Skip to content

Qualitative Analysis of Subject Experience of Nasal Polyps

Qualitative Research to Characterize the Patient Experience of Nasal Polyps

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03221192
Enrollment
27
Registered
2017-07-18
Start date
2017-07-31
Completion date
2018-02-28
Last updated
2019-05-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Nasal Polyps

Keywords

Real-time data capture, Concept elicitation, Nasal polyps, Cognitive debriefing, Patient-reported outcomes, HRQoL

Brief summary

Nasal polyposis is a chronic inflammatory disease of the nose and sinuses. GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) is embarking on a clinical program to assess treatment of severe, recurrent nasal polyps with an anti-interleukin-5 (anti-IL5) (mepolizumab). Subject specific symptomatic endpoints will form the basis for the assessment of treatment benefit of nasal polyp therapies. However, there is a lack of published qualitative data regarding nasal polyps to understand the symptoms or health-related quality of life (HRQoL) impacts. This cross-sectional qualitative study aims to address this unmet gap by conducting semi-structured combined concept elicitation (CE) and cognitive debriefing (CD) telephone interviews and real-time data capture. The combined CE and CD interviews (each 90 minutes in duration) will investigate the subject experience of nasal polyps, and the relevance and understanding of existing patient-reported outcomes (PRO) instruments. The real-time data capture conducted over a 10 day period, will investigate the subject experience of the symptoms, HRQoL impacts and treatment of nasal polyps and any day-to-day variability that exists in these experiences in 'real time'. Twenty adult subjects in the United States (US), and 10 adult subjects in Germany with severe, recurrent nasal polyps will participate in the CE and CD interviews section of the study and of these, 10 subjects from US will also complete real-time data capture app task.

Interventions

VAS questionnaire is a PRO tool in which subjects will be asked to evaluate overall symptom severity, or the severity of individual symptoms of nasal polyps along a continuum, typically of 10 centimeter (cm) or 100 millimeter (mm) whereby 0 represents 'no symptom' and '10 or 100 represents 'as bad as you can imagine', Scores of 0-3 (or 0-30) are defined as mild disease, \>3-7 (or \>30-70) as moderate disease and \>7-10 (or \>70-100) as severe disease.

OTHERSNOT-22 questionnaire

SNOT-22 is a PRO tool to measure HRQoL associated with rhinosinusitis with or without nasal polyps. It contains 22 nose, sinus, and general HRQoL items and subjects will be required to score the experience on a 6-point scale ranging from 0 (no problem) to 5 (Problem as bad as it can be) and identify the five most important items affecting their health.

OTHERData capture app

Real time data capture app is a smart-phone or web-based application which will allow the subjects to communicate about their experience of nasal polyps in real-time as they go about their daily lives via varying video, audio, photographic and text responses.

Sponsors

GlaxoSmithKline
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
CROSS_SECTIONAL

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Subject has a clinical diagnosis of bilateral nasal polyps as diagnosed by endoscopy or CT scan. * Subject is aged 18 or over. * Subject has severe nasal polyps symptoms defined as a subject-reported nasal obstruction VAS score of \>5. * Subject had at least one previous surgery in the past ten years for the removal of nasal polyps. Surgery in this case is defined as any procedure involving instruments with resulting incision and removal of polyp tissue from the nasal cavity (polypectomy). * Subject is currently an eligible candidate for polypectomy defined by an overall subject-reported VAS symptom score of \>7 and an endoscopic bilateral nasal polyp score of at least 5 out of a maximum score of 8 (with a minimum score of 2 in each nasal cavity). * Subject has symptoms consistent with chronic rhinosinusitis. * Subject is currently receiving intranasal corticosteroids for the management of their nasal polyps. * Subject is willing to participate in the study and provide informed consent. * Subject is an English speaker and is able to read, write and fully understand the English language. * Subject is willing to and able to attend and participate in a 90-minute interview to discuss their experiences of nasal polyps and obtain their feedback on several symptom/impact questionnaires. For real-time data capture: * Subject owns/or has access to either a smartphone \[iPhone Operating System (iOS) or android\] or tablet which has video, audio/microphone and photographic capabilities and access to either the Apple app store or Google play store to download the app. * Subject is willing and able to take part in the real-time data application task and respond to a series of questions/tasks fielded to them via the application over the course of 10 days and is willing to respond to some brief questions following the real-time data capture task about their experience of using the app and completing the tasks, either during their interview or in a 5-10 minute telephone call following completion of the task. * Subject would feel comfortable recording short videos of themselves and providing audio commentary in response to questions/tasks.

