Skip to content

Cost Effectiveness of the EndoPhys Pressure Sensing Access System vs. Radial A-line for Intra-operative Blood Pressure Monitoring

Cost Effectiveness of the EndoPhys Pressure Sensing Access System vs. Radial A-line for Intra-operative Blood Pressure Monitoring

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03239847
Enrollment
40
Registered
2017-08-04
Start date
2016-09-06
Completion date
2017-04-05
Last updated
2017-08-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cerebrovascular Disorders

Brief summary

This study aims to compare the time difference between radial arterial line placement and use of the EndoPhys sheath, as well as, assess the cost effectiveness of the EnoPhys sheath vs. use of a radial arterial line based on device and operating room costs.

Interventions

OTHEREndoPhys Sheath and Radial Arterial Line
OTHEREndoPhys Sheath

Sponsors

Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SEQUENTIAL
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
SINGLE (Caregiver)

Masking description

Anesthesia team will not be made aware of the purpose of the trial.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* All elective neuro endovascular procedures requiring general anesthesia and continuous invasive blood pressure monitoring * Adequate access to both the radial or femoral artery

Exclusion criteria

* Pre-operative identification of contra-indication for radial arterial line placement * Hemodynamic instability * Need for continued post-operative invasive blood pressure monitoring * Failure to obtain informed consent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Total CostPatient time in operating room (approximately 2 hours)Total cost of each approach, as defined by the sum of material (device) costs plus the value of operative room time per minute.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Complication rates between the two groups.Patient time in operating room (approximately 2 hours)
Associated anticipated costs of complications between the two groups.Patient time in operating room (approximately 2 hours)
Patient satisfaction as assessed by post-operative questionnaireQuestionnaire is assessed post-operatively at one day and at the 2-4 week follow up (approximately 5 minutes to assess)
Difference in preparation time between the two approachesFrom onset of anesthesia to successful insertion of the catheter (approximately 30 minutes)
Technical success of EndoPhys sheath for blood pressure measurement and accuracy as compared to the radial arterial line.Upon EndoPhys sheath insertion until it is removed from the femoral artery (approximately 1.5 hours)
Sensitivity analysis to evaluated variation in times for arterial line placementFrom onset of anesthesia to successful insertion of the catheter (approximately 30 minutes)
Sensitivity analysis to evaluated variable operating room time costsPatient time in operating room (approximately 2 hours)
Anesthesiologist satisfaction as assessed by post-operative questionnaireQuestionnaire is assessed post-operatively in the operating room (approximately 5 minutes to assess)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 24, 2026