Skip to content

Safety and Efficacy of CD5024 0.3% Cream in Subjects With Atopic Dermatitis

Safety and Efficacy of CD5024 0.3% Cream in Subjects With Atopic Dermatitis

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03250624
Enrollment
63
Registered
2017-08-15
Start date
2016-11-01
Completion date
2017-06-26
Last updated
2023-05-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Atopic Dermatitis

Brief summary

Exploratory, multi-centric, randomized, vehicle-controlled, investigator-blind, parallel group study, involved participants with chronic lesions of Atopic Dermatitis (AD) to evaluate the local and systemic safety of CD5024 0.3% cream over a 6-week treatment period compared to its vehicle.

Detailed description

Study application was performed once daily, 7 days a week for 6 weeks.

Interventions

DRUGCD5024 0.3% cream

Participants applied CD5024 0.3% cream topically in the evening to the affected areas as a thin film corresponding to approximately 2 milligrams per centimeter square (mg/cm\^2) once daily for 6 weeks.

DRUGPlacebo

Participants applied placebo matched to CD5024 0.3% cream topically in the evening to the affected areas as a thin film corresponding to approximately 2 mg/cm\^2 once daily for 6 weeks.

Sponsors

Galderma R&D
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
SINGLE (Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. The participant was a male or female aged 18 to 60 years old inclusive at Screening. 2. The participant presented with a total body surface area (tBSA) less than or equal to (\>=) 2 square meter (m\^2) at Screening. 3. The participant had atopic dermatitis for at least 6 months prior to Day 1. The clinical diagnosis of atopic dermatitis must be confirmed with the criteria of Hanifin and Rajka at the screening visit. 4. Atopic dermatitis must be stable for at least one month before the screening visit (according to participant). 5. The participant had a Body Surface Area (BSA) affected by AD ranging from 1% inclusive to 10% inclusive at Day 1, excluding scalp and genitals. 6. The participant had an overall Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) score of 3 (moderate) at Day 1;

