Skip to content

Multicultural Healthy Diet to Reduce Cognitive Decline

Multicultural Healthy Diet to Reduce Cognitive Decline & Alzheimer's Disease Risk

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03240406
Acronym
MHD
Enrollment
393
Registered
2017-08-07
Start date
2018-10-02
Completion date
2023-08-30
Last updated
2024-12-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cognitive Change, Cognitive Decline, Diet Modification

Brief summary

This is a pilot randomized controlled clinical trial is designed to investigate whether the Multicultural Healthy Diet (MHD), an anti-Inflammatory diet tailored to a multi-cultural population, can improve cognitive functioning in a middle aged (40-65 yr) urban population in Bronx, New York compared to a usual diet.

Detailed description

The Multicultural Healthy Diet (MHD) is a pilot randomized controlled clinical trial designed to test the effects of an 18 month intervention on cognitive function among 290 middle-aged individuals (40-65 yr). MHD is an anti-inflammatory diet tailored to a multicultural population. The emphasis of the intervention is on plant-based foods and limited animal and high saturated fat foods with focus on anti-inflammatory foods/food components specific to the cultural context of the participants. The trial will employ a parallel group design comparing the effects of the dietary intervention (MHD) on cognitive status to those of the control diet or usual diet plus modules on self-care matters such as dealing with aches and pains of aging, obtaining a health care proxy ,etc. To show that MHD can be adapted to this population serum biomarkers indicative of the MHD diet pattern such as fatty acid profile as well as other key nutrition biomarkers will be evaluated. Other aims include testing whether the MHD intervention can benefit cognitive function using real-time ambulatory assessments. The investigators will also assess plasma and serum markers of inflammation. Components of the MHD diet that are associated with stable or improved measures of cognition will also be evaluated. The clinical site for the proposed study is at the Albert Einstein College of Medicine; the ambulatory cognitive assessment reading center is at Pennsylvania State University, State College; the statistical core is at the Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute and the laboratory for biospecimen analysis is at the University of Minnesota.

Interventions

OTHERMulticultural Healthy Diet

An anti-inflammatory dietary pattern consists of a dietary pattern that has high anti-inflammatory potential

OTHERUsual Diet plus Self-Care

Usual diet plus sessions that focus on self-care such as dealing with aches and pains of aging.

Sponsors

Penn State University
CollaboratorOTHER
Kaiser Permanente
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Minnesota
CollaboratorOTHER
National Institute on Aging (NIA)
CollaboratorNIH
National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS)
CollaboratorNIH
Albert Einstein College of Medicine
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

The research clinician who assesses cognitive status needs to be blinded to assignment.

Intervention model description

This is a pilot randomized clinical trial to the effects of an anti-inflammatory diet on cognition in a middle-aged cohort. The comparison arm will receive information on self-care matters such as aches and pains of aging.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
40 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* living, working, attending school or visiting Co-op City, Bronx (e.g. for shopping, doctors' visits, etc.) or communities neighboring Co-op City and between 40-65 yr of age * willingness to accept assignment to intervention or comparison diet group * willingness to participate in a study where weight loss is not a primary goal

Exclusion criteria

* cognitively impaired * history of traumatic brain injury * psychiatric illness * history of diabetes and experiencing hypoglycemia * liver disease * uncontrolled hypertension as defined as blood pressure \> 140/90 mm Hg * history of cardiovascular disease that affects physical functioning * severe chronic illness * low literacy * history of alcohol or drug dependence * hematologic disease or malignancy not in remission for more than 5 years * visual, auditory, or motor impairment that precludes cognitive testing. * chronic kidney disease on dialysis or special diet

