Parkinson Disease
Conditions
Keywords
Rhythm, Ecological sounds, Auditory stimuli, rhythmic auditory stimulation, Parkinson's Disease, Gait, Gait analysis, Spatio-temporal parameters
Brief summary
The use of rhythmic auditory stimulation (RAS) has been proven useful in the management of gait disturbances induced by Parkinson's disease (PD). Typically, the stimuli used to provide RAS consist of metronome or music-based sounds, which are not related with the auditory experience of walking. Based on previous laboratory research, it is hypothesized that the use of ecological sounds deriving from biological motion (i.e., footstep sounds) could have a greater impact compared to artificial sounds (i.e., metronome sounds), within a rehabilitation program. In a double-blind experiment, it was investigated the effects of 5 weeks of supervised rehabilitation integrated with RAS. Thirty-two individuals affected by PD (age 68.2 ± 10.5, Hoehn and Yahr 1,5-3) were randomly assigned to one of the two conditions (artificial vs. ecological sounds). Spatio-temporal parameters of gait and clinical variables were assessed before the rehabilitation period, at its end, and after a 3-month follow-up. The results revealed that the rehabilitation program integrated with RAS had positive effects on the majority of objective and subjective measures, independently of the type of sound. However, when the two groups were examined separately, the patients assigned to the ecological RAS condition were the only who improved both in terms of cadence and gait speed. Overall, the hypothesized greater effect of the ecological sounds compared to artificial sounds was only partially supported by data.
Interventions
OTHERAdministration of rhytmic acoustic stimuli for gait training
The intervention consist in 5 weeks, 20 min/day gait training assisted by rhythmic acoustic stimuli administered using a portable MP3 player
Sponsors
University of Cagliari
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Intervention model description
Participants were randomly assigned to one of the two groups (artificial or ecological RAS) and were evaluated in three moments: before the rehabilitative treatment (T0), at the end of the 5 week rehabilitative treatment (T5), and 3 months after the end of the treatment, namely 17 weeks after the first assessment (T17).
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
50 Years to 90 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
* diagnosis of PD according to the UK Brain Bank criteria; * ability to walk independently; * absence of relevant hearing impairments which could prevent the correct perception of the auditory cues; * absence of significant cognitive impairment (i.e., Mini-Mental Status Examination (MMSE) \> 24; Frontal Assessment Battery (FAB) \> 13); * absence of psychiatric or severe systemic illnesses; * mild-to-moderate disability assessed by means of the modified Hoehn and Yahr (H&Y) staging scale (1,5 ≤ H&Y ≤ 3); * no engagement in any rehabilitative program in the 3 months before the beginning of the study
Exclusion criteria
\-
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Walking speed | 5 weeks | Walking speed calculated on a 10 m path using motion-capture system |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Hip Flexion-extension | 5 weeks | Angle of flexion-extension of hip joint during a gait cycle |
| Knee Flexion-extension | 5 weeks | Angle of flexion-extension of knee joint during a gait cycle |
| Ankle Dorsi- Plantar-flexion | 5 weeks | Angle of dorsi- plantar-flexion of ankle joint during a gait cycle |
| GPS | 5 weeks | Gait Profile Score (synthetic index of deviation from a physiologic gait pattern) |
Countries
Italy
Outcome results
None listed