Exclusion criteria

1. The participant was a pregnant female, is breastfeeding or intends to conceive a child during the study, 2. The participant had any uncontrolled or serious disease, or any medical or surgical condition, that may either interfere with the interpretation of the clinical trial results (e.g. extensive scaring or pigmented lesion in a treated area), and/or put the participant at significant risk according to Investigator's judgment if he/she participates in the clinical trial (e.g. active cancer, AIDS, insulin-dependent diabetes…) at Screening or Day 1. 3. The participant presented with an acute flare of AD at Day 1. 4. The participant had active cutaneous bacterial or viral infection in any treated area at baseline (e.g. clinically infected AD) at Screening or Day 1. 5. The participant had a history of confounding skin condition (e.g. psoriasis, erythroderma) or a history of Netherton syndrome at Screening. 6. The participant had a past history of serious persistent neurological disorders such as seizures, multiple sclerosis, or neurological signs or symptoms at Screening.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Score at Day 43Baseline, Day 43The EASI score was used to measure the severity and extent of atopic dermatitis (AD) and measures erythema, induration, excoriation and lichenification on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper and lower extremities. The total EASI score ranges from 0 (minimum) to 72 (maximum), with the higher scores indicated the worse severity of AD. All missing values were imputed by Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) Score of 1 (Almost Clear) or 0 (Clear)Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 36 and 43IGA scale consisted of 5 grades (0-4) among which 0 = Clear (Minor, residual discoloration, no erythema or induration/papulation, no oozing/crusting), 1 = Almost clear (Trace, faint pink erythema with almost no induration/papulation and no oozing/crusting), 2 = Mild (Faint pink erythema with mild induration/papulation and no oozing/crusting), 3 = Moderate (Pink-red erythema with moderate induration/papulation and there may be some oozing/crusting.), 4 = Severe (Deep/bright red erythema with severe induration/papulation with oozing/crusting). Success rate was defined as percentage of participants who achieved an IGA score of 1 (almost clear) or 0 (Clear) at specified visits. All missing values were imputed by LOCF.
Percent Change From Baseline in Total Sum Score (TSS) at Each VisitBaseline, Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 36 and 43The TSS was the sum of individual clinical severity scores for 5 signs of AD (erythema, induration/papulation, oozing/crusting, excoriation and lichenification). The severity of each sign was evaluated by using a 4-graded scale (0: none; 1: mild; 2: moderate; 3: severe). The total score ranges from 0 to 15, where higher score indicated worse severity of AD. All missing values were imputed by LOCF.
Percent Change From Baseline in EASI at Each VisitBaseline, Days 8,15, 22, 29, 36 and 43The EASI score was used to measure the severity and extent of atopic dermatitis (AD) and measures erythema, induration, excoriation and lichenification on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper and lower extremities. The total EASI score ranges from 0 (minimum) to 72 (maximum) points, with the higher scores indicated the worse severity of AD. All missing values were imputed by LOCF.
Change From Baseline in Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) at Each VisitBaseline, Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6Pruritus NRS was a scale that was used by the participants to report the intensity of their pruritus (itch) during the last 24 hours. For maximum itch intensity: the scores were provided on a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 = 'no itch' and 10 = 'worst itch imaginable', where higher score indicated very severe itch. All missing values were imputed by LOCF.
Change From Baseline in Pruritus Verbal Rating Scale (VRS) Score at Day 43Baseline, Day 43Participants were asked for a response that best described their pruritus intensity in last 24 hours, to rate their itch using a list of adjectives describing different levels of symptom intensity rated on a scale of 0 to 3 that is (i.e.) 0 = No itch, 1 = low, 2 = Moderate and 3 = Severe, where higher score indicated very severe itch. All missing values were imputed by LOCF.
Percent Change From Baseline in Modified Objective Scoring Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) at Each VisitBaseline, Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 36 and 43SCORAD index uses the rule of nines to assess disease extent and evaluates 6 clinical characteristics to determine disease severity: (1) erythema, (2) edema/papulation, (3) oozing/crusts, (4) excoriation, (5) lichenification, and (6) dryness on a scale of 0 to 3 (0=absence, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe). The SCORAD index also assesses subjective symptoms of pruritus and sleep loss with visual analog scale (VAS) where 0 is no itching or no trouble sleeping and 10 is unbearable itching or a lot of trouble sleeping. These 3 aspects: extent of disease (A: 0-1-2), disease severity (B: 0-18), & subjective symptoms (C: 0-20) combine using A/5 + 7\*B/2+ C to give a maximum possible score of 103, where 0 = no disease and 103 = severe disease. Higher scores indicated worse outcome. All missing values were imputed by LOCF.

Countries

Canada

Participant flow

Recruitment details

The study was conducted at 5 centers in Canada between 01 November 2016 and 26 June 2017.

Pre-assignment details

A total of 101 participants were screened in the study. Out of which, 63 participants were randomized in a ratio of 1:1 to receive CD5024 0.3 percent (%) cream or its vehicle. Screen failures were mainly due to exclusion criteria met.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
CD5024 0.3% Cream
Participants applied CD5024 0.3% cream topically in the evening to the affected areas as a thin film corresponding to approximately 2 mg/cm\^2 once daily for 6 weeks.
32
Placebo
Participants applied placebo matched to CD5024 0.3% cream topically in the evening to the affected areas as a thin film corresponding to approximately 2 mg/cm\^2 once daily for 6 weeks.
31
Total63

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event01
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy14
Overall StudyOther12

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicCD5024 0.3% CreamPlaceboTotal
Age, Continuous27.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.19
30.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.77
28.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.98
Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Score5.341 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.432
5.371 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.652
5.356 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.542
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
5 Participants3 Participants8 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
1 Participants5 Participants6 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
25 Participants23 Participants48 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
21 Participants26 Participants47 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
11 Participants5 Participants16 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 320 / 31
other
Total, other adverse events
16 / 3221 / 31
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 320 / 31

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Score at Day 43

The EASI score was used to measure the severity and extent of atopic dermatitis (AD) and measures erythema, induration, excoriation and lichenification on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper and lower extremities. The total EASI score ranges from 0 (minimum) to 72 (maximum), with the higher scores indicated the worse severity of AD. All missing values were imputed by Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF).

