Skip to content

Clinical Study Comparing PillCam® Crohn's Capsule Endoscopy to Ileocolonoscopy (IC) Plus MRE for Detection of Active CD in the Small Bowel and Colon in Subjects With Known CD and Mucosal Disease.

Multicenter, Prospective, Study Comparing PillCam® Crohn's Capsule Endoscopy (CE) to Ileocolonoscopy (IC) Plus MRE for Detection of Active Crohn's Disease (CD) in the Small Bowel and Colon in Subjects With Known CD and Mucosal Disease

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03241368
Acronym
BLINK
Enrollment
187
Registered
2017-08-07
Start date
2017-12-21
Completion date
2019-06-20
Last updated
2020-06-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Crohn Disease

Keywords

Irritable Bowel Disease, IBD, Mucosal Disease, Crohn's, Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Brief summary

This study will evaluate the efficacy of capsule endoscopy (CE) versus ileocolonoscopy (IC) plus MRE for detection of active Crohn's disease (CD) in the small bowel in subjects with known CD and mucosal disease. The primary objective of the study is to assess the accuracy of CE versus IC plus MRE for detecting active CD, by visualizing the small bowel and colon in subjects with known CD and mucosal disease. There will be assessment of mucosal disease activity at baseline. Patient satisfaction questionnaire will be completed at baseline.

Detailed description

This is a multicenter, prospective, study, evaluating the efficacy of CE versus IC plus MRE for detecting active Crohn's Disease (CD) in the small bowel and colon in subjects with known CD and mucosal disease. A screening visit will be performed within 30 days prior to baseline procedures to assess pre-procedure eligibility. At this visit the following assessments will be performed: Informed Consent, Inclusion/Exclusion Criteria, Demographics, Montreal Classification, Medical History, Previous GI procedures, Surgical history, Laboratory tests and pregnancy tests. At baseline, subjects with known CD on routine evaluation (e.g. history, physical exams, labs) and a recent history of mucosal disease (within the last 2 years and diagnosis based on radiologic, endoscopic, or histologic findings) OR subjects with known CD and active disease based on clinical judgment based on symptoms, laboratory data or other clinical information will undergo Magnetic Resonance Enterography (MRE), Capsule Endoscopy (CE) and Ileocolonoscopy (IC), to assess presence or absence of CD across the small and large bowel. Also, at baseline the following assessments will take place: Laboratory tests, Pregnancy test, Concomitant medications, Patient satisfaction questionnaire and Adverse Events (AE). Subjects will be exited from the study once all Baseline Procedures have been completed and AEs resolved. All CE videos, IC videos and MRE images will be evaluated by central readers. The planned number of subjects is 352. Subjects will be enrolled at up to 40 sites in the United States, Israel, and Austria. Study duration is expected to be up to approximately 1.5 years. The expected duration of each subject's participation is approximately 1 month.

Interventions

DEVICECapsule Endoscopy

At baseline subject will under the PillCam Crohn's Capsule Procedure

Sponsors

Medtronic - MITG
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Subject has provided informed consent. * Subject is ≥ 18 years of age * Subject is willing and able to comply with all aspects of treatment and evaluation schedule. * Subject has known CD and a recent history (within last 2 years) of mucosal disease (based on radiologic, endoscopic, or histologic evidence) OR known CD and active disease, based on clinical judgment based on symptoms, laboratory data or other clinical information.

