Skip to content

Peer-led Psycho-education for Schizophrenia

The Effectiveness of a Peer-led Psycho-education Group in Schizophrenia: A Multi-site Randomised Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03246932
Enrollment
342
Registered
2017-08-11
Start date
2020-12-01
Completion date
2025-09-30
Last updated
2026-03-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Schizophrenia

Keywords

peer expert or specialist, psycho-education, schizophrenia, outpatients

Brief summary

Profession-led psycho-education programs for people with schizophrenia are evidenced to improve patients' knowledge about the illness, mental state and relapse rate. Nevertheless, other benefits to patients, for example, their functioning and insight into illness or to be substantive in a longer term (\>12 months) are inconsistent and uncertain, especially in Asian populations. This single-blind multi-site randomized clinical trial was to test the effects of a peer-expert-led psycho-education group intervention (in addition to usual care) for adult patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders over a 24-month follow-up, in comparison to a profession-led psycho-education group or treatment-as-usual only.

Detailed description

Objectives: This study is to test the effectiveness of a peer-expert-led psycho-education group programme for Chinese outpatients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders over an 24-month follow-up. The program is an integrated,psycho-education program that addresses patients' knowledge and self-management of schizophrenia and problem-solving skills. Methods: A single-blind, multi-site randomized controlled trial will be conducted with 342 Chinese patients with schizophrenia in Hong Kong, China and Taiwan. In each of three study sites, the participants will be randomly selected from the eligible patient list (i.e., 114 subjects from each study site) and after baseline measurement, be assigned to either the peer-led psycho-education program, profession-led psycho-education group, or usual psychiatric care. The patients' mental and psychosocial functioning, insights into illness, and their re-hospitalization rates will be measured at recruitment and at one week, and 6, 12 and 24 months after completing the interventions. Hypothesis: The patients in the peer-led psycho-education program will report significantly greater improvements in their symptoms and re-hospitalisation rates (primary outcomes) and other secondary outcomes (e.g., insight into illness and functioning) over the 24-month follow-up, when compared with those in profession-led psycho-education group and/or usual care. Conclusions: The findings will provide evidence whether the peer-led psycho-education group program can better improve Chinese schizophrenia sufferers' psychosocial functioning and reduce their illness relapse.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALPeer-led psycho-education group

A structured, researcher-designed peer-led psycho-education program (6 months), comprising of 12 bi-weekly, 2-hour group sessions.

BEHAVIORALProfession-led psycho-education group

A psychoeducation group program (12 sessions, bi-weekly).

OTHERRoutine psychiatric care

Routine psychiatric outpatient care, or Treatment-as-usual (TAU).

Sponsors

Chinese University of Hong Kong
Lead SponsorOTHER
Hospital Authority, Hong Kong
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
Jilin University Medical Science Division
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Taipei Medical University
CollaboratorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

The outcome assessor will be blinded to the group assignments.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 64 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* patients, aged 18+, attending one psychiatric outpatient clinic under study; * diagnosed as schizophrenia and its subtypes according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual, 4th Text-Revised Edition, as ascertained by the Structured Clinical Interview (SCID-I); * having onset of the illness for not \>5 years; and * able to communicate in Cantonese language.

Exclusion criteria

* mentally unstable and unfit for study participation at recruitment; * with co-morbidity of other severe mental health problems such as depression and substance misuse; and * have recently received or are receiving any structured psychosocial intervention.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Positive and Negative Syndrome Scalefrom recruitment to 24-month follow-upThe Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale assesses the severity of psychotic symptoms on three subscales: positive symptoms (7 items), negative symptoms (7 items) and general psychopathology (16 items). will be assessed at recruitment and one week, 6 months, 12 months and 24 months after the interventions completed.
Specific Level of Functioning Scalefrom recruitment to 24-month follow-upPatients' levels of psychosocial functioning will be assessed with the Specific Level of Functioning Scale at baseline and one week, 6 months, 12 months and 24 months follow-up.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Re-hospitalization ratefrom recruitment to 24-month follow-upAverage amount (number) and length of hospital stay of the patients over previous six months will be assessed at recruitment and one week, 6 months, 12 months and 24 months after the interventions completed.
Six-item Social Support Questionnairefrom recruitment to 24-month follow-upPatients' perceived social support will be assessed with the Six-item Social Support Questionnaire at baseline and one week, 6 months, 12 months and 24 months follow-up.

Countries

China, Hong Kong

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORWT Chien, PhD

CUHK

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 20, 2026