Skip to content

Neurocognitive Impact and Dose-Effect Relationship of Hippocampal Avoidance During Whole Brain Radiotherapy Plus Simultaneous Integrated Boost - A Prospective Follow-up Study

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03223675
Enrollment
100
Registered
2017-07-21
Start date
2016-04-01
Completion date
2025-12-31
Last updated
2023-05-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Brain Metastases, Brain Metastasis

Brief summary

For newly-diagnosed patients with brain metastasis, whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) probably remains a common palliative management even for those with oligometastatic brain disease. However, WBRT-related late sequelae, particularly a decline in neurocognitive functions (NCFs), are a major concern. More importantly, in patients with limited brain metastases and a fair/good performance status, sparing the radiosensitive and vulnerable structures which are responsible for essential NCFs during the WBRT course is one of the reasonable strategies to postpone and prevent the development of WBRT-induced neurocognitive impairments. Actually, radiation-related neurocognitive dysfunction is usually characterized as a decline involving learning and memory, in which the extremely radiosensitive hippocampus indeed plays a critical role. In addition to the neurocognitive preservation by virtue of sparing the radiosensitive structures like the hippocampus, durable intracranial tumor control critically depends on an escalated radiotherapeutic dose level which is adequate enough to eradicate gross metastatic brain lesions. Therefore, in order to achieve both hippocampal sparing and simultaneous integrated boost(s) to gross metastatic foci, a specialized WBRT technique, hippocampal avoidance during WBRT plus simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) will be adopted in this prospective study. Moreover, the dose-effect relationship would be analyzed in order to explore the correlation between the equivalent uniform dose (EUD) irradiating the hippocampus and the neurocognitive change/decline after the above WBRT course measured by objective neurocognitive test tools. Newly-diagnosed cancer patients harboring 1-3 gross metastatic lesions but still in fair/good performance statuses are potentially eligible. All recruited patients should receive baseline functional brain MRI examination and baseline neurobehavioral assessment. Treatment planning will be designed via the technique of volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) to achieve both hippocampal avoidance and simultaneous integrated boost(s) to gross metastatic lesions. Except for the above regions for which conformal avoidance or SIB is attempted, the prescribed dose to the remaining brain parenchyma will be consistently 3000 cGy in 12 fractions. Accordingly, a battery of neuropsychological measures, which includes 7 standardized neuropsychological tests (e.g., executive functions, verbal and non-verbal memory, working memory, and psychomotor speed), is used to evaluate neurobehavioral functions for our registered patients. The primary outcome measure is delayed recall, as determined by the change/decline in verbal memory or non-verbal memory, from the baseline assessment to 4 months after the start of the WBRT course. This prospective cohort study aims to examine thoroughly the impact of a specialized WBRT technique, integrating both simultaneous integrated boost(s) delivered to gross metastatic foci and conformal hippocampal avoidance, on the status of NCF change/decline in patients with oligometastatic brain disease. It is anticipated that intracranial local control will be more sustainable and durable resulting from the escalated focal dose of SIBs. Ultimately, we also expect the dose-effect relationship will be clearly demonstrated after investigating the correlation between the hippocampal dosimetry and the status of NCF change/decline after receiving HA-WBRT plus SIB.

Interventions

Sponsors

Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 84 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients with pathologically-confirmed non-hematopoietic malignancy who are referred for therapeutic or prophylactic WBRT * Good performance status no worse than Eastern Cooperative Group (ECOG) of 2 or a general status of Karnofsky Score (KPS) at least 70 % * The number and extent of brain metastatic lesions should be no more than three metastatic foci with a greatest diameter no more than 3 cm

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with MRI-identified metastasis within 5 mm perihippocampally * Patients with metastasis involving the brain stem * Clinical suspicion of leptomeningeal spreading * Patients with a solitary brain metastatic lesion which had been totally removed * History of prior radiotherapy including stereotactic radiosurgery delivered to brain/head region for any reasons

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The primary endpoint is delayed recall, as determined by the change/decline in verbal memory (WMS III- Word List score) from the baseline assessment to 4 months after the start of HS-WBRT.4 months after the start of HS-WBRTNeurocognitive assessment: including memory, executive functions, and psychomotor speed. This neurocognitive outcome was delayed recall, as determined by the change/decline in verbal memory \[Wechsler Memory Scale - 3rd edition (WMS III) - Word List score\] from the baseline assessment to 4 months after the start of the course of WBRT with hippocampus sparing (HS-WBRT). Additionally, the follow-up of neurocognitive assessment will also be administered at 12 months and up to 18 months after the start of HS-WBRT
The primary endpoint is delayed recall, as determined by the change/decline in non-verbal memory (WMS III- Visual Reproduction score) from the baseline assessment to 4 months after the start of HS-WBRT4 months after the start of HS-WBRTNeurocognitive assessment: including memory, executive functions, and psychomotor speed. This neurocognitive outcome was delayed recall, as determined by the change/decline in non-verbal memory (WMS III- Visual Reproduction score) from the baseline assessment to 4 months after the start of the course of WBRT with hippocampus sparing (HS-WBRT). Additionally, the follow-up of neurocognitive assessment will also be administered at 12 months and up to 18 months after the start of HS-WBRT.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Overall survival time, indicated by the time from the date of recruitment to the date of expiringup to 18 months
The time from the date of recruitment to that of intracranial progression/failure noted on brain MRI or CTup to 18 months

Countries

Taiwan

Contacts

Primary ContactChi-Cheng Chuang, M.D.
ccc2915@cgmh.org.tw+886-33281200
Backup ContactShinn-Yn Lin, M.D.
rt3126@gmail.com+886-33281200

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 13, 2026