Skip to content

Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Patients With Opioid Use Disorders

The Effects of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Patients With Opioid Use Disorders: Analysis of Clinical Outcomes, Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Biomarkers, and Neuropsychological Tests

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03229642
Enrollment
60
Registered
2017-07-25
Start date
2017-08-01
Completion date
2022-12-31
Last updated
2020-09-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Heroin Dependence, Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

Keywords

repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, opioid use disorder, craving, functional magnetic resonance imaging, neuropsychological tests

Brief summary

Opioid use disorder (OUD) is prevalent and causes substantial health and social burdens. Although evidence have showed the effectiveness of opioid agonist maintenance therapy in OUD, high drop-out rate and the requirement of continuing use of opioid agonists are the major problems. Therefore, to develop novel treatment for OUD is important. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a noninvasive method of brain stimulation used to treat a variety of neuropsychiatric disorders. Recent studies showed that there may be potential therapeutic effects in rTMS for addictive disorder, including reducing craving and substance use severity. The underlying mechanisms of rTMS in treating addictions may involve increased dopamine function in corticomesolimbic brain circuits and modulation of neural activity in brain circuits that relevant to addiction. However, the treatment results of rTMS in OUD were lacked, and the analysis in functional brain imaging study, neuropsychological tests and other potential biomarkers under rTMS treatment were limited, too. Thus, the investigators will conduct the add-on double-blinded, sham-controlled study rTMS treatment in 40-60 patients with OUD under methadone maintenance therapy. Patients will be allocated to active and sham rTMS in a 1 : 1 ratio, and participants will receive rTMS on the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) (15 Hz frequency, 4 seconds per train, inter-train interval of 26 seconds, 40 trains per session, total 11 sessions in 4 weeks). The treatment response, urine drug tests, craving scales and side effects to evaluate the therapeutic effects of rTMS will be examined. Neuropsychological assessments, functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and tests for potential biomarkers of immune parameters will also be measured during 12-weeks follow up. The study results will provide the important data in whether rTMS add-on methadone maintenance therapy is able to 1) reduce heroin use; 2) reduce craving for heroin; 3) be an effective treatment for OUD, and 4) be associated with improvement in fMRI, biological markers and psychological tests.

Interventions

DEVICEActive rTMS

The stimulator device was a Magstim super rapid magnetic stimulator (Magstim Company, Ltd., Wales, United Kingdom) with 4 booster modules equipped with a 70-mm air-cooled figure-eight-shaped coil. We performed rTMS on the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC).The TMS parameters were as follows: 15Hz frequency, pulse intensity 100% of the rMT, 60 pulses per train, inter train pause of 26 sec, 40 stimulation trains, and 2400 total pulses for a total duration of 20 min. The patients received one rTMS session per day during the first five days of treatment, and then twice a week for the following three weeks, for a total of 11 rTMS sessions. The sham group was administered rTMS with the same parameters, but using a figure-of-eight sham coil.

DEVICESham rTMS

The stimulator device was a Magstim super rapid magnetic stimulator (Magstim Company, Ltd., Wales, United Kingdom) with 4 booster modules equipped with a 70-mm air-cooled figure-eight-shaped coil. We performed rTMS on the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC).The TMS parameters were as follows: 15Hz frequency, pulse intensity 100% of the rMT, 60 pulses per train, inter train pause of 26 sec, 40 stimulation trains, and 2400 total pulses for a total duration of 20 min. The patients received one rTMS session per day during the first five days of treatment, and then twice a week for the following three weeks, for a total of 11 rTMS sessions. The sham group was administered rTMS with the same parameters, but using a figure-of-eight sham coil.

Sponsors

Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
National Cheng-Kung University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Signed informed consent by patient or legal representative. 2. Male or female patient aged ≧20 and ≦65 years. 3. A diagnosis of OUD according to DSM criteria made by a specialist in psychiatry. 4. Patient or a reliable caregiver can be expected to ensure acceptable compliance and visit attendance for the duration of the study.