Exclusion criteria

* Subject has indeterminate, ulcerative, antibiotic-associated colitis. * Subject has stool positive for ova and parasite and for Clostridium difficile toxins within 3 months prior to enrollment. * Subject with other known infectious cause of abdominal symptoms. * Subject with clinical evidence of renal disease with the past 6 months, defined as estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) outside the normal reference range. * Subject with known history of intestinal obstruction or current obstructive symptoms, such as severe abdominal pain with accompanying nausea or vomiting, based on investigator judgment. * Subject with a diagnosis of gastroparesis or small bowel or large bowel dysmotility. * Subject with suspected or known bowel obstruction, stricture (defined as unequivocal proximal upstream dilation equal ≥ 2.5 cm), or fistula. * Subject has used non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs including aspirin, two times per week, during the 4 weeks preceding enrollment. Low dose aspirin regimens (≤ 100 mg daily) are acceptable and not exclusionary. * Subject suffers from any condition, such as swallowing problems, that precludes compliance with study and/or device instructions. * Subject with cardiac pacemaker or other implanted electromedical device. * Subject has an allergy or other known contraindication to the medications used in the study. * Subject is pregnant (documented by a positive pregnancy test) or is actively breast-feeding. * Subject is considered to be a part of a vulnerable population (eg. prisoners or those without sufficient mental capacity). * Subject has a known contraindication to MRE or IC. * Subject has participated in a drug or device research study within 30 days of enrollment that may interfere with the subject's safety or ability to participate in the study. * Subject has any medical condition that would make it unsafe for them to participate, per Investigator's discretion * Subject with ileostomy or colostomy, history of total or subtotal colectomy (including those with ileosigmoidostomy, and ileorectostomy)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Accuracy of CE Versus IC Plus MRE for Detecting Active Crohn's Disease (CD), by Visualizing the Small Bowel and Colon in Subjects With Know CD and Mucosal Disease.BaselineCentral readers will be used to read all videos/images and analyses will be based on these results. A consensus panel will be used if there are discrepancies in results between modalities at baseline. Capsule endoscopy and IC results will be read by gastroenterologists and MRE results will be read by radiologists. Scores used will be Lewis Score, Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn's Disease Index (SES-CD) Score and Magnetic Resonance Index of Activity (MaRIA) Score

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Specificity, Negative Predictive Value, and Positive Predictive Value for Active CD in the Small Bowel and Colon by CE as Compared to IC Plus MRE.BaselineCentral readers will be used to read all videos/images and analyses will be based on these results. A consensus panel will be used if there are discrepancies in results between modalities at baseline. Capsule endoscopy and IC results will be read by gastroenterologists and MRE results will be read by radiologists. Scores used will be Lewis Score, Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn's Disease Index (SES-CD) Score and Magnetic Resonance Index of Activity (MaRIA) Score
Sensitivity, Specificity, Negative Predictive Value and Positive Predictive Value for Active CD in Designated Bowel Segments (Proximal Small Bowel Terminal Ileum, and Colon) by Capsule Endoscopy as Compared to IC Plus MREBaselineCentral readers will be used to read all videos/images and analyses will be based on these results. A consensus panel will be used if there are discrepancies in results between modalities at baseline. Capsule endoscopy and IC results will be read by gastroenterologists and MRE results will be read by radiologists. Scores used will be Lewis Score, Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn's Disease Index (SES-CD) Score and Magnetic Resonance Index of Activity (MaRIA) Score
Patient SatisfactionAfter completion of final procedure, either the same day or by the next business day following procedure completion.Patient preference of which procedure they preferred (CE, IC or MRE plus IC)

Countries

Austria, Israel, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

187 subjects signed consent. Per the protocol, a subject was not considered enrolled until consent was signed and subject met inclusion/exclusion criteria. Of the 187 who signed consent, 158 were considered enrolled per the protocol. 29 were screen failures, i.e. they signed informed consent, but ended up failing inclusion/exclusion.

Pre-assignment details

Of the 187 subjects who signed informed consent, 29 failed inclusion/exclusion criteria and were exited from the study. Criteria included labs, which caused some subjects to wash out at this early phase. This left us with 158 subjects. For various reasons, 39 additional subjects were exited prior to all imaging procedures being completed.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
MRE, Patency Capsule (if Needed), CE, and IC
Subjects will undergo MRE, patency capsule (if necessary), CE, and IC procedures. If MRE shows evidence of a stricture, subject must undergo a Patency procedure prior to CE. If patency cannot be confirmed through MRE or patency capsule will be discontinued from the study. Subjects will perform bowel preparation and follow a detailed dietary regimen for CE and IC procedures. Between 45 and 75 minutes after final PEG ingestion, subject will swallow the PillCam Crohn's Capsule. Adequate boosts will be administered, as necessary. Subjects will be allowed to leave clinic after 'Alert 2' is received and if capsule is not yet excreted. Subjects leaving prior to excretion will be instructed to disconnect the recorder at excretion or battery failure (whichever is first). After CE procedure (either same or following day), subject will undergo IC. If the IC is done the following day, subject will stay on clear liquid diet (or NPO, per physician's discretion for sedation).
99
Total99

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up1
Overall StudyMRE Stricture or Patency Capsule Failure25
Overall StudyPhysician Decision6
Overall StudyProtocol Violation1
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject6

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicMRE, Patency Capsule (if Needed), CE, and IC
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
3 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
96 Participants
BMI28.82 kg/m²
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.36
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected— Participants
Region of Enrollment
Austria
2 participants
Region of Enrollment
Israel
2 participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
95 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
63 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
36 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 119
other
Total, other adverse events
11 / 119
serious
Total, serious adverse events
7 / 119

Outcome results

Primary

Accuracy of CE Versus IC Plus MRE for Detecting Active Crohn's Disease (CD), by Visualizing the Small Bowel and Colon in Subjects With Know CD and Mucosal Disease.

