Soft Tissue Evaluation Around Implants Using Prf or a Palatal Pedicle

Clinical Evaluation of Peri-Implant Soft Tissue Around Immediately Placed Implants Using PRF Membrane Versus The Palatal Pedicle Soft Tissue Graft: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.

Status

UNKNOWN

Phases

Study type

Interventional

Source

ClinicalTrials.gov

Registry ID

NCT03224442

Enrollment

Registered

2017-07-21

Start date

2017-12-01

Completion date

2018-10-01

Last updated

2017-11-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Soft Tissue Augmentation

Brief summary

Clinical Evaluation of Peri-Implant Soft Tissue Around Immediately Placed Implants Using PRF Membrane Versus The Palatal Pedicle Soft Tissue Graft: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.

Detailed description

Immediate implant will be place and followed by soft tissue augmentation by PRF or palatal pedicle and the primary outcome is the pink esthetic score

Interventions

PROCEDUREPRF

soft tissue augmentation by prf

PROCEDUREPalatal Pedicle

soft tissue augmentation by palatal pedicle

Study design

Allocation

RANDOMIZED

Intervention model

PARALLEL

Primary purpose

TREATMENT

Masking

DOUBLE (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

ALL

Age

18 Years to 70 Years

Healthy volunteers

Yes

Inclusion criteria

1. Absence of periodontal disease or a periapical infection 2. Adequate native bone to achieve implant primary stability 3. The need for a single-tooth replacement in the anterior maxilla (from the second bicuspid to the second bicuspid), subsequent to an inevitable tooth extraction.

Exclusion criteria

1. Systemic conditions/disease that contraindicated surgery 2. Radiation therapy in the head and neck region or chemotherapy during the 12 months prior to surgery. 3. Patients who have any habits that might jeopardize the osseointegration process, such as current smokers. 4. Patients with parafunctional habits that produce overload on implant, such as bruxism and clenching. 5. Patients who have inadequate interarch space for the prosthetic part.

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame	Description
Pink Esthetic Score	5 months	photographs

Secondary

Measure	Time frame	Description
mid-buccal gingival level	5 months	probe
interproximal gingival level	5 months	probe
- width of keratinized gingiva (KG	5 months	probe
facial gingival thickness	5 months	probe
Implant stability	5 months	ostel
Pain	5 months	VAS
Crestal bone loss	5 months	CBCT

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026