Skip to content

Efficacy and Safety of Ofatumumab Compared to Placebo in Patients With Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis Followed by Extended Treatment With Open-label Ofatumumab

A 24-week, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel-group, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety and Pharmacokinetics of Ofatumumab in Patients With Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis Followed by an Extended Treatment of at Least 24 Weeks With Open-label Ofatumumab

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03249714
Enrollment
64
Registered
2017-08-15
Start date
2018-03-15
Completion date
2020-07-29
Last updated
2022-04-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis

Keywords

double-blind, placebo controlled, ofatumumab, relapsing multiple sclerosis, Japanese patients, MS, RMS, adult, OMB157

Brief summary

The study provided efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics (PK) data for patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS) in Japan and the other countries

Detailed description

This study had 2 parts: A controlled Core and an open-label Extension. * Core part: A 24-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled, parallel-group, multicenter study evaluated the efficacy, safety and tolerability and PK of ofatumumab in patients with RMS. * Extension part: The Core part was followed by an Extension part in which all patients received open-label ofatumumab. In the Extension part, patients were treated for at least 24 weeks and no longer than 48 weeks. Sixty-four patients were randomized in a 2:1 ratio to ofatumumab or placebo in the Core part; half of the study patients were from Japan and the other half from the other countries.

Interventions

DRUGOfatumumab

Provided in pre-filled syringes for subcutaneous injection (s.c.) administration containing 20 mg ofatumumab (50 mg/mL, 0.4 mL content)

DRUGMatching placebo of ofatumumab

Matching placebo in pre-filled syringes

Sponsors

Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 55 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis (MS) * Relapsing MS (RMS) * At least 1 appearance of a new neurological abnormality or worsening of pre-existing neurological abnormality during the previous 2 years prior to Screening AND an MRI activity (Gd-enhancing T1 lesions or new or enlarging T2 lesions) in brain during the previous 1 year prior to randomization * EDSS score of 0 to 5.5

Exclusion criteria

* Primary progressive MS or SPMS without disease activity * Patients with an active chronic disease of the immune system other than MS * Patients at risk of developing or having reactivation of hepatitis * Patients with active systemic infections or with neurological findings consistent with PML