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Mean Global Composite Cognition Score From BaselineBaseline (Burst 1) and 9 months (Burst 2)Change in global composite cognition score (standardized unit) is computed as the average of the three domain-specific Z-scores of the participant's performance on three ambulatory cognitive assessments: visuospatial working memory (Dot Grid Memory), processing speed (Symbol Search), and short-term associative memory binding (Color Shapes Task) at 9 months post baseline (Burst 1). Z-scores are centered at a population mean of 0 (i.e., a Z-score of 0 signifies that the data point(s) is equal to the population mean at study baseline for all three tasks in the composite average; positive Z-score group values indicate the number of standard deviations the data point(s) is above the mean and negative Z-score group values indicate the number of standard deviations the data point(s) is below the mean). Mean change in global composite Z-score from baseline will be reported by study arm. Increase in composite Z-scores from baseline are associated with improved cognition.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Energy-Adjusted DII ScoreBaseline (Burst 1) and 9 months (Burst 2)Energy-adjusted DII score was determined by an algorithm that summarized the inflammatory potential of the diet. This score represents a weighted sum of self-reported quantities of 28 foods per 1000 kilocalories of consumption that were then translated into Z-scores using a global comparative database of data from 11 countries by subtracting from the individual's self-report value the mean of the global database, then dividing by the SD. Z-scores are centered at a population mean of 0 (i.e., a Z-score of 0 signifies that the data point is = to the population mean at study baseline for all 3 tasks in the composite average; positive and negative Z-score group values indicate the number of SD the data point is above or below the mean, respectively). For this study, possible scoring range for 28 food parameters was -8 to 8 based on ref: Hebert JR, et.al., Perspective: The Dietary Inflammatory Index (DII®): Adv Nutr. 2019;10:185-95. Higher values are indicative of a more inflammatory diet.
Total Serum Folate LevelsBaseline (Burst 1) and 9 months (Burst 2)Blood sera specimens were collected and processed at Baseline and 9-months post-intervention and shipped to University of Minnesota Advanced Research & Diagnostic Laboratory (ARDL) for total folate analysis by a validated serum folate assay. Mean total folate levels are summarized by study arm and reported in nmol/L. The lower limit of detection (LLOD) for mean total folate is 4.54 nmol/L and the upper limit of detection (ULOD) 90.8 nmol/L. Increase in this biomarker from baseline for MHD participants indicates possible adherence to an MHD dietary pattern such as eating more green leafy vegetables.
α-Tocopherol LevelsBaseline (Burst 1) and 9 months (Burst 2)Blood plasma specimens were collected and processed at Baseline and 9-months post-intervention and shipped to University of Minnesota ARDL for α-tocopherol analysis by an HPLC method. α-Tocopherols were measured with a diode array detector equipped HPLC system. Mean α-tocopherol levels are summarized by study arm and reported in mcg/mL. There are no reference ranges for this biomarker from this laboratory (other than non-negative values). Increase in this biomarker from baseline for MHD participants indicates possible adherence to an MHD dietary pattern.
α-Carotenoid LevelsBaseline (Burst 1) and 9 months (Burst 2)Blood plasma specimens were collected and processed at Baseline and 9-months post-intervention from a sub-sample and shipped to University of Minnesota ARDL lab for α-carotenoid analysis by an HPLC method. α-Carotenoids were measured with a diode array detector equipped HPLC system. Mean α-carotenoid levels are summarized by study arm and reported in mcg/mL. There are no reference ranges for this biomarker (other than non-negative values). Increase in this biomarker from baseline for MHD participants indicates possible adherence to an MHD dietary pattern.
Vitamin B12 LevelsBaseline (Burst 1) and 9 months (Burst 2)Blood sera specimens were collected and processed at Baseline and 9-months post-intervention and shipped to University of Minnesota ARDL laboratory for Vitamin B12 analysis by a validated Vitamin B12 assay. Mean Vitamin B12 levels are summarized by study arm and reported in pg/mL. Reference ranges for this biomarker are: 232-1245 pg/mL and LLOD is 100 pg/mL. Increase in this biomarker from baseline for MHD participants indicates possible adherence to an MHD dietary pattern.
Fatty Acid ProfileBaseline (Burst 1) and 9 months (Burst 2)Blood plasma specimens were collected and processed at Baseline and 9-months follow-up for a sub-sample and shipped to University of Minnesota ARDL laboratory for total fatty acid analysis by a gas chromatography method. Fatty acids are expressed as a percent of total fatty acids. Fatty acids are compared with each sample rather than measured against a standard and the range of percentage values for each fatty acid is 0-100%. Mean percentage plasma levels of the following fatty acids will be summarized by study arm for Burst 2: Sum of monounsaturated fatty acids (n=6); Long chain saturated fatty acids (fatty acids with 20 or more carbons (n=3)); EPA (eicosapentaenoic acid); DHA (docosahexaenoic acid); n3 DPA (omega three docosapentaenoic acid). Monounsaturated fat is a composite of 6 fatty acids: 16:1n7 cis, 17:1n7T, 18:1n9 cis,18:1n7 cis, 20:1n9, and 24:1n9 Long chain saturated fat is a composite of 3 fatty acids: 22:0, 23:0, and 24:0
Serum SodiumBaseline (Burst 1) and 9 months (Burst 2)Serum specimens were collected and processed at Baseline and 9-months follow-up and shipped to University of Minnesota ARDL laboratory for analysis on Roche Cobas 8000 Chemistry Analyzer. Mean serum sodium levels are summarized by study arm and reported in mmol/L. Reference range is 136-145 mmol/L and the lower LOD is 80 mmol/L. Decreased serum sodium levels from baseline may indicate dehydration.
Self-reported Diet Components and Food Groups: Total MoistureBaseline (Burst 1) and 9 months (Burst 2)Total Moisture obtained from the participants' diet was derived as a parameter of the self-reported diet components and food groups from the 2018 and 2020 versions of the Automated Self-reported Self-administered 24 hour food records (ASA24-2018 and ASA24-2020) at baseline and 9 month follow-up. Total moisture from diet was captured by the MOIS variable field within the ASA24. This field is quantified in grams (g) of water. Possible results values are limited to values \> 0 (i.e., positive values). Basic descriptive statistics were used to summarize data by arm.ASA-2018 and 2020
Self-reported Diet Components and Food Groups: EnergyBaseline (Burst 1) and 9 months (Burst 2)Energy obtained from the participants' diet was derived as a parameter of the self-reported diet components and food groups from the 2018 and 2020 versions of the Automated Self-reported Self-administered 24 hour food records (ASA24-2018 and ASA24-2020) at baseline and 9 month follow-up. Total energy from diet was captured by the KCAL variable field within the ASA24. This field represents kilocalories (kcal) of energy. Possible results values are to values \> 500kcal. Basic descriptive statistics were used to summarize data by arm.
Self-reported Diet Components and Food Groups: ProteinBaseline (Burst 1) and 9 months (Burst 2)Protein obtained from the participants' diet was derived as a parameter of the self-reported diet components and food groups from the 2018 and 2020 versions of the Automated Self-reported Self-administered 24 hour food records (ASA24-2018 and ASA24-2020) at baseline and 9 month follow-up. Protein from the diet was captured by the PROT variable field within the ASA24. This field represents grams (g) of protein consumed. Possible results values are limited to non-negative values. Basic descriptive statistics were used to summarize data by arm.
Self-reported Diet Components and Food Groups: Total Intact Fruits + Fruit JuicesBaseline (Burst 1) and 9 months (Burst 2)Total Intact fruits and fruit juices obtained from the participants' diet was derived as a parameter of the self-reported diet components and food groups from the 2018 and 2020 versions of the Automated Self-reported Self-administered 24 hour food records (ASA24-2018 and ASA24-2020) at baseline and 9 month follow-up. Total Intact fruit and fruit juice consumption from the diet was captured by the F\_TOTAL variable field within the ASA24. This field represents total fruit consumption in cup equivalents (cup eq). Possible results values are limited to non-negative values. Basic descriptive statistics were used to summarize data by arm.
Self-reported Diet Components and Food Groups: Dark Green VegetablesBaseline (Burst 1) and 9 months (Burst 2)Dark Green Vegetables obtained from the participants' diet was derived as a parameter of the self-reported diet components and food groups from the 2018 and 2020 versions of the Automated Self-reported Self-administered 24 hour food records (ASA24-2018 and ASA24-2020) at baseline and 9 month follow-up. Dark green vegetable consumption from the diet was captured by the V\_DRKGR variable field within the ASA24. This field represents dark green vegetable consumption in cup equivalents (cup eq). Possible results values are limited to non-negative values. Basic descriptive statistics were used to summarize data by arm.
Self-reported Diet Components and Food Groups: Total FatsBaseline (Burst 1) and 9 months (Burst 2)Total fats obtained from the participants' diet was derived as a parameter of the self-reported diet components and food groups from the 2018 and 2020 versions of the Automated Self-reported Self-administered 24 hour food records (ASA24-2018 and ASA24-2020) at baseline and 9 month follow-up. Total fats from the diet, which consisted of total saturated fatty acids, total monounsaturated fatty acids, and total polyunsaturated fatty acids, was captured by the TFAT variable field within the ASA24. This field represents grams (g) of total fats consumed. Possible results values are limited to non-negative values. Basic descriptive statistics were used to summarize data by arm.
Self-reported Diet Components and Food Groups: Solid FatsBaseline (Burst 1) and 9 months (Burst 2)Solid fats obtained from the participants' diet was derived as a parameter of the self-reported diet components and food groups from the 2018 and 2020 versions of the Automated Self-reported Self-administered 24 hour food records (ASA24-2018 and ASA24-2020) at baseline and 9 month follow-up. Solid fats from the diet was captured by the DISCFAT\_SOL variable field within the ASA24. This field represents grams (g) of solid fats consumed. Possible results values are limited to non-negative values. Basic descriptive statistics were used to summarize data by arm.
Self-reported Diet Components and Food Groups: CarbohydratesBaseline (Burst 1) and 9 months (Burst 2)Carbohydrates obtained from the participants' diet was derived as a parameter of the self-reported diet components and food groups from the 2018 and 2020 versions of the Automated Self-reported Self-administered 24 hour food records (ASA24-2018 and ASA24-2020) at baseline and 9 month follow-up. Carbohydrates from the diet was captured by the CARB variable field within the ASA24. This field represents grams (g) of carbohydrates consumed. Possible results values are limited to non-negative values. Basic descriptive statistics were used to summarize data by arm.
Self-reported Diet Components and Food Groups: Total Folate From FoodBaseline (Burst 1) and 9 months (Burst 2)Total Folate from food obtained from the participants' diet was derived as a parameter of the self-reported diet components and food groups from the 2018 and 2020 versions of the Automated Self-reported Self-administered 24 hour food records (ASA24-2018 and ASA24-2020) at baseline and 9 month follow-up. Total Folate from food was captured by the FF variable field within the ASA24. This field represents micrograms (mcg) of total folate from food consumed. Possible results values are limited to non-negative values. Basic descriptive statistics were used to summarize data by arm.
Self-reported Diet Components and Food Groups: Non-food FolateBaseline (Burst 1) and 9 months (Burst 2)Non-food Folate obtained from the participants' diet was derived as a parameter of the self-reported diet components and food groups from the 2018 and 2020 versions of the Automated Self-reported Self-administered 24 hour food records (ASA24-2018 and ASA24-2020) at baseline and 9 month follow-up. Non-food Folate was captured by the FDFE variable field within the ASA24. This field represents micrograms (mcg) of Non-food Folate consumed. Possible results values are limited to non-negative values. Basic descriptive statistics were used to summarize data by arm.
Self-reported Diet Components and Food Groups: Vitamin B-12Baseline (Burst 1) and 9 months (Burst 2)Vitamin B-12 obtained from the participants' diet was derived as a parameter of the self-reported diet components and food groups from the 2018 and 2020 versions of the Automated Self-reported Self-administered 24 hour food records (ASA24-2018 and ASA24-2020) at baseline and 9 month follow-up. Vitamin B-12 was captured by the VB12 variable field within the ASA24. This field represents micrograms (mcg) of Vitamin B-12 consumed (including supplemental sources). Possible results values are limited to non-negative values. Basic descriptive statistics were used to summarize data by arm.
Self-reported Diet Components and Food Groups: Alpha CaroteneBaseline (Burst 1) and 9 months (Burst 2)Alpha Carotene obtained from the participants' diet was derived as a parameter of the self-reported diet components and food groups from the 2018 and 2020 versions of the Automated Self-reported Self-administered 24 hour food records (ASA24-2018 and ASA24-2020) at baseline and 9 month follow-up. Alpha Carotene from the diet was captured by the ACAR variable field within the ASA24. This field represents micrograms (mcg) of Alpha Carotene consumed. Possible results values are limited to non-negative values. Basic descriptive statistics were used to summarize data by arm.
Self-reported Diet Components and Food Groups: Beta CaroteneBaseline (Burst 1) and 9 months (Burst 2)Beta Carotene obtained from the participants' diet was derived as a parameter of the self-reported diet components and food groups from the 2018 and 2020 versions of the Automated Self-reported Self-administered 24 hour food records (ASA24-2018 and ASA24-2020) at baseline and 9 month follow-up. Beta Carotene from the diet was captured by the BCAR variable field within the ASA24. This field represents micrograms (mcg) of Beta Carotene consumed. Possible results values are limited to non-negative values. Basic descriptive statistics were used to summarize data by arm.
Self-reported Diet Components and Food Groups: RetinolBaseline (Burst 1) and 9 months (Burst 2)Retinol obtained from the participants' diet was derived as a parameter of the self-reported diet components and food groups from the 2018 and 2020 versions of the Automated Self-reported Self-administered 24 hour food records (ASA24-2018 and ASA24-2020) at baseline and 9 month follow-up. Retinol from the diet was captured by the RET variable field within the ASA24. This field represents micrograms (mcg) of Retinol consumed. Possible results values are limited to non-negative values. Basic descriptive statistics were used to summarize data by arm.
Self-reported Diet Components and Food Groups: Beta CryptoxanthinBaseline (Burst 1) and 9 months (Burst 2)Beta Cryptoxanthin obtained from the participants' diet was derived as a parameter of the self-reported diet components and food groups from the 2018 and 2020 versions of the Automated Self-reported Self-administered 24 hour food records (ASA24-2018 and ASA24-2020) at baseline and 9 month follow-up. Beta Cryptoxanthin from the diet was captured by the CRYP variable field within the ASA24. This field represents micrograms (mcg) of Beta Cryptoxanthin consumed. Possible results values are limited to non-negative values. Basic descriptive statistics were used to summarize data by arm.
Self-reported Diet Components and Food Groups: LycopeneBaseline (Burst 1) and 9 months (Burst 2)Lycopene obtained from the participants' diet was derived as a parameter of the self-reported diet components and food groups from the 2018 and 2020 versions of the Automated Self-reported Self-administered 24 hour food records (ASA24-2018 and ASA24-2020) at baseline and 9 month follow-up. Lycopene from the diet was captured by the LYCO variable field within the ASA24. This field represents micrograms (mcg) of Lycopene consumed. Possible results values are limited to non-negative values. Basic descriptive statistics were used to summarize data by arm.
Self-reported Diet Components and Food Groups: Lutein + ZeaxanthinBaseline (Burst 1) and 9 months (Burst 2)Lutein + Zeaxanthin obtained from the participants' diet was derived as a parameter of the self-reported diet components and food groups from the 2018 and 2020 versions of the Automated Self-reported Self-administered 24 hour food records (ASA24-2018 and ASA24-2020) at baseline and 9 month follow-up. Lutein + Zeaxanthin from the diet was captured by the LZ variable field within the ASA24. This field represents micrograms (mcg) of Lutein + Zeaxanthin consumed. Possible results values are limited to non-negative values. Basic descriptive statistics were used to summarize data by arm.
Self-reported Diet Components and Food Groups: Alpha Tocopherol (Vitamin E)Baseline (Burst 1) and 9 months (Burst 2)Alpha Tocopherol (Vitamin E) obtained from the participants' diet was derived as a parameter of the self-reported diet components and food groups from the 2018 and 2020 versions of the Automated Self-reported Self-administered 24 hour food records (ASA24-2018 and ASA24-2020) at baseline and 9 month follow-up. Alpha Tocopherol from the diet was captured by the ATOC variable field within the ASA24. This field represents micrograms (mg) of Alpha Tocopherol consumed (including from supplemental sources). Possible results values are limited to non-negative values. Basic descriptive statistics were used to summarize data by arm.
Self-reported Diet Components and Food Groups: Seafood High in n-3 Fatty AcidsBaseline (Burst 1) and 9 months (Burst 2)Seafood high in n-3 fatty acids obtained from the participants' diet was derived as a parameter of the self-reported diet components and food groups from the 2018 and 2020 versions of the Automated Self-reported Self-administered 24 hour food records (ASA24-2018 and ASA24-2020) at baseline and 9 month follow-up. Seafood high in n-3 fatty acids from the diet was captured by the M\_FISH\_HI variable field within the ASA24. This field represents ounce equivalents (oz eq) of Seafood high in n-3 fatty acids consumed. Possible results values are limited to non-negative values. Basic descriptive statistics were used to summarize data by arm.
Self-reported Diet Components and Food Groups: EPA (P205)Baseline (Burst 1) and 9 months (Burst 2)EPA (P205) obtained from the participants' diet was derived as a parameter of the self-reported diet components and food groups from the 2018 and 2020 versions of the Automated Self-reported Self-administered 24 hour food records (ASA24-2018 and ASA24-2020) at baseline and 9 month follow-up. EPA (P205) from the diet was captured by the P205 variable field within the ASA24. This field represents grams (g) of EPA (P205) consumed. Possible results values are limited to non-negative values. Basic descriptive statistics were used to summarize data by arm.
Self-reported Diet Components and Food Groups: DHA (P226)Baseline (Burst 1) and 9 months (Burst 2)DHA (P226) obtained from the participants' diet was derived as a parameter of the self-reported diet components and food groups from the 2018 and 2020 versions of the Automated Self-reported Self-administered 24 hour food records (ASA24-2018 and ASA24-2020) at baseline and 9 month follow-up. DHA (P226) from the diet was captured by the P226 variable field within the ASA24. This field represents grams (g) of DHA (P226) consumed. Possible results values are limited to non-negative values. Basic descriptive statistics were used to summarize data by arm.
Self-reported Diet Components and Food Groups: DPA (P225)Baseline (Burst 1) and 9 months (Burst 2)DPA (P225) obtained from the participants' diet was derived as a parameter of the self-reported diet components and food groups from the 2018 and 2020 versions of the Automated Self-reported Self-administered 24 hour food records (ASA24-2018 and ASA24-2020) at baseline and 9 month follow-up. DPA (P225) from the diet was captured by the P225 variable field within the ASA24. This field represents grams (g) of DPA (P225) consumed. Possible results values are limited to non-negative values. Basic descriptive statistics were used to summarize data by arm.
Self-reported Diet Components and Food Groups: Beans and Peas (Legumes)Baseline (Burst 1) and 9 months (Burst 2)Beans and peas (Legumes) consumed as part of participants' diet was derived as a parameter of the self-reported diet components and food groups from the 2018 and 2020 versions of the Automated Self-reported Self-administered 24 hour food records (ASA24-2018 and ASA24-2020) at baseline and 9 month follow-up. Legumes information from the diet was captured by the V\_LEGUMES variable field within the ASA24. This field represents cup equivalents (cup eq) of legumes consumed. Possible results values are limited to non-negative values. Basic descriptive statistics were used to summarize data by arm.
Self-reported Diet Components and Food Groups: Whole GrainsBaseline (Burst 1) and 9 months (Burst 2)Whole grains consumed as part of participants' diet was derived as a parameter of the self-reported diet components and food groups from the 2018 and 2020 versions of the Automated Self-reported Self-administered 24 hour food records (ASA24-2018 and ASA24-2020) at baseline and 9 month follow-up. Whole grains information from the diet was captured by the G\_WHOLE variable field within the ASA24. This field represents ounce equivalents (oz eq) of whole grains consumed. Possible results values are limited to non-negative values. Basic descriptive statistics were used to summarize data by arm.
Self-reported Diet Components and Food Groups: Cured MeatsBaseline (Burst 1) and 9 months (Burst 2)Cured meats consumed as part of participants' diet was derived as a parameter of the self-reported diet components and food groups from the 2018 and 2020 versions of the Automated Self-reported Self-administered 24 hour food records (ASA24-2018 and ASA24-2020) at baseline and 9 month follow-up. Cured meats information from the diet was captured by the PF\_CUREDMEAT variable field within the ASA24. This field represents ounce equivalents (oz eq) of cured meats consumed. Possible results values are limited to non-negative values. Basic descriptive statistics were used to summarize data by arm.
Self-reported Diet Components and Food Groups: PoultryBaseline (Burst 1) and 9 months (Burst 2)Poultry consumed as part of participants' diet was derived as a parameter of the self-reported diet components and food groups from the 2018 and 2020 versions of the Automated Self-reported Self-administered 24 hour food records (ASA24-2018 and ASA24-2020) at baseline and 9 month follow-up. Poultry information from the diet was captured by the PF\_POULT variable field within the ASA24. This field represents ounce equivalents (oz eq) of poultry consumed. Possible results values are limited to non-negative values. Basic descriptive statistics were used to summarize data by arm.
Self-reported Diet Components and Food Groups: Nuts and SeedsBaseline (Burst 1) and 9 months (Burst 2)Nuts and seeds consumed as part of participants' diet was derived as a parameter of the self-reported diet components and food groups from the 2018 and 2020 versions of the Automated Self-reported Self-administered 24 hour food records (ASA24-2018 and ASA24-2020) at baseline and 9 month follow-up. Nuts and seeds information from the diet was captured by the PF\_NUTSDS variable field within the ASA24. This field represents ounce equivalents (oz eq) of nuts and seeds consumed. Possible results values are limited to non-negative values. Basic descriptive statistics were used to summarize data by arm.
Dietary Inflammatory Index (DII) ScoreBaseline (Burst 1) and 9 months (Burst 2)DII score was determined by an algorithm that summarized the inflammatory potential of the diet. The DII score represents a weighted sum of the self-reported quantities of 28 foods, each translated into Z-scores using a global comparative database consisting of data from 11 countries by subtracting from the individual's self-report value the mean of the global database, then dividing by the standard deviation (SD). Z-scores are centered at a population mean of 0 (i.e., a Z-score of 0 signifies that the data point(s) is = to the population mean at study baseline for all 3 tasks in the composite average; positive and negative Z-score group values indicate the number of SD the data point(s) is above or below the mean, respectively). For this study, possible scoring range for 28 food parameters was -8 to 8 based on ref: Hebert JR, et.al., Perspective: The Dietary Inflammatory Index (DII®): Adv Nutr. 2019;10:185-95. Higher Z-score values are indicative of a more pro-inflammatory diet.
Self-reported Diet Components and Food Groups: Added SugarsBaseline (Burst 1) and 9 months (Burst 2)Added sugars consumed as part of participants' diet was derived as a parameter of the self-reported diet components and food groups from the 2018 and 2020 versions of the Automated Self-reported Self-administered 24 hour food records (ASA24-2018 and ASA24-2020) at baseline and 9 month follow-up. Added sugars information from the diet was captured by the ADD\_SUGARS variable field within the ASA24. This field represents tablespoon equivalents (tsp eq) of added sugars consumed. Possible results values are limited to non-negative values. Basic descriptive statistics were used to summarize data by arm.
Symbol Search Task PerformanceBaseline (Burst 1), and 9 months (Burst 2), 18 months (Burst 3), and 27 months (Burst 4) post-interventionSymbol Search Task Performance is an ambulatory cognitive assessment of processing speed/attention. The task is administered 5 times daily throughout each 7-day measurement Burst (Baseline, 9 months, 18 months, 27 months). Mean response time in milliseconds (ms) for accurate trials will be determined and reported. Possible values ranges for Symbol Search Task Performance are \>0 ms (i.e., positive values). Lower Symbol Search Task Performance values in mean response time are indicative of improvement in cognitive processing.
Grid Memory Task PerformanceBaseline (Burst 1), and 9 months (Burst 2), 18 months (Burst 3), and 27 months (Burst 4) post-interventionGrid Memory Task Performance is an ambulatory cognitive assessment of visuospatial working memory. The task is administered 5 times daily throughout each 7-day measurement Burst (Baseline, 9 months, 18 months, 27 months). The mean error distance (pixel Euclidean distance, represented in pixels) of the red dots between study and recall arrays will be quantified and reported based on the completion of 4 trials. Possible value ranges for pixels are \>0 (i.e., positive values). Lower pixel values are indicative of improved short-term recall and visuospatial working memory.
Color Shapes Task PerformanceBaseline (Burst 1), and 9 months (Burst 2), 18 months (Burst 3), and 27 months (Burst 4) post-interventionColor Shapes Task Performance is an ambulatory cognitive assessment of short-term associative visual memory. The task is administered 5 times daily throughout each 7-day measurement Burst. The task had 2 conditions, signal present and signal absent. Hit rate represents the proportion of trials where participants correctly responded that signal was present. False alarm rate represents the proportion of trials where a signal was absent where participants incorrectly responded that a signal was present. Corrected Recognition Score represents the overall sensitivity to the signal and is calculated by subtracting the False alarm rate from the Hit rate and is summarized by study arm as described in Hakun, et.al., (2024). Mobile Monitoring of Cognitive Change (M2C2): High-Frequency Assessments and Protocol Reporting Guidelines. Possible ranges for Corrected Recognition Score are -1 to 1. Higher Corrected Recognition Rate values are indicative of better short term associative memory-binding.
Self-reported Diet Components and Food Groups: CheesesBaseline (Burst 1) and 9 months (Burst 2)Cheeses consumed as part of participants' diet was derived as a parameter of the self-reported diet components and food groups from the 2018 and 2020 versions of the Automated Self-reported Self-administered 24 hour food records (ASA24-2018 and ASA24-2020) at baseline and 9 month follow-up. Cheese information from the diet was captured by the D\_CHEESE variable field within the ASA24. This field represents cup equivalents (cup eq) of cheeses consumed. Possible results values are limited to non-negative values. Basic descriptive statistics were used to summarize data by arm.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

