Skip to content

Cranioplasty: Autogenous Bone Graft Versus Artificial Substitutes

Cranioplasty: Autogenous Bone Graft Versus Artificial Substitutes

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03218150
Enrollment
1
Registered
2017-07-14
Start date
2016-10-31
Completion date
2018-10-31
Last updated
2017-07-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cerebral Decompression Injury

Brief summary

Prospective, comparative, observational study. The project's aim is long term follow up of patient's having skull bone defects due to traumatic or lesion resection causes, treated , in standard clinical practice, with autologous bone graft , bone cement or titanium mesh and to compare the clinical outcome and safety among the 3 types of treatment. Eligibility to each treatment will respect the standard clinical practice. Primary outcome: minimize post operative infection Secondary outcomes: decrease operation time , clinical and psychological improvement of the patient, decrease the cost on the patient

Detailed description

Cranioplasty is the surgical intervention to repair cranial defects. The aim of cranioplasty is not only a cosmetic issue; also, the repair of cranial defects gives relief to psychological drawbacks and increases the social performances. Many different types of materials were used throughout the history of cranioplasty. With the evolving biomedical technology, new materials are available to be used by the surgeons. Although many different materials and techniques had been described, ongoing researches on both biologic and non biologic substitutions continue aiming to develop the ideal reconstruction material. Autologous bone grafts remain the best option for adult and pediatric patients with viable donor sites and small-to-medium defects. Large defects in the adult population can be reconstructed with titanium mesh and polymethylmethacrylate overlay with or without the use of computer-assisted design and manufacturing customization. Advances in alloplastic materials and custom manufacturing of implants will have an important influence on cranioplasty techniques in the years to come.

Interventions

PROCEDUREcranioplasty

. The margins of the craniectomy defects exposed, and the bone flaps fixed in their original positions using wires or titanium plates with screws. As prophylaxis, all patients intravenously administered with pre- and postoperative antibiotics. In cases of artificial substitutes , The polymethyemethacrylate implant fixed to the defective region with titanium plates and self-tapping screws.

Sponsors

Assiut University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
10 Years to 60 Years

Inclusion criteria

1. All patients that have reconstructive surgery of cranial defects due to traumatic or lesion resection causes . 2. Age older than 10 and less than 60 years 3. Provided written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

1. Cases of cranial defects due to congenital anomalies or growing skull fractures . 2. Severe disease with limited life expectancy of less than one year

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
safety : minimize incidence of infection360 days after surgeryincidence of adverse events ((infection, reabsorption))

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
efficacy60 , 120 , 360 days after surgeryquality of life improvement evaluation : (( glasgow coma score))

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026