Time frame: Baseline, Day 43

Population: The Intent-to-treat (ITT) efficacy analysis set was defined as any participant who were randomized.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
CD5024 0.3% CreamChange From Baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Score at Day 43-2.64 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.41
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Score at Day 43-2.36 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.44
p-value: 0.63295% CI: [-1.46, 0.89]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) at Each Visit

Pruritus NRS was a scale that was used by the participants to report the intensity of their pruritus (itch) during the last 24 hours. For maximum itch intensity: the scores were provided on a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 = 'no itch' and 10 = 'worst itch imaginable', where higher score indicated very severe itch. All missing values were imputed by LOCF.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6

Population: The ITT efficacy analysis set was defined as any participant who were randomized. Here, Overall Number of Participants Analyzed signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
CD5024 0.3% CreamChange From Baseline in Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) at Each VisitWeek 1-0.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.1
CD5024 0.3% CreamChange From Baseline in Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) at Each VisitWeek 2-0.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.9
CD5024 0.3% CreamChange From Baseline in Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) at Each VisitWeek 3-0.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.1
CD5024 0.3% CreamChange From Baseline in Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) at Each VisitWeek 4-1.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.3
CD5024 0.3% CreamChange From Baseline in Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) at Each VisitWeek 5-1.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.2
CD5024 0.3% CreamChange From Baseline in Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) at Each VisitWeek 6-1.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.4
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) at Each VisitWeek 5-0.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) at Each VisitWeek 1-0.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.4
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) at Each VisitWeek 4-0.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.1
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) at Each VisitWeek 2-0.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.7
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) at Each VisitWeek 6-0.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.1
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) at Each VisitWeek 3-0.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.9
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Pruritus Verbal Rating Scale (VRS) Score at Day 43

Participants were asked for a response that best described their pruritus intensity in last 24 hours, to rate their itch using a list of adjectives describing different levels of symptom intensity rated on a scale of 0 to 3 that is (i.e.) 0 = No itch, 1 = low, 2 = Moderate and 3 = Severe, where higher score indicated very severe itch. All missing values were imputed by LOCF.

Time frame: Baseline, Day 43

Population: The ITT efficacy analysis set was defined as any participant who were randomized. Here, Overall Number of Participants Analyzed signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
CD5024 0.3% CreamChange From Baseline in Pruritus Verbal Rating Scale (VRS) Score at Day 43-.31 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.79
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Pruritus Verbal Rating Scale (VRS) Score at Day 43-.13 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.74
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) Score of 1 (Almost Clear) or 0 (Clear)

IGA scale consisted of 5 grades (0-4) among which 0 = Clear (Minor, residual discoloration, no erythema or induration/papulation, no oozing/crusting), 1 = Almost clear (Trace, faint pink erythema with almost no induration/papulation and no oozing/crusting), 2 = Mild (Faint pink erythema with mild induration/papulation and no oozing/crusting), 3 = Moderate (Pink-red erythema with moderate induration/papulation and there may be some oozing/crusting.), 4 = Severe (Deep/bright red erythema with severe induration/papulation with oozing/crusting). Success rate was defined as percentage of participants who achieved an IGA score of 1 (almost clear) or 0 (Clear) at specified visits. All missing values were imputed by LOCF.

