Comparison of Stapler Line Bleeding Control Techniquessurgery

Comparison of Stapler Line Bleeding Control Techniques in Laparoscopic Gastric Bypass

Status

Completed

Phases

Study type

Interventional

Source

ClinicalTrials.gov

Registry ID

NCT03240367

Enrollment

Registered

2017-08-07

Start date

2016-12-04

Completion date

2017-07-14

Last updated

2017-08-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Obesity, Morbid

Brief summary

Introduction RYGB surgeon; Have become increasingly morbid obesity treatment methods with improvements in minimally invasive surgery. Ensuring patient comfort and early return to life are the criteria that should be given priority in this treatment method.The purpose of this study; Emphasizing that the cautery technique of the stapler line bleeding control methods is as successful as the other methods.

Detailed description

The question of the availability of cautery in RYGB surgeons

Interventions

OTHERCoutery

Stapler line bleeding control with coutery

Study design

Allocation

RANDOMIZED

Intervention model

PARALLEL

Primary purpose

TREATMENT

Masking

NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

ALL

Age

18 Years to 65 Years

Healthy volunteers

Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Morbid obese patients

Exclusion criteria

* Cirrhotic patients, those under 18 years of age, additional intraabdominal surgeries during LRYGBP and those who had previously undergone obesity surgery (revision surgery)

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame	Description
3-item drainage control	8 months	Bleeding quantities to be noted

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026