Skip to content

Usefulness of Light Wand-guided Insertion of Flexible Reinforced Laryngeal Mask Airway

Usefulness of Light Wand-guided Insertion of Flexible Reinforced Laryngeal Mask Airway: Comparison With Conventional Blind-insertion

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03224611
Enrollment
54
Registered
2017-07-21
Start date
2017-08-01
Completion date
2018-09-30
Last updated
2018-10-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Laryngeal Mask Airway

Brief summary

Flexible LMA (Laryngeal mask airway) is very useful for variable situation but it is hard to insert in correct position because of it's flexible structure. Especially in classical way of manual LMA insertion, when the index finger could not guide the flexible LMA to the optimal position, we could not guarantee the correct position of the LMA. Therefore several studies have been investigated to improve this. The light wand is a kind of stylet which have a light on the tip. Recently some studies demonstrated the usefulness of the light wand which could be used for indicating correct position of the LMA. We hypothesised there will be two advantages if the light wand is used as a stylet of the flexible LMA. First the stylet could support the mildness of the flexible LMA, and second the lightness could confirm the correct position of the flexible LMA.

Interventions

DEVICElight wand

The light wand is used as a stylet of the flexible LMA. When the investigator inserts the flexible LMA in light wand group, the correct position of the LMA is confirmed by the light.

Sponsors

Ajou University School of Medicine
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
19 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* The patient need general anesthesia using LMA and belonged to the ASA(American society of Anesthesiologist) class I or II

Exclusion criteria

* The patient who has URI(upper respiratory infection) symptom within 14 days or * The patient's BMI(body mass index) exceeds 35 kg/m2 * The patient has severe GERD(gastroesophageal reflux disease) or hiatus hernia * The patient who has any contraindication for LMA insertion

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Oropharyngeal leak pressure5 minutes after LMA is insertedThe oropharyngeal leak pressure is measured by the pressure which the investigator could detect the audible sound by stethoscope on patient's cheek during the exhaust valve is closed and the fresh gas is allowed to flow into the lungs at 3 liters per minute.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The grade of oropharyngeal view through the fiberoptic assessment5 minutes after LMA is insertedThe position of the LMA was assessed by fiberoptic examination through an attachment between the LMA and the anesthetic circuit.

Countries

South Korea

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026