Exclusion criteria

* Subject has a diagnosis of cystic fibrosis. * Subject has a diagnosis of eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (also known as Churg Strauss syndrome), Young's, Kartagener's or dyskinetic ciliary syndromes). * Subject has a diagnosis of antrochoanal polyps. * Subject has a diagnosis of nasal septal deviation occluding one nostril. * Subject has had acute sinusitis or upper respiratory tract infection in the last two week. * Subject has ongoing rhinitis medicamentosa (rebound or chemical induced rhinitis). * Subject has had an asthma exacerbation requiring admission to hospital in the last four weeks. * Subject is currently or has previously taken part in a clinical trial for nasal polyps. * Subject is unwilling or unable to comply with the requirements of the study or has a physical or mental condition or learning difficulties that, in the opinion of the physician, may affect the subject's ability to participate in the study, the responses he/she might provide or their ability to provide consent.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants Who Reported Missing SNOT-22 ItemsUp to 120 minutesParticipants completed SNOT-22 as a part of the CD interview. The SNOT-22 contains 22 nose, sinus, and general HRQoL items and is used to measure health-related quality of life associated with rhinosinusitis with or without nasal polyps. Within the SNOT-22, participants were required to indicate the level to which each listed nasal, sinus or HRQoL experience has been affected on a 6-point scale ranging from 0 (No problem) to 5 (Problem as bad as it can be). Participants were asked if they felt any items were missing from SNOT-22. Number of participants who reported missing items in SNOT-22 is presented.
Number of Participants Who Did Not Understand Visual Analog Scale (VAS) AssessmentUp to 120 minutesParticipants were required to complete six VAS assessments (overall symptom VAS and single item VAS) as a part of the CD interview. The participants evaluated their overall symptom severity, or the severity of individual symptoms of nasal polyps along a continuum, typically of 10 centimeter (cm) or 100 millimeter (mm) whereby 0 represents 'no symptom' and 10 or 100 represents 'as bad as you can imagine' respectively. Participants were asked to speak aloud their thoughts as they read the instructions and completed the questions. After completion of each think-aloud exercise, participants were also probed upon their understanding of the instrument items. Number of participants who did not understand the VAS assessments is reported.
Number of Participants Who Reported Symptoms Assessed by VAS to be Relevant to Their ConditionUp to 120 minutesParticipants were required to complete six VAS assessments (overall symptom VAS and single item VAS) as a part of the CD interview. The participants evaluated their overall symptom severity, or the severity of individual symptoms of nasal polyps along a continuum, typically of 10 cm or 100 mm whereby 0 represents 'no symptom' and 10 or 100 represents 'as bad as you can imagine' respectively. Participants were asked to speak aloud their thoughts as they read the instructions and completed the questions. After completion of each think-aloud exercise, participants were also probed about the relevance of VAS items. Relevance was determined based on participants personal descriptions and related discussion of their experience of each symptom or impact during CD interview. It was also determined via the rating of a given symptom/impact on each measure as greater than a score of zero. Number of participants who reported the symptoms assessed by VAS to be relevant are presented.
Number of Participants Who Liked or Disliked VAS AssessmentsUp to 120 minutesParticipants were required to complete six VAS assessments (overall symptom VAS and single item VAS) as a part of the CD interview. The participants evaluated their overall symptom severity, or the severity of individual symptoms of nasal polyps along a continuum, typically of 10 cm or 100 mm whereby 0 represents 'no symptom' and 10 or 100 represents 'as bad as you can imagine' respectively. Participants provided a general feedback on completing the six VAS assessments which included relevance of symptoms to their condition, ease of completion and interpretation of the scale. The number of participants who provided general feedback for VAS assessments in terms of likes or dislikes for VAS assessment is presented.
Number of Participants With Difficulties Completing VAS AssessmentsUp to 120 minutesParticipants were required to complete six VAS assessments (overall symptom VAS and single item VAS) as a part of the CD interview. The participants evaluated their overall symptom severity, or the severity of individual symptoms of nasal polyps along a continuum, typically of 10 cm or 100 mm whereby 0 represents 'no symptom' and 10 or 100 represents 'as bad as you can imagine' respectively. Participants provided a general feedback on completing the six VAS assessments which included relevance of symptoms to their condition, ease of completion and interpretation of the scale. The number of participants with difficulties completing VAS assessment is presented.
Number of Participants Who Understood VAS AnchorsUp to 120 minutesParticipants completed the VAS assessment as a part of the CD interview. Participants evaluated their overall symptom severity, or the severity of individual symptoms of nasal polyps along a continuum, typically of 10 cm or 100 mm whereby 0 represents 'no symptom' and 10 or 100 represents 'as bad as you can imagine' respectively. Participants were asked about their understanding of the response continuum for VAS assessment. Number of participants who understood the VAS anchors (100 as bad as you can imagine and 0 none) is presented.
Number of Participants Who Did Not Understand the Items of Sino-nasal Outcomes Test (SNOT)-22Up to 120 minutesParticipants completed SNOT-22 assessment as a part of the CD interview. The SNOT-22 contains 22 nose, sinus, and general health-related quality of life (HRQoL) items and is used to measure HRQoL associated with rhinosinusitis with or without nasal polyps. Within the SNOT-22, participants were required to indicate the level to which each listed nasal, sinus or HRQoL experience has been affected on a 6-point scale ranging from 0 (No problem) to 5 (Problem as bad as it can be). Number of participants who did not understand the items of SNOT-22 is presented.
Number of Participants Who Reported Symptoms Assessed by SNOT-22 as Relevant to Their ConditionUp to 120 minutesParticipants were required to complete SNOT-22 assessment as a part of the CD interview. The SNOT-22 contains 22 nose, sinus, and general HRQoL items and is used to measure health-related quality of life associated with rhinosinusitis with or without nasal polyps. Within the SNOT-22, participants were required to indicate the level to which each listed nasal, sinus or HRQoL experience has been affected on a 6-point scale ranging from 0 (No problem) to 5 (Problem as bad as it can be). Number of participants who reported the symptoms assessed by SNOT-22 to be relevant to their condition are presented.
Number of Participants Who Liked or Disliked SNOT-22 AssessmentsUp to 120 minutesThe SNOT-22 contains 22 nose, sinus, and general HRQoL items and is used to measure health-related quality of life associated with rhinosinusitis with or without nasal polyps. Within the SNOT-22, participants were required to indicate the level to which each listed nasal, sinus or HRQoL experience has been affected on a 6-point scale ranging from 0 (No problem) to 5 (Problem as bad as it can be). Participants provided a general feedback on completing the SNOT-22 which included relevance of symptoms to their condition, ease of completion and interpretation of the scale. Number of participants who liked or disliked the SNOT-22 is presented.
Number of Participants With Difficulties Completing SNOT-22Up to 120 minutesParticipants provided a general feedback on completing the SNOT-22 during the CD interview. The SNOT-22 contains 22 nose, sinus, and general HRQoL items and is used to measure health-related quality of life associated with rhinosinusitis with or without nasal polyps. Within the SNOT-22, participants were required to indicate the level to which each listed nasal, sinus or HRQoL experience has been affected on a 6-point scale ranging from 0 (No problem) to 5 (Problem as bad as it can be). Number of participants with difficulties completing SNOT-22 assessment is presented.
Number of Participants Who Understood SNOT-22 Response OptionsUp to 120 minutesParticipants completed SNOT-22 as a part of the CD interview. The SNOT-22 contains 22 nose, sinus, and general HRQoL items and is used to measure health-related quality of life associated with rhinosinusitis with or without nasal polyps. Within the SNOT-22, participants were required to indicate the level to which each listed nasal, sinus or HRQoL experience has been affected on a 6-point scale ranging from 0 (No problem) to 5 (Problem as bad as it can be). Participants were asked about their understanding of each of the six options (no problem, mild or slight problem, very mild problem, moderate problem, severe problem, as bad as it can be) included in SNOT-22. Number of participants who understood each of the six SNOT-22 response options is presented.
Number of Participants Who Reported Primary SymptomsUp to 120 minutesDuring the CE section of the interview, participants were asked a series of broad open-ended questions designed to encourage them to talk openly and as spontaneously as possible about their experience of having nasal polyps. In addition, participants were asked more focused questions designed to probe on issues that they may not have mentioned during the course of the interview spontaneously or concepts/statements that required additional clarification. The interviews were transcribed/translated verbatim and qualitative analysis was conducted using Atlas Ti. The symptoms which were most frequently reported spontaneously and were also reported to either be the most frequent, bothersome or worst were categorized as primary symptoms. Number of participants who reported each of the primary symptom is presented.
Number of Participants Who Reported Secondary SymptomsUp to 120 minutesDuring the CE section of the interview, participants were asked a series of broad open-ended questions designed to encourage them to talk openly and as spontaneously as possible about their experience of having nasal polyps. In addition, participants were asked more focused questions designed to probe on issues that they may not have mentioned during the course of the interview spontaneously or concepts/statements that required additional clarification. The interviews were transcribed/translated verbatim and qualitative analysis was conducted using Atlas Ti. The symptoms that were reported by fewer participants and less frequently mentioned spontaneously by participants during the interviews were classified as secondary symptoms. Number of participants who reported each of the secondary symptoms is reported.
Number of Participants Who Reported Worst, Most-frequent and Most-bothersome SymptomsUp to 120 minutesFollowing spontaneous and probed discussions regarding symptoms during CE interviews, participants were asked to comment on what they each considered to be their 'worst' symptom, their 'most frequent' symptom and their 'most bothersome' symptom. The interviews were transcribed/translated verbatim and qualitative analysis was conducted using Atlas Ti. The number of participants with worst, most-frequent and most-bothersome symptoms are presented.
Number of Participants Reporting Proximal Impacts-Physical ImpactUp to 120 minutesThe impacts as reported by participants during CE interviews were categorized as proximal impacts and distal impacts. Proximal impacts were defined as those reported to be the direct impact of the symptoms of nasal polyps and included; physical impacts, sleep impacts and impacts on activities of daily living (ADL). The number of participants with physical impacts are reported.
Number of Participants Reporting Proximal Impacts-Sleep ImpactUp to 120 minutesThe impacts as reported by participants during CE interviews were categorized as proximal impacts and distal impacts. Proximal impacts were defined as those reported to be the direct impact of the symptoms of nasal polyps and included; physical impacts, sleep impacts and impacts on ADL. The number of participants with sleep impacts are reported.
Number of Participants Reporting Proximal Impacts-ADL ImpactUp to 120 minutesThe impacts as reported by participants during CE interviews were categorized as proximal impacts and distal impacts. Proximal impacts were defined as those reported to be the direct impact of the symptoms of nasal polyps and included; physical impacts, sleep impacts and impacts on ADL. The number of participants with ADL impacts are reported.
Number of Participants Reporting Distal Impacts-emotional ImpactUp to 120 minutesThe impacts as reported by participants during CE interviews were categorized as proximal impacts and distal impacts. Distal impacts were those reported to be impacts of the condition as a whole and included; emotional, social, work/school and treatment impacts. The number of participants with emotional impacts are reported.
Number of Participants Reporting Distal Impacts-social ImpactUp to 120 minutesThe impacts as reported by participants during CE interviews were categorized as proximal impacts and distal impacts. Distal impacts were those reported to be impacts of the condition as a whole and included; emotional, social, work/school and treatment impacts. The number of participants with social impacts are reported.
Number of Participants Reporting Distal Impacts-work/School ImpactUp to 120 minutesThe impacts as reported by participants during CE interviews were categorized as proximal impacts and distal impacts. Distal impacts were those reported to be impacts of the condition as a whole and included; emotional, social, work/school and treatment impacts. The number of participants with work/school impacts are reported.
Number of Participants Reporting Distal Impacts-treatment ImpactUp to 120 minutesThe impacts as reported by participants during CE interviews were categorized as proximal impacts and distal impacts. Distal impacts were those reported to be impacts of the condition as a whole and included; emotional, social, work/school and treatment impacts. The number of participants with treatment impacts are reported.
Number of Participants Who Reported Symptoms to be Targeted by New TreatmentUp to 120 minutesDuring CE interviews, participants were asked about the changes they would like to see from a new treatment for nasal polyps and which symptoms would be most meaningful for the treatment to target. The number of participants with their reported symptoms to be targeted by new treatment is presented.
Number of Participant Who Reported Impacts to be Targeted by New TreatmentUp to 120 minutesDuring CE interviews, participants were asked about the changes they would like to see from a new treatment for nasal polyps and which impacts would be most meaningful for the treatment to target. The number of participants with corresponding impacts to be targeted by new treatment is presented.
Number of Participants Reporting Factors to be Considered for SurgeryUp to 120 minutesDuring CE interviews, participants were asked about experiences of their surgery in past. The number of participants with the corresponding factors to be considered for surgery is presented.
Number of Participants With Ease of Decision to Have SurgeryUp to 120 minutesDuring CE interviews, participants were asked about experiences of their surgery in past. The number of participants with ease of decision to have surgery is presented.
Number of Participants Who Reported on the Positive or Negative Impacts of SurgeryUp to 120 minutesDuring CE interviews, participants were asked about experiences of their surgery in past. The number of participants who reported on the positive or negative impacts of surgery is presented.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants Reporting Primary Symptoms as Identified During App TaskUp to 10 daysParticipants took part in an app-based real-world data capture activity. The participants were required to download an app to their smart phone or tablet. Data capture was conducted over a 10-day period during which participants were required to complete a series of questions/tasks via the smartphone/tablet application in real-time. The questions/tasks were designed to explore the experience of nasal polyps. Participants provided responses to the questions using a variety of methodologies including video, audio, text and photographic responses with captions. Number of participants reporting primary symptoms as identified during app task is reported.
Number of Participants Reporting Secondary Symptoms as Identified During App TaskUp to 10 daysParticipants took part in an app-based real-world data capture activity. The participants were required to download an app to their smart phone or tablet. Data capture was conducted over a 10-day period during which participants were required to complete a series of questions/tasks via the smartphone/tablet application in real-time. The questions/tasks were designed to explore the experience of nasal polyps. Participants provided responses to the questions using a variety of methodologies including video, audio, text and photographic responses with captions. Number of participants reporting secondary symptoms as identified during app task is reported.
Number of Participants Reporting Physical Impacts as Idenfied During the App TaskUp to 10 daysParticipants took part in an app-based real-world data capture activity. The participants were required to download an app to their smart phone or tablet. Data capture was conducted over a 10-day period during which participants were required to complete a series of questions/tasks via the smartphone/tablet application in real-time. The questions/tasks were designed to explore the experience of nasal polyps. Participants provided responses to the questions using a variety of methodologies including video, audio, text and photographic responses with captions. Number of participants with physical impacts as identified during app task is reported.
Number of Participants Reporting Sleep Impacts as Identified During the App TaskUp to 10 daysParticipants took part in an app-based real-world data capture activity. The participants were required to download an app to their smart phone or tablet. Data capture was conducted over a 10-day period during which participants were required to complete a series of questions/tasks via the smartphone/tablet application in real-time. The questions/tasks were designed to explore the experience of nasal polyps. Participants provided responses to the questions using a variety of methodologies including video, audio, text and photographic responses with captions. Number of participants reporting sleep impacts as identified during app task is reported.
Number of Participants Reporting ADL Impacts as Identified During the App TaskUp to 10 daysParticipants took part in an app-based real-world data capture activity. The participants were required to download an app to their smart phone or tablet. Data capture was conducted over a 10-day period during which participants were required to complete a series of questions/tasks via the smartphone/tablet application in real-time. The questions/tasks were designed to explore the experience of nasal polyps. Participants provided responses to the questions using a variety of methodologies including video, audio, text and photographic responses with captions. Number of participants reporting ADL impacts as identified during app task is reported.
Number of Participants Reporting Emotional Impacts as Identified During the App TaskUp to 10 daysParticipants took part in an app-based real-world data capture activity. The participants were required to download an app to their smart phone or tablet. Data capture was conducted over a 10-day period during which participants were required to complete a series of questions/tasks via the smartphone/tablet application in real-time. The questions/tasks were designed to explore the experience of nasal polyps. Participants provided responses to the questions using a variety of methodologies including video, audio, text and photographic responses with captions. Number of participants reporting emotional impacts as identified during app task is reported.
Number of Participants Reporting Social Functioning Impacts as Identified During the App TaskUp to 10 daysParticipants took part in an app-based real-world data capture activity. The participants were required to download an app to their smart phone or tablet. Data capture was conducted over a 10-day period during which participants were required to complete a series of questions/tasks via the smartphone/tablet application in real-time. The questions/tasks were designed to explore the experience of nasal polyps. Participants provided responses to the questions using a variety of methodologies including video, audio, text and photographic responses with captions. Number of participants reporting social functioning impacts as identified during app task is reported.
Number of Participants Reporting Work Impacts as Identified During the App TaskUp to 10 daysParticipants took part in an app-based real-world data capture activity. The participants were required to download an app to their smart phone or tablet. Data capture was conducted over a 10-day period during which participants were required to complete a series of questions/tasks via the smartphone/tablet application in real-time. The questions/tasks were designed to explore the experience of nasal polyps. Participants provided responses to the questions using a variety of methodologies including video, audio, text and photographic responses with captions. Number of participants reporting work impacts as identified during app task is reported.
Number of Participants Reporting Treatment Impacts as Identified During the App TaskUp to 10 daysParticipants took part in an app-based real-world data capture activity. The participants were required to download an app to their smart phone or tablet. Data capture was conducted over a 10-day period during which participants were required to complete a series of questions/tasks via the smartphone/tablet application in real-time. The questions/tasks were designed to explore the experience of nasal polyps. Participants provided responses to the questions using a variety of methodologies including video, audio, text and photographic responses with captions. Number of participants reporting treatment impacts as identified during app task is reported.
Number of Participants Reporting Symptom Variability-Application (App) TaskUp to 10 daysParticipants took part in an app-based real-world data capture activity. The participants were required to download an app to their smart phone or tablet. Data capture was conducted over a 10-day period during which participants were required to complete a series of questions/tasks via the smartphone/tablet application in real-time. The questions/tasks were designed to explore the experience of nasal polyps. Participants provided responses to the questions using a variety of methodologies including video, audio, text and photographic responses with captions. Participants completed a number of tasks across 10 days, which explored how nasal polyp symptoms and impacts varied across a full day (within day variability) or assess the day to day variability (between day variability). Number of participants reporting within day and between-day symptom variability is reported.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

