Myopia
Conditions
Keywords
+3.00ADD, single vision spectacle
Brief summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of +3.00ADD vs single vision spectacle on the progression of myopia in children. Many studies applying bifocals or multifocal spectacles to intervene the progression have been carried out based on the idea that myopia was caused by excessive accommodation, however, the effect was limited. The possible reason is that bifocal or multifocal spectacles still not fully adjust the accommodative error in myopia children.
Detailed description
The optical intervention has been extensively explored for the intervention of myopia progression. Based on the theory that myopia was caused by the excessive accommodative, bifocal or multifocal spectacles for slowing the progression of myopia have been fully studied. Although some studies' results showed statistically significant for slowing myopia progression with multifocal spectacles, few had clinically meaningful, even in children with high accommodative lag or near-point esophoria. The investigators think that the possible reason for this clinical un-meaningful maybe that daily wearing bifocal or multifocal spectacles still not fully adjust the accommodative error in children. The aim of this randomized clinical trial is to evaluate myopic progression in children using two spectacles (single-vision spectacles for distant vision, and +3.00ADD spectacle for near vision), compared with control subjects wearing one spectacles (single-vision spectacles). Myopia progression quantified by changes in axial length (AL) and cycloplegic spherical equivalent refraction will be monitored for 3 years. The spectacles for intervention group children will be adjusted based on the cycloplegic spherical equivalent and the extent of accommodation lag for schedule time.
Interventions
DEVICEtwo spectacles
single-vision spectacles for distant vision, and +3.00ADD spectacle for near vision
DEVICEsingle vision spectacles
Wear single vision spectacle only
Sponsors
Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
8 Years to 12 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
1. Children who are aged 8 to 12 years (grade 3 and grade 4) from Huadu district of Guangzhou in China. 2. Refractive error meeting all the following, obtained by cycloplegic autorefraction: spherical equivalent -1.00 to -6.00D in both eyes, astigmatism ≤2.00 D in both eyes, and spherical equivalent anisometropia ≤1.50 D. 3. The best corrected visual acuity is ≥ 6/9.5 4. The parents are willing to provide consent to participation in the study, and the children are willing to wear the only provided spectacles
Exclusion criteria
1. Children who are allergy to tropicamide or topical anesthetic drugs. 2. Children who had other eye diseases that cause the visual impairment including strabismus, amblyopia, ocular surface related disease, cataract, traumas, ocular fundus diseases, and ocular surgery. 3. Children who were wearing rigid gas permeable contact lenses, progressive-addition lenses, bifocal spectacles lens, Peripheral defocus modifying contact lenses; 4. Children who are receiving visual function training.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| spherical equivalent refraction (SER) change | 3 years | SE was measured by autorefractometer with cycloplegic once a year at scheduled time |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| axial length | 3 years | Axial length is measured by IOMaster once a year at scheduled time |
| corneal curvature | 3 years | Corneal curvature is measured by IOMaster once a year at scheduled time |
| binocular vision | 3 years | the binocular vision was measured by an ophthalmologist every six month at scheduled time. |
Countries
China
Contacts
Primary ContactYuting LI, Master
Backup ContactQianyun Chen, Bachelor
Outcome results
None listed