Fracture Fixation, Internal
Conditions
Brief summary
To compare classical pedicle finder versus pedicle finder with impedancemetry on the perioperative radiation exposure of PPTLO. These two devices are already used in common practice.
Interventions
Posterior thoracic and lumbar osteosynthesis with classical pedicle finder
Posterior thoracic and lumbar osteosynthesis with pedicle finder with impedancemetry
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Men and women between 18 and 80 years-old; * Patient with an indication of PPTLO for one or two segments * Patient in a position to understand protocol information; * Patient who received information about the protocol and who did not show opposition to participate
Exclusion criteria
* History of posterior spinal fusion surgery on the spinal level concerned by the study; * Morbid obesity (body mass index greater than 35 kg / m²); * Major incapable (safeguard of justice, guardianship) and persons deprived of liberty. * Simultaneous participation in another research protocol involving the human person
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Dose area product in cGy.cm2 (DAP) | Surgery Day | Dose area product in cGy.cm2 (DAP) |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Radiation duration in seconds (measured on the fluoroscope); | Surgery Day | Radiation duration in seconds (measured on the fluoroscope); |
| Radiation rate | Surgery Day | Radiation rate on:1 ring carried by the surgeon (passive dosimeter),1 passive dosimeter worn at the surgeon's eye level, 1 passive dosimeter on the fluoroscope,1 active dosimeter placed on the bust of the surgeon under the lead apron |
| Path of pedicle screws extracted from fluoroscopic images | Day 2 after surgery | Trajectory of pedicle screws; |
| Operating time in minutes. | Surgery Day | Operating time in minutes. |
Countries
France
Contacts
Rennes University Hospital