This was a cross-sectional qualitative study to characterize the participants experience of nasal polyps. Participants were identified via partner recruitment agencies for participation in the Concept Elicitation (CE) or Cognitive Debriefing (CD) interview.

Pre-assignment details

A total of 27 participants with severe, recurrent nasal polyps who underwent at least one nasal polyp surgery in the past 10 years were enrolled in the study. The study was conducted in the United States and Germany.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Interview Participants With Nasal Polyps
Participants with severe, recurrent nasal polyps who underwent at least one nasal polyp surgery in the past 10 years were enrolled.
27
Total27

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicInterview Participants With Nasal Polyps
Age, Continuous48.4 Years
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian/Pacific islander
1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black/African American
2 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic
4 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Multiple
1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
19 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
18 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
9 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 27
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 27
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 27

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants Reporting Distal Impacts-emotional Impact

The impacts as reported by participants during CE interviews were categorized as proximal impacts and distal impacts. Distal impacts were those reported to be impacts of the condition as a whole and included; emotional, social, work/school and treatment impacts. The number of participants with emotional impacts are reported.

Time frame: Up to 120 minutes

Population: All Enrolled Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Reporting Distal Impacts-emotional ImpactAnnoyance/frustration18 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Reporting Distal Impacts-emotional ImpactSadness9 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Reporting Distal Impacts-emotional ImpactIrritable/crabby9 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Reporting Distal Impacts-emotional ImpactAcceptance of nasal polyps9 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Reporting Distal Impacts-emotional ImpactStressed7 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Reporting Distal Impacts-emotional ImpactScared/worried6 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Reporting Distal Impacts-emotional ImpactEmbarrased6 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Reporting Distal Impacts-emotional ImpactLoss of enjoyment5 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Reporting Distal Impacts-emotional ImpactNot understanding condition2 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Reporting Distal Impacts-emotional ImpactWanting to be normal2 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Reporting Distal Impacts-emotional ImpactIsolated1 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Reporting Distal Impacts-emotional ImpactWorthless1 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Reporting Distal Impacts-emotional ImpactNot in control1 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Reporting Distal Impacts-emotional ImpactSuffering1 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Reporting Distal Impacts-emotional ImpactNot feeling themselves1 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants Reporting Distal Impacts-social Impact

The impacts as reported by participants during CE interviews were categorized as proximal impacts and distal impacts. Distal impacts were those reported to be impacts of the condition as a whole and included; emotional, social, work/school and treatment impacts. The number of participants with social impacts are reported.