Central readers will be used to read all videos/images and analyses will be based on these results. A consensus panel will be used if there are discrepancies in results between modalities at baseline. Capsule endoscopy and IC results will be read by gastroenterologists and MRE results will be read by radiologists. Scores used will be Lewis Score, Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn's Disease Index (SES-CD) Score and Magnetic Resonance Index of Activity (MaRIA) Score

Time frame: Baseline

Population: Per-protocol analysis set, includes subjects who underwent MRE, CE, and IC (and could be evaluated for CD activity) who had no major deviations (violations that may have significant impact on outcomes) and did not meet following criteria:~* Subject withdraws~* Capsule remained in stomach or small bowel for entire procedure~* Technical failure

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
MRE, Patency Capsule (if Needed), CE, and ICAccuracy of CE Versus IC Plus MRE for Detecting Active Crohn's Disease (CD), by Visualizing the Small Bowel and Colon in Subjects With Know CD and Mucosal Disease.Sensitivity CE Overall94 percentage of participants
MRE, Patency Capsule (if Needed), CE, and ICAccuracy of CE Versus IC Plus MRE for Detecting Active Crohn's Disease (CD), by Visualizing the Small Bowel and Colon in Subjects With Know CD and Mucosal Disease.Sensitivity MRE + IC Overall100 percentage of participants
MRE, Patency Capsule (if Needed), CE, and ICAccuracy of CE Versus IC Plus MRE for Detecting Active Crohn's Disease (CD), by Visualizing the Small Bowel and Colon in Subjects With Know CD and Mucosal Disease.Specificity CE Overall74 percentage of participants
MRE, Patency Capsule (if Needed), CE, and ICAccuracy of CE Versus IC Plus MRE for Detecting Active Crohn's Disease (CD), by Visualizing the Small Bowel and Colon in Subjects With Know CD and Mucosal Disease.Specificity MRE + IC Overall22 percentage of participants
Comparison: This was a 1-arm, non-powered study. Sensitivity, Specificity, Positive Predictive Value (PPV) and Negative Predictive Value (NPV) was estimated for each treatment group, along with the 95% confidence interval. The difference between treatment groups in Sensitivity and Specificity was compared.p-value: 0.125McNemar
Secondary

Patient Satisfaction

Patient preference of which procedure they preferred (CE, IC or MRE plus IC)

Time frame: After completion of final procedure, either the same day or by the next business day following procedure completion.

Population: Subjects who completed the satisfaction questionnaire and underwent all 3 procedures MRE, CE, and IC and could be evaluated for overall active CD at baseline (i.e., a modified intent-to-treat (mITT).~population).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
MRE, Patency Capsule (if Needed), CE, and ICPatient SatisfactionPreferred PillCam CE64 Participants
MRE, Patency Capsule (if Needed), CE, and ICPatient SatisfactionPreferred IC43 Participants
MRE, Patency Capsule (if Needed), CE, and ICPatient SatisfactionPreferred MRE + IC11 Participants
Secondary

Sensitivity, Specificity, Negative Predictive Value and Positive Predictive Value for Active CD in Designated Bowel Segments (Proximal Small Bowel Terminal Ileum, and Colon) by Capsule Endoscopy as Compared to IC Plus MRE

Central readers will be used to read all videos/images and analyses will be based on these results. A consensus panel will be used if there are discrepancies in results between modalities at baseline. Capsule endoscopy and IC results will be read by gastroenterologists and MRE results will be read by radiologists. Scores used will be Lewis Score, Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn's Disease Index (SES-CD) Score and Magnetic Resonance Index of Activity (MaRIA) Score

