Skip to content

Goal Oriented Strategy to Preserve Ejection Fraction Trial

Raising the Bars in the Treatment of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: Goal Oriented Strategy to Preserve Ejection Fraction Trial

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03236818
Acronym
GOSPEL
Enrollment
30
Registered
2017-08-02
Start date
2013-05-31
Completion date
2017-09-30
Last updated
2017-08-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension

Keywords

pulmonary arterial hypertension, right ventricle, MRI, medical combination therapy

Brief summary

In this prospective long term feasibility study we examine whether a goal oriented therapeutic strategy that is able to preserve right ventricular function will result in improved clinical outcome in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension. We hypothesize that right ventricular function can only be preserved when early and aggressive medical combination therapy not only reduces pulmonary vascular resistance but also pulmonary pressures.

Detailed description

Rationale: The current strategy in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH)is to improve exercise capacity which can be achieved by decreasing pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) and subsequently increasing cardiac output (CO). Despite this load reduction, a substantial proportion of patients show progressive right ventricular (RV) dysfunction leading to clinical worsening and death. A possible explanation is that current therapies show a relatively modest reduction in PVR, leaving mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) unchanged. As a consequence RV work, defined as the product of CO and mPAP increases, contributing to progressive RV dysfunction. Hypothesis: A goal oriented therapeutic strategy that is able to preserve RV function will result in improved clinical outcome. RV function can only be preserved when early and aggressive combination therapy not only reduces PVR but also mPAP. Study questions: 1. Will a goal oriented strategy to preserve/improve RV function, measured by right ventricular ejection fraction (RVEF) be effective? 2. Does early and aggressive combination therapy result in improved RV function and survival during long term follow-up? 3. Does a strategy to preserve RVEF also translate into improvements of other clinically meaningful parameters? 4. Can RVEF be replaced by more simple measures? 5. Will a goal oriented strategy to improve RVEF also lead to improvement of myocardial performances and coupling of the RV to its load? Study design and study population: In this prospective longitudinal feasibility study, thirty newly diagnosed idiopathic or heritable PAH patients with New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class II or III will be included. Maintenance/improvement of RVEF will be our primary outcome parameter and therefore cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) will be performed at baseline and at 4, 8 , 12 and 24 months of follow-up. Six-minute walk testing (6MWT), quality of life questionnaires and blood sampling (NT-proBNP) will be performed at similar follow-up intervals. In addition, right heart catheterization (RHC) will be performed at baseline, after 4, 12 and 24 months of follow-up. NYHA II patients will start with single agent medical treatment whereas patients with NYHA III will start on combination therapy (2 treatments). In case of a stable/improved RVEF during each follow-up measurement (defined as no decrease in RVEF \>3% compared to previous measurement), the treatment strategy will remain unchanged. In case of decreased RVEF \>3%, additional medical therapy will be added. Our hypothesis will prove to be correct when the additional medical treatment result in improved RVEF during the subsequent follow-up measurement.

Interventions

DRUGERA and PDE-5I (Sildenafil, Tadalafil, Bosentan, Macitentan)

Combination of an ERA and PDE-5I (Sildenafil, Tadalafil, Bosentan, Macitentan)

Sponsors

Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Idiopathic or heritable pulmonary arterial hypertension * New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class II or III

Exclusion criteria

* Other causes of pulmonary arterial hypertension (i.e. collagen vascular disease, congenital heart disease, chrono-thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension, pulmonary venous hypertension, left heart failure, hypoxemic lung disease) * Pulmonary arterial hypertension targeted therapies before study inclusion

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in right ventricular ejection fraction4,12, 24 months of follow-upThe primary endpoint will be change in right ventricular ejection fraction (RVEF) during 2 years of follow-up.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
pulmonary vascular resistance4,12, 24 months of follow-upChange in pulmonary vascular resistance
mPAP4,12, 24 months of follow-upChange in mPAP
Cardiac output in L/min (Thermodilution method)4,8, 12, 24 months of follow-upChange in cardiac output
Exercise capacity4,8, 12, 24 months of follow-upChange in exercise capacity
New York Heart Association functional class4,8, 12, 24 months of follow-upChange in New York Heart Association functional class

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
NT-proBNP4,8, 12, 24 months of follow-upChange in NT-proBNP
Quality of Life by SF-36 questionnaire4,8, 12, 24 months of follow-upChange in Quality of Life

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026