Time frame: Up to 120 minutes

Population: All Enrolled Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Reporting Distal Impacts-social ImpactSocial activities affected12 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Reporting Distal Impacts-social ImpactCancelling/avoiding social activities12 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Reporting Distal Impacts-social ImpactStigma7 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Reporting Distal Impacts-social ImpactLack of understanding from others4 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Reporting Distal Impacts-social ImpactImprove relationships with family3 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Reporting Distal Impacts-social ImpactPersonal relationships affected3 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Reporting Distal Impacts-social ImpactStruggles to hold conversation2 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants Reporting Distal Impacts-treatment Impact

The impacts as reported by participants during CE interviews were categorized as proximal impacts and distal impacts. Distal impacts were those reported to be impacts of the condition as a whole and included; emotional, social, work/school and treatment impacts. The number of participants with treatment impacts are reported.

Time frame: Up to 120 minutes

Population: All Enrolled Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Reporting Distal Impacts-treatment ImpactCost of treatment7 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Reporting Distal Impacts-treatment ImpactShort treatment efficacy7 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Reporting Distal Impacts-treatment ImpactSide effects of medication5 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Reporting Distal Impacts-treatment ImpactLack of treatment efficacy2 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Reporting Distal Impacts-treatment ImpactFear of taking medication2 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants Reporting Distal Impacts-work/School Impact

The impacts as reported by participants during CE interviews were categorized as proximal impacts and distal impacts. Distal impacts were those reported to be impacts of the condition as a whole and included; emotional, social, work/school and treatment impacts. The number of participants with work/school impacts are reported.

Time frame: Up to 120 minutes

Population: All Enrolled Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Reporting Distal Impacts-work/School ImpactTime off work17 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Reporting Distal Impacts-work/School ImpactAffects activities at work10 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Reporting Distal Impacts-work/School ImpactReduced productivity5 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Reporting Distal Impacts-work/School ImpactInability to focus5 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Reporting Distal Impacts-work/School ImpactTaking breaks4 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Reporting Distal Impacts-work/School ImpactSymptom triggers in the workplace3 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Reporting Distal Impacts-work/School ImpactLoss of income3 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Reporting Distal Impacts-work/School ImpactFatigue at work3 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Reporting Distal Impacts-work/School ImpactReduced smell at work3 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Reporting Distal Impacts-work/School ImpactBlowing nose at work3 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants Reporting Factors to be Considered for Surgery

During CE interviews, participants were asked about experiences of their surgery in past. The number of participants with the corresponding factors to be considered for surgery is presented.

Time frame: Up to 120 minutes

Population: All Enrolled Population. Only those participants who discussed the factors were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Reporting Factors to be Considered for SurgerySeriousness of surgery3 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Reporting Factors to be Considered for SurgerySuccess of surgery3 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Reporting Factors to be Considered for SurgeryUnable to bear symptoms any longer3 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Reporting Factors to be Considered for SurgeryConfidence in doctor3 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Reporting Factors to be Considered for SurgeryTreatment failure3 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Reporting Factors to be Considered for SurgerySimplicity of surgery3 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Reporting Factors to be Considered for SurgeryNo alternative2 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Reporting Factors to be Considered for SurgeryOwn research1 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Reporting Factors to be Considered for SurgeryAge1 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Reporting Factors to be Considered for SurgeryPain/recovery1 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Reporting Factors to be Considered for SurgeryRisk of surgery1 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Reporting Factors to be Considered for SurgeryRisk of scarring1 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Reporting Factors to be Considered for SurgeryLife expectancy1 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants Reporting Proximal Impacts-ADL Impact

The impacts as reported by participants during CE interviews were categorized as proximal impacts and distal impacts. Proximal impacts were defined as those reported to be the direct impact of the symptoms of nasal polyps and included; physical impacts, sleep impacts and impacts on ADL. The number of participants with ADL impacts are reported.

Time frame: Up to 120 minutes

Population: All Enrolled Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Reporting Proximal Impacts-ADL ImpactADLs affected17 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Reporting Proximal Impacts-ADL ImpactAlways being prepared8 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Reporting Proximal Impacts-ADL ImpactHygiene4 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants Reporting Proximal Impacts-Physical Impact

The impacts as reported by participants during CE interviews were categorized as proximal impacts and distal impacts. Proximal impacts were defined as those reported to be the direct impact of the symptoms of nasal polyps and included; physical impacts, sleep impacts and impacts on activities of daily living (ADL). The number of participants with physical impacts are reported.

Time frame: Up to 120 minutes

Population: All Enrolled Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Reporting Proximal Impacts-Physical ImpactTiredness/fatigue21 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Reporting Proximal Impacts-Physical ImpactBlowing nose19 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Reporting Proximal Impacts-Physical ImpactMouth breathing14 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Reporting Proximal Impacts-Physical ImpactSports/exercise14 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Reporting Proximal Impacts-Physical ImpactDiscomfort7 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Reporting Proximal Impacts-Physical ImpactAltered physical appearance6 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Reporting Proximal Impacts-Physical ImpactMobility4 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Reporting Proximal Impacts-Physical ImpactIncreased thirst4 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Reporting Proximal Impacts-Physical ImpactReduced appetite/weight loss2 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Reporting Proximal Impacts-Physical ImpactHearing loss2 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Reporting Proximal Impacts-Physical ImpactSpitting mucus1 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Reporting Proximal Impacts-Physical ImpactSmack lips1 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Reporting Proximal Impacts-Physical ImpactPassing out1 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants Reporting Proximal Impacts-Sleep Impact

The impacts as reported by participants during CE interviews were categorized as proximal impacts and distal impacts. Proximal impacts were defined as those reported to be the direct impact of the symptoms of nasal polyps and included; physical impacts, sleep impacts and impacts on ADL. The number of participants with sleep impacts are reported.

Time frame: Up to 120 minutes

Population: All Enrolled Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Reporting Proximal Impacts-Sleep ImpactNight-time awakenings22 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Reporting Proximal Impacts-Sleep ImpactPoor sleep quality12 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Reporting Proximal Impacts-Sleep ImpactSnoring11 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Reporting Proximal Impacts-Sleep ImpactDifficulty falling asleep9 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Reporting Proximal Impacts-Sleep ImpactWaking partner2 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Reporting Proximal Impacts-Sleep ImpactBedsheet choice1 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Reporting Proximal Impacts-Sleep ImpactComfortable sleep position1 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants Who Did Not Understand the Items of Sino-nasal Outcomes Test (SNOT)-22

Participants completed SNOT-22 assessment as a part of the CD interview. The SNOT-22 contains 22 nose, sinus, and general health-related quality of life (HRQoL) items and is used to measure HRQoL associated with rhinosinusitis with or without nasal polyps. Within the SNOT-22, participants were required to indicate the level to which each listed nasal, sinus or HRQoL experience has been affected on a 6-point scale ranging from 0 (No problem) to 5 (Problem as bad as it can be). Number of participants who did not understand the items of SNOT-22 is presented.

Time frame: Up to 120 minutes

Population: All Enrolled Population. Only those participants who were asked about each item was analyzed (represented by n=X in category titles)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Who Did Not Understand the Items of Sino-nasal Outcomes Test (SNOT)-22Need to blow nose; n=250 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Who Did Not Understand the Items of Sino-nasal Outcomes Test (SNOT)-22Nasal blockage; n=270 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Who Did Not Understand the Items of Sino-nasal Outcomes Test (SNOT)-22Sneezing; n=261 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Who Did Not Understand the Items of Sino-nasal Outcomes Test (SNOT)-22Runny nose; n=253 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Who Did Not Understand the Items of Sino-nasal Outcomes Test (SNOT)-22Cough; n=260 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Who Did Not Understand the Items of Sino-nasal Outcomes Test (SNOT)-22Post-nasal discharge; n=274 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Who Did Not Understand the Items of Sino-nasal Outcomes Test (SNOT)-22Thick nasal discharge; n=262 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Who Did Not Understand the Items of Sino-nasal Outcomes Test (SNOT)-22Ear fullness; n=271 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Who Did Not Understand the Items of Sino-nasal Outcomes Test (SNOT)-22Dizziness; n=270 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Who Did Not Understand the Items of Sino-nasal Outcomes Test (SNOT)-22Ear pain; n=230 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Who Did Not Understand the Items of Sino-nasal Outcomes Test (SNOT)-22Facial pain/pressure; n=250 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Who Did Not Understand the Items of Sino-nasal Outcomes Test (SNOT)-22Decreased sense of smell/taste; n=270 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Who Did Not Understand the Items of Sino-nasal Outcomes Test (SNOT)-22Difficulty falling asleep; n=270 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Who Did Not Understand the Items of Sino-nasal Outcomes Test (SNOT)-22Wake up at night; n=270 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Who Did Not Understand the Items of Sino-nasal Outcomes Test (SNOT)-22Lack of good night's sleep; n=241 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Who Did Not Understand the Items of Sino-nasal Outcomes Test (SNOT)-22Wake up tired; n=250 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Who Did Not Understand the Items of Sino-nasal Outcomes Test (SNOT)-22Fatigue; n=240 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Who Did Not Understand the Items of Sino-nasal Outcomes Test (SNOT)-22Reduced productivity; n=260 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Who Did Not Understand the Items of Sino-nasal Outcomes Test (SNOT)-22Reduced concentration; n=260 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Who Did Not Understand the Items of Sino-nasal Outcomes Test (SNOT)-22Frustration/restless/irritable; n=260 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Who Did Not Understand the Items of Sino-nasal Outcomes Test (SNOT)-22Sad; n=261 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Who Did Not Understand the Items of Sino-nasal Outcomes Test (SNOT)-22Embarrassed; n=261 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants Who Did Not Understand Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Assessment

Participants were required to complete six VAS assessments (overall symptom VAS and single item VAS) as a part of the CD interview. The participants evaluated their overall symptom severity, or the severity of individual symptoms of nasal polyps along a continuum, typically of 10 centimeter (cm) or 100 millimeter (mm) whereby 0 represents 'no symptom' and 10 or 100 represents 'as bad as you can imagine' respectively. Participants were asked to speak aloud their thoughts as they read the instructions and completed the questions. After completion of each think-aloud exercise, participants were also probed upon their understanding of the instrument items. Number of participants who did not understand the VAS assessments is reported.