Time frame: Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 36 and 43

Population: The ITT efficacy analysis set was defined as any participant who were randomized.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
CD5024 0.3% CreamPercentage of Participants Who Achieved an Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) Score of 1 (Almost Clear) or 0 (Clear)Day 80 percentage of participants
CD5024 0.3% CreamPercentage of Participants Who Achieved an Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) Score of 1 (Almost Clear) or 0 (Clear)Day 153.13 percentage of participants
CD5024 0.3% CreamPercentage of Participants Who Achieved an Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) Score of 1 (Almost Clear) or 0 (Clear)Day 229.38 percentage of participants
CD5024 0.3% CreamPercentage of Participants Who Achieved an Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) Score of 1 (Almost Clear) or 0 (Clear)Day 2915.6 percentage of participants
CD5024 0.3% CreamPercentage of Participants Who Achieved an Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) Score of 1 (Almost Clear) or 0 (Clear)Day 3621.9 percentage of participants
CD5024 0.3% CreamPercentage of Participants Who Achieved an Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) Score of 1 (Almost Clear) or 0 (Clear)Day 4337.5 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Who Achieved an Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) Score of 1 (Almost Clear) or 0 (Clear)Day 3616.1 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Who Achieved an Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) Score of 1 (Almost Clear) or 0 (Clear)Day 83.23 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Who Achieved an Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) Score of 1 (Almost Clear) or 0 (Clear)Day 296.45 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Who Achieved an Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) Score of 1 (Almost Clear) or 0 (Clear)Day 156.45 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Who Achieved an Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) Score of 1 (Almost Clear) or 0 (Clear)Day 439.68 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Who Achieved an Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) Score of 1 (Almost Clear) or 0 (Clear)Day 229.68 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in EASI at Each Visit

The EASI score was used to measure the severity and extent of atopic dermatitis (AD) and measures erythema, induration, excoriation and lichenification on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper and lower extremities. The total EASI score ranges from 0 (minimum) to 72 (maximum) points, with the higher scores indicated the worse severity of AD. All missing values were imputed by LOCF.

Time frame: Baseline, Days 8,15, 22, 29, 36 and 43

Population: The ITT efficacy analysis set was defined as any participant who were randomized.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
CD5024 0.3% CreamPercent Change From Baseline in EASI at Each VisitDay 8-8.7 percent changeStandard Deviation 19.1
CD5024 0.3% CreamPercent Change From Baseline in EASI at Each VisitDay 15-21.0 percent changeStandard Deviation 37.5
CD5024 0.3% CreamPercent Change From Baseline in EASI at Each VisitDay 22-29.1 percent changeStandard Deviation 40.7
CD5024 0.3% CreamPercent Change From Baseline in EASI at Each VisitDay 29-34.5 percent changeStandard Deviation 59.9
CD5024 0.3% CreamPercent Change From Baseline in EASI at Each VisitDay 36-43.1 percent changeStandard Deviation 35.3
CD5024 0.3% CreamPercent Change From Baseline in EASI at Each VisitDay 43-46.4 percent changeStandard Deviation 38.8
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline in EASI at Each VisitDay 36-28.8 percent changeStandard Deviation 44.7
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline in EASI at Each VisitDay 8-5.5 percent changeStandard Deviation 39.6
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline in EASI at Each VisitDay 29-21.0 percent changeStandard Deviation 41.7
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline in EASI at Each VisitDay 15-10.7 percent changeStandard Deviation 43.7
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline in EASI at Each VisitDay 43-24.6 percent changeStandard Deviation 62.7
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline in EASI at Each VisitDay 22-26.7 percent changeStandard Deviation 35.8
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in Modified Objective Scoring Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) at Each Visit

SCORAD index uses the rule of nines to assess disease extent and evaluates 6 clinical characteristics to determine disease severity: (1) erythema, (2) edema/papulation, (3) oozing/crusts, (4) excoriation, (5) lichenification, and (6) dryness on a scale of 0 to 3 (0=absence, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe). The SCORAD index also assesses subjective symptoms of pruritus and sleep loss with visual analog scale (VAS) where 0 is no itching or no trouble sleeping and 10 is unbearable itching or a lot of trouble sleeping. These 3 aspects: extent of disease (A: 0-1-2), disease severity (B: 0-18), & subjective symptoms (C: 0-20) combine using A/5 + 7\*B/2+ C to give a maximum possible score of 103, where 0 = no disease and 103 = severe disease. Higher scores indicated worse outcome. All missing values were imputed by LOCF.