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Gadolinium-enhancing T1 Lesions Per MRI Scan - Core PartBaseline up to Week 24Total number of Gd-enhancing T1 lesions across scans at Week 12, 16, 20, and 24 were adjusted for the different numbers of scans. This was calculated as a rate for population, rather than at patient level, using a negative binomial regression model with log link. The model included each patient's total number of Gd-enhancing T1 lesions as the response variable, and treatment, region, and subgroup of baseline number of Gd-enhancing T1 lesions (0 or \>=1) as explanatory variables, and logarithm of the patient's number of scans as the offset variable.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of New or Enlarging T2 Lesions on MRI Scans (Annualized T2 Lesion Rate) - Core PartBaseline up to Week 24Number of new/enlarging T2 lesions on the last available MRI scan in the Core Part (up to Week 24) relative to baseline, adjusted for different follow-up times. This was calculated as a rate for population, rather than at patient level, using a negative binomial regression model with log-link. The model included each patient's last available number of new or enlarging T2 lesions relative to baseline as the response variable, and treatment, region, subgroup of baseline number of Gd-enhancing T1 lesions (0 or \>=1), and baseline volume of T2 lesions as explanatory variables, and the patient's follow-up time as the offset variable.
Annualized Relapse Rate (ARR) - Core PartBaseline up to Week 24ARR was the number of confirmed MS relapses in a year. A confirmed MS relapse was defined as one accompanied by a clinically-relevant change in the EDSS performed by the Independent EDSS rater, i.e. an increase of at least 0.5 points on the EDSS score, or an increase of 1 point on two functional scores or 2 points on one functional score (excluding changes involving bowel/bladder or cerebral functional system). ARR was calculated as a rate for population, rather than at patient-level, using a negative binomial regression model with log-link. The model included each patient's number of confirmed relapses as the response variable, and treatment and region as explanatory variables, and the patient's follow-up time as the offset variable.
Pharmacokinetic (PK) Concentrations of Ofatumumab - Core PartPre-dose at Baseline, Days 2, 5, 7, 14, Weeks 4, 12, 24Blood samples were collected at the scheduled visit. Summary statistics of PK concentrations from trough samples.
B-cell Counts - Japan vs Non-Japan - Core PartBaseline, Days 2, 5, 7, 14, Weeks 4, 12, 24Blood samples were collected at the scheduled visits. The CD19+ B-cell counts were measured by the central laboratory.
Number of Gadolinium-enhancing T1 Lesions Per MRI Scan - Extension PartWeek 24 up to Week 48Total number of Gd-enhancing T1 lesions per scan during the Extension Part (up to Week 48) calculated as a rate for population, rather than at patient-level. It was calculated as sum of each patient's total number of Gd-enhancing T1 lesions across scans at Week 36 and 48, divided by sum of each patient's total number of scans.
Number of Gadolinium-enhancing T1 Lesions Per MRI Scan - Japan vs Non-Japan - Core PartBaseline up to Week 24Total number of Gd-enhancing T1 lesions across scans at Week 12, 16, 20, and 24 were adjusted for the different numbers of scans. This was calculated as a rate for population, rather than at patient level, using a negative binomial regression model with log link. The model included each patient's total number of Gd-enhancing T1 lesions as the response variable, and treatment, region, subgroup of baseline number of Gd-enhancing T1 lesions (0 or \>=1), and the treatment-by-region interaction term as explanatory variables, and the patient's number of scans as the offset variable.
Annualized Relapse Rate (ARR) - Extension PartWeek 24 up to Week 48ARR was the number of confirmed MS relapses in a year. A confirmed MS relapse was defined as one accompanied by a clinically-relevant change in the EDSS performed by the Independent EDSS rater, i.e. an increase of at least 0.5 points on the EDSS score, or an increase of 1 point on two functional scores or 2 points on one functional score (excluding changes involving bowel/bladder or cerebral functional system). ARR (time-based) was calculated by summing each patient's number of confirmed relapses observed during the Extension part, divided by the total number of each patient's days in a study of all patients during the Extension part, and multiplied by 365.25.
Pharmacokinetic (PK) Concentrations of Ofatumumab - Extension PartWeeks 24, 28, 36, 48Blood samples were collected at the scheduled visits. Summary statistics of PK concentrations from trough samples.
B-cell Counts - Extension PartWeeks 24, 36 and 48Blood samples were collected at the scheduled visits. The CD19+ B-cell counts were measured by the central laboratory.
Participants With Confirmed Relapse - Core and Extension PartsBaseline up to Week 48A confirmed MS relapse was defined as one accompanied by a clinically-relevant change in the EDSS performed by the Independent EDSS rater, i.e. an increase of at least 0.5 points on the EDSS score, or an increase of 1 point on two functional scores or 2 points on one functional score (excluding changes involving bowel/bladder or cerebral functional system).
Number of New or Enlarging T2 Lesions on MRI Scans (Annualized T2 Lesion Rate) - Extension PartWeek 24 up to Week 48Number of new/enlarging T2 lesions on the last available MRI scan in the Extension Part (up to Week 48) relative to Week 24, adjusted for different follow-up times. Annualized rate of new or enlarging T2 lesions was calculated by dividing the sum of each patient's number of new or enlarging T2 lesions relative to Week 24 by the sum of each patient's number of MRI assessment days during the Extension part, and then multiplying it by 365.25.

Countries

Japan, Russia

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

Patients where randomized in a 2:1 ratio to ofatumumab or placebo in the Core Part

Participants by arm

ArmCount
OMB 20 mg
CORE PART: Ofatumumab 20 mg s.c. injections on Days 1, 7, 14, Week 4 and every 4 weeks thereafter. EXTENSION PART: Ofatumumab 20 mg s.c. injections every 4 weeks
43
Placebo
CORE PART: Placebo s.c. injections on Days 1, 7, 14, Week 4 and every 4 weeks thereafter. EXTENSION PART: Ofatumumab 20 mg s.c. injections at Week 24, Week 25, Week 26 and every 4 weeks thereafter
21
Total64

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Double-blind Treatment (Core Part)Lack of Efficacy11
Double-blind Treatment (Core Part)Lost to Follow-up10
Double-blind Treatment (Core Part)Subject/guardian decision11
Open-label Treatment (Extension Part)Adverse Event20