Time frame: Up to 120 minutes

Population: All Enrolled Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Who Did Not Understand Visual Analog Scale (VAS) AssessmentFacial pain/pressure0 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Who Did Not Understand Visual Analog Scale (VAS) AssessmentOverall symptoms0 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Who Did Not Understand Visual Analog Scale (VAS) AssessmentLoss of smell0 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Who Did Not Understand Visual Analog Scale (VAS) AssessmentMucus in the throat0 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Who Did Not Understand Visual Analog Scale (VAS) AssessmentNasal discharge1 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Who Did Not Understand Visual Analog Scale (VAS) AssessmentNasal obstruction0 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants Who Liked or Disliked SNOT-22 Assessments

The SNOT-22 contains 22 nose, sinus, and general HRQoL items and is used to measure health-related quality of life associated with rhinosinusitis with or without nasal polyps. Within the SNOT-22, participants were required to indicate the level to which each listed nasal, sinus or HRQoL experience has been affected on a 6-point scale ranging from 0 (No problem) to 5 (Problem as bad as it can be). Participants provided a general feedback on completing the SNOT-22 which included relevance of symptoms to their condition, ease of completion and interpretation of the scale. Number of participants who liked or disliked the SNOT-22 is presented.

Time frame: Up to 120 minutes

Population: All Enrolled Population. Only those participants who provided general feedback were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Who Liked or Disliked SNOT-22 AssessmentsSNOT-22 likes11 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Who Liked or Disliked SNOT-22 AssessmentsSNOT-22 dislikes9 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants Who Liked or Disliked VAS Assessments

Participants were required to complete six VAS assessments (overall symptom VAS and single item VAS) as a part of the CD interview. The participants evaluated their overall symptom severity, or the severity of individual symptoms of nasal polyps along a continuum, typically of 10 cm or 100 mm whereby 0 represents 'no symptom' and 10 or 100 represents 'as bad as you can imagine' respectively. Participants provided a general feedback on completing the six VAS assessments which included relevance of symptoms to their condition, ease of completion and interpretation of the scale. The number of participants who provided general feedback for VAS assessments in terms of likes or dislikes for VAS assessment is presented.

Time frame: Up to 120 minutes

Population: All Enrolled Population. Only those participants who provided general feedback were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Who Liked or Disliked VAS AssessmentsVAS likes17 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Who Liked or Disliked VAS AssessmentsVAS dislikes2 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants Who Reported Missing SNOT-22 Items

Participants completed SNOT-22 as a part of the CD interview. The SNOT-22 contains 22 nose, sinus, and general HRQoL items and is used to measure health-related quality of life associated with rhinosinusitis with or without nasal polyps. Within the SNOT-22, participants were required to indicate the level to which each listed nasal, sinus or HRQoL experience has been affected on a 6-point scale ranging from 0 (No problem) to 5 (Problem as bad as it can be). Participants were asked if they felt any items were missing from SNOT-22. Number of participants who reported missing items in SNOT-22 is presented.

Time frame: Up to 120 minutes

Population: All Enrolled Population. Only those participants who were asked about missing items were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Who Reported Missing SNOT-22 Items5 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants Who Reported on the Positive or Negative Impacts of Surgery

During CE interviews, participants were asked about experiences of their surgery in past. The number of participants who reported on the positive or negative impacts of surgery is presented.

Time frame: Up to 120 minutes

Population: All Enrolled Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Who Reported on the Positive or Negative Impacts of SurgeryPositive impact of surgery21 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Who Reported on the Positive or Negative Impacts of SurgeryNegative impact of surgery23 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants Who Reported Primary Symptoms

During the CE section of the interview, participants were asked a series of broad open-ended questions designed to encourage them to talk openly and as spontaneously as possible about their experience of having nasal polyps. In addition, participants were asked more focused questions designed to probe on issues that they may not have mentioned during the course of the interview spontaneously or concepts/statements that required additional clarification. The interviews were transcribed/translated verbatim and qualitative analysis was conducted using Atlas Ti. The symptoms which were most frequently reported spontaneously and were also reported to either be the most frequent, bothersome or worst were categorized as primary symptoms. Number of participants who reported each of the primary symptom is presented.

Time frame: Up to 120 minutes

Population: All Enrolled Population included all participants with severe, recurrent nasal polyps enrolled in the study

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Who Reported Primary SymptomsBreathing difficulties27 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Who Reported Primary SymptomsNasal congestion27 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Who Reported Primary SymptomsPost-nasal drip25 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Who Reported Primary SymptomsRunny nose24 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Who Reported Primary SymptomsHead/facial pressure23 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Who Reported Primary SymptomsLoss of smell23 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Who Reported Primary SymptomsEar congestion23 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Who Reported Primary SymptomsHeadache23 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Who Reported Primary SymptomsLoss of taste22 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants Who Reported Secondary Symptoms

During the CE section of the interview, participants were asked a series of broad open-ended questions designed to encourage them to talk openly and as spontaneously as possible about their experience of having nasal polyps. In addition, participants were asked more focused questions designed to probe on issues that they may not have mentioned during the course of the interview spontaneously or concepts/statements that required additional clarification. The interviews were transcribed/translated verbatim and qualitative analysis was conducted using Atlas Ti. The symptoms that were reported by fewer participants and less frequently mentioned spontaneously by participants during the interviews were classified as secondary symptoms. Number of participants who reported each of the secondary symptoms is reported.

Time frame: Up to 120 minutes

Population: All Enrolled Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Who Reported Secondary SymptomsMucus catarrh20 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Who Reported Secondary SymptomsNose bleeds20 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Who Reported Secondary SymptomsNasal swelling19 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Who Reported Secondary SymptomsSneezing18 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Who Reported Secondary SymptomsNasal pressure16 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Who Reported Secondary SymptomsNasal pain15 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Who Reported Secondary SymptomsNasal tightness13 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Who Reported Secondary SymptomsVisible polyps6 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Who Reported Secondary SymptomsNasal dryness7 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Who Reported Secondary SymptomsSinus blockage18 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Who Reported Secondary SymptomsSinus inflammation17 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Who Reported Secondary SymptomsSinus infections16 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Who Reported Secondary SymptomsWheezing14 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Who Reported Secondary SymptomsCough19 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Who Reported Secondary SymptomsDistorted voice17 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Who Reported Secondary SymptomsDizziness16 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Who Reported Secondary SymptomsFacial pain13 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Who Reported Secondary SymptomsFacial swelling9 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Who Reported Secondary SymptomsWatering eyes4 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Who Reported Secondary SymptomsVisual disturbances1 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Who Reported Secondary SymptomsItchy eyes2 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Who Reported Secondary SymptomsRed eyes1 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Who Reported Secondary SymptomsItching ears1 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Who Reported Secondary SymptomsGeneral illness/infection4 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Who Reported Secondary SymptomsFever1 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants Who Reported Symptoms Assessed by SNOT-22 as Relevant to Their Condition

Participants were required to complete SNOT-22 assessment as a part of the CD interview. The SNOT-22 contains 22 nose, sinus, and general HRQoL items and is used to measure health-related quality of life associated with rhinosinusitis with or without nasal polyps. Within the SNOT-22, participants were required to indicate the level to which each listed nasal, sinus or HRQoL experience has been affected on a 6-point scale ranging from 0 (No problem) to 5 (Problem as bad as it can be). Number of participants who reported the symptoms assessed by SNOT-22 to be relevant to their condition are presented.

