Patient Satisfaction and Bone Changes for OT Cap and OT Vertical Attachment

Patient Satisfaction and Bone Changes in Bilateral Distal Extension Case Using OT Cap Versus OT Vertical Attachment Randomized Clinical Trial

Status

UNKNOWN

Phases

Study type

Interventional

Source

ClinicalTrials.gov

Registry ID

NCT03221803

Enrollment

Registered

2017-07-19

Start date

2018-01-01

Completion date

2019-03-31

Last updated

2017-07-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Bone Changes, Patient Satisfaction

Brief summary

The purpose of this study aimed to answer a clinical question whether In a patient with bilateral distal extension area, would the metal framework partial denture with OT vertical attachment versus partial denture with OT CAP attachment result in better patient satisfaction?

Interventions

OTHEROT Vertical attachment

new extra coronal castable attachment

OTHEROT cap attachment

standard extra coronal attachment

Study design

Allocation

RANDOMIZED

Intervention model

PARALLEL

Primary purpose

TREATMENT

Masking

DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

ALL

Age

35 Years to 45 Years

Healthy volunteers

Inclusion criteria

* patients age ranged between 35-45years old. * All patients have Kennedy class I partially edentulous mandibular arch in which the last remaining teeth were the second premolars bilaterally. * The abutment teeth had an apparently good periodontal condition with no signs of mobility or inflammation with firm and healthy mucosa. * Edentulous ridge covered by health firm mucoperiosteum, without abnormal bony irregularity or severe lingual undercuts. * Patients with normal relationship of maxilla and mandible (Angle class I ridge classification) and sufficient inter-arch space (6mm) the size of the attachment * The opposing dentition is intact arch with no noticeable over eruption or tilting or restored with acceptable fixed restoration. * All patients are free from neurological, muscular disorders and tempro-mandibular joint disorders. * Only patients who can be easily motivated to achieve and maintain good oral

Exclusion criteria

* Patient with limited skills * Un co-operative patients. * patient with bad oral hygiene

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame	Description
patient satisfaction assessed using questionnaire	9 months	Questionnaire for patient satisfaction

Secondary

Measure	Time frame	Description
bone height	9 months	radio graphically by digora
bone density	9 months	radio graphically by digora

Contacts

Primary ContactAhmed Hassaan, PHD

ahmedhassan871983@gmail.com01021722944

Backup ContactYusr Mady

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026