Skip to content

Classification of the Sagittal Profile of the Spine in Asymptomatic Elderly Subjects

Classification of the Sagittal Profile of the Spine in Asymptomatic Elderly Subjects

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03237039
Acronym
EOS60
Enrollment
160
Registered
2017-08-02
Start date
2017-06-14
Completion date
2019-04-03
Last updated
2017-08-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Aged, Asymptomatic Condition

Keywords

Roussouly type, spine alignment, fall-risk, gait cycle analysis

Brief summary

Principal aim The main purpose of the study is to describe the distribution of the sagittal profile in elderly subjects in order to bridge the gap present in this type of screening, evaluated in the literature for adults only (i.e. 160 subjects considered by Roussouly et al. in 2005). This classification assigns an integer value from 1 to 4 in relation to the evaluation of alignment of the lumbar spine and pelvis in the sagittal plane. The population description is therefore divided into four categories. The extension of this classification to elderly can provide useful support for the clinical evaluation and the specific treatment of the elderly patients. Secondary aims The study aims in addition to evaluate the relation between the spine sagittal profile and the objective indexes obtained from the assessment of fall-risk and gait cycle analysis. Accordingly, a subgroup of 40 subjects out of the 160 will be evaluated. This subgroup will consider the subjects older than or equal to 74 years, where the risk of falling is most likely to be expected.

Detailed description

Introduction: The classification of spine sagittal profile can be an essential prediction factor for the specific prevention and treatment of patient's pathologies. Despite high variability, sagittal alignment can be accurately measured by radiographic examination and is fully replicable. To this regard, a classification of the lumbar profile and pelvis in the sagittal plane was proposed by Roussouly et al. Specifically, four different typologies can be recognized. These typologies classify the profile of the lumbar curve and are directly related to the quantification of the pelvic inclination. The study by Roussouly et al. examined 160 asymptomatic subjects aged between 18 and 45 years and confirmed the high inter-individual variability of the sagittal profile. Unfortunately, this classification has not been extended to elderly. In this regard, it has been shown that peculiar changes in the sagittal profile are particularly evident in aging, such as the advancement of the average sagittal axis and the tendency to decrease of the degree of lumbar lordosis. According to that, extending the classification of the spine sagittal alignment in elderly results of prime importance. Furthermore, extending this classification will also provide useful information supporting the clinical evaluation and the specific treatment of elderly patients (e.g. better understanding the association between spine alignment and the development of degenerative alterations). In addition to this primary objective, this study aims to assess the relation between postural imbalance (due to alterations of the sagittal profile) and motor functionality in elderly. A subgroup of the enrolled subjects, equal to one quarter of the total size, will undergo fall-risk assessment and gait cycle analysis. This subgroup will account subjects older than or equal to 74 years, where the risk of falling is more likely to occur. The objective indices obtained from these analyses will be put in relation with the classification of the spine sagittal profile. Aims of the study: The primary aim of this study is to classify the spine sagittal profile in elderly asymptomatic subjects (older than or equal to 60 years) through the semi-automatic analysis of low dose radiographic images obtained through a validated radiographic system (EOS Imaging System, France). The study will evaluate 160 subjects, at least 40 of whom will have an age greater than or equal to 74 years. According to Roussouly et al., the classification of the spine alignment will assign an integer value ranging from 1 to 4, in relation to the evaluation of the lumbar spine and pelvis in the sagittal plane. Secondary aim of the study will be to investigate the relation between the classification of spine sagittal profile and the objective indexes characterizing the fall-risk and the gait cycle analysis. This assessment will take into account the subgroup of 40 subjects aged 74 years or more. Radiographic examination: The radiographic examination will be performed with the EOS low-dose X-ray radiation system by a radiology technician. The examination, which will take about 10 seconds, will allow the simultaneous acquisition in upright position of two full-body radiographic images, one in the coronal plane and one in the sagittal plane. The evaluation of the radiographic images will be performed by an orthopedic physician. Image processing will be performed by a biomedical engineer through sterEOS proprietary software and will provide the anatomical parameters needed to classify the sagittal profile. Assessment of fall-risk: This evaluation will be performed after the radiographic examination, in the same session. The fall-risk assessment test will be performed by a biomedical engineer through OAK device (OAK, Khymeia, Italy). The OAK device integrates two force plates and sensory elastic straps applied to pelvis and limbs. This test, which takes approximately twenty minutes, accounts eight consecutive postural equilibrium exercises and provide the automatic detection of subject's postural parameters. At the end of the test, the fall-risk rating is automatically assigned. Gait cycle analysis: This assessment will be performed in the same session of fall-risk evaluation. The gait cycle analysis, which takes approximately forty minutes, will be executed by a biomedical engineer. Adhesive passive reflective markers will be placed on the skin according to a protocol suitable to characterize the alignment of lower limbs and trunk. The markers trajectories during walk will be recorded by an eight cameras optoelectronic system (BTS smart-D, Italy). A force platform (Kistler, Switzerland) placed in the middle of the pathway will detect the forces exchanged with the ground. The data analysis will provide the kinematic and kinetic descriptive parameters of gait cycle. Statistical analysis: The total sample size was chosen considering the classificatory purpose of the present study and its descriptive and non-comparative intent. It was therefore considered as appropriate to match the number of 160 subjects evaluated in previous study to classify the spine sagittal alignment in adult subjects. Concerning the secondary aim of the study, the correlation between the Roussouly type (identifying the spine sagittal alignment) and the indexes characterizing fall-risk and gait cycle will be assessed. The significance of the Pearson correlation coefficient or of Spearman correlation coefficient, in case of non-Gaussian data, will be tested according to two-tailed t-test or permutation distribution test, respectively. Statistical significance will be considered at p \<0.05 level. To this regard, the sample size requested to guarantee the significance (with α = 0.05 and statistical power = 95%) of a correlation value defined as 'strong' (not less than 0.6, in absolute value), is equal to 30. The number of 40 subjects planned for the secondary aim thus fulfills the requirements for the correlation analysis.

