discomfort and costs make this an unattractive routine method of diagnosis. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can usually demonstrate pelvic and ovarian varices, as well as the gonadal veins. In this prospective study, we will investigate the feasibility of using magnetic resonance venography (MRV) in the diagnosis of PCS and evaluated its accuracy and reliability in comparison to phlebography.

Interventions

DEVICEMRI

Magnetic Resonance imaging modalities and sequences in pelvic congestion syndrome

Sponsors

Assiut University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
25 Years to 55 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* All patients with signs and symptoms of PCS.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with general contraindications to MRI as presence of any para-magnetic substance as pacemakers, or in severely ill patients or those with claustrophobia, arrhythmic patients.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
MRI and MRV in pelvic congestion syndrome in females.one yearTo investigate the feasibility of MRI and MRV in diagnosis of pelvic congestion syndrome.

Contacts

Primary ContactMohamed Sayed, (M.B.B.CH)
dr.abudeif@gmail.com+201008253457
Backup ContactNoha Attia, lect
nohamohamedali@yahoo.com+201001238435

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026