Skip to content

15 Years Outcomes Following Bioprosthetic vs Mechanical Aortic Valve Replacement Between 50-65 Years

15 Years Outcomes Following Bioprosthetic vs Mechanical Isolated Aortic Valve Replacement for Aortic Stenosis in Patients Aged 50 to 65 Years in South Spain. The Andalousian Aortic Valve Multicentric Study (ANDALVALVE)

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03239509
Acronym
ANDALVALVE
Enrollment
1200
Registered
2017-08-04
Start date
2017-01-31
Completion date
2018-04-30
Last updated
2018-07-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Surgery, Survival, Prosthesis, Valve Heart Disease

Keywords

long-term survival, bioprosthesis, complications, anticoagulation, mechanichal prosthesis

Brief summary

Currently there is an increase in the use of bioprosthesis worldwide (\> 70% according to national data of the Spanish Society of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery). There is conflicting evidence regarding the long-term survival of patients aged 50-65 years with mechanical (M) or biological (B) aortic prostheses. General consensus of greater complications associated with the use of long-life anticoagulation in M and of reoperation in B. Similar survival with lower MACCE complications in bioprosthesis could reconsider their choice in patients aged 50-65 years, specially in the current TAVI era. The investigators are going to perform a multicentric retrospective observational study (Registry) about 15 year-outcomes Following Bioprosthetic vs Mechanical Isolated Aortic Valve Replacement for Aortic Stenosis in Patients Aged 50 to 65 Years in 5 Cardiovascular Surgery Centers in Andalousia (south Spain)

Detailed description

Objectives The main objective is to analyze long-term survival (15 years) and major cardiovascular complications (MACE, (death of any cause, neurological events (TIA / stroke), any prosthesis reoperation, and major bleeding), in patients aged 50-65 years who underwent isolated aortic valve replacement (AVR) due to severe aortic stenosis . Secondary objectives were to analyze the evolution of transprosthetic gradients by echocardiography, type of INR control, and degree of significant structural degeneration in bioprostheses. Material and Method: A retrospective analytical study of patients aged 50-65 years who underwent AVR surgery for stenosis between 2000-2015 in all centers with a Cardiovascular Surgery Dept. in Andalousia (SPAIN) as an inclusion criterion. As exclusion criteria, autonomic change of residence, need for concomitant surgery, previous cardiac interventions and endocarditis. Survival analysis and clinical data will be performed through the Diraya Health Care medical records (DAE), direct telephone contact with family and / or relatives, A crude analysis of the data and a posterior analysis by propensity score matching with the help of the Foundation for Biomedical Research of Malaga (IBIMA) with SPSS software will be carried out using a 1: 1 nearest neighbour matching protocol based on the Number of total bioprosthesis. A total sample of more than 1200 cases is expected, of which about 380 would be bioprostheses that would serve as a basis for the pairing. To find a 10% difference in the primary endpoint, two groups of 325 patients are required for a p = 0.05 and 80% for a bilateral contrast of two independent proportions. Sub-analysis will be performed by subgroups of age (50-59 vs. 60-65 years) and another according to the mark of the 2 prostheses of each type most used. All statistical analyzes will be two-tailed with an alpha error of 0.05 to consider statistically significant data, and will be reviewed by IBIMA biostatistics. Conclusions: A positive result (similar survival and prosthetic durability in group B, with lower complications) could change the current indications of AVS in our environment, allowing the age of indication of bioprostheses to be reduced below 60 years.

Interventions

PROCEDUREbioprosthesis implantation between 2000-2015

Implantation of a bioprosthesis in aortic position with cardiopulmonary bypass

PROCEDUREmechanical prosthesis implantation between 2000-2015

Implantation of a mechanical prosthesis in aortic position with cardiopulmonary bypass

Sponsors

Fundación Pública Andaluza para la Investigación de Málaga en Biomedicina y Salud
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
50 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients aged 50-65 years who underwent isolated aortic valve replacement (AVR) for severe aortic stenosis from years 2000-2015 both inclusive

Exclusion criteria

* Not reported Residency change (unreachable) * Need of concomitant surgery * Reoperations * Infective endocarditis

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of participants aliveFrom date of surgery until the date of death from any cause, assessed up to 17 yearsSurvival since surgery
Late postoperative endpoint of 4 MACE complicationsFrom date of surgery until the date of first documented MACE (see description) or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 17 yearsAll cause Mortality, major bleeding, cerebrovascular or transient ischemic accident, and need of any prosthesis reintervention (Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events, MACE)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Cross-clamp ischemic heart time in minutes needed in the surgeryday 1 after surgeryCross-clamp ischemic heart time in minutes needed in the surgery
Transfusional requirements (number of red packed cells, fresh frozen plasma and platelets)rom date of surgery until the date of first documented transfusional requirement assessed up to 17 yearstransfusional needs in long term follow up
Structural valve deterioration (SVD) in bioprosthesisFrom date of surgery until the date of first documented SVD assessed up to 17 yearsincrease in 20 mmHg in transaortic gradient since discharge echocardiography, any aortic regurgitation greater than moderate or need for bioprosthesis reoperation
Total in-Hospital and Intensive Care Unit stay (in days)From date of surgery to discharge of the unit and Hospital, up to 6 monthsTotal in-Hospital and Intensive Care Unit stay (in days)
Postsurgery Mean transprosthetic gradients in mmHgFrom date of surgery until the date of Hospital Discharge, documented first Mean transprosthetic gradient in mmHg assessed by echocardiography after surgery.measured by the first echocardiography after surgery
Late Mean transprosthetic gradients in mmHgFrom date of surgery until the date of last documented echocardiography assessed up to 17 yearsmeasured by the last echocardiography in follow up
Any prosthetic infective endocarditisFrom date of surgery until the date of first documented prosthetic infective endocarditis, assessed up to 17 yearsdefinite diagnosis of early or late infective endocarditis
Cardiovascular cause of rehospitalizationf first documented Cardiovascular cause of rehospitalization assessed up to 17 yearsany cardiovascular cause which need rehospitalization after surgery
Cardiopulmonary bypass time in minutes needed in the surgeryday 1 after surgeryCardiopulmonary bypass time in minutes needed in the surgery

Countries

Spain

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 22, 2026