Skip to content

Clinical Implications of Azole-Resistant Aspergillosis in Hematological Malignancy

CLARITY - Clinical Implications of Azole-Resistant Aspergillosis in Hematological Malignancy

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03221075
Acronym
CLARITY
Enrollment
203
Registered
2017-07-18
Start date
2017-03-01
Completion date
2022-10-25
Last updated
2023-05-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Invasive Aspergillosis

Keywords

Invasive Aspergillosis, Azole resistance, Aspergillus fumigatus, Efficacy of antifungal therapy, Patient registry

Brief summary

In order to determine the efficacy of antifungal therapy in patients with documented azole-resistant invasive Aspergillosis (IA), anonymized clinical information of patients with a hematological malignancy with a culture-positive invasive fungal infection caused by Aspergillus fumigatus are collected in an online registry. Respective fungal isolates are analysed for azole susceptibility and resistance mechanisms. Patients diagnosed with an IA in 2016 and later are included in the study.

Detailed description

For mold-active azoles (e.g. isavuconazole, itraconazole, posaconazole and voriconazole), cross-resistance of Aspergillus spp. is an increasingly recognized problem. The study aims to determine the efficacy of antifungal therapy in patients with documented azole-resistant IA. On the basis of this study, it will be possible to assess the clinical implications of IA caused by azole-resistant versus azole-susceptible Aspergillus spp. The investigators aim at collecting at least 55 azole-resistant and 130 azole-susceptible cases. Cases diagnosed with an IA by culture from January 1st, 2016 onwards with an underlying hematological malignancy are eligible for inclusion. Culture of azole-resistant cases must be provided for confirmation of the species, sequencing for azole-resistance mutations and determination of MIC using the EUCAST reference method. Isolates obtained from patients with presumed azole-susceptible disease will be analyzed to confirm the wild type phenotype. Eligible azole-resistant and azole-susceptible IA cases will be documented using the web-based case report form. If there is ≥1 resistant isolate, the patient fulfills the definition of a resistant case. Patient level data will be recorded at the respective study centres in a continuous fashion. Data items to be documented will include: demographic data; type and status of underlying conditions; concurrent immunosuppressive treatment; diagnostic measures (clinical presentation, radiology, microbiology, pathology, organ involvement); medical and surgical treatment (including prior exposure to antifungals); response to treatment (clinical and radiological) at day 14, 42, 84; overall survival at day 14, 42, 84 and at last contact; and cause of death (if applicable).

Interventions

OTHERRegistry

There is no intervention.

Sponsors

Radboud University Medical Center
CollaboratorOTHER
University Hospital of Cologne
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_ONLY
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adult and pediatric patients diagnosed with an IA in 2016 and later * Patients with a hematological malignancy * Evidence of invasive Aspergillosis * Aspergillus fumigatus culture from clinical material of the patient

Exclusion criteria

* Colonization only, without proof of invasive infection * Non-availability of the azole resistant isolate

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Treatment response to antifungal therapy in patients with an invasive Aspergillosis caused by an azole resistant pathogen.Change from diagnosis at day 14, 28, 42 and 84 and throughout study completionAnalysis of efficacy of antifungal therapy of azole-resistant and azole-susceptible invasive Aspergillosis. Patient receive either complete response, partial response, stable disease, progression of the disease. Treatment response will be assessed by treating physicians. Response will be compared between the two groups.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Overall survival4 yearsFinal outcome will be compared between the two groups in consideration of the type and state of underlying diseases and risk factors.

Countries

Germany, Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026