Skip to content

MAGnesium-based Bioresorbable Scaffold in ST Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction

MAGnesium-based Bioresorbable Scaffold and Vasomotor Function in Patients With Acute ST Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03234348
Acronym
MAGSTEMI
Enrollment
151
Registered
2017-07-31
Start date
2017-07-01
Completion date
2019-10-31
Last updated
2020-04-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Acute Coronary Syndrome, Stent, ST Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction

Keywords

biodegradable stent, STEMI, Magnesium bioresorbable, Vasomotion

Brief summary

This is a prospective, randomized, active control, single-blind, non-inferiority, multicenter clinical trial. 148 subjects will be registered at up to 10 Spanish sites. Subjects will be followed for 5 years. All eligible patients (STEMI \< 12 hours from onset of chest pain) will be randomized to * Biotronik MAGMARISTM Sirolimus Eluting Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold System (M-BRS) or * Biotronik ORSIRO Sirolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System Endothelium-independent vasomotor response (NTG injection) will be analyzed at 12 months angiographic follow-up (Primary endpoint). In a subgroup of 40 patients Optical Coherence Tomography will be performed after the procedure and at 12 months follow-up. Angiographic (QCA pre- and post-procedure and at 12 months follow-up), OCT data (at 12 months follow-up) will be analyzed off-line by an independent core lab.

Interventions

DEVICEPercutaneous coronary intervention

PCI + stent implantation

Sponsors

Spanish Society of Cardiology
CollaboratorOTHER
Hospital Clinic of Barcelona
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Neither the participant ot the outcomes assessor will be aware of the treatment received. The patient will be blinded until the primary endpoint is reached (1 year follow-up).

Intervention model description

Patients will be randomised to one of two groups: MAGMARIS stent arm or ORSIRO stent arm in the ratio of 1:1

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 90 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Clinical: 1. At least 18 years of age. 2. ST-segment elevation Myocardial Infarction documented in an ambulance or in a Cathlab, with ≥2 mm ST segment elevation in at least two contiguous leads, presenting in the Cathlab \<12 hours after the onset of symptoms lasting ≥20 min requiring primary PCI. 3. Target lesion must be a de-novo lesion located in a native vessel. 4. The patient accepts Informed Consent 5. The patient understands and accepts clinical follow-up and angiographic control. Angiographic: 6. Vessel size should match available M-BRS scaffold sizes (≥2.75 mm, and ≤3.7 mm by visual assessment). 7. Lesion preparation by either manual thrombectomy or pre-dilatation has been successful, with opening of the vessel and TIMI ≥2 and residual stenosis \<20%.

Exclusion criteria

1. Pregnancy. 2. Known intolerance to aspirin, heparin, stainless steel, sirolimus, and contrast material. 3. Distal vessel occlusion after recanalization 4. STEMI due to stent/scaffold thrombosis 5. Severe tortuous, calcified or angulated coronary anatomy of the study vessel that in the opinion of the investigator would result in sub-optimal m-BRS placement. 6. Fibrinolysis prior to PCI 7. Known thrombocytopenia (PLT\< 100,000/mm3) 8. Active bleeding or coagulopathy or patients at chronic anticoagulation therapy 9. Cardiogenic Shock 10. Significant comorbidities precluding clinical/angiographic FU (as judged by investigators) 11. Major planned surgery that requires discontinuation of dual antiplatelet therapy. 12. Diffuse coronary artery disease that will require CABG 13. Chronic kidney disease with GFR\<30 ml/min

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
In-stent/scaffold vasodilatory endothelium independent response12 months follow-upin-stent/scaffold vasodilatory response ≥3% (delta in mean lumen diameter) after nitroglycerin injection

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Procedure successUp to 7 daysdevice success and no in-hospital cardiac events: death, repeat MI, TVR or stent/scaffold thrombosis
Device-oriented Composite Endpoint (DOCE)1, 6 months, 1,2,3,4,5 yearsCombined of cardiac death, Target vessel MI, or clinically-indicated target lesion revascularization
Cardiac death1, 6 months, 1,2,3,4,5 yearsARC definition
Target vessel MI1, 6 months, 1,2,3,4,5 yearsARC definition
Clinically driven target lesion revascularization1, 6 months, 1,2,3,4,5 yearsARC definition-Ischemia driven revascularization
Stent/scaffold thrombosis1, 6 months, 1,2,3,4,5 yearsARC definition: definite, probable, possible, acute, subacute, late and very late
Patient oriented endpoint (POCE)1, 6 months, 1,2,3,4,5 yearsCombined of all-cause death, any repeat myocardial infarction and any revascularization
All-cause death1, 6 months, 1,2,3,4,5 yearsAll-cause death rate
Any repeat myocardial infarction1, 6 months, 1,2,3,4,5 yearsAccording to WHO extended definition
Any revascularization1, 6 months, 1,2,3,4,5 yearsAny repeat intervention in the patient
Target lesion revascularization1, 6 months, 1,2,3,4,5 yearsARC definition
Target vessel revascularization1, 6 months, 1,2,3,4,5 yearsARC definition
MLDBaseline and 1 year follow-upMinimal lumen diameter by QCA
Device successImmediate after the procedureimplantation of the intended device with attainment of \<30% residual stenosis of the target lesion and TIMI ≥2
Acute gainBaselineMLD post - MLD pre by QCA
Late loss1 yearMLD post - MLD at 1 year follow-up by QCA
Binary restenosis1 year% of patients with \>50% DS at 1 year follow-up by QCA
Lumen area1 year follow-upMean and minimum lumen area of the stented/scaffolded segment by OCT
Mean lumen volume1 year follow-upmean lumen volume of the stented/scaffolded segment by OCT
% strut malapposition1 year follow-upmean area of strut malapposition by OCT
Tissue Prolapse1 year follow-uppresence and % of lumen area occupied by tissue prolapse by OCT
Neointimal hyperplasia1 year follow-upmean intra-stent/scaffold area occupied by neointimal hyperplasia by OCT
Healing index1 year follow-upIndex obtained by a combination of % malapposition, % coverage, % tissue prolapse by OCT
Strut coverage1 year follow-upPresence and amount of tissue covering the strut of the stent/scaffold by OCT
RUTTS1 year follow-upRatio of Uncovered to Total Stent/scaffold Struts Per Cross Section (RUTTS) score of ≤30% of the target stent/scaffold as determined by OCT pullback
in-stent/in-scaffold endothelium-dependent vasomotionat 12 months% change in mean luminal dimeter on the treated segment after acetylcholine infusion
%DSBaseline and 1 year follow-uppercentage diameter stenosis by QCA

Countries

Spain

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 23, 2026