Skip to content

Evaluation of Methods of Teaching Self-management Strategies to Patients With Symptomatic Knee Osteoarthritis

Evaluation of Different Methods of Teaching Self-management Strategies to Patients With Symptomatic Knee Osteoarthritis

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03245463
Enrollment
24
Registered
2017-08-10
Start date
2017-08-09
Completion date
2018-02-13
Last updated
2019-11-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Osteoarthritis, Knee

Brief summary

Symptomatic knee osteoarthritis greatly impacts the quality of life, mobility, independence, and even safety of the individuals who suffer from it. One of the most powerful tools for these patients can be education on self-care and self-management strategies that can be taught to a patient by a physician, physical or occupational therapist, or a nurse. These self-management strategies can help patients treat daily stiffness through exercise or manage flares of osteoarthritis. There is a lack of consensus on the best teaching methods to accomplish the goal of educating our patients. Feedback from both patients and providers regarding teaching methods is needed. This study will evaluate teaching methods on self-management strategies for patients who are undergoing hyaluronic acid injections for knee osteoarthritis.

Interventions

The educational handout will include information on self-management strategies.

OTHERVerbal script

The verbal script will include details on self-management strategies that will be reviewed with the patient.

DRUGHyaluronic Acid

All study patients are undergoing injections with hyaluronic acid prior to the administration of the teaching method. The injections are standard of care and are required as part of the inclusion criteria.

Sponsors

Hospital for Special Surgery, New York
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients of co-investigator physicians * Age 18+ years * Diagnosis of symptomatic knee osteoarthritis * Scheduled for a hyaluronic acid injection into the knee * Provider is available to administer teaching method

Exclusion criteria

* Patients who are already enrolled in the study * Non-English speaking

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Patient Satisfaction With the Teaching Method1 month post-injectionSatisfaction will be assessed using a 0-10 scale, where 0=not satisfied and 10=most satisfied. The higher the score, the greater the satisfaction.
Provider Satisfaction With the Teaching Method1 month post-injectionSatisfaction will be assessed using a 0-10 scale, where 0=not satisfied and 10=most satisfied. The higher the score, the greater the satisfaction.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Patients Who Would Have Preferred a Different Method of Receiving Education.3 months post-injectionPatient will be asked: Would you have preferred a different method of receiving education?
Number of Patients Who Believed That the Education They Received Helped With the Care of Their Osteoarthritis3 months post-injectionPatient will be asked: Did the education you received help with the care of your osteoarthritis?
PROMIS Physical Health Score3 months post-injectionThe physical health score will be surveyed using the PROMIS-10 global health questionnaire. A higher score indicates better physical health. Scores range from 16.2 to 67.7.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Teaching Method A
Patient will receive an educational handout on self-management strategies. Patient will be asked to take the handout home to read and to call the office if he/she has any questions. Educational handout: The educational handout will include information on self-management strategies. Hyaluronic Acid: All study patients are undergoing injections with hyaluronic acid prior to the administration of the teaching method. The injections are standard of care and are required as part of the inclusion criteria.
12
Teaching Method B
Patient will receive an educational handout on self-management strategies. A provider will review the handout with the patient (approximately 5 minutes including a question-and-answer session). Educational handout: The educational handout will include information on self-management strategies. Verbal script: The verbal script will include details on self-management strategies that will be reviewed with the patient. Hyaluronic Acid: All study patients are undergoing injections with hyaluronic acid prior to the administration of the teaching method. The injections are standard of care and are required as part of the inclusion criteria.
12
Total24

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTeaching Method ATeaching Method BTotal
Age, Continuous71 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8
69 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13
70 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10
Average pain5.6 units on a 0-10 scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.2
4.8 units on a 0-10 scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.3
5.2 units on a 0-10 scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.2
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants3 Participants4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
11 Participants9 Participants20 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
12 participants12 participants24 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
8 Participants10 Participants18 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
4 Participants2 Participants6 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 120 / 12
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 120 / 12
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 120 / 12

Outcome results

Primary

Patient Satisfaction With the Teaching Method

Satisfaction will be assessed using a 0-10 scale, where 0=not satisfied and 10=most satisfied. The higher the score, the greater the satisfaction.

Time frame: 1 month post-injection

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Teaching Method APatient Satisfaction With the Teaching Method8.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.6
Teaching Method BPatient Satisfaction With the Teaching Method8.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.2
Primary

Patient Satisfaction With the Teaching Method

Satisfaction will be assessed using a 0-10 scale, where 0=not satisfied and 10=most satisfied. The higher the score, the greater the satisfaction.

Time frame: 3 months post-injection

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Teaching Method APatient Satisfaction With the Teaching Method8.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.2
Teaching Method BPatient Satisfaction With the Teaching Method8.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
Primary

Provider Satisfaction With the Teaching Method

Satisfaction will be assessed using a 0-10 scale, where 0=not satisfied and 10=most satisfied. The higher the score, the greater the satisfaction.

Time frame: 1 month post-injection

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Teaching Method AProvider Satisfaction With the Teaching Method6.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.9
Teaching Method BProvider Satisfaction With the Teaching Method8.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
Secondary

Number of Patients Who Believed That the Education They Received Helped With the Care of Their Osteoarthritis

Patient will be asked: Did the education you received help with the care of your osteoarthritis?

Time frame: 3 months post-injection

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Teaching Method ANumber of Patients Who Believed That the Education They Received Helped With the Care of Their Osteoarthritis7 Participants
Teaching Method BNumber of Patients Who Believed That the Education They Received Helped With the Care of Their Osteoarthritis8 Participants
Secondary

Number of Patients Who Would Have Preferred a Different Method of Receiving Education.

Patient will be asked: Would you have preferred a different method of receiving education?

Time frame: 3 months post-injection

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Teaching Method ANumber of Patients Who Would Have Preferred a Different Method of Receiving Education.1 Participants
Teaching Method BNumber of Patients Who Would Have Preferred a Different Method of Receiving Education.1 Participants
Secondary

PROMIS Physical Health Score

The physical health score will be surveyed using the PROMIS-10 global health questionnaire. A higher score indicates better physical health. Scores range from 16.2 to 67.7.

Time frame: 3 months post-injection

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Teaching Method APROMIS Physical Health Score45.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.1
Teaching Method BPROMIS Physical Health Score48.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.5

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026