Exclusion criteria

1. Women of childbearing potential, not using adequate contraception as per investigator judgment or not willing to comply with contraception for the duration of the study. 2. Females who are pregnant or lactation. 3. Current evidence of an uncontrolled and/or clinically significant medical condition, e.g.,cardiac, hepatic and renal failure that would compromise patient safety or preclude study participation. 4. History of seizure or epilepsy. 5. History of neurological diseases or traumatic brain injury. 6. Suicidal attempts or risks during screen or study period. 7. Presence of devices, e.g. pace-makers, cochlear prosthesis, neuro-stimulators, magnetic cochlear prosthesis, intraocular metallic fragments. 8. Patient has received electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) within 4 weeks prior to the first intervention of the double-blinded treatment.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The treatment retention rate12 weeksTo compare the treatment retention rate between the active and sham rTMS groups from baseline to endpoint (12 weeks).
The treatment attendance rate12 weeksTo compare the treatment attendance rate between the active and sham rTMS groups from baseline to endpoint (12 weeks).
Urinary assessment12 weeksUrinary morphine examinations will be measured at every visit. The rate of positive urinary morphine tests will be compared between active and sham rTMS groups in 12 weeks of follow up.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Wisconsin Card Sorting Test(WCST)12 weeksWCST will be tested at initial screen and at the end of study (week 12) and compared between the active and sham rTMS groups.
Continuous performance tests(CPT)12 weeksCPT will be tested at initial screen and at the end of study (week 12) and compared between the active and sham rTMS groups.
Side effect checklist12 weeksTo compare the side effect profiles using side effect checklist between the active and sham rTMS groups from baseline to endpoint (12 weeks).
Assessment of craving12 weeksTo compare the severity of craving between the active and sham rTMS groups from baseline to endpoint (12 weeks).
17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS)12 weeksTo compare the mood symptoms between the active and sham rTMS groups from baseline to endpoint (12 weeks).
fMRI5 weeksThe fMRI scan will be done at initial screen and at week 5 (after rTMS treatment) with resting-state fMRI and task activation fMRI with an IGT.
Family APGAR index12 weeksTo compare the level of family support (using family APGAR index) between the active and sham rTMS groups from baseline to endpoint (12 weeks).
The Opiate Treatment Index (OTI)12 weeksTo compare the OTI tween the active and sham rTMS groups from baseline to endpoint (12 weeks).
Clinical Global Impressions (CGI)12 weeksTo compare the CGI tween the active and sham rTMS groups from baseline to endpoint (12 weeks).
Barratt Impulsiveness Scale(BIS)12 weeksTo compare the BIS tween the active and sham rTMS groups from baseline to endpoint (12 weeks).
World Health Organization's Quality of Life Assessment-Brief of Taiwan (WHOQOL-BREF TW)12 weeksTo compare the life quality (using WHOQOL-BREF TW) between the active and sham rTMS groups from baseline to endpoint (12 weeks).
Immunological markers12 weeksTwenty milliliters of blood will be drawn from each participant. Plasma will be isolated from the whole blood after it has been centrifuged at 3000 g for 15 min at 4℃, and the will be immediately stored at -80℃. Cytokine and BDNF levels will be quantified using an antibody pair assay system (Flexia; BioSource Intl., Camarillo, CA). Sample processing and data analysis will be done according to the manufacturer's instructions. The immunological parameters that we intend to analyze will include TNF-α, CRP, TGF-β1, IL-8, Il-10 and BDNF. The immunological markers will be measured from baseline to endpoint (week 12) in each patient group.
Wechsler Memory Scale - third edition(WMS-III)12 weeksWMS-III will be tested at initial screen and at the end of study (week 12) and compared between the active and sham rTMS groups.

Countries

Taiwan

Contacts

Primary ContactTzu-Yun Wang
tzuyun0105@hotmail.com+886-6-2353535

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 16, 2026