During the Covid-19 pandemic, collection of biospecimens and anthropometry data in-person was halted from 3/12/2020 to 7/16/2020; screening visits were administered via Zoom instead of in-person. Group and telephone sessions related to intervention and comparison activities continued via Zoom and telephone during this hiatus and until the end of the study. Recruitment slowed during the pandemic and follow-up was extended to allow all participants to meet their primary endpoint milestone

Pre-assignment details

Of 393 enrolled patients, 290 met eligibility criteria for randomization and were randomized into the study. For this study, Burst time intervals are as follows: Baseline (Burst 1), 9 months (Burst 2), 18 months (Burst 3), and 27 months (Burst 4) post-baseline Completion of this study was defined as the first of the following: the completion of all activities through: 1. Burst 4 (27 months post-baseline) OR 2. August 30, 2023.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Anti-inflammatory Dietary Intervention (MHD Arm)
18 month intervention of dietary counseling to adhere to the Multicultural Healthy Diet or the anti-inflammatory diet, Multicultural Healthy Diet: An anti-inflammatory dietary pattern consists of a dietary pattern that has high anti-inflammatory potential
144
Usual Diet Plus Self-Care (Comparison Arm)
18 month intervention of usual diet plus self-care modules Usual Diet plus Self-Care: Usual diet plus sessions that focus on self-care such as dealing with aches and pains of aging.
146
Total290

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAnti-inflammatory Dietary Intervention (MHD Arm)TotalUsual Diet Plus Self-Care (Comparison Arm)
Age, Continuous53.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.2
53.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.1
54.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
60 Participants118 Participants58 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
84 Participants172 Participants88 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
3 Participants4 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
4 Participants7 Participants3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
63 Participants130 Participants67 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
28 Participants61 Participants33 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
2 Participants4 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
10 Participants18 Participants8 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
34 Participants66 Participants32 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
144 participants290 participants146 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
115 Participants230 Participants115 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
29 Participants60 Participants31 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 1440 / 146
other
Total, other adverse events
73 / 14471 / 146
serious
Total, serious adverse events
9 / 14410 / 146

Outcome results

Primary

Change in Mean Global Composite Cognition Score From Baseline

Change in global composite cognition score (standardized unit) is computed as the average of the three domain-specific Z-scores of the participant's performance on three ambulatory cognitive assessments: visuospatial working memory (Dot Grid Memory), processing speed (Symbol Search), and short-term associative memory binding (Color Shapes Task) at 9 months post baseline (Burst 1). Z-scores are centered at a population mean of 0 (i.e., a Z-score of 0 signifies that the data point(s) is equal to the population mean at study baseline for all three tasks in the composite average; positive Z-score group values indicate the number of standard deviations the data point(s) is above the mean and negative Z-score group values indicate the number of standard deviations the data point(s) is below the mean). Mean change in global composite Z-score from baseline will be reported by study arm. Increase in composite Z-scores from baseline are associated with improved cognition.

Time frame: Baseline (Burst 1) and 9 months (Burst 2)

Population: Participants completing at least 18 sessions for the primary three domains at Bursts 1 or 2 were analyzed. Missing and non-compliant data were multiply imputed using multivariate imputation by chained equations (MICE).

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Anti-inflammatory Dietary Intervention (MHD Arm)Change in Mean Global Composite Cognition Score From Baseline0.2 Z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.8
Usual Diet Plus Self-Care (Comparison Arm)Change in Mean Global Composite Cognition Score From Baseline0.2 Z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.8
p-value: 0.25995% CI: [-0.15, 0.04]ANCOVA
Secondary

Color Shapes Task Performance

Color Shapes Task Performance is an ambulatory cognitive assessment of short-term associative visual memory. The task is administered 5 times daily throughout each 7-day measurement Burst. The task had 2 conditions, signal present and signal absent. Hit rate represents the proportion of trials where participants correctly responded that signal was present. False alarm rate represents the proportion of trials where a signal was absent where participants incorrectly responded that a signal was present. Corrected Recognition Score represents the overall sensitivity to the signal and is calculated by subtracting the False alarm rate from the Hit rate and is summarized by study arm as described in Hakun, et.al., (2024). Mobile Monitoring of Cognitive Change (M2C2): High-Frequency Assessments and Protocol Reporting Guidelines. Possible ranges for Corrected Recognition Score are -1 to 1. Higher Corrected Recognition Rate values are indicative of better short term associative memory-binding.

Time frame: Baseline (Burst 1), and 9 months (Burst 2), 18 months (Burst 3), and 27 months (Burst 4) post-intervention

Population: Missing data: MHD, Burst 1, (N=4); MHD, Burst 2 (N=29); MHD, Burst 3 (N=24); MHD, Burst 4 (N=20). Comparison, Burst 1 (N=0); Comparison, Burst 2 (N=31); Comparison, Burst 3 (N=34); Comparison, Burst 4 (N=15).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Anti-inflammatory Dietary Intervention (MHD Arm)Color Shapes Task PerformanceBurst 3 (18 months)0.6 Corrected Recognition ScoreStandard Deviation 0.2
Anti-inflammatory Dietary Intervention (MHD Arm)Color Shapes Task PerformanceBurst 2 (9 months)0.6 Corrected Recognition ScoreStandard Deviation 0.2
Anti-inflammatory Dietary Intervention (MHD Arm)Color Shapes Task PerformanceBurst 4 (27 months)0.7 Corrected Recognition ScoreStandard Deviation 0.2
Anti-inflammatory Dietary Intervention (MHD Arm)Color Shapes Task PerformanceBurst 1 (Baseline)0.6 Corrected Recognition ScoreStandard Deviation 0.2
Usual Diet Plus Self-Care (Comparison Arm)Color Shapes Task PerformanceBurst 4 (27 months)0.7 Corrected Recognition ScoreStandard Deviation 0.2
Usual Diet Plus Self-Care (Comparison Arm)Color Shapes Task PerformanceBurst 2 (9 months)0.6 Corrected Recognition ScoreStandard Deviation 0.2
Usual Diet Plus Self-Care (Comparison Arm)Color Shapes Task PerformanceBurst 3 (18 months)0.6 Corrected Recognition ScoreStandard Deviation 0.2
Usual Diet Plus Self-Care (Comparison Arm)Color Shapes Task PerformanceBurst 1 (Baseline)0.6 Corrected Recognition ScoreStandard Deviation 0.2
p-value: 0.84695% CI: [-0.09, 0.054]Generalized Estimating Equation
Secondary

Dietary Inflammatory Index (DII) Score

DII score was determined by an algorithm that summarized the inflammatory potential of the diet. The DII score represents a weighted sum of the self-reported quantities of 28 foods, each translated into Z-scores using a global comparative database consisting of data from 11 countries by subtracting from the individual's self-report value the mean of the global database, then dividing by the standard deviation (SD). Z-scores are centered at a population mean of 0 (i.e., a Z-score of 0 signifies that the data point(s) is = to the population mean at study baseline for all 3 tasks in the composite average; positive and negative Z-score group values indicate the number of SD the data point(s) is above or below the mean, respectively). For this study, possible scoring range for 28 food parameters was -8 to 8 based on ref: Hebert JR, et.al., Perspective: The Dietary Inflammatory Index (DII®): Adv Nutr. 2019;10:185-95. Higher Z-score values are indicative of a more pro-inflammatory diet.

Time frame: Baseline (Burst 1) and 9 months (Burst 2)

Population: Missing data: MHD, Burst 1 (N=1); MHD, Burst 2 (N=19). Comparison, Burst 1 (N=0); Comparison, Burst 2 (N=22).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Anti-inflammatory Dietary Intervention (MHD Arm)Dietary Inflammatory Index (DII) ScoreBurst 1 (Baseline)1.10 Z-scoreStandard Deviation 1.85
Anti-inflammatory Dietary Intervention (MHD Arm)Dietary Inflammatory Index (DII) ScoreBurst 2 (9 Months)0.70 Z-scoreStandard Deviation 2.01
Usual Diet Plus Self-Care (Comparison Arm)Dietary Inflammatory Index (DII) ScoreBurst 1 (Baseline)1.17 Z-scoreStandard Deviation 1.83
Usual Diet Plus Self-Care (Comparison Arm)Dietary Inflammatory Index (DII) ScoreBurst 2 (9 Months)1.38 Z-scoreStandard Deviation 1.76
p-value: 0.00195% CI: [-1.02, -0.27]ANCOVA
Secondary

Energy-Adjusted DII Score

Energy-adjusted DII score was determined by an algorithm that summarized the inflammatory potential of the diet. This score represents a weighted sum of self-reported quantities of 28 foods per 1000 kilocalories of consumption that were then translated into Z-scores using a global comparative database of data from 11 countries by subtracting from the individual's self-report value the mean of the global database, then dividing by the SD. Z-scores are centered at a population mean of 0 (i.e., a Z-score of 0 signifies that the data point is = to the population mean at study baseline for all 3 tasks in the composite average; positive and negative Z-score group values indicate the number of SD the data point is above or below the mean, respectively). For this study, possible scoring range for 28 food parameters was -8 to 8 based on ref: Hebert JR, et.al., Perspective: The Dietary Inflammatory Index (DII®): Adv Nutr. 2019;10:185-95. Higher values are indicative of a more inflammatory diet.

