Skip to content

Splenic Injury Embolization - the Question About NOM (SInE Qua NOM)

A Multi-centre, Prospective, Randomized Controlled Study to Compare Outcomes of Non-operative Management (NOM) With and Without Splenic Arterial Embolization (SAE) in Hemodynamically Stable OIS Grade 4 and 5 Splenic Injuries.

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03231202
Enrollment
224
Registered
2017-07-27
Start date
2017-07-01
Completion date
2019-08-01
Last updated
2017-07-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Wounds and Injuries

Keywords

Non-operative management, Splenic Injury, Blunt, Splenic artery embolization, Trauma

Brief summary

The primary objective is to compare the failure rate due to splenic bleeding between the patients undergoing pre-emptive splenic arterial embolization (SAE) as part of non-operative management (NOM) and the patients not undergoing SAE. We hypothesize that the use of pre-emptive SAE will decrease the delayed bleeding rate and increase the success rate of NOM.

Detailed description

This randomised controlled study will follow the clinical course of hemodynamically normal trauma patients with Organ Injury Scale (OIS) grade 4 or 5 blunt splenic injuries, undergoing SAE or observation only until day 7 post injury. Only hemodynamically normal patients will be considered for enrolment into the study, and written informed consent from the patient is required. CONTROL The control arm in this randomized controlled trial will include only NOM patients diagnosed with splenic injuries OIS grade 4 or 5 and suitable for observation alone, and will comprise clinical observation according to local routines and protocols. The patients will be observed with special focus on delayed bleeding and failure of NOM. A contrast enhanced US or CT scan with arterial phase will be performed on day 3-5 to exclude PSA. On day 7, the decision to perform SAE, splenectomy or continue NOM is left to the discretion of each participating institution, and registered in the case report form (CRF). INTERVENTION The intervention arm will perform SAE as a central embolization of the splenic artery. Additional peripheral embolization is left to the discretion of the interventional radiologist. Each institution decides whether patients in the SAE group are to undergo immunization or not. The study does not interfere with local diagnostic work-up and treatment protocols. We hypothesize that the use of pre-emptive SAE will decrease the delayed bleeding rate and increase the success rate of NOM leading to fewer splenectomies in this group of patients without concomitant increased complication rates. Additionally, we want to explore the effects of pre-emptive SAE vs observation alone on all cause failure rate, operative procedures, repeat angiography rate, complications, critical care stay, and mortality.

Interventions

PROCEDUREEmbolization

The intervention arm will perform SAE as a central embolization of the splenic artery. Additional peripheral embolization is left to the discretion of the interventional radiologist.

Sponsors

Oslo University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
16 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* blunt splenic injury OIS grade 4 or 5 * Adult trauma patients (according to local definitions) * Present hemodynamically normal as judged by the responsible trauma consultant surgeon and eligible for NOM * Randomised within 48 hours of injury * Written informed consent is obtained

Exclusion criteria

* Hemodynamically compromised (not suitable for NOM) * Needing transfusions * CT shows evidence of significant contrast extravasation * Other indications for laparotomy * Prisoners * Pregnant * \>80 years old * Penetrating injury * Contraindication to iv contrast

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Failure of NOM7 daysThe primary objective is to compare the failure rate due to splenic bleeding between the patients undergoing pre-emptive SAE as part of NOM and the patients not undergoing SAE. The primary endpoint is the proportion of subjects failing NOM due to spleen related bleeding within 7 days of injury. All analyses will be based on an intention to treat analysis.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
All cause and spleen related mortality6-12 weeksIncidence
All cause and spleen related failure of NOM6-12 weeksIncidence
Pseudoaneurysms (PSA)6-12 weeksIncidence
Delayed bleeding episode6-12 weeksIncidence. Delayed bleeding episode is defined as hemodynamically unstable patient, CT verified contrast blush or drop in hemoglobin/hematocrit.
Other spleen related complications6-12 weeksIncidence
Angiography related complications6-12 weeksIncidence
Symptomatic thromboembolic events6-12 weeksIncidence

Countries

Australia, Canada, Denmark, Germany, Netherlands, Norway, Sweden, United Kingdom, United States

Contacts

Primary Contactiver Anders Gaski, MD
iagaski@gmail.com90063971
Backup ContactChristine Gaarder, MD, PhD
tinagaar@onliine.no41318992

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026