Skip to content

Effect of Emergency Department Care Reorganization on Door-to-antibiotic Times for Sepsis (LDS SWARM)

Effect of Emergency Department Care Reorganization on Door-to-antibiotic Times for Sepsis (LDS SWARM)

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03226366
Enrollment
3230
Registered
2017-07-21
Start date
2015-05-16
Completion date
2020-04-11
Last updated
2020-06-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Sepsis, Septic Shock

Keywords

door-to-antibiotic time, emergency department care, antimicrobial, care reorganization, severe sepsis, swarming

Brief summary

Sepsis is a common syndrome resulting from a dysregulated response to infection. The timing of antibiotic initiation is an important determinant of outcomes for patients presenting to the emergency department with sepsis. The potential effect of care reorganization on very early care for sepsis is unknown. This study will investigate whether multidisciplinary coordination of the initial patient evaluation in the emergency department influences door-to-antibiotic time for septic patients.

Detailed description

This is a retrospective cohort study of emergency department sepsis care before versus after implementation of a swarming model for simultaneous patient evaluation by multidisciplinary care providers. The analysis will use data from similar hospitals that did not change sepsis care organization during the study period to control for changes in sepsis care not resulting from the swarming intervention.

Interventions

OTHERImmediate evaluation by multidisciplinary team

Simultaneous initial evaluation by the ED physician, nurse, and patient care associate

Sponsors

Intermountain Health Care, Inc.
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Primary inclusion criteria: * Adult patients age ≥18 years * Presented to the ED of study hospital from May 16, 2015 to April 15, 2016 (pre-implementation cohort) or May 16 to November 15, 2016 (post-implementation cohort) * Sepsis present in ED (Sequential Organ Failure Assessment \[SOFA\] score ≥2 points above baseline while in ED plus antibiotic initiation while in the ED) * Triage acuity score 2-5 Inclusion criteria for supplemental sensitivity analyses: * Presented to the ED of study hospital between May 16, 2015 and April 15, 2016 (pre-implementation cohort) or May 16, 2016 and February 15, 2017 (post-implementation cohort). * Sepsis on presentation to ED, defined as initial Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score ≥2 points above baseline plus antibiotics initiation within 24 hours of ED arrival. Overall

Exclusion criteria

* Age \<18 years * No antibiotics within 24 hours of ED arrival

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Time From ED Arrival to Administration of First Dose of Antibiotics24 hours

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Hospital MortalityUp to 1 year
ED Length of StayUp to 1 weekTime (minutes) from ED arrival to ED departure
Door-to-physician Evaluation TimeUp to 24 hoursTime (minutes) from subject's arrival in the ED until initial evaluation by a physician.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Pre-implementation (Intervention Site)
Adult patients age ≥18 years who received usual care after presenting to the ED of the intervention hospital with sepsis or septic shock between May 16, 2015 and April 15, 2016
911
Post-implementation (Intervention Site)
Adult patients age ≥18 years eligible to receive immediate evaluation by multidisciplinary team (swarming) after presenting to the ED of the intervention hospital with sepsis or septic shock between May 16, 2016 and November 15, 2016 Immediate evaluation by multidisciplinary team: Simultaneous initial evaluation by the ED physician, nurse, and patient care associate
495
Pre-implementation (Control Site)
Adult patients age ≥18 years who received usual care after presenting to the ED of a non-intervention study hospital with sepsis or septic shock between May 16, 2015 and April 15, 2016
1,183
Post-implementation (Control Site)
Adult patients age ≥18 years who received usual care after presenting to the ED of a non-intervention study hospital with sepsis or septic shock between May 16, 2016 and November 15, 2016
641
Total3,230

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPost-implementation (Control Site)TotalPre-implementation (Intervention Site)Post-implementation (Intervention Site)Pre-implementation (Control Site)
Age, Continuous58.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 20.4
57.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.9
55.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.7
55.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.6
59.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.7
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
45 Participants305 Participants117 Participants74 Participants69 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
596 Participants2925 Participants794 Participants421 Participants1114 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
2 Participants31 Participants15 Participants9 Participants5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
5 Participants45 Participants14 Participants8 Participants18 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
4 Participants50 Participants25 Participants15 Participants6 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
13 Participants67 Participants30 Participants12 Participants12 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
617 Participants3037 Participants827 Participants451 Participants1142 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
377 Participants1789 Participants474 Participants251 Participants687 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
264 Participants1441 Participants437 Participants244 Participants496 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
19 / 9117 / 49523 / 1,18311 / 641
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 9110 / 4950 / 1,1830 / 641
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 9110 / 4950 / 1,1830 / 641