Time frame: Baseline (Burst 1) and 9 months (Burst 2)

Population: Missing data: MHD, Burst 1 (N=1); MHD, Burst 2 (N=19). Comparison, Burst 1 (N=0); Comparison, Burst 2 (N=22).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Anti-inflammatory Dietary Intervention (MHD Arm)Energy-Adjusted DII ScoreBurst 1 (Baseline)-0.30 Z-scoreStandard Deviation 1.96
Anti-inflammatory Dietary Intervention (MHD Arm)Energy-Adjusted DII ScoreBurst 2 (9 Months)-0.98 Z-scoreStandard Deviation 2.16
Usual Diet Plus Self-Care (Comparison Arm)Energy-Adjusted DII ScoreBurst 1 (Baseline)-0.30 Z-scoreStandard Deviation 2.03
Usual Diet Plus Self-Care (Comparison Arm)Energy-Adjusted DII ScoreBurst 2 (9 Months)-0.09 Z-scoreStandard Deviation 2.03
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-1.34, -0.54]ANCOVA
Secondary

Fatty Acid Profile

Blood plasma specimens were collected and processed at Baseline and 9-months follow-up for a sub-sample and shipped to University of Minnesota ARDL laboratory for total fatty acid analysis by a gas chromatography method. Fatty acids are expressed as a percent of total fatty acids. Fatty acids are compared with each sample rather than measured against a standard and the range of percentage values for each fatty acid is 0-100%. Mean percentage plasma levels of the following fatty acids will be summarized by study arm for Burst 2: Sum of monounsaturated fatty acids (n=6); Long chain saturated fatty acids (fatty acids with 20 or more carbons (n=3)); EPA (eicosapentaenoic acid); DHA (docosahexaenoic acid); n3 DPA (omega three docosapentaenoic acid). Monounsaturated fat is a composite of 6 fatty acids: 16:1n7 cis, 17:1n7T, 18:1n9 cis,18:1n7 cis, 20:1n9, and 24:1n9 Long chain saturated fat is a composite of 3 fatty acids: 22:0, 23:0, and 24:0

Time frame: Baseline (Burst 1) and 9 months (Burst 2)

Population: Missing data: MHD, Burst 1, (N=61); MHD, Burst 2 (N=52). Comparison, Burst 1 (N=61); Comparison, Burst 2 (N=52). For the Fatty Acid Profile Outcome Measure only a subset of samples were analyzed due to cost.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Anti-inflammatory Dietary Intervention (MHD Arm)Fatty Acid ProfileMonounsaturated Fat at Burst 1 (Baseline)10.76 % of total fatty acidStandard Deviation 1.3
Anti-inflammatory Dietary Intervention (MHD Arm)Fatty Acid ProfileMonounsaturated Fat at Burst 2 (9 Months)10.91 % of total fatty acidStandard Deviation 1.44
Anti-inflammatory Dietary Intervention (MHD Arm)Fatty Acid ProfileLong-chain Saturated Fat at Burst 1 (Baseline)2.14 % of total fatty acidStandard Deviation 0.38
Anti-inflammatory Dietary Intervention (MHD Arm)Fatty Acid ProfileLong-chain Saturated Fat at Burst 2 (9 Months)2.15 % of total fatty acidStandard Deviation 0.41
Anti-inflammatory Dietary Intervention (MHD Arm)Fatty Acid ProfileEPA at Burst 1 (Baseline)0.98 % of total fatty acidStandard Deviation 1.24
Anti-inflammatory Dietary Intervention (MHD Arm)Fatty Acid ProfileEPA at Burst 2 (9 Months)1.01 % of total fatty acidStandard Deviation 0.9
Anti-inflammatory Dietary Intervention (MHD Arm)Fatty Acid ProfileDHA at Burst 1 (Baseline)3.67 % of total fatty acidStandard Deviation 1.09
Anti-inflammatory Dietary Intervention (MHD Arm)Fatty Acid ProfileDHA at Burst 2 (9 Months)3.77 % of total fatty acidStandard Deviation 1.41
Anti-inflammatory Dietary Intervention (MHD Arm)Fatty Acid Profilen3 DPA at Burst 1 (Baseline)1.10 % of total fatty acidStandard Deviation 0.18
Anti-inflammatory Dietary Intervention (MHD Arm)Fatty Acid Profilen3 DPA at Burst 2 (9 Months)1.07 % of total fatty acidStandard Deviation 0.17
Usual Diet Plus Self-Care (Comparison Arm)Fatty Acid ProfileDHA at Burst 2 (9 Months)3.48 % of total fatty acidStandard Deviation 1.05
Usual Diet Plus Self-Care (Comparison Arm)Fatty Acid ProfileMonounsaturated Fat at Burst 1 (Baseline)11.09 % of total fatty acidStandard Deviation 1.67
Usual Diet Plus Self-Care (Comparison Arm)Fatty Acid ProfileEPA at Burst 2 (9 Months)0.85 % of total fatty acidStandard Deviation 0.44
Usual Diet Plus Self-Care (Comparison Arm)Fatty Acid ProfileMonounsaturated Fat at Burst 2 (9 Months)10.96 % of total fatty acidStandard Deviation 1.58
Usual Diet Plus Self-Care (Comparison Arm)Fatty Acid Profilen3 DPA at Burst 2 (9 Months)1.07 % of total fatty acidStandard Deviation 0.18
Usual Diet Plus Self-Care (Comparison Arm)Fatty Acid ProfileLong-chain Saturated Fat at Burst 1 (Baseline)2.12 % of total fatty acidStandard Deviation 0.45
Usual Diet Plus Self-Care (Comparison Arm)Fatty Acid ProfileDHA at Burst 1 (Baseline)3.65 % of total fatty acidStandard Deviation 1.3
Usual Diet Plus Self-Care (Comparison Arm)Fatty Acid ProfileLong-chain Saturated Fat at Burst 2 (9 Months)2.23 % of total fatty acidStandard Deviation 0.42
Usual Diet Plus Self-Care (Comparison Arm)Fatty Acid Profilen3 DPA at Burst 1 (Baseline)1.09 % of total fatty acidStandard Deviation 0.21
Usual Diet Plus Self-Care (Comparison Arm)Fatty Acid ProfileEPA at Burst 1 (Baseline)0.90 % of total fatty acidStandard Deviation 0.45
Comparison: Statistical Analysis results for DHAp-value: 0.03995% CI: [0.01, 0.53]ANCOVA
Comparison: Statistical Analysis results for n3 DPAp-value: 0.61995% CI: [-0.06, 0.03]ANCOVA
Comparison: Statistical Analysis results for Monounsaturated Fatp-value: 0.39595% CI: [-0.2, 0.51]ANCOVA
Comparison: Statistical Analysis results for Long Chain Saturated Fatp-value: 0.01995% CI: [-0.21, -0.02]ANCOVA
Comparison: Statistical Analysis results for EPAp-value: 0.20195% CI: [-0.07, 0.31]ANCOVA
Secondary

Grid Memory Task Performance

Grid Memory Task Performance is an ambulatory cognitive assessment of visuospatial working memory. The task is administered 5 times daily throughout each 7-day measurement Burst (Baseline, 9 months, 18 months, 27 months). The mean error distance (pixel Euclidean distance, represented in pixels) of the red dots between study and recall arrays will be quantified and reported based on the completion of 4 trials. Possible value ranges for pixels are \>0 (i.e., positive values). Lower pixel values are indicative of improved short-term recall and visuospatial working memory.

Time frame: Baseline (Burst 1), and 9 months (Burst 2), 18 months (Burst 3), and 27 months (Burst 4) post-intervention

Population: Missing data: MHD, Burst 1, (N=4); MHD, Burst 2 (N=29); MHD, Burst 3 (N=24); MHD, Burst 4 (N=20). Comparison, Burst 1 (N=0); Comparison, Burst 2 (N=31); Comparison, Burst 3 (N=34); Comparison, Burst 4 (N=15).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Anti-inflammatory Dietary Intervention (MHD Arm)Grid Memory Task PerformanceBurst 1 (Baseline)34.0 pixelsStandard Deviation 15.6
Anti-inflammatory Dietary Intervention (MHD Arm)Grid Memory Task PerformanceBurst 2 (9 months)29.0 pixelsStandard Deviation 14.7
Anti-inflammatory Dietary Intervention (MHD Arm)Grid Memory Task PerformanceBurst 3 (18 months)26.8 pixelsStandard Deviation 15.5
Anti-inflammatory Dietary Intervention (MHD Arm)Grid Memory Task PerformanceBurst 4 (27 months)25.6 pixelsStandard Deviation 15.7
Usual Diet Plus Self-Care (Comparison Arm)Grid Memory Task PerformanceBurst 4 (27 months)27.4 pixelsStandard Deviation 16.3
Usual Diet Plus Self-Care (Comparison Arm)Grid Memory Task PerformanceBurst 1 (Baseline)35.2 pixelsStandard Deviation 15.3
Usual Diet Plus Self-Care (Comparison Arm)Grid Memory Task PerformanceBurst 3 (18 months)31.6 pixelsStandard Deviation 15.8
Usual Diet Plus Self-Care (Comparison Arm)Grid Memory Task PerformanceBurst 2 (9 months)30.4 pixelsStandard Deviation 15.4
p-value: 0.5595% CI: [-0.27, 0.51]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Self-reported Diet Components and Food Groups: Added Sugars

Added sugars consumed as part of participants' diet was derived as a parameter of the self-reported diet components and food groups from the 2018 and 2020 versions of the Automated Self-reported Self-administered 24 hour food records (ASA24-2018 and ASA24-2020) at baseline and 9 month follow-up. Added sugars information from the diet was captured by the ADD\_SUGARS variable field within the ASA24. This field represents tablespoon equivalents (tsp eq) of added sugars consumed. Possible results values are limited to non-negative values. Basic descriptive statistics were used to summarize data by arm.

Time frame: Baseline (Burst 1) and 9 months (Burst 2)

Population: Missing data: MHD, Burst 1, (N=1); MHD, Burst 2 (N=19). Comparison, Burst 1 (N=0); Comparison, Burst 2 (N=22).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Anti-inflammatory Dietary Intervention (MHD Arm)Self-reported Diet Components and Food Groups: Added SugarsBurst 1 (Baseline)10.06 tsp eqStandard Deviation 7.57
Anti-inflammatory Dietary Intervention (MHD Arm)Self-reported Diet Components and Food Groups: Added SugarsBurst 2 (9 Months)7.91 tsp eqStandard Deviation 6.02
Usual Diet Plus Self-Care (Comparison Arm)Self-reported Diet Components and Food Groups: Added SugarsBurst 1 (Baseline)9.91 tsp eqStandard Deviation 6.79
Usual Diet Plus Self-Care (Comparison Arm)Self-reported Diet Components and Food Groups: Added SugarsBurst 2 (9 Months)9.31 tsp eqStandard Deviation 6.89
p-value: 0.04295% CI: [-2.81, -0.06]ANCOVA
Secondary

Self-reported Diet Components and Food Groups: Alpha Carotene

Alpha Carotene obtained from the participants' diet was derived as a parameter of the self-reported diet components and food groups from the 2018 and 2020 versions of the Automated Self-reported Self-administered 24 hour food records (ASA24-2018 and ASA24-2020) at baseline and 9 month follow-up. Alpha Carotene from the diet was captured by the ACAR variable field within the ASA24. This field represents micrograms (mcg) of Alpha Carotene consumed. Possible results values are limited to non-negative values. Basic descriptive statistics were used to summarize data by arm.

Time frame: Baseline (Burst 1) and 9 months (Burst 2)

Population: Missing data: MHD, Burst 1, (N=1); MHD, Burst 2 (N=19). Comparison, Burst 1 (N=0); Comparison, Burst 2 (N=22).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Anti-inflammatory Dietary Intervention (MHD Arm)Self-reported Diet Components and Food Groups: Alpha CaroteneBurst 1 (Baseline)568.66 mcgStandard Deviation 900.88
Anti-inflammatory Dietary Intervention (MHD Arm)Self-reported Diet Components and Food Groups: Alpha CaroteneBurst 2 (9 Months)586.56 mcgStandard Deviation 858.46
Usual Diet Plus Self-Care (Comparison Arm)Self-reported Diet Components and Food Groups: Alpha CaroteneBurst 1 (Baseline)448.66 mcgStandard Deviation 676.44
Usual Diet Plus Self-Care (Comparison Arm)Self-reported Diet Components and Food Groups: Alpha CaroteneBurst 2 (9 Months)392.19 mcgStandard Deviation 626.37
p-value: 0.19195% CI: [-58.62, 295.76]ANCOVA
Secondary

Self-reported Diet Components and Food Groups: Alpha Tocopherol (Vitamin E)

Alpha Tocopherol (Vitamin E) obtained from the participants' diet was derived as a parameter of the self-reported diet components and food groups from the 2018 and 2020 versions of the Automated Self-reported Self-administered 24 hour food records (ASA24-2018 and ASA24-2020) at baseline and 9 month follow-up. Alpha Tocopherol from the diet was captured by the ATOC variable field within the ASA24. This field represents micrograms (mg) of Alpha Tocopherol consumed (including from supplemental sources). Possible results values are limited to non-negative values. Basic descriptive statistics were used to summarize data by arm.

Time frame: Baseline (Burst 1) and 9 months (Burst 2)

Population: Missing data: MHD, Burst 1, (N=1); MHD, Burst 2 (N=19). Comparison, Burst 1 (N=0); Comparison, Burst 2 (N=22).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Anti-inflammatory Dietary Intervention (MHD Arm)Self-reported Diet Components and Food Groups: Alpha Tocopherol (Vitamin E)Burst 1 (Baseline)7.48 mgStandard Deviation 3.07
Anti-inflammatory Dietary Intervention (MHD Arm)Self-reported Diet Components and Food Groups: Alpha Tocopherol (Vitamin E)Burst 2 (9 Months)8.69 mgStandard Deviation 5.34
Usual Diet Plus Self-Care (Comparison Arm)Self-reported Diet Components and Food Groups: Alpha Tocopherol (Vitamin E)Burst 1 (Baseline)7.59 mgStandard Deviation 3.87
Usual Diet Plus Self-Care (Comparison Arm)Self-reported Diet Components and Food Groups: Alpha Tocopherol (Vitamin E)Burst 2 (9 Months)7.34 mgStandard Deviation 3.41
p-value: 0.01195% CI: [0.32, 2.35]ANCOVA
Secondary

Self-reported Diet Components and Food Groups: Beans and Peas (Legumes)

Beans and peas (Legumes) consumed as part of participants' diet was derived as a parameter of the self-reported diet components and food groups from the 2018 and 2020 versions of the Automated Self-reported Self-administered 24 hour food records (ASA24-2018 and ASA24-2020) at baseline and 9 month follow-up. Legumes information from the diet was captured by the V\_LEGUMES variable field within the ASA24. This field represents cup equivalents (cup eq) of legumes consumed. Possible results values are limited to non-negative values. Basic descriptive statistics were used to summarize data by arm.

