Skip to content

Visualization of the Intubation Pathway With the IRRIS-Device

Video-laryngoscopic Visualization of the Intubation Pathway With the IRRIS-Device. A Clinical Safety and Proof of Concept Study

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03234283
Acronym
IRRIS
Enrollment
40
Registered
2017-07-31
Start date
2017-07-01
Completion date
2017-11-14
Last updated
2017-11-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Difficult Intubation

Keywords

Intubation

Brief summary

A prospective, open label, non-randomized, single centre safety and feasibility study. Patients with no expected airway difficulties scheduled for elective surgery including tracheal intubation and general anesthesia procedures will be enrolled into the study. Following standard induction of anesthesia, the IRRIS will be attached to the patient's neck skin just beneath the laryngeal prominence (Adam's apple) and the intubation will be performed by using a video-laryngoscope in a standardized fashion. The IRRIS device emits a light that penetrates through the skin into the airway and that is visible on the video-laryngoscope display. This light highlights the right pathway for the tracheal tube and facilitates the visual recognition and identification of the laryngeal inlet. In case of problems identified during the induction period such as an unexpected difficult intubation situation and the IRRIS does not provide the expected facilitation of intubation, the local unexpected difficult airway protocol goes into effect.

Detailed description

The IRRIS (InfraRed - Red Intubation System) is an external disposable light source in a patch that is intended for single use while it is placed externally on the patient's neck before tracheal intubation for the duration of tracheal intubation. The device transmits near-infrared light through the skin towards the trachea. During laryngoscopy, the emitted light becomes visible only from the trachea and not from the oesophagus. Video assisted devices which already are in the market known as video-laryngoscopes and fiberoptic bronchoscopes are capable of detecting and visualizing the emitted light so that the anaesthesiologist who is performing the intubation is aided to direct and insert the endotracheal tube into the trachea by following the light on the screen of his video-assisted endoscope. The objective of this study is to assess the safety, and performance of IRRIS in patients who undergo tracheal intubation in terms of skin integrity, duration of intubation, number of attempts, success of intubation and usability aspects in terms of subjective physician grading of the IRRIS.

Interventions

DEVICEIRRIS InfraRed - Red Intubation System

IRRIS will be attached to the patient's neck skin just beneath the laryngeal prominence. Tracheal intubation will be performed by using a video-laryngoscope in a standardized Fashion and by guiding the tracheal tube into the Larynx by following the visual Signal on the Screen that is caused by IRRIS. The handling of IRRIS and the Performance of tracheal Intubation will be recorded. Patients will be monitored for safety parameters and possible adverse events during the study until recovered and released from the postoperative care unit.

Sponsors

University of Zurich
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

A prospective, open label, non-randomized, safety and feasibility study.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Male and female patients scheduled for elective surgery requiring general anesthesia and tracheal intubation. 2. Patient age: adult (\>18 years old) 3. Mallampati scores 1 to 3. 4. ASA Physical Status Classification System 1-3 5. Ability to understand the requirements of the study, willingness to comply with its instructions and schedules, and agreement to the informed consent

Exclusion criteria

1. Emergency cases 2. Expected airway difficulties as defined during the pre-anaesthesia visit 3. Necessity for an alternative airway management approach other than by using a video-laryngoscope 4. Rapid sequence induction 5. Skin disorders and skin light sensitivity (SLE, lupus, Porphyria, Dermatomyositis, Pemphigus, Pellagra etc.) 6. Known history of any significant medical disorder, which in the investigator's judgment contraindicates the patient's participation 7. Impaired head and neck mobility 8. Scars or skin injuries at the neck

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Safety 1: Absence of skin lesions15 minutes after end of anesthesiaskin lesions, irritations after removal of the patch at the end of anesthesia (yes / no)
Safety 2: Severity of skin lesions15 minutes after end of anesthesiaskin lesions, irritations after removal of the patch at the end of anesthesia (mild/moderate/severe)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Proof of Concept 4: Intubation success5 minutes after start of intubationNumber of video laryngoscopy attempts till successful tracheal tube placement (number of video laryngoscope insertions during an intubation process that are related to the IRRIS operation)
Proof of Concept 5: Ease of use of IRRIS5 minutes after start of intubationSubjective degree of difficulty of the entire intubation process according a Verbal Rating Scale (VRS) assessed by the intubation person (values from 1 = very easy to 10 = extremely difficult)
Proof of Concept 2: Intubation success5 minutes after start of intubationSuccessful video-laryngoscopic tracheal intubation
Proof of Concept 8: Intubation success5 minutes after start of intubationFailures: necessity of alternative airway securing or abort of tracheal intubation if initial attempt(s) with IRRIS failed. (yes / no and number and choice of alternative techniques)
Proof of Concept 7: Ease of use of IRRIS5 minutes after start of intubationSubjective degree of helpfulness of the visual aid by the device: according a Verbal Rating Scale (VRS) assessed by the intubation person (values from 1 = not helpful at all to 10 = very helpful)
Proof of Concept 3: Intubation success5 minutes after start of intubationDuration of intubation (time in seconds from inserting the video laryngoscope till tracheal tube cuff inflation)

Countries

Switzerland

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026