Time frame: Up to 120 minutes

Population: All Enrolled Population. Only those participants who were asked about each item was analyzed (represented by n=X in category titles)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Who Reported Symptoms Assessed by SNOT-22 as Relevant to Their ConditionNeed to blow nose; n=2725 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Who Reported Symptoms Assessed by SNOT-22 as Relevant to Their ConditionNasal blockage; n=2524 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Who Reported Symptoms Assessed by SNOT-22 as Relevant to Their ConditionSneezing; n=2520 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Who Reported Symptoms Assessed by SNOT-22 as Relevant to Their ConditionRunny nose; n=2622 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Who Reported Symptoms Assessed by SNOT-22 as Relevant to Their ConditionCough; n=2519 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Who Reported Symptoms Assessed by SNOT-22 as Relevant to Their ConditionPost-nasal discharge; n=2320 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Who Reported Symptoms Assessed by SNOT-22 as Relevant to Their ConditionThick nasal discharge; n=2320 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Who Reported Symptoms Assessed by SNOT-22 as Relevant to Their ConditionEar fullness; n=2721 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Who Reported Symptoms Assessed by SNOT-22 as Relevant to Their ConditionDizziness; n=2515 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Who Reported Symptoms Assessed by SNOT-22 as Relevant to Their ConditionEar pain; n=2616 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Who Reported Symptoms Assessed by SNOT-22 as Relevant to Their ConditionFacial pain/pressure; n=2422 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Who Reported Symptoms Assessed by SNOT-22 as Relevant to Their ConditionDecreased sense of smell/taste; n=2318 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Who Reported Symptoms Assessed by SNOT-22 as Relevant to Their ConditionDifficulty falling asleep; n=2621 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Who Reported Symptoms Assessed by SNOT-22 as Relevant to Their ConditionWake up at night; n=2725 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Who Reported Symptoms Assessed by SNOT-22 as Relevant to Their ConditionLack of good night's sleep; n=2219 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Who Reported Symptoms Assessed by SNOT-22 as Relevant to Their ConditionWake up tired; n=2521 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Who Reported Symptoms Assessed by SNOT-22 as Relevant to Their ConditionFatigue; n=2722 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Who Reported Symptoms Assessed by SNOT-22 as Relevant to Their ConditionReduced productivity; n=2621 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Who Reported Symptoms Assessed by SNOT-22 as Relevant to Their ConditionReduced concentration; n=2521 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Who Reported Symptoms Assessed by SNOT-22 as Relevant to Their ConditionFrustration/restless/irritable; n=2319 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Who Reported Symptoms Assessed by SNOT-22 as Relevant to Their ConditionSad; n=2615 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Who Reported Symptoms Assessed by SNOT-22 as Relevant to Their ConditionEmbarrassed; n=2616 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants Who Reported Symptoms Assessed by VAS to be Relevant to Their Condition

Participants were required to complete six VAS assessments (overall symptom VAS and single item VAS) as a part of the CD interview. The participants evaluated their overall symptom severity, or the severity of individual symptoms of nasal polyps along a continuum, typically of 10 cm or 100 mm whereby 0 represents 'no symptom' and 10 or 100 represents 'as bad as you can imagine' respectively. Participants were asked to speak aloud their thoughts as they read the instructions and completed the questions. After completion of each think-aloud exercise, participants were also probed about the relevance of VAS items. Relevance was determined based on participants personal descriptions and related discussion of their experience of each symptom or impact during CD interview. It was also determined via the rating of a given symptom/impact on each measure as greater than a score of zero. Number of participants who reported the symptoms assessed by VAS to be relevant are presented.

Time frame: Up to 120 minutes

Population: All Enrolled Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Who Reported Symptoms Assessed by VAS to be Relevant to Their ConditionOverall symptoms26 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Who Reported Symptoms Assessed by VAS to be Relevant to Their ConditionFacial pain/pressure25 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Who Reported Symptoms Assessed by VAS to be Relevant to Their ConditionLoss of smell24 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Who Reported Symptoms Assessed by VAS to be Relevant to Their ConditionMucus in the throat25 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Who Reported Symptoms Assessed by VAS to be Relevant to Their ConditionNasal discharge26 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Who Reported Symptoms Assessed by VAS to be Relevant to Their ConditionNasal obstruction25 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants Who Reported Symptoms to be Targeted by New Treatment

During CE interviews, participants were asked about the changes they would like to see from a new treatment for nasal polyps and which symptoms would be most meaningful for the treatment to target. The number of participants with their reported symptoms to be targeted by new treatment is presented.

Time frame: Up to 120 minutes

Population: All Enrolled Population. Only those participants who were asked about treatment preferences were included.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Who Reported Symptoms to be Targeted by New TreatmentNasal congestion12 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Who Reported Symptoms to be Targeted by New TreatmentBreathing difficulty8 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Who Reported Symptoms to be Targeted by New TreatmentHead/facial pressure5 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Who Reported Symptoms to be Targeted by New TreatmentPost-nasal drip4 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Who Reported Symptoms to be Targeted by New TreatmentLoss of taste4 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Who Reported Symptoms to be Targeted by New TreatmentLoss of smell2 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Who Reported Symptoms to be Targeted by New TreatmentHeadache2 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Who Reported Symptoms to be Targeted by New TreatmentEar pressure1 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Who Reported Symptoms to be Targeted by New TreatmentDizziness1 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants Who Reported Worst, Most-frequent and Most-bothersome Symptoms

Following spontaneous and probed discussions regarding symptoms during CE interviews, participants were asked to comment on what they each considered to be their 'worst' symptom, their 'most frequent' symptom and their 'most bothersome' symptom. The interviews were transcribed/translated verbatim and qualitative analysis was conducted using Atlas Ti. The number of participants with worst, most-frequent and most-bothersome symptoms are presented.

Time frame: Up to 120 minutes

Population: All Enrolled Population. Only those participants with data available at specified time points were analyzed (represented by n=X in category titles).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Who Reported Worst, Most-frequent and Most-bothersome SymptomsNasal congestion: Worst, n=268 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Who Reported Worst, Most-frequent and Most-bothersome SymptomsNasal congestion: most-frequent; n=279 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Who Reported Worst, Most-frequent and Most-bothersome SymptomsNasal congestion: most bothersome; n=263 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Who Reported Worst, Most-frequent and Most-bothersome SymptomsDifficulty breathing: Worst, n=267 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Who Reported Worst, Most-frequent and Most-bothersome SymptomsDifficulty breathing: most-frequent, n=273 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Who Reported Worst, Most-frequent and Most-bothersome SymptomsDifficulty breathing: most bothersome, n=267 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Who Reported Worst, Most-frequent and Most-bothersome SymptomsHead/facial pressure: Worst, n=266 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Who Reported Worst, Most-frequent and Most-bothersome SymptomsHead/facial pressure: most-frequent, n=276 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Who Reported Worst, Most-frequent and Most-bothersome SymptomsHead/facial pressure: most bothersome, n=264 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Who Reported Worst, Most-frequent and Most-bothersome SymptomsLoss of smell/taste: Worst, n=263 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Who Reported Worst, Most-frequent and Most-bothersome SymptomsLoss of smell/taste: most frequent, n=271 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Who Reported Worst, Most-frequent and Most-bothersome SymptomsLoss of smell/taste: most bothersome, n=262 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Who Reported Worst, Most-frequent and Most-bothersome SymptomsCough: Worst, n=261 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Who Reported Worst, Most-frequent and Most-bothersome SymptomsCough: most-frequent, n=271 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Who Reported Worst, Most-frequent and Most-bothersome SymptomsCough: most-bothersome, n=261 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Who Reported Worst, Most-frequent and Most-bothersome SymptomsNasal discharge: Worst, n=261 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Who Reported Worst, Most-frequent and Most-bothersome SymptomsNasal discharge: most-frequent, n=272 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Who Reported Worst, Most-frequent and Most-bothersome SymptomsNasal discharge: most-bothersome, n=260 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Who Reported Worst, Most-frequent and Most-bothersome SymptomsPost-nasal drip: Worst, n=261 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Who Reported Worst, Most-frequent and Most-bothersome SymptomsPost-nasal drip: most-frequent, n=272 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Who Reported Worst, Most-frequent and Most-bothersome SymptomsPost-nasal drip: most-bothersome, n=265 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Who Reported Worst, Most-frequent and Most-bothersome SymptomsDry mouth: Worst, n=261 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Who Reported Worst, Most-frequent and Most-bothersome SymptomsDry mouth: most-frequent, n=270 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Who Reported Worst, Most-frequent and Most-bothersome SymptomsDry mouth: most-bothersome, n=261 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Who Reported Worst, Most-frequent and Most-bothersome SymptomsPainful eyes: Worst, n=261 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Who Reported Worst, Most-frequent and Most-bothersome SymptomsPainful eyes: most-frequent, n=270 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Who Reported Worst, Most-frequent and Most-bothersome SymptomsPainful eyes: most-bothersome, n=260 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Who Reported Worst, Most-frequent and Most-bothersome SymptomsEarache: Worst, n=261 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Who Reported Worst, Most-frequent and Most-bothersome SymptomsEarache: most-frequent, n=270 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Who Reported Worst, Most-frequent and Most-bothersome SymptomsEarache: most-bothersome, n=260 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Who Reported Worst, Most-frequent and Most-bothersome SymptomsRunny nose: Worst, n=260 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Who Reported Worst, Most-frequent and Most-bothersome SymptomsRunny nose: most-frequent, n=271 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Who Reported Worst, Most-frequent and Most-bothersome SymptomsRunny nose: most-bothersome, n=263 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Who Reported Worst, Most-frequent and Most-bothersome SymptomsSinus blockage: Worst, n=260 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Who Reported Worst, Most-frequent and Most-bothersome SymptomsSinus blockage: most-frequent, n=271 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Who Reported Worst, Most-frequent and Most-bothersome SymptomsSinus blockage: most-bothersome, n=261 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Who Reported Worst, Most-frequent and Most-bothersome SymptomsSneezing: Worst, n=260 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Who Reported Worst, Most-frequent and Most-bothersome SymptomsSneezing: most-frequent, n=271 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Who Reported Worst, Most-frequent and Most-bothersome SymptomsSneezing: most-bothersome, n=260 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Who Reported Worst, Most-frequent and Most-bothersome SymptomsSinus inflammation: Worst, n=260 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Who Reported Worst, Most-frequent and Most-bothersome SymptomsSinus inflammation: most-frequent, n=270 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Who Reported Worst, Most-frequent and Most-bothersome SymptomsSinus inflammation: most-bothersome, n=261 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants Who Understood SNOT-22 Response Options

