Skip to content

Evaluation of Internet-Based CME for Wet-cupping Providers

Evaluation of Internet-Based CME for Wet-cupping Providers: Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03235895
Enrollment
90
Registered
2017-08-01
Start date
2017-09-25
Completion date
2017-12-10
Last updated
2017-08-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Educational Problems

Brief summary

A randomized controlled Trial to evaluate the internet based CME for wet cupping providers in Saudi Arabia

Detailed description

Research problem: Complementary and Alternative Medicine (CAM) is widely used in Saudi Arabia. As wet-cupping practice regulation and licensing had been established the need increased to develop a system of Continuing Medical Education (CME) for wet-cupping providers. E-learning grown steadily to become a popular approach in medical education with the fast-evolving technologies made it possible to develop and implement a high-quality Internet-based CME. The aim of this study is to compare the effectiveness of Internet-based CME with conventional CME in the field of complementary medicine. Research Significance: Aiming to control the training to guarantee evidenced-based quality care while facing the challenge of increased number of licensed cupping providers who needs CME hours to maintain and improve their practice. There is a need for a study to evaluate if the internet-based technique can help overcome the challenge and to increase the number and improve the quality of CME activities. Research Objectives: To evaluate the effect of internet-based CME activity on knowledge, knowledge retention and intellectual skills in wet-cupping providers compared with conventional CME activity. Moreover, to develop a model of a blended CME activity using the online platform to conduct a flipping classroom CME activity in complementary medicine. Research Methodology: Randomised, open, comparative controlled trial. Participants will be selected from a list of the registered cupping providers. Using a list of registered cupping providers (sample frame) a sample will be selected randomly using computer generated number. After taking informed consent participants will be allocated randomly into three groups; 1) Internet-based CME activity group; 2) Conventional CME activity group, and 3) control group (waitlist) receiving no intervention. Data will be explored for distribution, and the appropriate methods of presentation and testing of differences will be selected accordingly. Two-tailed values of p\<0.05 will be considered statistically significant. Immediate knowledge score, Retention Knowledge rate and skills score will be compared within and between the groups.

Interventions

Educational material given as a part of CME activity as through enhanced internet method

Sponsors

National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine, Saudi Arabia
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
25 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Physicians, nurses, physiotherapists * Passed the Compulsory wet cupping training course within the last three years. * Available during the study periods.

Exclusion criteria

* Unaccredited wet cupping training courses. * Accredit courses more than three Years

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Knowledge scoreDay 0 and day 7To measure the change the knowledge score within and between the internet-based CME group, the conventional CME group, and the control group before and immediately after the intervention

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Knowledge scoreDay 7 and day 14to asses the change in knowledge score knowledge between day 7 and day 14

Contacts

Primary ContactMohamed K Khalil, MD
statkhl@hotmail.com00966504955087

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026