Skip to content

Examining Effects of Spinal Fusion on Outcomes Following Total Hip Replacement

Examining Effects of Spinal Arthrodesis on Outcomes Following Total Hip Arthroplasty

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03240484
Enrollment
160
Registered
2017-08-07
Start date
2017-05-15
Completion date
2021-06-01
Last updated
2020-03-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Spinal Fusion, Total Hip Replacement

Brief summary

The purpose of the study is to explore the long term functional status of people who have had both a spinal fusion procedure and a total hip replacement.

Detailed description

The purpose of the study is to explore the long term functional status of people who have had both a spinal fusion procedure and a total hip replacement. Studies have found that those who have received spinal fusion may have worse outcomes following a total hip replacement than those who have not received a spinal fusion. The information obtained from this study will allow surgeons and researchers to better understand why some who've had a spine fusion have more complications post total hip replacement compared to those who did not have spinal fusion surgery.

Interventions

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTX-Ray Imaging

X-Ray imaging in the following positions: Lateral standing, lateral seated, standard standing AP pelvis and AP pelvis lying down.

OTHERGait Analysis

Certain patients may be asked to participate in a motion analysis procedure at the Human Movement Laboratory at the University of Ottawa. This procedure takes approximately 1.5 hours and you will only be asked to participate in the motion analysis procedure once. Participants will change into a custom-designed tight body suit, which has reflective markers on its surface for infrared video capture. Participants will then have pairs of surface electromyography (EMG) electrodes placed on certain areas of the skin on the legs and on the back. Wearing the EMG electrodes and marker suit, participants will perform 5 trials of walking on a level walkway, walking up and down a 3-step staircase, sitting from a standing position, and standing from a seated position.

Sponsors

Ottawa Hospital Research Institute
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_CONTROL
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Willing to come to the Civic Campus for a surgical follow-up visit * Speaks English and/or French * Group 1 patients must have had a spine fusion (SF) and total hip arthroplasty (THA) * Group 2 patients must have had a total hip replacement (THA) and no history of spine fusion (SF) * Group 3 patients must have had a spine fusion (SF) and no history of total hip arthroplasty (THA)

Exclusion criteria

* Patient does not meet all 'inclusion' criteria * Patient is unable to answer questionnaires * Unable to get x-rays for other medical reasons * Severe dementia

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Implant positioning6months or greater post-operativeRadiographic assessment (x-ray cup orientation measurements)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Hip dysfunction and osteoarthritis outcome score (HOOS)6months or greater post-operativeDisease-specific quality of life measure
Oxford Hip Score6months or greater post-operativeDisease-specific quality of life measure
SF-12 Questionnaire6months or greater post-operativePatient-reported overall quality of life measure
Oswestry low back disability questionnaire6months or greater post-operativeAssessment of low back pain

Countries

Canada

Contacts

Primary ContactMeaghan Dufresne
meadufresne@ohri.ca613-737-8899
Backup ContactResearch Manager
jdobransky@ohri.ca613-737-8920

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026