Skip to content

NOVOCART 3D Treatment Following Microfracture Failure

Safety and Efficacy of NOVOCART 3D in the Treatment of Articular Cartilage Defects Following Failure on Microfracture

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03219307
Enrollment
30
Registered
2017-07-17
Start date
2018-11-30
Completion date
2029-01-31
Last updated
2025-03-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Articular Cartilage Defect

Keywords

cartilage repair, cartilage regeneration, cartilage reconstruction, cartilage restoration, autologous chondrocyte implantation, matrix associated chondrocyte implantation

Brief summary

This study is prospective single arm extension study of protocol AAG-G-H-1220. It is open only to participants of AAG-G-H-1220 randomized to the Microfracture treatment group.

Detailed description

This study is an extension of protocol AAG-G-H-1220 wherein patients were randomized to either NOVOCART 3D or Microfracture treatment groups. This prospective single arm extension study is only open to participants of AAG-G-H-1220 who were randomized to Microfracture treatment and who failed Microfracture treatment.

Interventions

COMBINATION_PRODUCTNOVOCART 3D

Matrix associated autologous chondrocyte implant

Sponsors

Aesculap Biologics, LLC
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* participated in study AAG-G-H-1220 * identified as a microfracture failure patient * voluntary consent to participate in the study

Exclusion criteria

* other cartilage repair procedures performed on target knee * other conditions that would interfere with healing or evaluating outcomes * lesions requiring implants larger than 9cm2 * non-compliance with requirements in study AAG-G-H-1220

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
KOOS pain subdomain score24 monthsComparison of pain scores from the KOOS questionnaire from baseline

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
KOOS function subdomain score24 monthsComparison of function scores from the KOOS questionnaire from baseline
VAS pain scale24 monthsComparison of pain from baseline
IKDC subjective scores24 monthsComparison of IKDC subjective scores from baseline

Countries

Canada, United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026