Skip to content

TMS Enhancement of Visual Plasticity in Schizophrenia

Testing TMS Enhancement of Visual Plasticity in Schizophrenia

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03220438
Enrollment
17
Registered
2017-07-18
Start date
2017-09-27
Completion date
2019-07-16
Last updated
2025-04-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Schizophrenia

Brief summary

The major goal is to determine if Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) enhances visual plasticity in schizophrenia. TMS sessions (sham/placebo and real TMS) will be conducted before two MRI scans with two weeks in-between to assess whether TMS stimulation to the visual cortex will enhance visual plasticity in patients with schizophrenia-spectrum disorders. This project may provide a better understanding of the underlying neurobiological mechanisms responsible for learning and memory deficits in schizophrenia.

Detailed description

Learning and memory impairments are commonly observed in schizophrenia spectrum disorders. Alterations in long-term potentiation (LTP), a basic mechanism underlying learning and memory, may explain this impairment. This project will assess fMRI visual plasticity, thought to reflect LTP, in participants with and without schizophrenia spectrum disorders. Previous studies have shown that visual plasticity is impaired in schizophrenia. The major goal is to determine if Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) enhances visual plasticity in schizophrenia. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) provides a non-invasive means for altering brain electrical neural activity. TMS sessions (sham/placebo and real TMS) will be conducted before two MRI scans with two weeks in-between to assess whether TMS stimulation to the visual cortex will enhance visual plasticity in patients with schizophrenia-spectrum disorders. This project may provide a better understanding of the underlying neurobiological mechanisms responsible for learning and memory deficits in schizophrenia.

Interventions

DEVICETranscranial Magnetic Stimulation

Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

Sponsors

University of Maryland, Baltimore
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

1. age: 18-65, 2. no neurological illness, head trauma, or major medical illness, 3. not pregnant or nursing, 4. no contraindication for TMS or MRI scanning, 5. no current substance abuse/dependence. Healthy controls will have no DSM-5 diagnosis and no first-degree relatives with a psychotic disorder. Inclusion criteria for patients includes: 1. DSM-5 diagnosis of schizophreniform, schizophrenia or schizoaffective and competent to sign an informed consent, 2. not currently taking other medications that affects brain structure (e.g. steroids), 3. less than 12 months antipsychotic exposure and on the same psychotropic medications for 4 weeks prior to study, 4. not be taking clozapine (due to its effects on NMDA receptors and increase of seizure threshold), 5. clinically stable (i.e. no change in psychotic symptoms for at least 4 weeks).

Exclusion criteria

1. age outside of 18-65, 2. neurological illness, head trauma, or major medical illness, 3. pregnant or nursing, 4. contraindication for TMS or MRI scanning, 5. current substance abuse/dependence, 6. currently taking medications that affects brain structure (e.g. steroids). Healthy controls with a DSM-5 diagnosis and/or a first-degree relative with a psychotic disorder. Participants with schizophrenia that are not competent to sign an informed consent, have more than 12 months antipsychotic exposure, not on the same psychotropic medications for 4 weeks prior to study, taking clozapine, and not clinically stable (i.e.a change in psychotic symptoms for at least 4 weeks).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
fMRI Blood Oxygenation Level Dependent (BOLD) Response of Visual Plasticity~1 hourfMRI BOLD response in visual cortex, during visual stimulation (0.9 Hz) before and after high frequency visual stimulation (9 Hz).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (MRS) Assessment of Glutamate~1 hourMRS was used to obtain occipital cortical glutamate levels (active, sham). Levels reflect institutional units, as is standard for the field.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

17 adults provided informed consent. 2 screen failures and 1 lost to follow-up before screening.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
TMS (Active Then Sham)
Participants first received active rTMS 10Hz to the occipital cortex and then 2 weeks later received sham (A sham coil was used to control for the auditory artifacts induced by rTMS)
3
TMS (Sham Then Active)
Participants first received sham (A sham coil was used to control for the auditory artifacts induced by rTMS) and then 2 weeks later received active rTMS 10Hz to the occipital cortex
0
iTBS (Active Then Sham)
Participants first received active iTBS 5 Hz to the occipital cortex and then 2 weeks later received sham (a sham coil was used to control for the auditory artifacts induced by iTBS).
6
iTBS (Sham Then Active)
Participants first received sham (a sham coil was used to control for the auditory artifacts induced by iTBS) and then 2 weeks later received active iTBS 5 Hz to the occipital cortex
5
Total14

