Skip to content

Study With an Autologous Dermo-epidermal Skin Substitute for the Treatment of Burns in Adults and Adolescents

A Phase IIb, Prospective, Intra-patient Randomised Controlled, Multicentre Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of an Autologous Bio-engineered Dermo-epidermal Skin Substitute (EHSG-KF) for the Treatment of Partial Deep Dermal and Full Thickness Burns in Adults and Adolescents in Comparison to Autologous Split-thickness Skin Grafts (STSG)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03227146
Enrollment
14
Registered
2017-07-24
Start date
2017-10-25
Completion date
2025-08-28
Last updated
2026-08-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Burns

Keywords

Burns, Scar, Skin, Wound healing, Tissue Engineering, Dermis, Epidermis, Thermal Injuries

Brief summary

This phase IIb trial aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of EHSG-KF (synonym denovoSkin) in comparison to meshed STSG in adults and adolescents with partial deep dermal and full thickness burns.

Detailed description

This multicentre phase IIb clinical trial will target adults and adolescents with severe burns to elucidate the benefit of a tissue-engineered autologous skin substitute for the patient group with the highest mortality rates. Particular emphasis, apart from safety, will be placed on efficacy, including the ratio of covered surface area to harvested surface area and scar quality, in comparison to meshed STSG.

Interventions

BIOLOGICALEHSG-KF

Transplantation of autologous dermo-epidermal skin substitute EHSG-KF to the experimental area

BIOLOGICALSTSG

Transplantation of autologous split-thickness skin graft to the control area

Sponsors

CUTISS AG
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY
Wyss Zurich
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Julius Clinical
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Sintesi Research Srl
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
University Hospital, Zürich
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Zurich
CollaboratorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
12 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age: ≥12 years of age * Deep partial thickness and/or full thickness burns requiring surgical wound coverage * Expected that ≥90 cm2 of wound (not counting the head and neck area for study patients in The Netherlands) will remain open at 4 weeks post burn despite proceeding with treatment in accordance with the standard of care. \>20% TBSA burns can be taken as guideline, but TBSA is not an inclusion criterion. * Signed Informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Patients tested positive for HBV, HCV, syphilis or HIV * Patients with known underlying or concomitant medical conditions that may interfere with normal wound healing (e.g. systemic skin and connective tissue diseases, any kind of congenital defect of metabolism including insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, Cushing syndrome or disease, scurvy, chronic hypothyroidism, congenital or acquired immunosuppressive condition, chronic renal failure, or chronic hepatic dysfunction (Child-Pugh class B or C), severe malnutrition, or other concomitant illness which, in the opinion of the Investigator, has the potential to significantly delay wound healing) * Severe drug and alcohol abuse * Pre-existing coagulation disorders as defined by INR outside its normal value, PTT \>ULN and fibrinogen \<LLN prior to the current hospital admission and / or at the Investigator's discretion * Patients with known allergies to amphotericin B, gentamicin, penicillin, streptomycin, or bovine collagen * Previous enrolment of the patient into the current phase II study * Participation of the patient in another study with conflicting endpoints within 30 days preceding and during the present study * Patients expected not to comply with the study protocol (including patients with severe cognitive dysfunction/impairment and severe psychiatric disorders) * Pregnant or breast feeding females * Intention to become pregnant during the clinical course of the study (12 months) * Wounds in the head and neck area as study target area (only applicable for study patients in The Netherlands) * Enrolment of the Investigator, his/her family members, employees and other dependent persons

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Efficacy of EHSG-KF in comparison to meshed STSG based on ratio of covered surface4 weeks post graftingEfficacy of EHSG-KF in comparison to meshed STSG based on ratio of covered surface area to biopsy site/donor site surface area

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Safety of EHSG-KF in comparison to meshed STSG based on clinical signs of infection4-11 days post grafting and 21 +/-2 days post graftingEvaluation of clinical signs of infection at experimental area and control area
Safety of EHSG-KF in comparison to meshed STSG based on microbiological signs of infection4-11 days post grafting and 21 +/-2 days post graftingEvaluation of microbiologic signs of infection at experimental area and control area
Efficacy of EHSG-KF in comparison to meshed STSG based on evaluation of scar quality by measurement of the elasticity using Cutometer(R)1 year +/-30 days post graftingAssessment of elasticity of experimental area and control area using Cutometer(R)
Efficacy of EHSG-KF in comparison to meshed STSG based on evaluation of scar quality by assessment of General scar quality using POSAS assessment tool1 year +/-30 days post graftingAssessment of general scar Quality of experimental area and control area using POSAS assessment tool

Countries

Italy, Netherlands, Switzerland

Contacts

STUDY_CHAIRClemens Schiestl, Prof.

University Children's Hospital, Zurich

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Aug 7, 2026