Skip to content

Use of a Home-based PDG Urine Test to Confirm Ovulation

Use of a Home-based Urinary Pregnanediol 3-glucuronide (PDG) Test to Confirm Ovulation

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03230084
Enrollment
25
Registered
2017-07-26
Start date
2017-08-23
Completion date
2018-03-14
Last updated
2018-03-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Infertility, Female

Keywords

Infertility, Ovulation, Pregnanediol 3-glucuronide, Progesterone, Urine dipstick test, Feasibility study, Fertile period, Menstrual cycle, Natural family planning, Fertility awareness methods

Brief summary

Infertility affects many people in Ontario and carries a significant amount of emotional, physical and financial burden to those who experience it. Knowing when a woman ovulates is important for improving a couple's chance to become pregnant naturally and for learning about fertility problems, such as infertility, irregular menses, and hormonal disorders. Currently, there are two reliable methods to confirm ovulation: a trans-vaginal ultrasound or a blood test for progesterone, which is a hormone that only rises sharply after ovulation. However, both are time consuming and expensive. Recently, an inexpensive, home-based urine test strip has been developed to confirm ovulation. The test strip works by measuring urine for a marker of Progesterone, called pregnanediol-3a-glucuronide (PDG). The purpose of this feasibility study is to follow the use of this home-based PDG urinary test strip over the course of one menstrual cycle in 25 female participants. The results of the urine test strip will then be compared to a Progesterone blood test. Participants will be recruited from the general Ottawa, Ontario area The ultimate aim of this study is to provide information for the design of a larger study to determine the accuracy of the PDG urinary test strip. If shown to be as effective in confirming ovulation, this test would provide substantial cost saving to the Ontario health care system and a much more convenient way for women and clinicians to confirm ovulation and determine if women are fertile.

Detailed description

Infertility affects many people in Ontario and carries a significant amount of emotional, physical and financial burden to those who experience it. More specifically, it impacts the couple's quality of life and can have detrimental effects related to marital conflicts, couple burnout and psychological disorders including a lack of confidence and depression. As part of the standard evaluation of infertility, ovulatory function assessment is a fundamental step. Confirmation that ovulation has actually occurred can only be determined by performing a serum Progesterone test or by using the gold standard, serial transvaginal ultrasound. However, both of these investigations require visits to a physician, specialized laboratory testing, and in the case of ultrasound are often prohibitive due to its high costs and logistical demands. In the female body, levels of Progesterone are low in the first half of the menstrual cycle. After the ovary releases an egg (ovulation) the corpus luteum produces high levels of Progesterone. Pregnanediol-3a-glucuronide (PDG) is the major urine metabolite of Progesterone. An inexpensive, home-based PDG urine test strip to confirm ovulation has recently been developed. The PDG test measures the presence of PDG in urine, which has been shown to directly correlate with the presence Progesterone in serum (blood). According to GLOWM (The Global Library of Women's Medicine) PDG levels in urine typically rise 24-36 hours after ovulation. Although there also exists a home-based electronic hormone monitor for measuring urinary PDG, it is not widely available and is very time-consuming for women. Newer methods to monitor PDG using a simple urinary test strip that are less time consuming would be a welcome addition to the evaluation of infertility. Additionally, urinary hormonal tests have been proven to be easy and useful adjuncts to natural fertility markers. The primary purpose of this feasibility study is to evaluate the use of the PDG urine test in a clinical setting to determine its accuracy to confirm ovulation when compared to the serum Progesterone test. This study will follow the use of the PDG urinary test strip over the course of one menstrual cycle in 25 female participants. In order to obtain participants, this study will use a non-probability sample using an initiation to volunteer technique for women in the general Ottawa area. The ultimate aim of this study is to provide information for the design of a larger study to determine the accuracy of the PDG urinary test strip.

Interventions

DEVICEUrine PDG test

Urine dipstick test that detects the presence of the urinary metabolite of progesterone, PDG.

Sponsors

Rene Leiva, MD
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Bruyere Foundation
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Bruyère Health Research Institute.
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
DEVICE_FEASIBILITY
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 42 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Females aged 18 to 42 years * Have had a menstrual cycle length of 25-35 days for the past 3 months * Are able to provide informed consent * Are willing to complete a trial diary

Exclusion criteria

* Have current or recent (in the past 6 months) use of any hormonal contraception (e.g. the Pill, Norplant, Depo Provera injections) * Have current or recent (in the past 6 months) breastfeeding * Have use of emergency contraception (e.g. the morning after pill or Plan B) in the past two menstrual cycles * Cannot medically receive frequent blood tests, for example due to a blood clotting disorder * Are pregnant at the time of enrollment to study * Plan to donate blood during the study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Sensitivity and specificity of the PDG urine test strip1 monthThe sensitivity will be estimated as the proportion of true positives cycles, that is, cycles with appropriate recognition of the post-ovulatory phase. The specificity will be estimated as the proportion of true negatives cycles, that is, cycles with appropriate recognition of the pre-ovulatory phase.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Frequency of protocol violation1 monthPercentage of participants who violated protocol to show acceptability of study design to participants.
Frequency of positive responses versus negative responses about the study procedures1 monthRatio of positive responses to negative responses in the feedback questionnaire given to participants concerning the study protocol.
Frequency of positive responses versus negative responses on the study product1 monthRatio of positive responses to negative responses in the feedback questionnaire given to participants concerning the study product.

Countries

Canada

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 21, 2026