Skip to content

Spinal Prilocaine for Caesarian Sections

A Prospective Randomized Double Blind Comparison of 7,5 mg Hyperbaric Bupivacaine With 2,5mcg Sufentanyl or 50 mg Hyperbaric Prilocaine With 2,5 mcg Sufentanyl for Caesarean Sections

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03219086
Enrollment
182
Registered
2017-07-17
Start date
2017-08-01
Completion date
2022-05-01
Last updated
2022-08-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Combined Spinal Epidural Anesthesia, Prilocaine, Bupivacaine, Pain

Keywords

combined spinal epidural anesthesia, caesarian section, prilocaine, bupivacaine

Brief summary

Prilocaine theoretically could provide faster onset because of its lower pKa (7,7) compared to bupivacaine (8,1). The primary objective of this prospective double blind randomized trial is to determine block onset of spinal hyperbaric prilocaine compared to bupivacaine, both with a small dose of sufentanyl as an additive.The primary hypothesis is that a significant larger amount of patients will gain surgical readiness within 8 minutes after spinal injection of prilocaine with sufentanyl compared to bupivacaine with sufentanyl. Surgical readiness is defined as a sensory block level of T5 tested by loss of cold sensation.

Detailed description

This study is designed as a randomised prospective double blind multi centre study. Following approval by the Hospital Ethics committee of the University Hospital Antwerp and all participating hospitals, all-in term (37-42 weeks of gestation) pregnant women planned for a caesarean section will be asked to participate in this trial. Patients will be randomised to receive either spinal prilocaine with sufentanyl or spinal bupivacaine with sufentanyl.The patient, the anaesthetist performing the CSE and the observer are not aware of the local anaesthetic solution administered. Preoperative a combined spinal epidural puncture will be performed in the sitting position at the level of L2-L3 or L3-L4 . Vital parameters will be registered at regular intervals. Block characteristics ( onset, duration and intensity of the sensory block and motor block) will be measured at regular intervals. Patients with insufficient analgesia will receive a top up dose of 5 ml lidocaine 2 % via the epidural catheter. Time of birth, neonatal outcome (Apgar score 1 min, 5 min and 10 minutes after birth) and admission to the nicu as well as umbilicus venous and arterial blood gasses are recorded. Patients will be discharged from the PACU when motor block reached a Bromage score 1 Time intervals of discharge to the ward will be registered.At the maternity ward the time of first contact of the baby and the mother and first breast feed (if applicable) will be registered. One week postoperative patients will be called and asked if they experienced any postoperative symptoms like headache, micturition problems or symptoms resembling Transient Neurological Symptoms

Interventions

To give surgical anesthesia for performance of the caesarian section a combined spinal epidural anesthesia will be performed with different spinal solutions according to the appointed study group

A combined spinal epidural anesthesia with spinal administration of 50 mg hyperbaric prilocaine 2% (Tachipri, Nordic Pharma) + 2,5mcg sufentanyl (5 mcg/ml) (Janssens-cilag)

DRUGBupivacaine

combined spinal epidural anesthesia with spinal administration of 7,5 mg hyperbaric bupivacaine 0,5% (Marcaine H) + 2,5mcg sufentanyl ( 5 mcg/ml)( Janssens -cilag) +1 ml nacl0,9%

Sponsors

AZ Klina
CollaboratorOTHER
AZ Middelheim
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
University Hospital, Antwerp
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

The spinal solution will be prepared by an independent anaesthetist, anaesthetist trainee or research nurse on a sterile table after opening the sealed envelope with the appointed study group. The patient, the anaesthetist performing the CSE and the observer are not aware of the local anaesthetic solution administered.

Intervention model description

prospective double blind randomised

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* A term Pregnant women (37-42 weeks)scheduled for caesarian section

Exclusion criteria

* Patient refusal * Twin or multiple pregnancy * Preeclampsia * Contraindication neuraxial technique * Indication general anaesthesia * BMI before pregnancy \>35 * Maternal height \<155 cm

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
onset time surgical readinessfrom start spinal anaesthesia to start of surgery (up to 30 minutes)amount of minutes from spinal injection (T0) to loss of cold sensation on the fifth thoracic dermatome

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
regression interval of the motor blockup to 3 hoursTime from spinal injection to a Bromage score of 1 (knee flexion possible)
occurrence of hypotensionfrom spinal injection(T0) to motor block regression ( up to 3 hours)percentage of study group with hypotension defined as a systolic BP of less than 100 mm Hg or a 20% drop from the baseline level
sensory block levelUp to 3 hourshighest dermatome measured during the study
discharge time maternity wardUp to 3 hoursthe time interval from spinal injection (T0) to discharge to the maternity ward
First Breast feedup to 6 hoursthe time interval from injection (T0) to first breast feeding

Countries

Belgium

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026