Time frame: Baseline

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
MRE, Patency Capsule (if Needed), CE, and ICSensitivity, Specificity, Negative Predictive Value and Positive Predictive Value for Active CD in Designated Bowel Segments (Proximal Small Bowel Terminal Ileum, and Colon) by Capsule Endoscopy as Compared to IC Plus MRESensitivity CE Proximal Small Bowel (PSB)97 percentage of participants
MRE, Patency Capsule (if Needed), CE, and ICSensitivity, Specificity, Negative Predictive Value and Positive Predictive Value for Active CD in Designated Bowel Segments (Proximal Small Bowel Terminal Ileum, and Colon) by Capsule Endoscopy as Compared to IC Plus MRESensitivity MRE PSB71 percentage of participants
MRE, Patency Capsule (if Needed), CE, and ICSensitivity, Specificity, Negative Predictive Value and Positive Predictive Value for Active CD in Designated Bowel Segments (Proximal Small Bowel Terminal Ileum, and Colon) by Capsule Endoscopy as Compared to IC Plus MRESpecificity CE PSB87 percentage of participants
MRE, Patency Capsule (if Needed), CE, and ICSensitivity, Specificity, Negative Predictive Value and Positive Predictive Value for Active CD in Designated Bowel Segments (Proximal Small Bowel Terminal Ileum, and Colon) by Capsule Endoscopy as Compared to IC Plus MRESpecificity MRE PSB66 percentage of participants
MRE, Patency Capsule (if Needed), CE, and ICSensitivity, Specificity, Negative Predictive Value and Positive Predictive Value for Active CD in Designated Bowel Segments (Proximal Small Bowel Terminal Ileum, and Colon) by Capsule Endoscopy as Compared to IC Plus MRENPV CE PSB98 percentage of participants
MRE, Patency Capsule (if Needed), CE, and ICSensitivity, Specificity, Negative Predictive Value and Positive Predictive Value for Active CD in Designated Bowel Segments (Proximal Small Bowel Terminal Ileum, and Colon) by Capsule Endoscopy as Compared to IC Plus MRENPV MRE PSB83 percentage of participants
MRE, Patency Capsule (if Needed), CE, and ICSensitivity, Specificity, Negative Predictive Value and Positive Predictive Value for Active CD in Designated Bowel Segments (Proximal Small Bowel Terminal Ileum, and Colon) by Capsule Endoscopy as Compared to IC Plus MREPPV CE PSB77 percentage of participants
MRE, Patency Capsule (if Needed), CE, and ICSensitivity, Specificity, Negative Predictive Value and Positive Predictive Value for Active CD in Designated Bowel Segments (Proximal Small Bowel Terminal Ileum, and Colon) by Capsule Endoscopy as Compared to IC Plus MREPPV MRE PSB49 percentage of participants
MRE, Patency Capsule (if Needed), CE, and ICSensitivity, Specificity, Negative Predictive Value and Positive Predictive Value for Active CD in Designated Bowel Segments (Proximal Small Bowel Terminal Ileum, and Colon) by Capsule Endoscopy as Compared to IC Plus MRESensitivity CE Terminal ilium (TI)94 percentage of participants
MRE, Patency Capsule (if Needed), CE, and ICSensitivity, Specificity, Negative Predictive Value and Positive Predictive Value for Active CD in Designated Bowel Segments (Proximal Small Bowel Terminal Ileum, and Colon) by Capsule Endoscopy as Compared to IC Plus MRESensitivity MRE + IC TI98 percentage of participants
MRE, Patency Capsule (if Needed), CE, and ICSensitivity, Specificity, Negative Predictive Value and Positive Predictive Value for Active CD in Designated Bowel Segments (Proximal Small Bowel Terminal Ileum, and Colon) by Capsule Endoscopy as Compared to IC Plus MRESpecificity CE TI82 percentage of participants
MRE, Patency Capsule (if Needed), CE, and ICSensitivity, Specificity, Negative Predictive Value and Positive Predictive Value for Active CD in Designated Bowel Segments (Proximal Small Bowel Terminal Ileum, and Colon) by Capsule Endoscopy as Compared to IC Plus MRESpecificity MRE + IC TI37 percentage of participants
MRE, Patency Capsule (if Needed), CE, and ICSensitivity, Specificity, Negative Predictive Value and Positive Predictive Value for Active CD in Designated Bowel Segments (Proximal Small Bowel Terminal Ileum, and Colon) by Capsule Endoscopy as Compared to IC Plus MRENPV CE TI91 percentage of participants
MRE, Patency Capsule (if Needed), CE, and ICSensitivity, Specificity, Negative Predictive Value and Positive Predictive Value for Active CD in Designated Bowel Segments (Proximal Small Bowel Terminal Ileum, and Colon) by Capsule Endoscopy as Compared to IC Plus MRENPV MRE + IC TI93 percentage of participants
MRE, Patency Capsule (if Needed), CE, and ICSensitivity, Specificity, Negative Predictive Value and Positive Predictive Value for Active CD in Designated Bowel Segments (Proximal Small Bowel Terminal Ileum, and Colon) by Capsule Endoscopy as Compared to IC Plus MREPPV CE TI88 percentage of participants
MRE, Patency Capsule (if Needed), CE, and ICSensitivity, Specificity, Negative Predictive Value and Positive Predictive Value for Active CD in Designated Bowel Segments (Proximal Small Bowel Terminal Ileum, and Colon) by Capsule Endoscopy as Compared to IC Plus MREPPV MRE + IC TI68 percentage of participants
MRE, Patency Capsule (if Needed), CE, and ICSensitivity, Specificity, Negative Predictive Value and Positive Predictive Value for Active CD in Designated Bowel Segments (Proximal Small Bowel Terminal Ileum, and Colon) by Capsule Endoscopy as Compared to IC Plus MRESensitivity CE Colon83 percentage of participants
MRE, Patency Capsule (if Needed), CE, and ICSensitivity, Specificity, Negative Predictive Value and Positive Predictive Value for Active CD in Designated Bowel Segments (Proximal Small Bowel Terminal Ileum, and Colon) by Capsule Endoscopy as Compared to IC Plus MRESensitivity IC Colon91 percentage of participants
MRE, Patency Capsule (if Needed), CE, and ICSensitivity, Specificity, Negative Predictive Value and Positive Predictive Value for Active CD in Designated Bowel Segments (Proximal Small Bowel Terminal Ileum, and Colon) by Capsule Endoscopy as Compared to IC Plus MRESpecificity CE Colon88 percentage of participants
MRE, Patency Capsule (if Needed), CE, and ICSensitivity, Specificity, Negative Predictive Value and Positive Predictive Value for Active CD in Designated Bowel Segments (Proximal Small Bowel Terminal Ileum, and Colon) by Capsule Endoscopy as Compared to IC Plus MRESpecificity IC Colon89 percentage of participants
MRE, Patency Capsule (if Needed), CE, and ICSensitivity, Specificity, Negative Predictive Value and Positive Predictive Value for Active CD in Designated Bowel Segments (Proximal Small Bowel Terminal Ileum, and Colon) by Capsule Endoscopy as Compared to IC Plus MRENPV CE Colon93 percentage of participants
MRE, Patency Capsule (if Needed), CE, and ICSensitivity, Specificity, Negative Predictive Value and Positive Predictive Value for Active CD in Designated Bowel Segments (Proximal Small Bowel Terminal Ileum, and Colon) by Capsule Endoscopy as Compared to IC Plus MRENPV IC Colon97 percentage of participants
MRE, Patency Capsule (if Needed), CE, and ICSensitivity, Specificity, Negative Predictive Value and Positive Predictive Value for Active CD in Designated Bowel Segments (Proximal Small Bowel Terminal Ileum, and Colon) by Capsule Endoscopy as Compared to IC Plus MREPPV CE Colon70 percentage of participants
MRE, Patency Capsule (if Needed), CE, and ICSensitivity, Specificity, Negative Predictive Value and Positive Predictive Value for Active CD in Designated Bowel Segments (Proximal Small Bowel Terminal Ileum, and Colon) by Capsule Endoscopy as Compared to IC Plus MREPPV IC Colon75 percentage of participants
Secondary

