Skip to content

Neurostimulation in Chronic and Episodic Migraine

Clinical and Neuronal Changes in Chronic and Episodic Migraine Patients After Neurostimulation

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03237754
Enrollment
41
Registered
2017-08-03
Start date
2016-10-01
Completion date
2020-05-30
Last updated
2020-08-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Double-blind Design, Randomized, Sham-controlled

Keywords

migraine, neurostimulation, neuroimaging, tDCS, MRI

Brief summary

Currently, successful prevention of migraine is not sufficiently achieved by (prophylactic) drug therapy. In contrast, neurophysiologically guided treatments might provide an alternative avenue, since these can normalize brain alterations without side effects. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) appears useful in the acute and prophylactic treatment of migraine, probably because of its modifying and re-balancing influence on neuronal activity. Yet, to test for the efficacy of tDCS in a clinically acceptable way, it is necessary to apply not only tDCS but also a sham placebo, which is often neglected in tDCS stimulation studies. Further, tDCS needs to be applied in a large (n \> 20) sample of well-defined migraine patients, which would be advantageous, compared to previously published work. Monitoring sources of regional neuronal alterations in migraineurs prior and after tDCS is essential to investigate physiological mechanisms of tDCS. There is an increasing interest towards non-pharmacological treatment alternatives for migraine (and headache disorders) with reduced side effects to established prophylactic medications. The primary outcome of this project is to demonstrate that repetitive sessions of neurostimulation lead to a significant and permanent reduction of the primary symptom severity (i.e. migraine attacks) for patients suffering from chronic and episodic migraine. Since neurostimulation tools are nowadays accepted as therapeutic tools, our study might provide evidence that tDCS can be a non-pharmacological alternative for treating migraine.

Interventions

DEVICEtDCS device from neuroConn

weak electrical direct current stimulation

Sponsors

Kantonsspital Baden
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Zurich
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Masking description

double-blind

Intervention model description

Patients receive either Placebo or real neurostimulation

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

Patients from age 18 upwards (max. 80 years) suffering from chronic or episodic migraine. Medication overuse headache (MOH) patients are included as well (as chronic migraine patients do often show MOH). Healthy volunteers (18-80 years) are included if they don't fulfil the

Exclusion criteria

and do not suffer from migraine or other headache disorders, except infrequent episodic tension-type headache All volunteers are able to read and sign the informed consent.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Migraine days6 monthsChange in migraine days (in episodic and chronic migraine patients) after tDCS Treatment (relative to before tDCS)Treatment) in the active and Placebo group

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
MR data6 monthsChanges in functional and structural MR data before and after tDCS Treatment
Clinical data6 monthsClinical variables (e.g. depression scores) will be compared in an identical fashion as for the variable migraine days

Countries

Switzerland

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 20, 2026