Time frame: Baseline (Burst 1) and 9 months (Burst 2)

Population: Missing data: MHD, Burst 1, (N=1); MHD, Burst 2 (N=19). Comparison, Burst 1 (N=0); Comparison, Burst 2 (N=22).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Anti-inflammatory Dietary Intervention (MHD Arm)Self-reported Diet Components and Food Groups: Beans and Peas (Legumes)Burst 1 (Baseline)0.12 cup eqStandard Deviation 0.17
Anti-inflammatory Dietary Intervention (MHD Arm)Self-reported Diet Components and Food Groups: Beans and Peas (Legumes)Burst 2 (9 Months)0.14 cup eqStandard Deviation 0.22
Usual Diet Plus Self-Care (Comparison Arm)Self-reported Diet Components and Food Groups: Beans and Peas (Legumes)Burst 1 (Baseline)0.1 cup eqStandard Deviation 0.16
Usual Diet Plus Self-Care (Comparison Arm)Self-reported Diet Components and Food Groups: Beans and Peas (Legumes)Burst 2 (9 Months)0.09 cup eqStandard Deviation 0.14
p-value: 0.03695% CI: [0, 0.09]ANCOVA
Secondary

Self-reported Diet Components and Food Groups: Beta Carotene

Beta Carotene obtained from the participants' diet was derived as a parameter of the self-reported diet components and food groups from the 2018 and 2020 versions of the Automated Self-reported Self-administered 24 hour food records (ASA24-2018 and ASA24-2020) at baseline and 9 month follow-up. Beta Carotene from the diet was captured by the BCAR variable field within the ASA24. This field represents micrograms (mcg) of Beta Carotene consumed. Possible results values are limited to non-negative values. Basic descriptive statistics were used to summarize data by arm.

Time frame: Baseline (Burst 1) and 9 months (Burst 2)

Population: Missing data: MHD, Burst 1, (N=1); MHD, Burst 2 (N=19). Comparison, Burst 1 (N=0); Comparison, Burst 2 (N=22).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Anti-inflammatory Dietary Intervention (MHD Arm)Self-reported Diet Components and Food Groups: Beta CaroteneBurst 1 (Baseline)3464.67 mcgStandard Deviation 3758.65
Anti-inflammatory Dietary Intervention (MHD Arm)Self-reported Diet Components and Food Groups: Beta CaroteneBurst 2 (9 Months)4040.06 mcgStandard Deviation 3887.57
Usual Diet Plus Self-Care (Comparison Arm)Self-reported Diet Components and Food Groups: Beta CaroteneBurst 1 (Baseline)3389.68 mcgStandard Deviation 4072.72
Usual Diet Plus Self-Care (Comparison Arm)Self-reported Diet Components and Food Groups: Beta CaroteneBurst 2 (9 Months)2948.25 mcgStandard Deviation 2823.76
p-value: 0.01995% CI: [164.63, 1745.74]ANCOVA
Secondary

Self-reported Diet Components and Food Groups: Beta Cryptoxanthin

Beta Cryptoxanthin obtained from the participants' diet was derived as a parameter of the self-reported diet components and food groups from the 2018 and 2020 versions of the Automated Self-reported Self-administered 24 hour food records (ASA24-2018 and ASA24-2020) at baseline and 9 month follow-up. Beta Cryptoxanthin from the diet was captured by the CRYP variable field within the ASA24. This field represents micrograms (mcg) of Beta Cryptoxanthin consumed. Possible results values are limited to non-negative values. Basic descriptive statistics were used to summarize data by arm.

Time frame: Baseline (Burst 1) and 9 months (Burst 2)

Population: Missing data: MHD, Burst 1, (N=1); MHD, Burst 2 (N=19). Comparison, Burst 1 (N=0); Comparison, Burst 2 (N=22).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Anti-inflammatory Dietary Intervention (MHD Arm)Self-reported Diet Components and Food Groups: Beta CryptoxanthinBurst 1 (Baseline)96.49 mcgStandard Deviation 166.36
Anti-inflammatory Dietary Intervention (MHD Arm)Self-reported Diet Components and Food Groups: Beta CryptoxanthinBurst 2 (9 Months)81.28 mcgStandard Deviation 111.66
Usual Diet Plus Self-Care (Comparison Arm)Self-reported Diet Components and Food Groups: Beta CryptoxanthinBurst 1 (Baseline)57.57 mcgStandard Deviation 84.37
Usual Diet Plus Self-Care (Comparison Arm)Self-reported Diet Components and Food Groups: Beta CryptoxanthinBurst 2 (9 Months)57.41 mcgStandard Deviation 63.53
p-value: 0.1895% CI: [-6.78, 36.45]ANCOVA
Secondary

Self-reported Diet Components and Food Groups: Carbohydrates

Carbohydrates obtained from the participants' diet was derived as a parameter of the self-reported diet components and food groups from the 2018 and 2020 versions of the Automated Self-reported Self-administered 24 hour food records (ASA24-2018 and ASA24-2020) at baseline and 9 month follow-up. Carbohydrates from the diet was captured by the CARB variable field within the ASA24. This field represents grams (g) of carbohydrates consumed. Possible results values are limited to non-negative values. Basic descriptive statistics were used to summarize data by arm.

Time frame: Baseline (Burst 1) and 9 months (Burst 2)

Population: Missing data: MHD, Burst 1, (N=1); MHD, Burst 2 (N=19). Comparison, Burst 1 (N=0); Comparison, Burst 2 (N=22).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Anti-inflammatory Dietary Intervention (MHD Arm)Self-reported Diet Components and Food Groups: CarbohydratesBurst 2 (Baseline)181.11 gStandard Deviation 74.37
Anti-inflammatory Dietary Intervention (MHD Arm)Self-reported Diet Components and Food Groups: CarbohydratesBurst 2 (9 Months)169.66 gStandard Deviation 71.27
Usual Diet Plus Self-Care (Comparison Arm)Self-reported Diet Components and Food Groups: CarbohydratesBurst 2 (Baseline)176.49 gStandard Deviation 66.03
Usual Diet Plus Self-Care (Comparison Arm)Self-reported Diet Components and Food Groups: CarbohydratesBurst 2 (9 Months)169.23 gStandard Deviation 67.2
p-value: 0.63995% CI: [-16.18, 9.92]ANCOVA
Secondary

Self-reported Diet Components and Food Groups: Cheeses

Cheeses consumed as part of participants' diet was derived as a parameter of the self-reported diet components and food groups from the 2018 and 2020 versions of the Automated Self-reported Self-administered 24 hour food records (ASA24-2018 and ASA24-2020) at baseline and 9 month follow-up. Cheese information from the diet was captured by the D\_CHEESE variable field within the ASA24. This field represents cup equivalents (cup eq) of cheeses consumed. Possible results values are limited to non-negative values. Basic descriptive statistics were used to summarize data by arm.

Time frame: Baseline (Burst 1) and 9 months (Burst 2)

Population: Missing data: MHD, Burst 1, (N=1); MHD, Burst 2 (N=19). Comparison, Burst 1 (N=0); Comparison, Burst 2 (N=22).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Anti-inflammatory Dietary Intervention (MHD Arm)Self-reported Diet Components and Food Groups: CheesesBurst 1 (Baseline)0.58 cup eqStandard Deviation 0.48
Anti-inflammatory Dietary Intervention (MHD Arm)Self-reported Diet Components and Food Groups: CheesesBurst 2 (9 Months)0.51 cup eqStandard Deviation 0.54
Usual Diet Plus Self-Care (Comparison Arm)Self-reported Diet Components and Food Groups: CheesesBurst 1 (Baseline)0.62 cup eqStandard Deviation 0.6
Usual Diet Plus Self-Care (Comparison Arm)Self-reported Diet Components and Food Groups: CheesesBurst 2 (9 Months)0.54 cup eqStandard Deviation 0.48
p-value: 0.89395% CI: [-0.13, 0.11]ANCOVA
Secondary

Self-reported Diet Components and Food Groups: Cured Meats

Cured meats consumed as part of participants' diet was derived as a parameter of the self-reported diet components and food groups from the 2018 and 2020 versions of the Automated Self-reported Self-administered 24 hour food records (ASA24-2018 and ASA24-2020) at baseline and 9 month follow-up. Cured meats information from the diet was captured by the PF\_CUREDMEAT variable field within the ASA24. This field represents ounce equivalents (oz eq) of cured meats consumed. Possible results values are limited to non-negative values. Basic descriptive statistics were used to summarize data by arm.

Time frame: Baseline (Burst 1) and 9 months (Burst 2)

Population: Missing data: MHD, Burst 1, (N=1); MHD, Burst 2 (N=19). Comparison, Burst 1 (N=0); Comparison, Burst 2 (N=22).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Anti-inflammatory Dietary Intervention (MHD Arm)Self-reported Diet Components and Food Groups: Cured MeatsBurst 1 (Baseline)0.74 oz eqStandard Deviation 0.93
Anti-inflammatory Dietary Intervention (MHD Arm)Self-reported Diet Components and Food Groups: Cured MeatsBurst 2 (9 Months)0.63 oz eqStandard Deviation 0.82
Usual Diet Plus Self-Care (Comparison Arm)Self-reported Diet Components and Food Groups: Cured MeatsBurst 1 (Baseline)0.64 oz eqStandard Deviation 0.83
Usual Diet Plus Self-Care (Comparison Arm)Self-reported Diet Components and Food Groups: Cured MeatsBurst 2 (9 Months)0.76 oz eqStandard Deviation 0.95
p-value: 0.11995% CI: [-0.38, 0.04]ANCOVA
Secondary

Self-reported Diet Components and Food Groups: Dark Green Vegetables

Dark Green Vegetables obtained from the participants' diet was derived as a parameter of the self-reported diet components and food groups from the 2018 and 2020 versions of the Automated Self-reported Self-administered 24 hour food records (ASA24-2018 and ASA24-2020) at baseline and 9 month follow-up. Dark green vegetable consumption from the diet was captured by the V\_DRKGR variable field within the ASA24. This field represents dark green vegetable consumption in cup equivalents (cup eq). Possible results values are limited to non-negative values. Basic descriptive statistics were used to summarize data by arm.

Time frame: Baseline (Burst 1) and 9 months (Burst 2)

Population: Missing data: MHD, Burst 1, (N=1); MHD, Burst 2 (N=19). Comparison, Burst 1 (N=0); Comparison, Burst 2 (N=22).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Anti-inflammatory Dietary Intervention (MHD Arm)Self-reported Diet Components and Food Groups: Dark Green VegetablesBurst 1 (Baseline)0.3 cup eqStandard Deviation 0.33
Anti-inflammatory Dietary Intervention (MHD Arm)Self-reported Diet Components and Food Groups: Dark Green VegetablesBurst 2 (9 Months)0.43 cup eqStandard Deviation 0.45
Usual Diet Plus Self-Care (Comparison Arm)Self-reported Diet Components and Food Groups: Dark Green VegetablesBurst 1 (Baseline)0.33 cup eqStandard Deviation 0.34
Usual Diet Plus Self-Care (Comparison Arm)Self-reported Diet Components and Food Groups: Dark Green VegetablesBurst 2 (9 Months)0.28 cup eqStandard Deviation 0.28
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [0.08, 0.26]ANCOVA
Secondary

Self-reported Diet Components and Food Groups: DHA (P226)

DHA (P226) obtained from the participants' diet was derived as a parameter of the self-reported diet components and food groups from the 2018 and 2020 versions of the Automated Self-reported Self-administered 24 hour food records (ASA24-2018 and ASA24-2020) at baseline and 9 month follow-up. DHA (P226) from the diet was captured by the P226 variable field within the ASA24. This field represents grams (g) of DHA (P226) consumed. Possible results values are limited to non-negative values. Basic descriptive statistics were used to summarize data by arm.