Participants completed SNOT-22 as a part of the CD interview. The SNOT-22 contains 22 nose, sinus, and general HRQoL items and is used to measure health-related quality of life associated with rhinosinusitis with or without nasal polyps. Within the SNOT-22, participants were required to indicate the level to which each listed nasal, sinus or HRQoL experience has been affected on a 6-point scale ranging from 0 (No problem) to 5 (Problem as bad as it can be). Participants were asked about their understanding of each of the six options (no problem, mild or slight problem, very mild problem, moderate problem, severe problem, as bad as it can be) included in SNOT-22. Number of participants who understood each of the six SNOT-22 response options is presented.

Time frame: Up to 120 minutes

Population: All Enrolled Population

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Who Understood SNOT-22 Response Options27 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants Who Understood VAS Anchors

Participants completed the VAS assessment as a part of the CD interview. Participants evaluated their overall symptom severity, or the severity of individual symptoms of nasal polyps along a continuum, typically of 10 cm or 100 mm whereby 0 represents 'no symptom' and 10 or 100 represents 'as bad as you can imagine' respectively. Participants were asked about their understanding of the response continuum for VAS assessment. Number of participants who understood the VAS anchors (100 as bad as you can imagine and 0 none) is presented.

Time frame: Up to 120 minutes

Population: All Enrolled Population. Only those participants with data available at the specified time points were included in the analysis (indicated by n=X in category titles)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Who Understood VAS Anchors100=as bad as you can imagine; n=2727 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Who Understood VAS Anchors0=none; n=2423 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Difficulties Completing SNOT-22

Participants provided a general feedback on completing the SNOT-22 during the CD interview. The SNOT-22 contains 22 nose, sinus, and general HRQoL items and is used to measure health-related quality of life associated with rhinosinusitis with or without nasal polyps. Within the SNOT-22, participants were required to indicate the level to which each listed nasal, sinus or HRQoL experience has been affected on a 6-point scale ranging from 0 (No problem) to 5 (Problem as bad as it can be). Number of participants with difficulties completing SNOT-22 assessment is presented.

Time frame: Up to 120 minutes

Population: All Enrolled Population. Only those participants who were interviewed for ease of completion were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants With Difficulties Completing SNOT-223 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Difficulties Completing VAS Assessments

Participants were required to complete six VAS assessments (overall symptom VAS and single item VAS) as a part of the CD interview. The participants evaluated their overall symptom severity, or the severity of individual symptoms of nasal polyps along a continuum, typically of 10 cm or 100 mm whereby 0 represents 'no symptom' and 10 or 100 represents 'as bad as you can imagine' respectively. Participants provided a general feedback on completing the six VAS assessments which included relevance of symptoms to their condition, ease of completion and interpretation of the scale. The number of participants with difficulties completing VAS assessment is presented.

Time frame: Up to 120 minutes

Population: All Enrolled Population. Only those participants who provided general feedback were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants With Difficulties Completing VAS Assessments7 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Ease of Decision to Have Surgery

During CE interviews, participants were asked about experiences of their surgery in past. The number of participants with ease of decision to have surgery is presented.

Time frame: Up to 120 minutes

Population: All Enrolled Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants With Ease of Decision to Have SurgeryDecision was difficult6 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants With Ease of Decision to Have SurgeryDecision was easy6 Participants
Primary

Number of Participant Who Reported Impacts to be Targeted by New Treatment

During CE interviews, participants were asked about the changes they would like to see from a new treatment for nasal polyps and which impacts would be most meaningful for the treatment to target. The number of participants with corresponding impacts to be targeted by new treatment is presented.

Time frame: Up to 120 minutes

Population: All Enrolled Population. Only those participants who were asked about treatment preferences were included.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participant Who Reported Impacts to be Targeted by New TreatmentReduction in need for surgery & in polyp regrowth6 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participant Who Reported Impacts to be Targeted by New TreatmentAbility to do physical activity3 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participant Who Reported Impacts to be Targeted by New TreatmentSleep disturbance3 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participant Who Reported Impacts to be Targeted by New TreatmentLess need for medications2 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participant Who Reported Impacts to be Targeted by New TreatmentRegain energy1 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participant Who Reported Impacts to be Targeted by New TreatmentAble to concentrate1 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participant Who Reported Impacts to be Targeted by New TreatmentDry mouth1 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participant Who Reported Impacts to be Targeted by New TreatmentAble to blow nose1 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants Reporting ADL Impacts as Identified During the App Task

Participants took part in an app-based real-world data capture activity. The participants were required to download an app to their smart phone or tablet. Data capture was conducted over a 10-day period during which participants were required to complete a series of questions/tasks via the smartphone/tablet application in real-time. The questions/tasks were designed to explore the experience of nasal polyps. Participants provided responses to the questions using a variety of methodologies including video, audio, text and photographic responses with captions. Number of participants reporting ADL impacts as identified during app task is reported.

Time frame: Up to 10 days

Population: All Enrolled Population. Only those participants who took part in the real-world data capture activity were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Reporting ADL Impacts as Identified During the App TaskRestricts activities of daily living3 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Reporting ADL Impacts as Identified During the App TaskUnpredictably of condition1 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Reporting ADL Impacts as Identified During the App TaskHygiene1 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants Reporting Emotional Impacts as Identified During the App Task

Participants took part in an app-based real-world data capture activity. The participants were required to download an app to their smart phone or tablet. Data capture was conducted over a 10-day period during which participants were required to complete a series of questions/tasks via the smartphone/tablet application in real-time. The questions/tasks were designed to explore the experience of nasal polyps. Participants provided responses to the questions using a variety of methodologies including video, audio, text and photographic responses with captions. Number of participants reporting emotional impacts as identified during app task is reported.

Time frame: Up to 10 days

Population: All Enrolled Population. Only those participants who took part in the real-world data capture activity were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Reporting Emotional Impacts as Identified During the App TaskEmbarrassment4 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Reporting Emotional Impacts as Identified During the App TaskSadness3 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Reporting Emotional Impacts as Identified During the App TaskAnger3 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Reporting Emotional Impacts as Identified During the App TaskIrritable3 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Reporting Emotional Impacts as Identified During the App TaskStressed1 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants Reporting Physical Impacts as Idenfied During the App Task

Participants took part in an app-based real-world data capture activity. The participants were required to download an app to their smart phone or tablet. Data capture was conducted over a 10-day period during which participants were required to complete a series of questions/tasks via the smartphone/tablet application in real-time. The questions/tasks were designed to explore the experience of nasal polyps. Participants provided responses to the questions using a variety of methodologies including video, audio, text and photographic responses with captions. Number of participants with physical impacts as identified during app task is reported.