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicOMB 20 mgPlaceboTotal
Age, Continuous35.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.49
35.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.93
35.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.24
Country of Enrollment
Japan
21 Participants11 Participants32 Participants
Country of Enrollment
Russia
22 Participants10 Participants32 Participants
Number of Gd-enhancing T1 lesions1.3 lesions
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.62
1.0 lesions
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.47
1.2 lesions
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.29
Number of relapses in the past 12 months prior to screening1.6 Number of relapses
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.9
1.2 Number of relapses
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.7
1.5 Number of relapses
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.85
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
21 Participants11 Participants32 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
22 Participants10 Participants32 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
36 Participants19 Participants55 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
7 Participants2 Participants9 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 430 / 210 / 400 / 19
other
Total, other adverse events
23 / 4315 / 2123 / 4011 / 19
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 430 / 211 / 400 / 19

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Gadolinium-enhancing T1 Lesions Per MRI Scan - Core Part

Total number of Gd-enhancing T1 lesions across scans at Week 12, 16, 20, and 24 were adjusted for the different numbers of scans. This was calculated as a rate for population, rather than at patient level, using a negative binomial regression model with log link. The model included each patient's total number of Gd-enhancing T1 lesions as the response variable, and treatment, region, and subgroup of baseline number of Gd-enhancing T1 lesions (0 or \>=1) as explanatory variables, and logarithm of the patient's number of scans as the offset variable.

Time frame: Baseline up to Week 24

Population: Full analysis set (participants with missing baseline or post-baseline MRI data could not be included in the analysis)

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
OMB 20 mgNumber of Gadolinium-enhancing T1 Lesions Per MRI Scan - Core Part0.0670 lesions per scan
PlaceboNumber of Gadolinium-enhancing T1 Lesions Per MRI Scan - Core Part1.0413 lesions per scan
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [0.018, 0.232]negative binominal regression model
Secondary

Annualized Relapse Rate (ARR) - Core Part

ARR was the number of confirmed MS relapses in a year. A confirmed MS relapse was defined as one accompanied by a clinically-relevant change in the EDSS performed by the Independent EDSS rater, i.e. an increase of at least 0.5 points on the EDSS score, or an increase of 1 point on two functional scores or 2 points on one functional score (excluding changes involving bowel/bladder or cerebral functional system). ARR was calculated as a rate for population, rather than at patient-level, using a negative binomial regression model with log-link. The model included each patient's number of confirmed relapses as the response variable, and treatment and region as explanatory variables, and the patient's follow-up time as the offset variable.

Time frame: Baseline up to Week 24

Population: Full analysis set

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
OMB 20 mgAnnualized Relapse Rate (ARR) - Core Part0.2640 relapses in a year
PlaceboAnnualized Relapse Rate (ARR) - Core Part0.6286 relapses in a year
p-value: 0.11995% CI: [0.141, 1.25]negative binominal regression
Secondary

Annualized Relapse Rate (ARR) - Extension Part

ARR was the number of confirmed MS relapses in a year. A confirmed MS relapse was defined as one accompanied by a clinically-relevant change in the EDSS performed by the Independent EDSS rater, i.e. an increase of at least 0.5 points on the EDSS score, or an increase of 1 point on two functional scores or 2 points on one functional score (excluding changes involving bowel/bladder or cerebral functional system). ARR (time-based) was calculated by summing each patient's number of confirmed relapses observed during the Extension part, divided by the total number of each patient's days in a study of all patients during the Extension part, and multiplied by 365.25.

Time frame: Week 24 up to Week 48

Population: Extension full analysis set

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
OMB 20 mgAnnualized Relapse Rate (ARR) - Extension Part0.081 relapses in a year
PlaceboAnnualized Relapse Rate (ARR) - Extension Part0.083 relapses in a year
Secondary

B-cell Counts - Extension Part

Blood samples were collected at the scheduled visits. The CD19+ B-cell counts were measured by the central laboratory.

Time frame: Weeks 24, 36 and 48

Population: Extension safety set

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
OMB 20 mgB-cell Counts - Extension PartWeek 24 n=40,180.0 cells/uL
OMB 20 mgB-cell Counts - Extension PartWeek 36 n=38, 90.5 cells/uL
OMB 20 mgB-cell Counts - Extension PartWeek 48 n=38,11.0 cells/uL
PlaceboB-cell Counts - Extension PartWeek 24 n=40,181.0 cells/uL
PlaceboB-cell Counts - Extension PartWeek 36 n=38, 91.0 cells/uL
PlaceboB-cell Counts - Extension PartWeek 48 n=38,14.0 cells/uL
Secondary

B-cell Counts - Japan vs Non-Japan - Core Part

Blood samples were collected at the scheduled visits. The CD19+ B-cell counts were measured by the central laboratory.