Time frame: Baseline (Burst 1) and 9 months (Burst 2)

Population: Missing data: MHD, Burst 1, (N=1); MHD, Burst 2 (N=19). Comparison, Burst 1 (N=0); Comparison, Burst 2 (N=22).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Anti-inflammatory Dietary Intervention (MHD Arm)Self-reported Diet Components and Food Groups: DHA (P226)Burst 1 (Baseline)0.14 gStandard Deviation 0.17
Anti-inflammatory Dietary Intervention (MHD Arm)Self-reported Diet Components and Food Groups: DHA (P226)Burst 2 (9 Months)0.13 gStandard Deviation 0.16
Usual Diet Plus Self-Care (Comparison Arm)Self-reported Diet Components and Food Groups: DHA (P226)Burst 1 (Baseline)0.12 gStandard Deviation 0.16
Usual Diet Plus Self-Care (Comparison Arm)Self-reported Diet Components and Food Groups: DHA (P226)Burst 2 (9 Months)0.1 gStandard Deviation 0.12
p-value: 0.11695% CI: [-0.01, 0.06]ANCOVA
Secondary

Self-reported Diet Components and Food Groups: DPA (P225)

DPA (P225) obtained from the participants' diet was derived as a parameter of the self-reported diet components and food groups from the 2018 and 2020 versions of the Automated Self-reported Self-administered 24 hour food records (ASA24-2018 and ASA24-2020) at baseline and 9 month follow-up. DPA (P225) from the diet was captured by the P225 variable field within the ASA24. This field represents grams (g) of DPA (P225) consumed. Possible results values are limited to non-negative values. Basic descriptive statistics were used to summarize data by arm.

Time frame: Baseline (Burst 1) and 9 months (Burst 2)

Population: Missing data: MHD, Burst 1, (N=1); MHD, Burst 2 (N=19). Comparison, Burst 1 (N=0); Comparison, Burst 2 (N=22).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Anti-inflammatory Dietary Intervention (MHD Arm)Self-reported Diet Components and Food Groups: DPA (P225)Burst 1 (Baseline)0.03 gStandard Deviation 0.03
Anti-inflammatory Dietary Intervention (MHD Arm)Self-reported Diet Components and Food Groups: DPA (P225)Burst 2 (9 Months)0.03 gStandard Deviation 0.03
Usual Diet Plus Self-Care (Comparison Arm)Self-reported Diet Components and Food Groups: DPA (P225)Burst 1 (Baseline)0.03 gStandard Deviation 0.03
Usual Diet Plus Self-Care (Comparison Arm)Self-reported Diet Components and Food Groups: DPA (P225)Burst 2 (9 Months)0.02 gStandard Deviation 0.02
p-value: 0.21395% CI: [0, 0.01]ANCOVA
Secondary

Self-reported Diet Components and Food Groups: Energy

Energy obtained from the participants' diet was derived as a parameter of the self-reported diet components and food groups from the 2018 and 2020 versions of the Automated Self-reported Self-administered 24 hour food records (ASA24-2018 and ASA24-2020) at baseline and 9 month follow-up. Total energy from diet was captured by the KCAL variable field within the ASA24. This field represents kilocalories (kcal) of energy. Possible results values are to values \> 500kcal. Basic descriptive statistics were used to summarize data by arm.

Time frame: Baseline (Burst 1) and 9 months (Burst 2)

Population: Missing data: MHD, Burst 1 (N=1); MHD, Burst 2 (N=19). Comparison, Burst 1 (N=0); Comparison, Burst 2, (N=22).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Anti-inflammatory Dietary Intervention (MHD Arm)Self-reported Diet Components and Food Groups: EnergyBurst 1 (Baseline)1622.31 kcalStandard Deviation 574.26
Anti-inflammatory Dietary Intervention (MHD Arm)Self-reported Diet Components and Food Groups: EnergyBurst 2 (9 Months)1545.25 kcalStandard Deviation 552.32
Usual Diet Plus Self-Care (Comparison Arm)Self-reported Diet Components and Food Groups: EnergyBurst 1 (Baseline)1608.62 kcalStandard Deviation 518
Usual Diet Plus Self-Care (Comparison Arm)Self-reported Diet Components and Food Groups: EnergyBurst 2 (9 Months)1560.3 kcalStandard Deviation 532.73
p-value: 0.64595% CI: [-129.16, 79.89]ANCOVA
Secondary

Self-reported Diet Components and Food Groups: EPA (P205)

EPA (P205) obtained from the participants' diet was derived as a parameter of the self-reported diet components and food groups from the 2018 and 2020 versions of the Automated Self-reported Self-administered 24 hour food records (ASA24-2018 and ASA24-2020) at baseline and 9 month follow-up. EPA (P205) from the diet was captured by the P205 variable field within the ASA24. This field represents grams (g) of EPA (P205) consumed. Possible results values are limited to non-negative values. Basic descriptive statistics were used to summarize data by arm.

Time frame: Baseline (Burst 1) and 9 months (Burst 2)

Population: Missing data: MHD, Burst 1, (N=1); MHD, Burst 2 (N=19). Comparison, Burst 1 (N=0); Comparison, Burst 2 (N=22).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Anti-inflammatory Dietary Intervention (MHD Arm)Self-reported Diet Components and Food Groups: EPA (P205)Burst 1 (Baseline)0.07 gStandard Deviation 0.01
Anti-inflammatory Dietary Intervention (MHD Arm)Self-reported Diet Components and Food Groups: EPA (P205)Burst 2 (9 Months)0.07 gStandard Deviation 0.08
Usual Diet Plus Self-Care (Comparison Arm)Self-reported Diet Components and Food Groups: EPA (P205)Burst 1 (Baseline)0.06 gStandard Deviation 0.08
Usual Diet Plus Self-Care (Comparison Arm)Self-reported Diet Components and Food Groups: EPA (P205)Burst 2 (9 Months)0.05 gStandard Deviation 0.07
p-value: 0.27395% CI: [-0.01, 0.03]ANCOVA
Secondary

Self-reported Diet Components and Food Groups: Lutein + Zeaxanthin

Lutein + Zeaxanthin obtained from the participants' diet was derived as a parameter of the self-reported diet components and food groups from the 2018 and 2020 versions of the Automated Self-reported Self-administered 24 hour food records (ASA24-2018 and ASA24-2020) at baseline and 9 month follow-up. Lutein + Zeaxanthin from the diet was captured by the LZ variable field within the ASA24. This field represents micrograms (mcg) of Lutein + Zeaxanthin consumed. Possible results values are limited to non-negative values. Basic descriptive statistics were used to summarize data by arm.

Time frame: Baseline (Burst 1) and 9 months (Burst 2)

Population: Missing data: MHD, Burst 1, (N=1); MHD, Burst 2 (N=19). Comparison, Burst 1 (N=0); Comparison, Burst 2 (N=22).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Anti-inflammatory Dietary Intervention (MHD Arm)Self-reported Diet Components and Food Groups: Lutein + ZeaxanthinBurst 1 (Baseline)2885.48 mcgStandard Deviation 3661.72
Anti-inflammatory Dietary Intervention (MHD Arm)Self-reported Diet Components and Food Groups: Lutein + ZeaxanthinBurst 2 (9 Months)3570.56 mcgStandard Deviation 4028.1
Usual Diet Plus Self-Care (Comparison Arm)Self-reported Diet Components and Food Groups: Lutein + ZeaxanthinBurst 1 (Baseline)2765.1 mcgStandard Deviation 4110.87
Usual Diet Plus Self-Care (Comparison Arm)Self-reported Diet Components and Food Groups: Lutein + ZeaxanthinBurst 2 (9 Months)2609.09 mcgStandard Deviation 3357.6
p-value: 0.08395% CI: [-99.73, 1667.85]ANCOVA
Secondary

Self-reported Diet Components and Food Groups: Lycopene

Lycopene obtained from the participants' diet was derived as a parameter of the self-reported diet components and food groups from the 2018 and 2020 versions of the Automated Self-reported Self-administered 24 hour food records (ASA24-2018 and ASA24-2020) at baseline and 9 month follow-up. Lycopene from the diet was captured by the LYCO variable field within the ASA24. This field represents micrograms (mcg) of Lycopene consumed. Possible results values are limited to non-negative values. Basic descriptive statistics were used to summarize data by arm.

Time frame: Baseline (Burst 1) and 9 months (Burst 2)

Population: Missing data: MHD, Burst 1, (N=1); MHD, Burst 2 (N=19). Comparison, Burst 1 (N=0); Comparison, Burst 2 (N=22).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Anti-inflammatory Dietary Intervention (MHD Arm)Self-reported Diet Components and Food Groups: LycopeneBurst 1 (Baseline)3905.68 mcgStandard Deviation 5106.71
Anti-inflammatory Dietary Intervention (MHD Arm)Self-reported Diet Components and Food Groups: LycopeneBurst 2 (9 Months)3685.28 mcgStandard Deviation 4671.61
Usual Diet Plus Self-Care (Comparison Arm)Self-reported Diet Components and Food Groups: LycopeneBurst 1 (Baseline)3558.21 mcgStandard Deviation 3819.37
Usual Diet Plus Self-Care (Comparison Arm)Self-reported Diet Components and Food Groups: LycopeneBurst 2 (9 Months)3244.35 mcgStandard Deviation 2902.16
p-value: 0.37995% CI: [-534.05, 1406.33]ANCOVA
Secondary

Self-reported Diet Components and Food Groups: Non-food Folate

Non-food Folate obtained from the participants' diet was derived as a parameter of the self-reported diet components and food groups from the 2018 and 2020 versions of the Automated Self-reported Self-administered 24 hour food records (ASA24-2018 and ASA24-2020) at baseline and 9 month follow-up. Non-food Folate was captured by the FDFE variable field within the ASA24. This field represents micrograms (mcg) of Non-food Folate consumed. Possible results values are limited to non-negative values. Basic descriptive statistics were used to summarize data by arm.

Time frame: Baseline (Burst 1) and 9 months (Burst 2)

Population: Missing data: MHD, Burst 1, (N=1); MHD, Burst 2 (N=19). Comparison, Burst 1 (N=0); Comparison, Burst 2 (N=22).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Anti-inflammatory Dietary Intervention (MHD Arm)Self-reported Diet Components and Food Groups: Non-food FolateBurst 1 (Baseline)125.15 mcgStandard Deviation 86.02
Anti-inflammatory Dietary Intervention (MHD Arm)Self-reported Diet Components and Food Groups: Non-food FolateBurst 2 (9 Months)109.97 mcgStandard Deviation 80.89
Usual Diet Plus Self-Care (Comparison Arm)Self-reported Diet Components and Food Groups: Non-food FolateBurst 1 (Baseline)130.78 mcgStandard Deviation 108.64
Usual Diet Plus Self-Care (Comparison Arm)Self-reported Diet Components and Food Groups: Non-food FolateBurst 2 (9 Months)127.73 mcgStandard Deviation 98.76
p-value: 0.11595% CI: [-34.44, 3.69]ANCOVA
Secondary

Self-reported Diet Components and Food Groups: Nuts and Seeds

Nuts and seeds consumed as part of participants' diet was derived as a parameter of the self-reported diet components and food groups from the 2018 and 2020 versions of the Automated Self-reported Self-administered 24 hour food records (ASA24-2018 and ASA24-2020) at baseline and 9 month follow-up. Nuts and seeds information from the diet was captured by the PF\_NUTSDS variable field within the ASA24. This field represents ounce equivalents (oz eq) of nuts and seeds consumed. Possible results values are limited to non-negative values. Basic descriptive statistics were used to summarize data by arm.

Time frame: Baseline (Burst 1) and 9 months (Burst 2)

Population: Missing data: MHD, Burst 1, (N=1); MHD, Burst 2 (N=19). Comparison, Burst 1 (N=0); Comparison, Burst 2 (N=22).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Anti-inflammatory Dietary Intervention (MHD Arm)Self-reported Diet Components and Food Groups: Nuts and SeedsBurst 1 (Baseline)0.57 oz eqStandard Deviation 0.91
Anti-inflammatory Dietary Intervention (MHD Arm)Self-reported Diet Components and Food Groups: Nuts and SeedsBurst 2 (9 Months)0.82 oz eqStandard Deviation 1.43
Usual Diet Plus Self-Care (Comparison Arm)Self-reported Diet Components and Food Groups: Nuts and SeedsBurst 1 (Baseline)0.58 oz eqStandard Deviation 0.94
Usual Diet Plus Self-Care (Comparison Arm)Self-reported Diet Components and Food Groups: Nuts and SeedsBurst 2 (9 Months)0.56 oz eqStandard Deviation 0.88
p-value: 0.08895% CI: [-0.04, 0.53]ANCOVA
Secondary

Self-reported Diet Components and Food Groups: Poultry

Poultry consumed as part of participants' diet was derived as a parameter of the self-reported diet components and food groups from the 2018 and 2020 versions of the Automated Self-reported Self-administered 24 hour food records (ASA24-2018 and ASA24-2020) at baseline and 9 month follow-up. Poultry information from the diet was captured by the PF\_POULT variable field within the ASA24. This field represents ounce equivalents (oz eq) of poultry consumed. Possible results values are limited to non-negative values. Basic descriptive statistics were used to summarize data by arm.

Time frame: Baseline (Burst 1) and 9 months (Burst 2)

Population: Missing data: MHD, Burst 1, (N=1); MHD, Burst 2 (N=19). Comparison, Burst 1 (N=0); Comparison, Burst 2 (N=22).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Anti-inflammatory Dietary Intervention (MHD Arm)Self-reported Diet Components and Food Groups: PoultryBurst 1 (Baseline)1.82 oz eqStandard Deviation 1.65
Anti-inflammatory Dietary Intervention (MHD Arm)Self-reported Diet Components and Food Groups: PoultryBurst 2 (9 Months)1.79 oz eqStandard Deviation 1.56
Usual Diet Plus Self-Care (Comparison Arm)Self-reported Diet Components and Food Groups: PoultryBurst 1 (Baseline)1.89 oz eqStandard Deviation 1.64
Usual Diet Plus Self-Care (Comparison Arm)Self-reported Diet Components and Food Groups: PoultryBurst 2 (9 Months)1.82 oz eqStandard Deviation 1.54
p-value: 0.84195% CI: [-0.41, 0.33]ANCOVA
Secondary

Self-reported Diet Components and Food Groups: Protein

Protein obtained from the participants' diet was derived as a parameter of the self-reported diet components and food groups from the 2018 and 2020 versions of the Automated Self-reported Self-administered 24 hour food records (ASA24-2018 and ASA24-2020) at baseline and 9 month follow-up. Protein from the diet was captured by the PROT variable field within the ASA24. This field represents grams (g) of protein consumed. Possible results values are limited to non-negative values. Basic descriptive statistics were used to summarize data by arm.

