Skip to content

Clinical Performance of Two Bulk-Fill Composite of Posterior Restorations

Clinical Performance of Bulk-fill Resins Composite Restorations on Posterior Tooth of Adults Patients. Randomized Doble-blind Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03230604
Enrollment
142
Registered
2017-07-26
Start date
2016-04-01
Completion date
2021-12-01
Last updated
2022-05-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Caries, Dental, Post Dental Restoration

Brief summary

To minimize the effects of polymerization shrinkage in the restorative treatment, there are new composites called Bulk- Fill which the companies has developed this composites for example Tetric N Ceram(Ivoclar-Vivadent) and Filtek ( 3M ESPE). Its decreased polymerization shrinkage and properties allow the material to be inserted in one layer being quickly than traditional composite. This clinical study is designed to compare the clinical performance of the bulk fill composite resin in Class I (one-surface posterior), II (two-surface posterior) and V (cervical-surface posterior) fillings.

Detailed description

A patients with 3 caries lesions class one either two or five will be divided into 3 groups , cavities will be incrementally layered with resin composite and each increment will be cured as directed by the manufacturer with the light curing unit (Bluephase Style Ivoclar-Vivadent), with an energy 1,100 mW/cm² (±50 mw/cm²) and others group of cavities will be restored by bulk fill composite (3M ESPE) and other bulk fill composite ( IVOCLAR-VIVADENT) as one increment then will be cured as directed by the manufacturer with the light curing unit. The study will investigate the clinical performance and efficacy of a bulk-filled composite resin restorative material for a period of 5 years

Interventions

DEVICEFiltek Bulk Fill Composite and Tetric N Ceram Bulk Fill Composite

Restorative cavities one, two and five with material Filtek Bulk Fill Composite

DEVICEZ 350 Xt Composite

Restorative cavities one, two and five with material Z 350 XT Composite

Sponsors

Universidad Nacional Andres Bello
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Intervention model description

Intervention: Bulk full composite (3M) bulk fill composite in posterior class one cavities bulk fill composite in posterior class two cavities bulk fill composite in posterior class five cavities Intervention:Bulk full composite (Ivoclar-Vivadent) bulk fill composite in posterior class one cavities bulk fill composite in posterior class two cavities bulk fill composite in posterior class five cavities Other: bulk fill composite Intervention Control: Nano resin composite (K Z350 xt) Restoration in class one cavities Restoration in class Two cavities Restoration in class five cavities

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* must have given written informed consent to participate in the trial * need at least three posterior restorations * must be available for the required post-operative follow-up visits * have a buccal to lingual/palatal width no greater than 1/3 the distance from buccal to lingual/palatal cusp tips * At least one occlusal and proximal contact on a natural tooth * Cavities depth \> 2 mm in cervico-occlusal

Exclusion criteria

* have severe medical complications (organ transplants, long term antibiotic or steroid treatment, cancer or immunocompromised) and disabilities who may not be able to tolerate the time required to complete the restorations * have xerostomia either by taking medications known to produce xerostomia or those with radiation induced or Sjogren's syndrome patients * chronic periodontitis * present with any systemic or local disorders that contra-indicate the dental procedures included in this study * an unstable occlusion * severe bruxing * teeth with periapical pathology or expected pulp exposures * are pregnant. * Endodontically treated teeth

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Clinical performance restorationsix month, one years, two, three, four and five yearsOutcome measure is Clinical performance of composite resin restoration, Device for measurement is FDI criteria , Unit is Ranking system has 5 scores for each different criterion. Either restoration is clinically excellent, or good, or sufficient, or unsatisfactory, or clinically poor.

Countries

Chile

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026