Time frame: Baseline, Days 2, 5, 7, 14, Weeks 4, 12, 24

Population: Safety set

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
OMB 20 mgB-cell Counts - Japan vs Non-Japan - Core PartDay 2 n=21,11,21,93.0 cells/uL
OMB 20 mgB-cell Counts - Japan vs Non-Japan - Core PartDay 5 n=20,10,14,73.0 cells/uL
OMB 20 mgB-cell Counts - Japan vs Non-Japan - Core PartWeek 4 n=21,10,21,81.0 cells/uL
OMB 20 mgB-cell Counts - Japan vs Non-Japan - Core PartDay 14 n=21,11,19,82 cells/uL
OMB 20 mgB-cell Counts - Japan vs Non-Japan - Core PartWeek 24 n=19,8,19,80.0 cells/uL
OMB 20 mgB-cell Counts - Japan vs Non-Japan - Core PartDay 7 n=21,11,22,93.0 cells/uL
OMB 20 mgB-cell Counts - Japan vs Non-Japan - Core PartWeek 12 n=20,10,18,91.0 cells/uL
OMB 20 mgB-cell Counts - Japan vs Non-Japan - Core PartBaseline n=21,11,22,9207 cells/uL
PlaceboB-cell Counts - Japan vs Non-Japan - Core PartWeek 24 n=19,8,19,8227.5 cells/uL
PlaceboB-cell Counts - Japan vs Non-Japan - Core PartDay 14 n=21,11,19,8266.0 cells/uL
PlaceboB-cell Counts - Japan vs Non-Japan - Core PartWeek 4 n=21,10,21,8235.5 cells/uL
PlaceboB-cell Counts - Japan vs Non-Japan - Core PartDay 2 n=21,11,21,9319.0 cells/uL
PlaceboB-cell Counts - Japan vs Non-Japan - Core PartBaseline n=21,11,22,9205 cells/uL
PlaceboB-cell Counts - Japan vs Non-Japan - Core PartDay 5 n=20,10,14,7216.5 cells/uL
PlaceboB-cell Counts - Japan vs Non-Japan - Core PartWeek 12 n=20,10,18,9211.0 cells/uL
PlaceboB-cell Counts - Japan vs Non-Japan - Core PartDay 7 n=21,11,22,9209.0 cells/uL
OMB 20 mg Non-JapanB-cell Counts - Japan vs Non-Japan - Core PartWeek 4 n=21,10,21,81.0 cells/uL
OMB 20 mg Non-JapanB-cell Counts - Japan vs Non-Japan - Core PartWeek 12 n=20,10,18,91.0 cells/uL
OMB 20 mg Non-JapanB-cell Counts - Japan vs Non-Japan - Core PartDay 2 n=21,11,21,914.0 cells/uL
OMB 20 mg Non-JapanB-cell Counts - Japan vs Non-Japan - Core PartWeek 24 n=19,8,19,81.0 cells/uL
OMB 20 mg Non-JapanB-cell Counts - Japan vs Non-Japan - Core PartDay 5 n=20,10,14,78.5 cells/uL
OMB 20 mg Non-JapanB-cell Counts - Japan vs Non-Japan - Core PartBaseline n=21,11,22,9208 cells/uL
OMB 20 mg Non-JapanB-cell Counts - Japan vs Non-Japan - Core PartDay 7 n=21,11,22,93.5 cells/uL
OMB 20 mg Non-JapanB-cell Counts - Japan vs Non-Japan - Core PartDay 14 n=21,11,19,83.0 cells/uL
Placebo Non-JapanB-cell Counts - Japan vs Non-Japan - Core PartWeek 24 n=19,8,19,8224.5 cells/uL
Placebo Non-JapanB-cell Counts - Japan vs Non-Japan - Core PartBaseline n=21,11,22,9244 cells/uL
Placebo Non-JapanB-cell Counts - Japan vs Non-Japan - Core PartDay 2 n=21,11,21,9292.0 cells/uL
Placebo Non-JapanB-cell Counts - Japan vs Non-Japan - Core PartDay 5 n=20,10,14,7257.0 cells/uL
Placebo Non-JapanB-cell Counts - Japan vs Non-Japan - Core PartDay 7 n=21,11,22,9228.0 cells/uL
Placebo Non-JapanB-cell Counts - Japan vs Non-Japan - Core PartDay 14 n=21,11,19,8226.0 cells/uL
Placebo Non-JapanB-cell Counts - Japan vs Non-Japan - Core PartWeek 4 n=21,10,21,8179.5 cells/uL
Placebo Non-JapanB-cell Counts - Japan vs Non-Japan - Core PartWeek 12 n=20,10,18,9200.0 cells/uL
Secondary

