Skip to content

EUS-guided RFA for Pancreatic Neoplasms

Multi-center Prospective Study on EUS-guided Radiofrequency Ablation for Solid Pancreatic Neoplasms

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03218345
Enrollment
30
Registered
2017-07-14
Start date
2016-08-01
Completion date
2027-05-01
Last updated
2026-03-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pancreatic Neoplasms

Keywords

EUS-guided RFA, pancreatic ca, interventional EUS

Brief summary

Radiofrequency ablation has been used for treatment of solid neoplasms of the liver, lung, kidney and adrenal. Recently, EUS-guided RFA has become available and the device allows EUS-guided treatment of pancreatic neoplasms. The procedure has been shown to be feasible in the porcine pancreas and was used to treat small groups of patients that are not suitable for surgery suffering from pancreatic neoplasms. The aim of the current study is to perform a multi-center prospective study on EUS-guided radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of solid pancreatic neoplasms. The hypothesis is that EUS-guided RFA is safe, feasible and effective for treating solid pancreatic neoplasms.

Detailed description

RFA causes tissue destruction through the application of a high frequency alternating current, generating local temperatures above 60°C and leading to coagulative necrosis. The technique has been widely used in many solid organ tumors and has been shown to result in 5-year survival rates comparable to surgery. The technique is currently the standard therapy in hepatocellular carcinoma and colorectal pulmonary metastasis particular in patients that are not suitable for surgery. This study is a multi-center prospective study involving four high volume international institutions. Consecutive patients suffering from pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors and pancreatic cancers would be recruited. EUS-guided RFA would be performed using a 19-gauge RFA electrode and a generator. The primary outcome would be the overall adverse events rate. Secondary outcomes include mortality, technical success rate, completion ablation rate, 1 & 3 year overall and disease-free survival.

Interventions

EUS-guided RFA would be performed using a 19-gauge RFA electrode and a generator

Sponsors

Chinese University of Hong Kong
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Age 18 years-old or above * Suffering from pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor or pancreatic ductal carcinoma (\<5cm in largest diameter) that was confirmed by fine needle aspiration cytology * Unsuitable for surgery, due to one (or more) of the following items: * ASA score \> II\* * An alternative advanced malignancy * Unsuitable for surgery upon expert's opinion for any other reason * Healthy individuals who are not keen for surgical resection * Eligible for endoscopic intervention * Written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Coagulopathy (international normalized ratio \>1.3, partial thromboplastin time greater than twice that of control), platelet count \<50,000x103/uL * Pregnancy * Patients with a poor mental condition or mental retardation, unable to understand the nature and possible consequences of the study * Patients unwilling to undergo follow-up assessments * Patients with liver cirrhosis, portal hypertension and/or gastric varices.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Severe adverse events30 daysAdverse events specific to RFA would be graded according to the lexicon of endoscopic adverse events 24. Potential adverse events specific to RFA include: post-RFA syndrome, pancreatitis, pancreatic leak, thermal injury

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Technical success rates1 weekdefined as successful puncture of the lesion with the RFA needle and completion of the ablation cycle.
Procedural times1 dayDuration of the procedure
Hospital stay30 daysDuration of hospital stay
Radiological response1 yearBased on modified RECIST criterion
Number of re-interventions1 yearNumber of re-interventions after the procedure
Survival3 yearsDuration of survival after the procedure

Countries

Hong Kong

Contacts

CONTACTAnthony YB Teoh, Professor
anthonyteoh@surgery.cuhk.edu.hk26322956
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORAnthony YB Teoh, Professor

Chinese University of Hong Kong

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 21, 2026