Outcome results

Primary

Time From ED Arrival to Administration of First Dose of Antibiotics

Time frame: 24 hours

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Pre-implementation (Intervention Site)Time From ED Arrival to Administration of First Dose of Antibiotics173 minutesStandard Deviation 98
Post-implementation (Intervention Site)Time From ED Arrival to Administration of First Dose of Antibiotics165 minutesStandard Deviation 95
Pre-implementation (Control Site)Time From ED Arrival to Administration of First Dose of Antibiotics169 minutesStandard Deviation 90
Post-implementation (Control Site)Time From ED Arrival to Administration of First Dose of Antibiotics163 minutesStandard Deviation 85
Comparison: Differences-in-differences analysis using multivariable regression to estimate the change in emergency department (ED) door-to-antibiotic time after versus before intervention implementation at the intervention site adjusted for the change observed over the same time period at the control sites and for subject's age, sex, Elixhauser Comorbidity Score, initial systolic blood pressure, initial Glasgow Coma Scale score \<14. initial temperature, ED triage acuity score, and ED arrival via ambulance.p-value: 0.2995% CI: [-20.4, 6.1]Regression, Linear
Secondary

Door-to-physician Evaluation Time

Time (minutes) from subject's arrival in the ED until initial evaluation by a physician.

Time frame: Up to 24 hours

Population: Time of physician initial patient evaluation was missing for a small number of participants in each group

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Pre-implementation (Intervention Site)Door-to-physician Evaluation Time25 minutesStandard Deviation 18
Post-implementation (Intervention Site)Door-to-physician Evaluation Time23 minutesStandard Deviation 15
Pre-implementation (Control Site)Door-to-physician Evaluation Time22 minutesStandard Deviation 24
Post-implementation (Control Site)Door-to-physician Evaluation Time20 minutesStandard Deviation 16
Comparison: Differences-in-differences analysis using multivariable regression to estimate the change in emergency department (ED) door-to-physician evaluation time after versus before implementation at the intervention site adjusted for the change observed over the same time period at the control sites and for subject's age, sex, Elixhauser Comorbidity Score, initial systolic blood pressure, initial Glasgow Coma Scale score \<14. initial temperature, ED triage acuity score, and ED arrival via ambulance.p-value: 0.5595% CI: [-3.3, 1.8]Regression, Linear
Secondary

ED Length of Stay

Time (minutes) from ED arrival to ED departure

Time frame: Up to 1 week

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Pre-implementation (Intervention Site)ED Length of Stay280 minutesStandard Deviation 1143
Post-implementation (Intervention Site)ED Length of Stay265 minutesStandard Deviation 110
Pre-implementation (Control Site)ED Length of Stay269 minutesStandard Deviation 108
Post-implementation (Control Site)ED Length of Stay261 minutesStandard Deviation 98
Comparison: Differences-in-differences analysis using multivariable regression to estimate the change in emergency department length of stay after versus before implementation at the intervention site with adjustment for the change observed over the same time period at the control sites as well as for subject's age, sex, Elixhauser Comorbidity Score, initial systolic blood pressure, an initial Glasgow Coma Scale score \<14. initial temperature, ED triage acuity score, and arrival to the ED via ambulance.p-value: 0.2695% CI: [-25.9, 7]Regression, Linear
Secondary

Hospital Mortality

Time frame: Up to 1 year

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Pre-implementation (Intervention Site)Hospital Mortality19 Participants
Post-implementation (Intervention Site)Hospital Mortality7 Participants
Pre-implementation (Control Site)Hospital Mortality23 Participants
Post-implementation (Control Site)Hospital Mortality11 Participants
Comparison: Differences-in-differences analysis using multivariable regression to estimate the change in odds of hospital mortality after versus before implementation at the intervention site with adjustment for observed change in outcome over the same time period at the control sites as well as for subject's age, sex, Elixhauser Comorbidity Score, initial systolic blood pressure, an initial Glasgow Coma Scale score \<14. initial temperature, ED triage acuity score, and arrival to the ED via ambulance.p-value: 0.7295% CI: [0.25, 2.61]Regression, Logistic

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026