Interventions

Radiological examination of frontal and lateral planes, simultaneously acquired with low dose X-ray system (EOS system, France) in one single exposition. The evaluation of the radiographic images will be performed by an orthopedic physician.Image processing will be performed by a biomedical engineer through sterEOS proprietary software and will provide the anatomical parameters needed to classify the sagittal profile.

OTHERfall-risk assessment

This evaluation will be performed after the radiographic scan, in the same day. The fall-risk assessment test will be performed by a biomedical engineer through OAK device (OAK, Khymeia, Italy). The OAK device integrates two force plates and sensory elastic straps applied to pelvis and limbs. This test, which takes approximately twenty minutes, accounts eight consecutive postural equilibrium exercises and provide the automatic detection of subject's postural parameters. At the end of the test, the fall-risk rating is automatically assigned.

OTHERgait cycle analysis

This assessment will be performed in the same session of fall-risk evaluation. The gait cycle analysis, which takes approximately forty minutes, will be executed by a biomedical engineer. Adhesive passive reflective markers will be placed on the skin according to a protocol suitable to characterize the alignment of lower limbs and trunk. The markers trajectories during walk will be recorded by an eight cameras optoelectronic system (BTS smart-D, Italy). A force platform (Kistler, Switzerland) placed in the middle of the pathway will detect the forces exchanged with the ground. The data analysis will provide the kinematic and kinetic descriptive parameters of gait cycle.