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up0010

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristiciTBS (Sham Then Active)iTBS (Active Then Sham)TMS (Active Then Sham)TMS (Sham Then Active)Total
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
5 Participants6 Participants3 Participants0 Participants14 Participants
Age, Continuous33 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.2
32.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.6
33 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1
32.77 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.26
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
5 Participants6 Participants2 Participants13 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
3 Participants3 Participants1 Participants7 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
2 Participants2 Participants1 Participants5 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
5 participants6 participants3 participants14 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
2 Participants2 Participants0 Participants4 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
3 Participants4 Participants3 Participants10 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 30 / 30 / 100 / 10
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 30 / 30 / 100 / 10
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 30 / 30 / 100 / 10

Outcome results

Primary

fMRI Blood Oxygenation Level Dependent (BOLD) Response of Visual Plasticity

fMRI BOLD response in visual cortex, during visual stimulation (0.9 Hz) before and after high frequency visual stimulation (9 Hz).

Time frame: ~1 hour

Population: 13 participants completed active and/or sham conditions for either TMS or iTBS

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Patient: Active TMS 10 HzfMRI Blood Oxygenation Level Dependent (BOLD) Response of Visual Plasticity-2.95 Beta valuesStandard Deviation 0
Patient: Sham TMSfMRI Blood Oxygenation Level Dependent (BOLD) Response of Visual Plasticity-0.66 Beta valuesStandard Deviation 0
Patient: Active iTBSfMRI Blood Oxygenation Level Dependent (BOLD) Response of Visual Plasticity-0.29 Beta valuesStandard Deviation 2.55
Patient: Sham iTBSfMRI Blood Oxygenation Level Dependent (BOLD) Response of Visual Plasticity2.57 Beta valuesStandard Deviation 4.17
Control: Active TMS 10 HzfMRI Blood Oxygenation Level Dependent (BOLD) Response of Visual Plasticity-0.7 Beta valuesStandard Deviation 4.33
Control: Sham TMSfMRI Blood Oxygenation Level Dependent (BOLD) Response of Visual Plasticity0.86 Beta valuesStandard Deviation 2.33
Control: Active iTBSfMRI Blood Oxygenation Level Dependent (BOLD) Response of Visual Plasticity-2.44 Beta valuesStandard Deviation 3.27
Control: Sham iTBSfMRI Blood Oxygenation Level Dependent (BOLD) Response of Visual Plasticity2.47 Beta valuesStandard Deviation 1.36
Secondary

Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (MRS) Assessment of Glutamate

MRS was used to obtain occipital cortical glutamate levels (active, sham). Levels reflect institutional units, as is standard for the field.

Time frame: ~1 hour

Population: 2 participants had missing data; 11 participants completed active and sham conditions for either TMS or iTBS

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Patient: Active TMS 10 HzMagnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (MRS) Assessment of Glutamate8.96 spectroscopy institutional units
Patient: Sham TMSMagnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (MRS) Assessment of Glutamate9.23 spectroscopy institutional units
Patient: Active iTBSMagnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (MRS) Assessment of Glutamate9.34 spectroscopy institutional unitsStandard Deviation 1.19
Patient: Sham iTBSMagnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (MRS) Assessment of Glutamate9.16 spectroscopy institutional unitsStandard Deviation 1.15
Control: Active TMS 10 HzMagnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (MRS) Assessment of Glutamate10.61 spectroscopy institutional unitsStandard Deviation 0.49
Control: Sham TMSMagnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (MRS) Assessment of Glutamate9.97 spectroscopy institutional unitsStandard Deviation 0.07
Control: Active iTBSMagnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (MRS) Assessment of Glutamate12.04 spectroscopy institutional units
Control: Sham iTBSMagnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (MRS) Assessment of Glutamate11.91 spectroscopy institutional units

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026