Skip to content

Partially Covered Versus Uncovered Pyloro-duodenal Stents for Unresectable Malignant Gastric Outlet Obstruction. A Double Blinded Randomised Controlled Trial.

Partially Covered Versus Uncovered Pyloro-duodenal Stents for Unresectable Malignant Gastric Outlet Obstruction. A Double Blinded Randomised Controlled Trial.

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03223831
Enrollment
116
Registered
2017-07-21
Start date
2017-08-01
Completion date
2020-11-01
Last updated
2020-11-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Unresectable Malignant Gastric Outlet Obstruction

Keywords

unresectable malignant gastric outlet obstruction, Partially covered pyloro-duodenal stents, uncovered pyloro-duodenal stents

Brief summary

To compare the efficacy of a novel partially covered (PC) versus uncovered (UC) pyloro-duodenal stents (DS) in unresectable malignant gastric outlet obstruction. We hypothesize that the use of PCDS could reduce the re-intervention rates when compared to UCDS.

Detailed description

This would be a prospective multi-centred double-blinded randomised controlled study including all patients suffering from malignant gastric outlet obstruction due unresectable primary gastro-duodenal or pancreatico-biliary malignancies. Five international institutions in Hong Kong, Singapore and India would participate in the study. The procedure would be performed under conscious sedation or monitored anaesthesia. The patients would be randomised PCDS or UCDS after cannulation of the obstruction site is achieved with the guide-wire. The patients or assessors would be blinded to the type of stent that is inserted.

Interventions

OTHERPartially covered pyloro-duodenal stent

The PCDS (Niti-S COMVITM - Flare, Taewoong, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea) used in the current study is a partially covered metallic pyloro-duodenal stent. It consists of two portions (Figure 1). The stent is 2cm in diameter and the proximal 2cm of the stent is uncovered and flared. This is designed to provide anchorage of the stent to surrounding tissue and reduce the risk of migration. The remaining of the stent is covered, where a polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) membrane is held between two nitinol mesh to prevent the risk of tumour ingrowth into the stent. The stents come in lengths of 6, 8, 10 & 12cm.

OTHERUncovered pyloro-duodenal stents

The UCDS (Niti-S pyloric-duodenal D stent, Taewoong, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea) used in the current study is an uncovered stent made of nitinol wire, with a diameter of 20mm and length of 6,8,10,12cm. This stent is an unfixed-cell braided stent with low axial force, high flexibility and good conformability.

Sponsors

National University Hospital, Singapore
CollaboratorOTHER
Singapore General Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Changi General Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Baldota Institute of Digestive Diseases, Mumbai, India.
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Chinese University of Hong Kong
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Masking description

Recruited patients would not be informed of the type of stent that was inserted

Intervention model description

Recruited patients would be randomized to receive either uncovered duodenal stents or partially covered duodenal stents.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Consecutive patients ≥ 18 years old * Confirmed unresectable gastro-duodenal or pancreatico-biliary malignancies * Suffering from gastric outlet obstruction with a gastric outlet obstruction score of ≤ 1 (appendix 1) 19 * Performance status ECOG ≤3 (appendix 2)

Exclusion criteria

* Prior metallic stent placement * Severe comorbidities precluding the endoscopic procedure (such as cardiopulmonary disease, sepsis, or a bleeding disorder) * Life expectancy of less than 1 month * History of gastric surgery * Linitus plastica * Coagulation disorders * Pregnancy * Unable to give informed consent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Re-intervention rate1 yearPercentage of patients requiring additional endoscopic intervention due to stent dysfunction

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Clinical success3 daysImprovement of at least 1 point in the GOOS within 3 days after stent insertion
Adverse events rate1 yearGraded according to the lexicon of endoscopic adverse events
Mortality30 daysDeath from any cause
Technical success1 daySuccessful placement of the DS across the site of obstruction, as confirmed by endoscopy or flouroscopy.
Stent dysfunction1 yearRestenosis of the stent due to tumour ingrowth or overgrowth, stent migration, or fracture
Duration of stent patency1 yearcalculated from the time of stent placement to the time of stent dysfunction
Quality of life assessment scores1 yearEORTC QLQ-C30
Gastric outlet obstruction scores (GOOS)1 yearScoring system for food intake

Countries

China

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026