Number of Gadolinium-enhancing T1 Lesions Per MRI Scan - Extension Part

Total number of Gd-enhancing T1 lesions per scan during the Extension Part (up to Week 48) calculated as a rate for population, rather than at patient-level. It was calculated as sum of each patient's total number of Gd-enhancing T1 lesions across scans at Week 36 and 48, divided by sum of each patient's total number of scans.

Time frame: Week 24 up to Week 48

Population: Extension full analysis set

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
OMB 20 mgNumber of Gadolinium-enhancing T1 Lesions Per MRI Scan - Extension Part0.027 lesions per scan
PlaceboNumber of Gadolinium-enhancing T1 Lesions Per MRI Scan - Extension Part0.025 lesions per scan
Secondary

Number of Gadolinium-enhancing T1 Lesions Per MRI Scan - Japan vs Non-Japan - Core Part

Total number of Gd-enhancing T1 lesions across scans at Week 12, 16, 20, and 24 were adjusted for the different numbers of scans. This was calculated as a rate for population, rather than at patient level, using a negative binomial regression model with log link. The model included each patient's total number of Gd-enhancing T1 lesions as the response variable, and treatment, region, subgroup of baseline number of Gd-enhancing T1 lesions (0 or \>=1), and the treatment-by-region interaction term as explanatory variables, and the patient's number of scans as the offset variable.

Time frame: Baseline up to Week 24

Population: Full analysis set (participants with missing baseline or post-baseline MRI data could not be included in the analysis)

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
OMB 20 mgNumber of Gadolinium-enhancing T1 Lesions Per MRI Scan - Japan vs Non-Japan - Core Part0.1999 lesions per scan
PlaceboNumber of Gadolinium-enhancing T1 Lesions Per MRI Scan - Japan vs Non-Japan - Core Part1.4682 lesions per scan
OMB 20 mg Non-JapanNumber of Gadolinium-enhancing T1 Lesions Per MRI Scan - Japan vs Non-Japan - Core Part0.0000 lesions per scan
Placebo Non-JapanNumber of Gadolinium-enhancing T1 Lesions Per MRI Scan - Japan vs Non-Japan - Core Part0.6774 lesions per scan
p-value: 0.00395% CI: [0.036, 0.513]negative binomial regression
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [0, 0]negative binominal regression
Secondary

Number of New or Enlarging T2 Lesions on MRI Scans (Annualized T2 Lesion Rate) - Core Part

Number of new/enlarging T2 lesions on the last available MRI scan in the Core Part (up to Week 24) relative to baseline, adjusted for different follow-up times. This was calculated as a rate for population, rather than at patient level, using a negative binomial regression model with log-link. The model included each patient's last available number of new or enlarging T2 lesions relative to baseline as the response variable, and treatment, region, subgroup of baseline number of Gd-enhancing T1 lesions (0 or \>=1), and baseline volume of T2 lesions as explanatory variables, and the patient's follow-up time as the offset variable.

Time frame: Baseline up to Week 24

Population: Full analysis set (participants with missing baseline or post-baseline MRI data could not be included in the analysis)

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
OMB 20 mgNumber of New or Enlarging T2 Lesions on MRI Scans (Annualized T2 Lesion Rate) - Core Part3.7344 T2 lesions per year
PlaceboNumber of New or Enlarging T2 Lesions on MRI Scans (Annualized T2 Lesion Rate) - Core Part13.1533 T2 lesions per year
p-value: 0.00295% CI: [0.13, 0.62]negative binominal regression
Secondary

Number of New or Enlarging T2 Lesions on MRI Scans (Annualized T2 Lesion Rate) - Extension Part

Number of new/enlarging T2 lesions on the last available MRI scan in the Extension Part (up to Week 48) relative to Week 24, adjusted for different follow-up times. Annualized rate of new or enlarging T2 lesions was calculated by dividing the sum of each patient's number of new or enlarging T2 lesions relative to Week 24 by the sum of each patient's number of MRI assessment days during the Extension part, and then multiplying it by 365.25.