Time frame: Baseline (Burst 1) and 9 months (Burst 2)

Population: Missing data: MHD, Burst 1 (N=1); MHD, Burst 2 (N=19). Comparison, Burst 1 (N=0); Comparison, Burst 2, (N=22).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Anti-inflammatory Dietary Intervention (MHD Arm)Self-reported Diet Components and Food Groups: ProteinBurst 1 (Baseline)73.92 gStandard Deviation 27.21
Anti-inflammatory Dietary Intervention (MHD Arm)Self-reported Diet Components and Food Groups: ProteinBurst 2 (9 Months)73.42 gStandard Deviation 24.5
Usual Diet Plus Self-Care (Comparison Arm)Self-reported Diet Components and Food Groups: ProteinBurst 1 (Baseline)73.31 gStandard Deviation 23.62
Usual Diet Plus Self-Care (Comparison Arm)Self-reported Diet Components and Food Groups: ProteinBurst 2 (9 Months)70.09 gStandard Deviation 27.31
p-value: 0.24595% CI: [-2.23, 8.75]ANCOVA
Secondary

Self-reported Diet Components and Food Groups: Retinol

Retinol obtained from the participants' diet was derived as a parameter of the self-reported diet components and food groups from the 2018 and 2020 versions of the Automated Self-reported Self-administered 24 hour food records (ASA24-2018 and ASA24-2020) at baseline and 9 month follow-up. Retinol from the diet was captured by the RET variable field within the ASA24. This field represents micrograms (mcg) of Retinol consumed. Possible results values are limited to non-negative values. Basic descriptive statistics were used to summarize data by arm.

Time frame: Baseline (Burst 1) and 9 months (Burst 2)

Population: Missing data: MHD, Burst 1, (N=1); MHD, Burst 2 (N=19). Comparison, Burst 1 (N=0); Comparison, Burst 2 (N=22).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Anti-inflammatory Dietary Intervention (MHD Arm)Self-reported Diet Components and Food Groups: RetinolBurst 1 (Baseline)327.45 mcgStandard Deviation 210.72
Anti-inflammatory Dietary Intervention (MHD Arm)Self-reported Diet Components and Food Groups: RetinolBurst 2 (9 Months)302.99 mcgStandard Deviation 181.71
Usual Diet Plus Self-Care (Comparison Arm)Self-reported Diet Components and Food Groups: RetinolBurst 1 (Baseline)317.48 mcgStandard Deviation 190.29
Usual Diet Plus Self-Care (Comparison Arm)Self-reported Diet Components and Food Groups: RetinolBurst 2 (9 Months)318.97 mcgStandard Deviation 210.58
p-value: 0.49395% CI: [-60.66, 29.19]ANCOVA
Secondary

Self-reported Diet Components and Food Groups: Seafood High in n-3 Fatty Acids

Seafood high in n-3 fatty acids obtained from the participants' diet was derived as a parameter of the self-reported diet components and food groups from the 2018 and 2020 versions of the Automated Self-reported Self-administered 24 hour food records (ASA24-2018 and ASA24-2020) at baseline and 9 month follow-up. Seafood high in n-3 fatty acids from the diet was captured by the M\_FISH\_HI variable field within the ASA24. This field represents ounce equivalents (oz eq) of Seafood high in n-3 fatty acids consumed. Possible results values are limited to non-negative values. Basic descriptive statistics were used to summarize data by arm.

Time frame: Baseline (Burst 1) and 9 months (Burst 2)

Population: Missing data: MHD, Burst 1, (N=1); MHD, Burst 2 (N=19). Comparison, Burst 1 (N=0); Comparison, Burst 2 (N=22).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Anti-inflammatory Dietary Intervention (MHD Arm)Self-reported Diet Components and Food Groups: Seafood High in n-3 Fatty AcidsBurst 1 (Baseline)0.58 oz eqStandard Deviation 0.94
Anti-inflammatory Dietary Intervention (MHD Arm)Self-reported Diet Components and Food Groups: Seafood High in n-3 Fatty AcidsBurst 2 (9 Months)0.56 oz eqStandard Deviation 1.06
Usual Diet Plus Self-Care (Comparison Arm)Self-reported Diet Components and Food Groups: Seafood High in n-3 Fatty AcidsBurst 1 (Baseline)0.44 oz eqStandard Deviation 0.92
Usual Diet Plus Self-Care (Comparison Arm)Self-reported Diet Components and Food Groups: Seafood High in n-3 Fatty AcidsBurst 2 (9 Months)0.44 oz eqStandard Deviation 0.9
p-value: 0.54195% CI: [-0.16, 0.31]ANCOVA
Secondary

Self-reported Diet Components and Food Groups: Solid Fats

Solid fats obtained from the participants' diet was derived as a parameter of the self-reported diet components and food groups from the 2018 and 2020 versions of the Automated Self-reported Self-administered 24 hour food records (ASA24-2018 and ASA24-2020) at baseline and 9 month follow-up. Solid fats from the diet was captured by the DISCFAT\_SOL variable field within the ASA24. This field represents grams (g) of solid fats consumed. Possible results values are limited to non-negative values. Basic descriptive statistics were used to summarize data by arm.

Time frame: Baseline (Burst 1) and 9 months (Burst 2)

Population: Missing data: MHD, Burst 1, (N=1); MHD, Burst 2 (N=19). Comparison, Burst 1 (N=0); Comparison, Burst 2 (N=22).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Anti-inflammatory Dietary Intervention (MHD Arm)Self-reported Diet Components and Food Groups: Solid FatsBurst 1 (Baseline)26.84 gStandard Deviation 15.44
Anti-inflammatory Dietary Intervention (MHD Arm)Self-reported Diet Components and Food Groups: Solid FatsBurst 2 (9 Months)23.14 gStandard Deviation 15.44
Usual Diet Plus Self-Care (Comparison Arm)Self-reported Diet Components and Food Groups: Solid FatsBurst 1 (Baseline)26.77 gStandard Deviation 14.68
Usual Diet Plus Self-Care (Comparison Arm)Self-reported Diet Components and Food Groups: Solid FatsBurst 2 (9 Months)26.93 gStandard Deviation 14.48
p-value: 0.01995% CI: [-6.44, 0.59]ANCOVA
Secondary

Self-reported Diet Components and Food Groups: Total Fats

Total fats obtained from the participants' diet was derived as a parameter of the self-reported diet components and food groups from the 2018 and 2020 versions of the Automated Self-reported Self-administered 24 hour food records (ASA24-2018 and ASA24-2020) at baseline and 9 month follow-up. Total fats from the diet, which consisted of total saturated fatty acids, total monounsaturated fatty acids, and total polyunsaturated fatty acids, was captured by the TFAT variable field within the ASA24. This field represents grams (g) of total fats consumed. Possible results values are limited to non-negative values. Basic descriptive statistics were used to summarize data by arm.

Time frame: Baseline (Burst 1) and 9 months (Burst 2)

Population: Missing data: MHD, Burst 1, (N=1); MHD, Burst 2 (N=19). Comparison, Burst 1 (N=0); Comparison, Burst 2 (N=22).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Anti-inflammatory Dietary Intervention (MHD Arm)Self-reported Diet Components and Food Groups: Total FatsBurst 1 (Baseline)67.3 gStandard Deviation 26.52
Anti-inflammatory Dietary Intervention (MHD Arm)Self-reported Diet Components and Food Groups: Total FatsBurst 2 (9 Months)65.69 gStandard Deviation 29.13
Usual Diet Plus Self-Care (Comparison Arm)Self-reported Diet Components and Food Groups: Total FatsBurst 1 (Baseline)66.71 gStandard Deviation 25.45
Usual Diet Plus Self-Care (Comparison Arm)Self-reported Diet Components and Food Groups: Total FatsBurst 2 (9 Months)66.77 gStandard Deviation 25.4
p-value: 0.63595% CI: [-6.95, 4.24]ANCOVA
Secondary

Self-reported Diet Components and Food Groups: Total Folate From Food

Total Folate from food obtained from the participants' diet was derived as a parameter of the self-reported diet components and food groups from the 2018 and 2020 versions of the Automated Self-reported Self-administered 24 hour food records (ASA24-2018 and ASA24-2020) at baseline and 9 month follow-up. Total Folate from food was captured by the FF variable field within the ASA24. This field represents micrograms (mcg) of total folate from food consumed. Possible results values are limited to non-negative values. Basic descriptive statistics were used to summarize data by arm.

Time frame: Baseline (Burst 1) and 9 months (Burst 2)

Population: Missing data: MHD, Burst 1, (N=1); MHD, Burst 2 (N=19). Comparison, Burst 1 (N=0); Comparison, Burst 2 (N=22).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Anti-inflammatory Dietary Intervention (MHD Arm)Self-reported Diet Components and Food Groups: Total Folate From FoodBurst 1 (Baseline)199.05 mcgStandard Deviation 93.83
Anti-inflammatory Dietary Intervention (MHD Arm)Self-reported Diet Components and Food Groups: Total Folate From FoodBurst 2 (9 Months)224.17 mcgStandard Deviation 110.14
Usual Diet Plus Self-Care (Comparison Arm)Self-reported Diet Components and Food Groups: Total Folate From FoodBurst 1 (Baseline)197.56 mcgStandard Deviation 93.23
Usual Diet Plus Self-Care (Comparison Arm)Self-reported Diet Components and Food Groups: Total Folate From FoodBurst 2 (9 Months)181.69 mcgStandard Deviation 83.24
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [21.47, 61.96]ANCOVA
Secondary

Self-reported Diet Components and Food Groups: Total Intact Fruits + Fruit Juices

Total Intact fruits and fruit juices obtained from the participants' diet was derived as a parameter of the self-reported diet components and food groups from the 2018 and 2020 versions of the Automated Self-reported Self-administered 24 hour food records (ASA24-2018 and ASA24-2020) at baseline and 9 month follow-up. Total Intact fruit and fruit juice consumption from the diet was captured by the F\_TOTAL variable field within the ASA24. This field represents total fruit consumption in cup equivalents (cup eq). Possible results values are limited to non-negative values. Basic descriptive statistics were used to summarize data by arm.

Time frame: Baseline (Burst 1) and 9 months (Burst 2)

Population: Missing data: MHD, Burst 1, (N=1); MHD, Burst 2 (N=19). Comparison, Burst 1 (N=0); Comparison, Burst 2 (N=22).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Anti-inflammatory Dietary Intervention (MHD Arm)Self-reported Diet Components and Food Groups: Total Intact Fruits + Fruit JuicesBurst 1 (Baseline)0.85 cup eqStandard Deviation 0.91
Anti-inflammatory Dietary Intervention (MHD Arm)Self-reported Diet Components and Food Groups: Total Intact Fruits + Fruit JuicesBurst 2 (9 Months)0.95 cup eqStandard Deviation 0.92
Usual Diet Plus Self-Care (Comparison Arm)Self-reported Diet Components and Food Groups: Total Intact Fruits + Fruit JuicesBurst 1 (Baseline)0.77 cup eqStandard Deviation 0.78
Usual Diet Plus Self-Care (Comparison Arm)Self-reported Diet Components and Food Groups: Total Intact Fruits + Fruit JuicesBurst 2 (9 Months)0.68 cup eqStandard Deviation 0.76
p-value: 0.03295% CI: [0.02, 0.4]ANCOVA
Secondary

Self-reported Diet Components and Food Groups: Total Moisture

Total Moisture obtained from the participants' diet was derived as a parameter of the self-reported diet components and food groups from the 2018 and 2020 versions of the Automated Self-reported Self-administered 24 hour food records (ASA24-2018 and ASA24-2020) at baseline and 9 month follow-up. Total moisture from diet was captured by the MOIS variable field within the ASA24. This field is quantified in grams (g) of water. Possible results values are limited to values \> 0 (i.e., positive values). Basic descriptive statistics were used to summarize data by arm.ASA-2018 and 2020

Time frame: Baseline (Burst 1) and 9 months (Burst 2)

Population: Missing data: MHD, Burst 1, (N=1); MHD, Burst 2 (N=19). Comparison, Burst 1 (N=0); Comparison, Burst 2 (N=22).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Anti-inflammatory Dietary Intervention (MHD Arm)Self-reported Diet Components and Food Groups: Total MoistureBurst 1 (Baseline)1821 gStandard Deviation 840
Anti-inflammatory Dietary Intervention (MHD Arm)Self-reported Diet Components and Food Groups: Total MoistureBurst 2 (9 Months)1943 gStandard Deviation 959
Usual Diet Plus Self-Care (Comparison Arm)Self-reported Diet Components and Food Groups: Total MoistureBurst 1 (Baseline)1812 gStandard Deviation 791
Usual Diet Plus Self-Care (Comparison Arm)Self-reported Diet Components and Food Groups: Total MoistureBurst 2 (9 Months)1790 gStandard Deviation 815
p-value: 0.10195% CI: [-27.7, 317.6]ANCOVA
Secondary

Self-reported Diet Components and Food Groups: Vitamin B-12

Vitamin B-12 obtained from the participants' diet was derived as a parameter of the self-reported diet components and food groups from the 2018 and 2020 versions of the Automated Self-reported Self-administered 24 hour food records (ASA24-2018 and ASA24-2020) at baseline and 9 month follow-up. Vitamin B-12 was captured by the VB12 variable field within the ASA24. This field represents micrograms (mcg) of Vitamin B-12 consumed (including supplemental sources). Possible results values are limited to non-negative values. Basic descriptive statistics were used to summarize data by arm.