Sponsors

I.R.C.C.S Ospedale Galeazzi-Sant'Ambrogio
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
SCREENING
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

symptomatic elderly subjects

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
60 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* older than or equal to 60 years * subscription of informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Significant painful episodes linked to the spine in the last 2 years * Early surgical interventions involving the spine * scoliosis or other spine pathologies (vertebral, neurological, muscular) * Obesity (BMI\> 30 kg / m2)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Lumbar lordosisThrough study completion, an average of 18 monthsLumbar lordosis (°) will be accounted for the spine alignment classification, and correlations with fall-risk and gait cycle indexes will be checked for.
Classification of Roussouly typeThrough study completion, an average of 18 monthsThis classification assigns an integer value ranging from 1 to 4, in relation to the evaluation of lumbar spine and pelvis alignment in the sagittal plane. It will be acquired to describe subjects' population, and correlations with fall-risk and gait cycle indexes will be checked for.
Subject's weightThrough study completion, an average of 18 monthsSubject's weight (kg) will be acquired to describe subjects' population
Subject's heightThrough study completion, an average of 18 monthsSubject's height (cm) will be acquired to describe subjects' population
Thoracic kyphosisThrough study completion, an average of 18 monthsThoracic kyphosis (°) will be accounted for the spine alignment classification, and correlations with fall-risk and gait cycle indexes will be checked for.
Pelvic incidenceThrough study completion, an average of 18 monthsPelvic incidence (°) will be accounted for the spine alignment classification, and correlations with fall-risk and gait cycle indexes will be checked for.
Sacral slopeThrough study completion, an average of 18 monthsSacral slope (°) will be accounted for the spine alignment classification, and correlations with fall-risk and gait cycle indexes will be checked for.
Pelvic tiltThrough study completion, an average of 18 monthsPelvic tilt (°) will be accounted for the spine alignment classification, and correlations with fall-risk and gait cycle indexes will be checked for.
Lateral pelvic inclinationThrough study completion, an average of 18 monthsLateral pelvic inclination (°) will be accounted for the spine alignment classification, and correlations with fall-risk and gait cycle indexes will be checked for.
Pelvic torsionThrough study completion, an average of 18 monthsPelvic torsion (°) will be accounted for the spine alignment classification, and correlations with fall-risk and gait cycle indexes will be checked for.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Gait analysis: maximum hip flexion momentThrough study completion, an average of 18 monthsMaximum hip flexion moment (Nm) will be evaluated for both the right and left hips.
Fall-risk scoreThrough study completion, an average of 18 monthsEvaluation of the fall-risk with the OAK device (OAK, Khymeia, Italy). The device automatically evaluates the fall-risk score, an integer value ranging from 0 to 24, where 0 indicates maximum risk and 24 the minimum.
Gait analysis: maximum hip extension momentThrough study completion, an average of 18 monthsMaximum hip extension moment (Nm) will be evaluated for both the right and left hips.
Functional forward flexionThrough study completion, an average of 18 monthsFunctional forward flexion (cm) will be automatically computed by the OAK device.
CoP sway areaThrough study completion, an average of 18 monthsSway area of the center of pressure (cm2) will be automatically computed by the OAK device.
Gait analysis: stance phaseThrough study completion, an average of 18 monthsStance phase (% of total gait cycle time) will be evaluated for both the right and left legs.
Gait analysis: swing phaseThrough study completion, an average of 18 monthsSwing phase (% of total gait cycle time) will be evaluated for both the right and left legs.
Gait analysis: stride lengthThrough study completion, an average of 18 monthsStride length (m) will be evaluated for both the right and left legs.
Gait analysis: average walking speedThrough study completion, an average of 18 monthsAverage walking speed (m/s).
Gait analysis: average step cadenceThrough study completion, an average of 18 monthsAverage step cadence (steps/min)
Gait analysis: maximum hip flexionThrough study completion, an average of 18 monthsMaximum hip flexion (°) will be evaluated for both the right and left hips.
Gait analysis: maximum hip extensionThrough study completion, an average of 18 monthsMaximum hip extension (°) will be evaluated for both the right and left hips.

Countries

Italy

Contacts

Primary ContactTito Bassani, PhD
tito.bassani@grupposandonato.it+390266214939

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026