Time frame: Baseline, Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 36 and 43

Population: The ITT efficacy analysis set was defined as any participant who were randomized.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
CD5024 0.3% CreamPercent Change From Baseline in Modified Objective Scoring Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) at Each VisitDay 8-16.28 percent changeStandard Error 4.29
CD5024 0.3% CreamPercent Change From Baseline in Modified Objective Scoring Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) at Each VisitDay 15-30.76 percent changeStandard Error 5.51
CD5024 0.3% CreamPercent Change From Baseline in Modified Objective Scoring Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) at Each VisitDay 22-32.02 percent changeStandard Error 5.84
CD5024 0.3% CreamPercent Change From Baseline in Modified Objective Scoring Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) at Each VisitDay 29-39.14 percent changeStandard Error 6.51
CD5024 0.3% CreamPercent Change From Baseline in Modified Objective Scoring Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) at Each VisitDay 36-46.38 percent changeStandard Error 6.67
CD5024 0.3% CreamPercent Change From Baseline in Modified Objective Scoring Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) at Each VisitDay 43-48.92 percent changeStandard Error 7.26
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline in Modified Objective Scoring Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) at Each VisitDay 36-40.10 percent changeStandard Error 7.03
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline in Modified Objective Scoring Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) at Each VisitDay 8-16.00 percent changeStandard Error 4.52
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline in Modified Objective Scoring Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) at Each VisitDay 29-31.81 percent changeStandard Error 6.86
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline in Modified Objective Scoring Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) at Each VisitDay 15-20.49 percent changeStandard Error 5.81
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline in Modified Objective Scoring Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) at Each VisitDay 43-41.48 percent changeStandard Error 7.65
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline in Modified Objective Scoring Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) at Each VisitDay 22-30.73 percent changeStandard Error 6.16
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in Total Sum Score (TSS) at Each Visit

The TSS was the sum of individual clinical severity scores for 5 signs of AD (erythema, induration/papulation, oozing/crusting, excoriation and lichenification). The severity of each sign was evaluated by using a 4-graded scale (0: none; 1: mild; 2: moderate; 3: severe). The total score ranges from 0 to 15, where higher score indicated worse severity of AD. All missing values were imputed by LOCF.

Time frame: Baseline, Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 36 and 43

Population: The ITT efficacy analysis set was defined as any participant who were randomized.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
CD5024 0.3% CreamPercent Change From Baseline in Total Sum Score (TSS) at Each VisitDay 8-15.35 percent changeStandard Error 4.51
CD5024 0.3% CreamPercent Change From Baseline in Total Sum Score (TSS) at Each VisitDay 15-27.94 percent changeStandard Error 5.76
CD5024 0.3% CreamPercent Change From Baseline in Total Sum Score (TSS) at Each VisitDay 22-29.38 percent changeStandard Error 6.23
CD5024 0.3% CreamPercent Change From Baseline in Total Sum Score (TSS) at Each VisitDay 29-37.23 percent changeStandard Error 6.64
CD5024 0.3% CreamPercent Change From Baseline in Total Sum Score (TSS) at Each VisitDay 36-45.01 percent changeStandard Error 6.75
CD5024 0.3% CreamPercent Change From Baseline in Total Sum Score (TSS) at Each VisitDay 43-47.63 percent changeStandard Error 7.3
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline in Total Sum Score (TSS) at Each VisitDay 3642.24 percent changeStandard Error 7.11
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline in Total Sum Score (TSS) at Each VisitDay 8-17.30 percent changeStandard Error 4.75
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline in Total Sum Score (TSS) at Each VisitDay 29-34.44 percent changeStandard Error 6.99
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline in Total Sum Score (TSS) at Each VisitDay 15-20.82 percent changeStandard Error 6.07
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline in Total Sum Score (TSS) at Each VisitDay 43-45.00 percent changeStandard Error 7.69
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline in Total Sum Score (TSS) at Each VisitDay 22-33.57 percent changeStandard Error 6.57

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026