Time frame: Baseline (Burst 1) and 9 months (Burst 2)

Population: Missing data: MHD, Burst 1, (N=1); MHD, Burst 2 (N=19). Comparison, Burst 1 (N=0); Comparison, Burst 2 (N=22).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Anti-inflammatory Dietary Intervention (MHD Arm)Self-reported Diet Components and Food Groups: Vitamin B-12Burst 1 (Baseline)4.25 mcgStandard Deviation 2.59
Anti-inflammatory Dietary Intervention (MHD Arm)Self-reported Diet Components and Food Groups: Vitamin B-12Burst 2 (9 Months)4.18 mcgStandard Deviation 2.63
Usual Diet Plus Self-Care (Comparison Arm)Self-reported Diet Components and Food Groups: Vitamin B-12Burst 1 (Baseline)4.21 mcgStandard Deviation 2.64
Usual Diet Plus Self-Care (Comparison Arm)Self-reported Diet Components and Food Groups: Vitamin B-12Burst 2 (9 Months)4.06 mcgStandard Deviation 2.43
p-value: 0.84795% CI: [-0.53, 0.64]ANCOVA
Secondary

Self-reported Diet Components and Food Groups: Whole Grains

Whole grains consumed as part of participants' diet was derived as a parameter of the self-reported diet components and food groups from the 2018 and 2020 versions of the Automated Self-reported Self-administered 24 hour food records (ASA24-2018 and ASA24-2020) at baseline and 9 month follow-up. Whole grains information from the diet was captured by the G\_WHOLE variable field within the ASA24. This field represents ounce equivalents (oz eq) of whole grains consumed. Possible results values are limited to non-negative values. Basic descriptive statistics were used to summarize data by arm.

Time frame: Baseline (Burst 1) and 9 months (Burst 2)

Population: Missing data: MHD, Burst 1, (N=1); MHD, Burst 2 (N=19). Comparison, Burst 1 (N=0); Comparison, Burst 2 (N=22).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Anti-inflammatory Dietary Intervention (MHD Arm)Self-reported Diet Components and Food Groups: Whole GrainsBurst 1 (Baseline)0.75 oz eqStandard Deviation 0.76
Anti-inflammatory Dietary Intervention (MHD Arm)Self-reported Diet Components and Food Groups: Whole GrainsBurst 2 (9 Months)1.06 oz eqStandard Deviation 1.17
Usual Diet Plus Self-Care (Comparison Arm)Self-reported Diet Components and Food Groups: Whole GrainsBurst 1 (Baseline)0.85 oz eqStandard Deviation 0.93
Usual Diet Plus Self-Care (Comparison Arm)Self-reported Diet Components and Food Groups: Whole GrainsBurst 2 (9 Months)0.90 oz eqStandard Deviation 1.01
p-value: 0.22395% CI: [-0.1, 0.43]ANCOVA
Secondary

Serum Sodium

Serum specimens were collected and processed at Baseline and 9-months follow-up and shipped to University of Minnesota ARDL laboratory for analysis on Roche Cobas 8000 Chemistry Analyzer. Mean serum sodium levels are summarized by study arm and reported in mmol/L. Reference range is 136-145 mmol/L and the lower LOD is 80 mmol/L. Decreased serum sodium levels from baseline may indicate dehydration.

Time frame: Baseline (Burst 1) and 9 months (Burst 2)

Population: Missing data: Burst 1, MHD: (N=10); Burst 1, Comparison: (N=7). Burst 2, MHD: (N=33); Burst 2, Comparison: (N=40)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Anti-inflammatory Dietary Intervention (MHD Arm)Serum SodiumBurst 1 (Baseline)139.88 mmol/LStandard Deviation 1.88
Anti-inflammatory Dietary Intervention (MHD Arm)Serum SodiumBurst 2 (9 Months)140.24 mmol/LStandard Deviation 2.4
Usual Diet Plus Self-Care (Comparison Arm)Serum SodiumBurst 1 (Baseline)139.89 mmol/LStandard Deviation 1.91
Usual Diet Plus Self-Care (Comparison Arm)Serum SodiumBurst 2 (9 Months)140.11 mmol/LStandard Deviation 1.99
p-value: 0.52195% CI: [-0.37, 0.73]ANCOVA
Secondary

Symbol Search Task Performance

Symbol Search Task Performance is an ambulatory cognitive assessment of processing speed/attention. The task is administered 5 times daily throughout each 7-day measurement Burst (Baseline, 9 months, 18 months, 27 months). Mean response time in milliseconds (ms) for accurate trials will be determined and reported. Possible values ranges for Symbol Search Task Performance are \>0 ms (i.e., positive values). Lower Symbol Search Task Performance values in mean response time are indicative of improvement in cognitive processing.

Time frame: Baseline (Burst 1), and 9 months (Burst 2), 18 months (Burst 3), and 27 months (Burst 4) post-intervention

Population: Missing data: MHD, Burst 1, (N=4); MHD, Burst 2 (N=29); MHD, Burst 3 (N=24); MHD, Burst 4 (N=20). Comparison, Burst 1 (N=0); Comparison, Burst 2 (N=31); Comparison, Burst 3 (N=34); Comparison, Burst 4 (N=15).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Anti-inflammatory Dietary Intervention (MHD Arm)Symbol Search Task PerformanceBurst 1 (Baseline)1,874.7 msStandard Deviation 474.3
Anti-inflammatory Dietary Intervention (MHD Arm)Symbol Search Task PerformanceBurst 2 (9 months)1,854.4 msStandard Deviation 537.5
Anti-inflammatory Dietary Intervention (MHD Arm)Symbol Search Task PerformanceBurst 3 (18 months)1,845.0 msStandard Deviation 465.6
Anti-inflammatory Dietary Intervention (MHD Arm)Symbol Search Task PerformanceBurst 4 (27 months)1,765.2 msStandard Deviation 529.3
Usual Diet Plus Self-Care (Comparison Arm)Symbol Search Task PerformanceBurst 4 (27 months)1,812.0 msStandard Deviation 445
Usual Diet Plus Self-Care (Comparison Arm)Symbol Search Task PerformanceBurst 1 (Baseline)1,846.4 msStandard Deviation 466.3
Usual Diet Plus Self-Care (Comparison Arm)Symbol Search Task PerformanceBurst 3 (18 months)1,825.6 msStandard Deviation 470.7
Usual Diet Plus Self-Care (Comparison Arm)Symbol Search Task PerformanceBurst 2 (9 months)1,800.5 msStandard Deviation 457.8
p-value: 0.03195% CI: [-31, -1.5]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Total Serum Folate Levels

Blood sera specimens were collected and processed at Baseline and 9-months post-intervention and shipped to University of Minnesota Advanced Research & Diagnostic Laboratory (ARDL) for total folate analysis by a validated serum folate assay. Mean total folate levels are summarized by study arm and reported in nmol/L. The lower limit of detection (LLOD) for mean total folate is 4.54 nmol/L and the upper limit of detection (ULOD) 90.8 nmol/L. Increase in this biomarker from baseline for MHD participants indicates possible adherence to an MHD dietary pattern such as eating more green leafy vegetables.

Time frame: Baseline (Burst 1) and 9 months (Burst 2)

Population: Missing data: Burst 1, MHD (N=13); Burst 1, Comparison (N=12). Burst 2, MHD (N=36), Burst 2, Comparison (N=44).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Anti-inflammatory Dietary Intervention (MHD Arm)Total Serum Folate LevelsBurst 1 (Baseline)35.93 nmol/LStandard Deviation 17.19
Anti-inflammatory Dietary Intervention (MHD Arm)Total Serum Folate LevelsBurst 2 (9 months)35.26 nmol/LStandard Deviation 17.8
Usual Diet Plus Self-Care (Comparison Arm)Total Serum Folate LevelsBurst 1 (Baseline)34.72 nmol/LStandard Deviation 15.74
Usual Diet Plus Self-Care (Comparison Arm)Total Serum Folate LevelsBurst 2 (9 months)35.01 nmol/LStandard Deviation 15.78
p-value: 0.90495% CI: [-3.63, 4.11]ANCOVA
Secondary

Vitamin B12 Levels

Blood sera specimens were collected and processed at Baseline and 9-months post-intervention and shipped to University of Minnesota ARDL laboratory for Vitamin B12 analysis by a validated Vitamin B12 assay. Mean Vitamin B12 levels are summarized by study arm and reported in pg/mL. Reference ranges for this biomarker are: 232-1245 pg/mL and LLOD is 100 pg/mL. Increase in this biomarker from baseline for MHD participants indicates possible adherence to an MHD dietary pattern.

Time frame: Baseline (Burst 1) and 9 months (Burst 2)

Population: Missing data: Burst 1, MHD (N=10); Burst 1, Comparison (N=7). Burst 2, MHD (N=33), Burst 2, Comparison (N=40).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Anti-inflammatory Dietary Intervention (MHD Arm)Vitamin B12 LevelsBurst 1 (Baseline)736.78 pg/mLStandard Deviation 513.94
Anti-inflammatory Dietary Intervention (MHD Arm)Vitamin B12 LevelsBurst 2 (9 Months)718.23 pg/mLStandard Deviation 522.58
Usual Diet Plus Self-Care (Comparison Arm)Vitamin B12 LevelsBurst 1 (Baseline)712.89 pg/mLStandard Deviation 445.71
Usual Diet Plus Self-Care (Comparison Arm)Vitamin B12 LevelsBurst 2 (9 Months)716.22 pg/mLStandard Deviation 417.64
p-value: 0.97895% CI: [-100.13, 97.4]ANCOVA
Secondary

α-Carotenoid Levels

Blood plasma specimens were collected and processed at Baseline and 9-months post-intervention from a sub-sample and shipped to University of Minnesota ARDL lab for α-carotenoid analysis by an HPLC method. α-Carotenoids were measured with a diode array detector equipped HPLC system. Mean α-carotenoid levels are summarized by study arm and reported in mcg/mL. There are no reference ranges for this biomarker (other than non-negative values). Increase in this biomarker from baseline for MHD participants indicates possible adherence to an MHD dietary pattern.

Time frame: Baseline (Burst 1) and 9 months (Burst 2)

Population: Missing data: Burst 1, MHD (N=7); Burst 1, Comparison (N=6). Burst 2, MHD (N=31), Burst 2, Comparison (N=38).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Anti-inflammatory Dietary Intervention (MHD Arm)α-Carotenoid LevelsBurst 1 (Baseline)0.04 mcg/mLStandard Deviation 0.04
Anti-inflammatory Dietary Intervention (MHD Arm)α-Carotenoid LevelsBurst 2 (9 Months)0.04 mcg/mLStandard Deviation 0.04
Usual Diet Plus Self-Care (Comparison Arm)α-Carotenoid LevelsBurst 1 (Baseline)0.04 mcg/mLStandard Deviation 0.03
Usual Diet Plus Self-Care (Comparison Arm)α-Carotenoid LevelsBurst 2 (9 Months)0.04 mcg/mLStandard Deviation 0.06
p-value: 0.76995% CI: [-0.01, 0.01]ANCOVA
Secondary

α-Tocopherol Levels

Blood plasma specimens were collected and processed at Baseline and 9-months post-intervention and shipped to University of Minnesota ARDL for α-tocopherol analysis by an HPLC method. α-Tocopherols were measured with a diode array detector equipped HPLC system. Mean α-tocopherol levels are summarized by study arm and reported in mcg/mL. There are no reference ranges for this biomarker from this laboratory (other than non-negative values). Increase in this biomarker from baseline for MHD participants indicates possible adherence to an MHD dietary pattern.

Time frame: Baseline (Burst 1) and 9 months (Burst 2)

Population: Missing data: Burst 1, MHD (N=7); Burst 1, Comparison (N=6). Burst 2, MHD (N=31), Burst 2, Comparison (N=38).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Anti-inflammatory Dietary Intervention (MHD Arm)α-Tocopherol LevelsBurst 1 (Baseline)11.39 mcg/mLStandard Deviation 3.49
Anti-inflammatory Dietary Intervention (MHD Arm)α-Tocopherol LevelsBurst 2 (9 Months)11.45 mcg/mLStandard Deviation 3.73
Usual Diet Plus Self-Care (Comparison Arm)α-Tocopherol LevelsBurst 1 (Baseline)11.02 mcg/mLStandard Deviation 2.94
Usual Diet Plus Self-Care (Comparison Arm)α-Tocopherol LevelsBurst 2 (9 Months)11.26 mcg/mLStandard Deviation 3.56
p-value: 0.72195% CI: [-0.76, 0.52]ANCOVA

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 5, 2026