Time frame: Up to 10 days

Population: All Enrolled Population. Only those participants who took part in the real-world data capture activity were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Reporting Physical Impacts as Idenfied During the App TaskBlowing nose5 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Reporting Physical Impacts as Idenfied During the App TaskBreathing through mouth5 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Reporting Physical Impacts as Idenfied During the App TaskDry throat/mouth5 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Reporting Physical Impacts as Idenfied During the App TaskTiredness/fatigue3 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Reporting Physical Impacts as Idenfied During the App TaskThirst3 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Reporting Physical Impacts as Idenfied During the App TaskDiscomfort3 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Reporting Physical Impacts as Idenfied During the App TaskPhysical activity difficulties2 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Reporting Physical Impacts as Idenfied During the App TaskAltered physical appearance1 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Reporting Physical Impacts as Idenfied During the App TaskHearing loss1 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants Reporting Primary Symptoms as Identified During App Task

Participants took part in an app-based real-world data capture activity. The participants were required to download an app to their smart phone or tablet. Data capture was conducted over a 10-day period during which participants were required to complete a series of questions/tasks via the smartphone/tablet application in real-time. The questions/tasks were designed to explore the experience of nasal polyps. Participants provided responses to the questions using a variety of methodologies including video, audio, text and photographic responses with captions. Number of participants reporting primary symptoms as identified during app task is reported.

Time frame: Up to 10 days

Population: All Enrolled Population. Only those participants who took part in the real-world data capture activity were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Reporting Primary Symptoms as Identified During App TaskNasal congestion8 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Reporting Primary Symptoms as Identified During App TaskDifficulty breathing8 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Reporting Primary Symptoms as Identified During App TaskHead/facial pressure7 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Reporting Primary Symptoms as Identified During App TaskPost-nasal drip6 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Reporting Primary Symptoms as Identified During App TaskRunny nose6 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Reporting Primary Symptoms as Identified During App TaskLoss of smell5 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Reporting Primary Symptoms as Identified During App TaskLoss of taste4 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants Reporting Secondary Symptoms as Identified During App Task

Participants took part in an app-based real-world data capture activity. The participants were required to download an app to their smart phone or tablet. Data capture was conducted over a 10-day period during which participants were required to complete a series of questions/tasks via the smartphone/tablet application in real-time. The questions/tasks were designed to explore the experience of nasal polyps. Participants provided responses to the questions using a variety of methodologies including video, audio, text and photographic responses with captions. Number of participants reporting secondary symptoms as identified during app task is reported.

Time frame: Up to 10 days

Population: All Enrolled Population. Only those participants who took part in the real-world data capture activity were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Reporting Secondary Symptoms as Identified During App TaskNasal swelling3 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Reporting Secondary Symptoms as Identified During App TaskNasal pain3 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Reporting Secondary Symptoms as Identified During App TaskSneezing2 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Reporting Secondary Symptoms as Identified During App TaskNasal dryness2 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Reporting Secondary Symptoms as Identified During App TaskNasal tightness1 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Reporting Secondary Symptoms as Identified During App TaskNasal itching1 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Reporting Secondary Symptoms as Identified During App TaskNasal burning1 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Reporting Secondary Symptoms as Identified During App TaskNasal scabs1 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Reporting Secondary Symptoms as Identified During App TaskSinus inflammation1 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Reporting Secondary Symptoms as Identified During App TaskSinus infection1 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Reporting Secondary Symptoms as Identified During App TaskThroat pain1 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Reporting Secondary Symptoms as Identified During App TaskCough2 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Reporting Secondary Symptoms as Identified During App TaskDistorted voice3 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Reporting Secondary Symptoms as Identified During App TaskFace swelling5 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Reporting Secondary Symptoms as Identified During App TaskFacial pain3 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Reporting Secondary Symptoms as Identified During App TaskDizziness3 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Reporting Secondary Symptoms as Identified During App TaskHeadache4 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Reporting Secondary Symptoms as Identified During App TaskEar pain1 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Reporting Secondary Symptoms as Identified During App TaskWatering eyes1 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Reporting Secondary Symptoms as Identified During App TaskNasal tingling1 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Reporting Secondary Symptoms as Identified During App TaskIllness/infection1 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants Reporting Sleep Impacts as Identified During the App Task

Participants took part in an app-based real-world data capture activity. The participants were required to download an app to their smart phone or tablet. Data capture was conducted over a 10-day period during which participants were required to complete a series of questions/tasks via the smartphone/tablet application in real-time. The questions/tasks were designed to explore the experience of nasal polyps. Participants provided responses to the questions using a variety of methodologies including video, audio, text and photographic responses with captions. Number of participants reporting sleep impacts as identified during app task is reported.

Time frame: Up to 10 days

Population: All Enrolled Population. Only those participants who took part in the real-world data capture activity were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Reporting Sleep Impacts as Identified During the App TaskWaking up at night3 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Reporting Sleep Impacts as Identified During the App TaskDifficulty finding comfortable sleep position3 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Reporting Sleep Impacts as Identified During the App TaskDifficulty falling asleep2 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Reporting Sleep Impacts as Identified During the App TaskGeneral poor sleep quality2 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Reporting Sleep Impacts as Identified During the App TaskSnoring1 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants Reporting Social Functioning Impacts as Identified During the App Task

Participants took part in an app-based real-world data capture activity. The participants were required to download an app to their smart phone or tablet. Data capture was conducted over a 10-day period during which participants were required to complete a series of questions/tasks via the smartphone/tablet application in real-time. The questions/tasks were designed to explore the experience of nasal polyps. Participants provided responses to the questions using a variety of methodologies including video, audio, text and photographic responses with captions. Number of participants reporting social functioning impacts as identified during app task is reported.

Time frame: Up to 10 days

Population: All Enrolled Population. Only those participants who took part in the real-world data capture activity were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Reporting Social Functioning Impacts as Identified During the App TaskSocial isolation1 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Reporting Social Functioning Impacts as Identified During the App TaskImpacts personal relationships1 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants Reporting Symptom Variability-Application (App) Task

Participants took part in an app-based real-world data capture activity. The participants were required to download an app to their smart phone or tablet. Data capture was conducted over a 10-day period during which participants were required to complete a series of questions/tasks via the smartphone/tablet application in real-time. The questions/tasks were designed to explore the experience of nasal polyps. Participants provided responses to the questions using a variety of methodologies including video, audio, text and photographic responses with captions. Participants completed a number of tasks across 10 days, which explored how nasal polyp symptoms and impacts varied across a full day (within day variability) or assess the day to day variability (between day variability). Number of participants reporting within day and between-day symptom variability is reported.

Time frame: Up to 10 days

Population: All Enrolled Population. Only those participants who took part in the real-world data capture activity were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Reporting Symptom Variability-Application (App) TaskWithin day variability9 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Reporting Symptom Variability-Application (App) TaskBetween-day variability7 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants Reporting Treatment Impacts as Identified During the App Task

Participants took part in an app-based real-world data capture activity. The participants were required to download an app to their smart phone or tablet. Data capture was conducted over a 10-day period during which participants were required to complete a series of questions/tasks via the smartphone/tablet application in real-time. The questions/tasks were designed to explore the experience of nasal polyps. Participants provided responses to the questions using a variety of methodologies including video, audio, text and photographic responses with captions. Number of participants reporting treatment impacts as identified during app task is reported.

Time frame: Up to 10 days

Population: All Enrolled Population. Only those participants who took part in the real-world data capture activity were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Reporting Treatment Impacts as Identified During the App TaskSide effects of medications3 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Reporting Treatment Impacts as Identified During the App TaskLack of efficacy2 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Reporting Treatment Impacts as Identified During the App TaskShort efficacy2 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Reporting Treatment Impacts as Identified During the App TaskOverwhelming number of medications2 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Reporting Treatment Impacts as Identified During the App TaskCost of medications1 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants Reporting Work Impacts as Identified During the App Task

Participants took part in an app-based real-world data capture activity. The participants were required to download an app to their smart phone or tablet. Data capture was conducted over a 10-day period during which participants were required to complete a series of questions/tasks via the smartphone/tablet application in real-time. The questions/tasks were designed to explore the experience of nasal polyps. Participants provided responses to the questions using a variety of methodologies including video, audio, text and photographic responses with captions. Number of participants reporting work impacts as identified during app task is reported.

Time frame: Up to 10 days

Population: All Enrolled Population. Only those participants who took part in the real-world data capture activity were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Reporting Work Impacts as Identified During the App TaskCertain work activities affected2 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Reporting Work Impacts as Identified During the App TaskReduced productivity1 Participants
Interview Participants With Nasal PolypsNumber of Participants Reporting Work Impacts as Identified During the App TaskReduced concentration1 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 28, 2026