Malocclusion, Angle Class II
Conditions
Keywords
Low-level laser, functional treatment, twin-block, RCT
Brief summary
This experimental study will evaluate the effect of combined treatment with low-level laser and functional appliances (twin-block) on the correction of Class II malocclusion, compared with the control group treated with functional appliances (twin-block) only. The study sample will consist of 40 patients with Class II malocclusion. The sample will be allocated randomly into two groups: a control group and an experimental group. Functional appliance (twin-block) will be applied for all patients. Low-level laser will be applied for the experimental group only. The skeleto-dental changes occurring after functional treatment will be assessed using cephalometric radiographs; pre- and post- treatment changes for each group will be evaluated individually.
Detailed description
Class II malocclusion is considered as the most common malocclusion between patients. Recently low-level laser enters the world of dentistry, some studies assessed the effect of low-level laser on the growth of mandibles and condyles in animals and showed that there is a good effect of laser on the mandible growth. This study will evaluate the effect of low-level laser on the growth of the mandible and the duration of functional treatment. Twin-block will be applied in two groups: The control group will receive the twin-block only, and the experimental group will receive the twin-block combined with low-level laser therapy on the TMG region. Cephalometric radiographs will be gotten before and after functional treatment to evaluate the dento-skeletal changes.
Interventions
Functional treatment will be achieved using the Twin-block appliance
Functional treatment will be combined with low-level laser therapy on the TMG region
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Skeletal Class II malocclusion because of mandibular retrognathia * ANB \> 4 * Overjet \> 5 * SNB \< 78
Exclusion criteria
* Poor oral hygiene * Previous orthodontic treatment. * Patients with syndromes, clefts, or craniofacial abnormalities. * Reason of contraindication of functional treatment
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| The duration of functional treatment | After functional treatment which will take approximately 8 months | The duration of the functional treatment will be measured and compared between groups. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Dentoskeletal effects of the functional treatment | Changes will be evaluated before and after functional treatment which will take approximately 8 months | Dentoskeletal changes before and after functional treatment combined with Low-level Laser compared with those of the control group (SNA, SNB, ANB, Overjet ,…etc) using lateral cephalometric radiographs. |
Countries
Syria