Skip to content

LMWH vs Aspirin for VTE Prophylaxis in Orthopaedic Oncology

Low Molecular Weight Heparin Versus Aspirin for Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis in Orthopaedic Oncology

Status
Enrolling by invitation
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03244020
Enrollment
2868
Registered
2017-08-09
Start date
2018-02-16
Completion date
2028-07-01
Last updated
2025-10-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Sarcoma, Soft Tissue Sarcoma, Bone Sarcoma, Bone Metastases, Venous Thromboembolism, Hematoma, Anticoagulant-induced Bleeding

Brief summary

Aspirin and low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) are both commonly employed pharmacologic methods of venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis after orthopaedic surgery. Data comparing these two methods of VTE prophylaxis in patients undergoing pelvic/lower extremity orthopaedic surgery for malignancy are lacking, however, as compared to the data and guidelines present for VTE chemoprophylaxis after joint arthroplasty and hip fracture surgery. In this clinical trial, our specific aim is to compare the post operative incidence of VTE between patients receiving aspirin and LMWH after pelvic/lower extremity orthopaedic oncology procedures.

Detailed description

Lower extremity orthopaedic surgery and malignancy are both known major risk factors for venous thromboembolism (VTE). Guidelines from high quality data exist with regards to VTE prophylaxis in patients undergoing orthopaedic surgery, particularly joint arthroplasty. Far fewer data are available regarding the efficacy of various methods of pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis in patients undergoing surgery for primary or metastatic musculoskeletal malignancies as malignancy itself is known to confer a hypercoagulable state. The existing data, including published data from our institution, are almost exclusively from retrospective studies. Given the limited external validity of existing guidelines and limitations inherent in applying data from retrospective studies, a randomized, prospective study comparing two of the most common methods of pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis would help to guide clinical care of this patient population. In addition, large dead spaces susceptible to hematoma formation are often created from tumor resections in orthopaedic oncology. Our retrospective data suggest that hematoma formation may be an independent predictor of infection. An important risk of chemical VTE prophylaxis is an increased incidence of bleeding into these dead spaces, leading to hematomas. This illustrates the complexity of selecting a method of VTE prophylaxis in patients at both high risk of VTE and hematoma formation and the need for high quality data to guide clinical decision-making in this patient population. The specific aim of this study is to compare the post operative incidence of symptomatic deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolus (PE) between patients who receive low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) versus aspirin for prophylaxis after having undergone pelvic or lower extremity orthopaedic oncology surgery (primary bone sarcomas, soft tissue sarcomas, and metastatic osseous disease). Our secondary aim is to compare the incidence of hematoma formation and wound complications between these methods of pharmacologic prophylaxis in the aforementioned patient population. Our hypothesis is that there is no significant difference in the incidence rate of symptomatic DVT/PE in patients administered LMWH versus aspirin for prophylaxis; however there may exist a difference in the rate of wound complications between these prophylaxis methods.

Interventions

Aspirin 325 mg by mouth once daily

Enoxaparin 40 mg subcutaneous injection once daily

Sponsors

Johns Hopkins University
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Missouri-Columbia
CollaboratorOTHER
Massachusetts General Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Three separate patient categories are being investigated in this trial. All patients are undergoing pelvic and/or lower extremity surgery for one of three possible conditions: 1) soft tissue sarcoma; 2) primary bone sarcoma; 3) metastatic bone disease. Within each of these groups, patients will be randomized to either aspirin or low molecular weight heparin (enoxaparin) for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis post operatively.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Patients will first be evaluated for inclusion in a master observational study with the following inclusion criteria: 1. Age ≥18 years 2. Prior or planned surgery on the pelvis or lower extremity 3. Fulfills one of the following: a. Cohort A: Metastatic osseous disease, undergoing: i. Endoprosthetic reconstruction ii. Curettage, cement packing, and fixation with nails, plates, and/or screws iii. Intramedullary nail fixation only b. Cohort B: Primary bone sarcoma, undergoing wide resection, amputation, or reconstruction with endoprosthesis, allograft, or allograft-prosthesis composite (APC). c. Cohort C: Primary soft tissue sarcoma ≥5 cm in diameter, undergoing wide resection 4. Anticoagulation therapy was received or is planned. In addition to fulfilling all the inclusion criteria in Part 1 of this study, participants must also not meet any of the below

Exclusion criteria

in order to be eligible for randomization to either aspirin or LMWH.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Venous thromboembolismUp to 3 or 6 months post operatively for bone/soft tissue sarcomas and metastatic osseous disease, respectivelyDeep venous thrombosis; pulmonary embolus

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Hematoma formationUp to 3 or 6 months post operatively for bone/soft tissue sarcomas and metastatic osseous disease, respectively
Complication requiring return to operating roomUp to 3 or 6 months post operatively for bone/soft tissue sarcomas and metastatic osseous disease, respectivelyReturn to operating room for any reason related to the original surgery
Early chemoprophylaxis stopUp to 4 weeks post operativelyASA or LMWH stopped prior to 4 weeks post operatively by surgeon for any reason
InfectionUp to 3 or 6 months post operatively for bone/soft tissue sarcomas and metastatic osseous disease, respectivelyInfection requiring any sort of treatment (antibiotics alone, return to operating room)

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026