Time frame: Week 24 up to Week 48

Population: Extension full analysis set

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
OMB 20 mgNumber of New or Enlarging T2 Lesions on MRI Scans (Annualized T2 Lesion Rate) - Extension Part0.230 T2 lesions per year
PlaceboNumber of New or Enlarging T2 Lesions on MRI Scans (Annualized T2 Lesion Rate) - Extension Part0.813 T2 lesions per year
Secondary

Participants With Confirmed Relapse - Core and Extension Parts

A confirmed MS relapse was defined as one accompanied by a clinically-relevant change in the EDSS performed by the Independent EDSS rater, i.e. an increase of at least 0.5 points on the EDSS score, or an increase of 1 point on two functional scores or 2 points on one functional score (excluding changes involving bowel/bladder or cerebral functional system).

Time frame: Baseline up to Week 48

Population: Extension full analysis set

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
OMB 20 mgParticipants With Confirmed Relapse - Core and Extension PartsDay 1 to Week 123 Participants
OMB 20 mgParticipants With Confirmed Relapse - Core and Extension Parts>Week 12 to Week 241 Participants
OMB 20 mgParticipants With Confirmed Relapse - Core and Extension Parts>Week 24 to Week 361 Participants
OMB 20 mgParticipants With Confirmed Relapse - Core and Extension Parts>Week 36 to Week 480 Participants
PlaceboParticipants With Confirmed Relapse - Core and Extension Parts>Week 36 to Week 480 Participants
PlaceboParticipants With Confirmed Relapse - Core and Extension PartsDay 1 to Week 122 Participants
PlaceboParticipants With Confirmed Relapse - Core and Extension Parts>Week 24 to Week 360 Participants
PlaceboParticipants With Confirmed Relapse - Core and Extension Parts>Week 12 to Week 244 Participants
Secondary

Pharmacokinetic (PK) Concentrations of Ofatumumab - Core Part

Blood samples were collected at the scheduled visit. Summary statistics of PK concentrations from trough samples.

