Skip to content

PRECISION Study: Multi-center Study of Performance of a Novel Implanted CGM System Using a Next Generation Transmitter and Algorithm

PRECISION Study: A Prospective, Multi-center Evaluation of Precision, Compression and Performance of a Novel Implanted Continuous Glucose Sensor Using a Next Generation Transmitter and Algorithm

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03251079
Acronym
PRECISION
Enrollment
36
Registered
2017-08-16
Start date
2017-07-25
Completion date
2018-02-01
Last updated
2024-02-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Diabetes Mellitus, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2

Brief summary

The purpose of this multi-center, prospective clinical study is to evaluate the performance of a novel, implanted Senseonics continuous glucose monitoring system (Senseonics CGM System) compared to Yellow Springs Instrument (YSI) glucose analyzer reference standard measurements using a next generation transmitter and algorithm. Other measures evaluated will be the effects of compression on performance and the safety of the Senseonics CGM system.

Interventions

DEVICEContinuous glucose monitoring system

Implanted continuous glucose monitoring system

Sponsors

Senseonics, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Adult subjects, age ≥18 years 2. Clinically confirmed diagnosis of diabetes mellitus for ≥1 year 3. Subject has signed an informed consent form and is willing to comply with protocol requirements

Exclusion criteria

1. History of severe hypoglycemia in the previous 6 months. Severe hypoglycemia is defined as hypoglycemia resulting in loss of consciousness or seizure 2. History of diabetic ketoacidosis requiring emergency room visit or hospitalization in the previous 6 months 3. Female subjects of childbearing capacity (defined as not surgically sterile or not menopausal for ≥ 1 year) who are lactating or pregnant, intending to become pregnant, or not practicing birth control during the course of the study. 4. A condition preventing or complicating the placement, operation, or removal of the Sensor or wearing of transmitter, including upper extremity deformities or skin condition. 5. Symptomatic coronary artery disease; unstable angina; myocardial infarction, transient ischemic attack or stroke in the past 6 months; uncontrolled hypertension (systolic\>160 mm Hg or diastolic \>100 mm Hg at time of screening); current congestive heart failure; history of cardiac arrhythmia (benign Premature Atrial Contractions (PACs) and Premature Ventricular Contractions (PVCs) allowed). Subjects with asymptomatic coronary artery disease (e,g, coronary artery bypass graft (CABG), stent placement or angioplasty) may participate if negative stress test within 1 year prior to screening and written clearance from Cardiologist documented. 6. Hematocrit \<30% or \>55% 7. History of hepatitis B, hepatitis C, or HIV 8. Current treatment for a seizure disorder unless written clearance by neurologist to participate in study 9. History of adrenal insufficiency 10. Currently receiving (or likely to need during the study period): immunosuppressant therapy; chemotherapy; anticoagulant/antithrombotic therapy (excluding aspirin); glucocorticoids (excluding ophthalmic or nasal). This exclusion does include the use of inhaled glucocorticoids and the use of topical glucocorticoids (over sensor site only); antibiotic for chronic infection (e.g. osteomyelitis, endocarditis) 11. A condition requiring or likely to require magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) 12. Known topical or local anesthetic allergy 13. Known allergy to glucocorticoids 14. Any condition that in the investigator's opinion would make the subject unable to complete the study or would make it not in the subject's best interest to participate in the study. Conditions include but are not limited to psychiatric conditions, known current or recent alcohol abuse or drug abuse by subject history, a condition that may increase the risk of induced hypoglycemia or risk related to repeated blood testing. Investigator will supply rationale for exclusion 15. Participation in another clinical investigation (drug or device) within 2 weeks prior to screening or intent to participate during the study period 16. The presence of any other active implanted device (as defined further in protocol) 17. The presence of any other CGM sensor or transmitter located in upper arm (other location is acceptable)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Accuracy of CGM System Through 90 Days Post-Insertion (MARD for Paired CGM and Reference Glucose Measurements)90 daysThe effectiveness endpoint is the mean absolute relative difference (MARD), calculated for all paired Senseonics CGM System and reference glucose measurements through 90 days of Sensor use. MARD is defined as the average of absolute difference of paired Senseonics CGM System and reference glucose readings divided by the reference glucose reading (reference) for all reference glucose values, that is: MARD = ((SUM \| (Glucose)sensor - (Glucose)reference \| / (Glucose)reference ) / n ) x 100%, where n is the total number of CGM and reference glucose pairs after 90 days of sensor use (MARD is a percentage). Lower MARDs indicate higher (better) accuracy.
Safety Endpoint90 daysIncidence of device-related or sensor insertion/removal procedure-related serious adverse events through 90 days post-insertion.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Continuous Glucose Monitoring Device
Senseonics continuous glucose monitoring system Continuous glucose monitoring system: Implanted continuous glucose monitoring system
35
Total35

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject1

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicContinuous Glucose Monitoring Device
Age, Continuous51.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.7
Body Mass Index Class: Normal, Overweight, Obese28.2 kg/m2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.4
Diabetes Type: Type I, Type II
Type I
25 Participants
Diabetes Type: Type I, Type II
Type II
10 Participants
Dominant Hand: Right, Left
Left
2 participants
Dominant Hand: Right, Left
Right
33 participants
History of ketoacidosis and hypoglycemia in past 6 months
Hypoglycemia
0 Participants
History of ketoacidosis and hypoglycemia in past 6 months
Ketoacidosis
0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
2 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Caucasian
32 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic
4 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
More than One Race
0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Non-Hispanic
31 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
35 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
17 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
18 Participants
Type of insulin therapy
Continuous insulin infusion pump
19 Participants
Type of insulin therapy
Multiple daily injections
11 Participants
Type of insulin therapy
None
5 Participants
Years Since Diabetes Diagnosis26.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.3

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 35
other
Total, other adverse events
15 / 35
serious
Total, serious adverse events
3 / 35

Outcome results

Primary

Accuracy of CGM System Through 90 Days Post-Insertion (MARD for Paired CGM and Reference Glucose Measurements)

The effectiveness endpoint is the mean absolute relative difference (MARD), calculated for all paired Senseonics CGM System and reference glucose measurements through 90 days of Sensor use. MARD is defined as the average of absolute difference of paired Senseonics CGM System and reference glucose readings divided by the reference glucose reading (reference) for all reference glucose values, that is: MARD = ((SUM \| (Glucose)sensor - (Glucose)reference \| / (Glucose)reference ) / n ) x 100%, where n is the total number of CGM and reference glucose pairs after 90 days of sensor use (MARD is a percentage). Lower MARDs indicate higher (better) accuracy.

Time frame: 90 days

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Continuous Glucose Monitoring DeviceAccuracy of CGM System Through 90 Days Post-Insertion (MARD for Paired CGM and Reference Glucose Measurements)9.6 percent
Primary

Safety Endpoint

Incidence of device-related or sensor insertion/removal procedure-related serious adverse events through 90 days post-insertion.

Time frame: 90 days

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Continuous Glucose Monitoring DeviceSafety Endpoint0 serious adverse events

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026