Specificity, Negative Predictive Value, and Positive Predictive Value for Active CD in the Small Bowel and Colon by CE as Compared to IC Plus MRE.

Central readers will be used to read all videos/images and analyses will be based on these results. A consensus panel will be used if there are discrepancies in results between modalities at baseline. Capsule endoscopy and IC results will be read by gastroenterologists and MRE results will be read by radiologists. Scores used will be Lewis Score, Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn's Disease Index (SES-CD) Score and Magnetic Resonance Index of Activity (MaRIA) Score

Time frame: Baseline

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
MRE, Patency Capsule (if Needed), CE, and ICSpecificity, Negative Predictive Value, and Positive Predictive Value for Active CD in the Small Bowel and Colon by CE as Compared to IC Plus MRE.Specificity74 percentage of participants
MRE, Patency Capsule (if Needed), CE, and ICSpecificity, Negative Predictive Value, and Positive Predictive Value for Active CD in the Small Bowel and Colon by CE as Compared to IC Plus MRE.Negative Predictive Value (NPV)83 percentage of participants
MRE, Patency Capsule (if Needed), CE, and ICSpecificity, Negative Predictive Value, and Positive Predictive Value for Active CD in the Small Bowel and Colon by CE as Compared to IC Plus MRE.Positive Predictive Value (PPV)91 percentage of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 18, 2026