Time frame: Pre-dose at Baseline, Days 2, 5, 7, 14, Weeks 4, 12, 24

Population: Full analysis set

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
OMB 20 mgPharmacokinetic (PK) Concentrations of Ofatumumab - Core PartBaseline n=21,22,430.03 ug/mLStandard Deviation 0.07
OMB 20 mgPharmacokinetic (PK) Concentrations of Ofatumumab - Core PartDay 2 n=21,22,43.43 ug/mLStandard Deviation 0.38
OMB 20 mgPharmacokinetic (PK) Concentrations of Ofatumumab - Core PartDay 5 n=21,22,43.88 ug/mLStandard Deviation 0.4
OMB 20 mgPharmacokinetic (PK) Concentrations of Ofatumumab - Core PartDay 7 n=21,22,43.84 ug/mLStandard Deviation 0.39
OMB 20 mgPharmacokinetic (PK) Concentrations of Ofatumumab - Core PartDay 14 n=21,22,432.17 ug/mLStandard Deviation 0.63
OMB 20 mgPharmacokinetic (PK) Concentrations of Ofatumumab - Core PartWeek 4 n=21,22,432.69 ug/mLStandard Deviation 0.86
OMB 20 mgPharmacokinetic (PK) Concentrations of Ofatumumab - Core PartWeek 12 n=20,21,41.66 ug/mLStandard Deviation 0.62
OMB 20 mgPharmacokinetic (PK) Concentrations of Ofatumumab - Core PartWeek 24 n=20,20,40.84 ug/mLStandard Deviation 0.6
PlaceboPharmacokinetic (PK) Concentrations of Ofatumumab - Core PartDay 5 n=21,22,43.60 ug/mLStandard Deviation 0.46
PlaceboPharmacokinetic (PK) Concentrations of Ofatumumab - Core PartWeek 12 n=20,21,410.38 ug/mLStandard Deviation 0.38
PlaceboPharmacokinetic (PK) Concentrations of Ofatumumab - Core PartDay 7 n=21,22,430.48 ug/mLStandard Deviation 0.34
PlaceboPharmacokinetic (PK) Concentrations of Ofatumumab - Core PartDay 14 n=21,22,431.71 ug/mLStandard Deviation 1
PlaceboPharmacokinetic (PK) Concentrations of Ofatumumab - Core PartWeek 4 n=21,22,432.03 ug/mLStandard Deviation 1.14
PlaceboPharmacokinetic (PK) Concentrations of Ofatumumab - Core PartBaseline n=21,22,430.9 ug/mLStandard Deviation 0.39
PlaceboPharmacokinetic (PK) Concentrations of Ofatumumab - Core PartDay 2 n=21,22,43.24 ug/mLStandard Deviation 0.32
PlaceboPharmacokinetic (PK) Concentrations of Ofatumumab - Core PartWeek 24 n=20,20,40.64 ug/mLStandard Deviation 0.46
OMB 20 mg Non-JapanPharmacokinetic (PK) Concentrations of Ofatumumab - Core PartDay 5 n=21,22,43.73 ug/mLStandard Deviation 0.45
OMB 20 mg Non-JapanPharmacokinetic (PK) Concentrations of Ofatumumab - Core PartDay 2 n=21,22,430.33 ug/mLStandard Deviation 0.36
OMB 20 mg Non-JapanPharmacokinetic (PK) Concentrations of Ofatumumab - Core PartBaseline n=21,22,43.06 ug/mLStandard Deviation 0.28
OMB 20 mg Non-JapanPharmacokinetic (PK) Concentrations of Ofatumumab - Core PartDay 7 n=21,22,430.66 ug/mLStandard Deviation 0.4
OMB 20 mg Non-JapanPharmacokinetic (PK) Concentrations of Ofatumumab - Core PartWeek 12 n=20,21,41.51 ug/mLStandard Deviation 0.53
OMB 20 mg Non-JapanPharmacokinetic (PK) Concentrations of Ofatumumab - Core PartWeek 4 n=21,22,432.35 ug/mLStandard Deviation 1.05
OMB 20 mg Non-JapanPharmacokinetic (PK) Concentrations of Ofatumumab - Core PartDay 14 n=21,22,431.93 ug/mLStandard Deviation 0.86
OMB 20 mg Non-JapanPharmacokinetic (PK) Concentrations of Ofatumumab - Core PartWeek 24 n=20,20,40.74 ug/mLStandard Deviation 0.54
Secondary

Pharmacokinetic (PK) Concentrations of Ofatumumab - Extension Part

Blood samples were collected at the scheduled visits. Summary statistics of PK concentrations from trough samples.

Time frame: Weeks 24, 28, 36, 48

Population: Extension full analysis set

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
OMB 20 mgPharmacokinetic (PK) Concentrations of Ofatumumab - Extension PartWeek 24.84 ug/mLStandard Deviation 0.6
OMB 20 mgPharmacokinetic (PK) Concentrations of Ofatumumab - Extension PartWeek 28 n=19,190.64 ug/mLStandard Deviation 0.36
OMB 20 mgPharmacokinetic (PK) Concentrations of Ofatumumab - Extension PartWeek 36 n=19,19.97 ug/mLStandard Deviation 0.53
OMB 20 mgPharmacokinetic (PK) Concentrations of Ofatumumab - Extension PartWeek 48 n=18,191.11 ug/mLStandard Deviation 0.56
PlaceboPharmacokinetic (PK) Concentrations of Ofatumumab - Extension PartWeek 48 n=18,19.94 ug/mLStandard Deviation 0.76
PlaceboPharmacokinetic (PK) Concentrations of Ofatumumab - Extension PartWeek 24.64 ug/mLStandard Deviation 0.46
PlaceboPharmacokinetic (PK) Concentrations of Ofatumumab - Extension PartWeek 36 n=19,19.72 ug/mLStandard Deviation 0.56
PlaceboPharmacokinetic (PK) Concentrations of Ofatumumab - Extension PartWeek 28 n=19,19.61 ug/mLStandard Deviation 0.48

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 9, 2026