Skip to content

MK-7625A Plus Metronidazole Versus Meropenem in Pediatric Participants With Complicated Intra-Abdominal Infection (cIAI) (MK-7625A-035)

A Phase 2, Randomized, Active Comparator-Controlled, Multicenter, Double-Blind Clinical Trial to Study the Safety and Efficacy of Ceftolozane/Tazobactam (MK-7625A) Plus Metronidazole Versus Meropenem in Pediatric Subjects With Complicated Intra-Abdominal Infection

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03217136
Enrollment
94
Registered
2017-07-13
Start date
2018-04-03
Completion date
2020-03-16
Last updated
2023-05-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Complicated Intra-Abdominal Infection

Brief summary

This study aims to evaluate the safety and tolerability of MK-7625A (ceftolozane/tazobactam) plus metronidazole, compared with that of meropenem in pediatric participants with cIAI.

Interventions

Ceftolozane 20 mg/kg (maximum 1 g) and tazobactam 10 mg/kg (maximum 0.5 g/dose) administered IV every 8 hours for between 5 to 14 days.

DRUGMetronidazole

Metronidazole 10 mg/kg (maximum 1.5 g/day) administered IV every 8 hours for between 5 to 14 days. Participants ≤ 28 days old, start with a loading dose of 15 mg/kg; then if ≤ 2 kg are dosed 7.5 mg/kg/ every 12 hours; or if \> 2 kg are dosed 10 mg/kg every 8 hours.

DRUGMeropenem

Meropenem 20 mg/kg (maximum 1 g/dose) administered IV every 8 hours for between 5 to 14 days.

DRUGPlacebo for Metronidazole

Placebo for metronidazole administered IV every 8 hours for between 5 to 14 days.

Sponsors

Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
7 Days to 17 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Has a legally acceptable representative who provides documented informed consent/assent for the trial. * Aged from birth (defined as \>32 weeks gestational age and ≥7 days postnatal) to \<18 years of age. * Require IV antibacterial therapy for the treatment of presumed or documented cIAI. * Has an operative procedure for the current diagnosis and management of cIAI planned or completed within 24 hours of the first dose of an antibacterial drug. Note: Participants with a diagnosis of necrotizing enterocolitis are exempt and not required to have surgery planned or completed in order to be eligible. * Has in compliance baseline intra-abdominal specimen collection. * Is not of reproductive potential; but if of reproductive potential agrees to avoid becoming pregnant or impregnating a partner during screening, while receiving study treatment and for at least 30 days after the last dose of study treatment. * Female of reproductive potential is not pregnant, and not planning to become pregnant within 30 days of the last day of treatment administration; and is nonlactating.

Exclusion criteria

* Is currently participating in or has participated in an interventional clinical trial with an investigational compound or device within 30 days prior to the first dose of study treatment in this current trial. * Has previously participated in any trial of ceftolozane or ceftolozane/tazobactam or has enrolled previously in the current trial and been discontinued. * Has a history of any moderate or severe hypersensitivity (e.g, anaphylaxis), allergic reaction, or other contraindication to any of the following: β-lactam antibiotics (e.g, penicillins, cephalosporins, and carbapenems), β-lactamase inhibitors (e.g, tazobactam, sulbactam, clavulanic acid, avibactam), or metronidazole. * Has an IAI within the past 1 year prior to randomization known to be caused by a pathogen resistant to either IV study treatment. * Has a concomitant infection at the time of randomization that requires non-study systemic antibacterial therapy in addition to IV study treatment or oral step-down therapy. * Has received potentially therapeutic antibacterial therapy for a duration more than 24 hours during the 48 hours preceding the first dose of study treatment, unless is considered to be failing antibiotic therapy for cIAI. * Has any of the following: a) intractable cIAI that the investigator anticipates would require more than 14 days of study treatment; b) abdominal wall abscess; c) small bowel obstruction; d) ischemic bowel disease without perforation; e) traumatic bowel perforation with surgery within 12 hours of perforation; f) perforation of gastroduodenal ulcers requiring surgery within 24 hours of perforation; g) suspected uncomplicated intra-abdominal infection (e.g, cholecystitis without rupture or extension beyond the gallbladder wall); h) acute suppurative cholangitis; i) infected necrotizing pancreatitis; j) pancreatic abscess. * Has moderate or severe impairment of renal function. * Has a seizure disorder or is anticipated to be treated with divalproex sodium or valproic acid during the course of study treatment. * Is receiving, or is expected to receive, any prohibited medications. * Has any rapidly progressing disease or immediately life-threatening illness, including acute hepatic failure, respiratory failure, or septic shock. * Has an immunocompromising condition. * Has a history of malignancy ≤5 years prior to signing informed consent. * Is planning to receive suppressive/prophylactic antibiotics with gram-negative activity after completion of study treatment.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants Experiencing ≥1 Adverse Events (AEs)Up to approximately 75 daysAn AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered study treatment and which did not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. The number of participants who experienced an AE is presented.
Number of Participants Who Discontinued Study Therapy Due to AE(s)Up to approximately 18 daysAn AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered study treatment and which did not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. The number of participants who discontinued study treatment due to an AE is presented.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With a Clinical Response of Cure at the End of Treatment (EOT) VisitUp to approximately 27 daysThe percentage of participants who had a clinical outcome of cure at the time of the EOT visit is presented. The cure clinical outcome was defined as complete resolution or marked improvement in signs and symptoms of the complicated intra-abdominal infection (cIAI) or return to pre-infection signs and symptoms such that no further antibiotic therapy (intravenous or oral) or surgical or drainage procedure is required for treatment of the cIAI. Participants who were missing clinical response data were considered treatment failures.
Percentage of Participants With a Clinical Response of Cure at the Test of Cure (TOC) VisitUp to approximately 39 daysThe percentage of participants who had a clinical outcome of cure at the time of the TOC visit is presented. The cure clinical outcome was defined as complete resolution or marked improvement in signs and symptoms of the complicated intra-abdominal infection (cIAI) or return to pre-infection signs and symptoms such that no further antibiotic therapy (intravenous or oral) or surgical or drainage procedure is required for treatment of the cIAI. Participants who were missing clinical response data were considered treatment failures.
Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Eradication at the EOT VisitUp to approximately 27 daysThe percentage of participants who achieved either eradication or presumed eradication of each baseline infecting pathogen by the time of the EOT visit is presented. Eradication was defined as absence of the baseline pathogen(s) in a postbaseline specimen appropriately obtained from the original site of infection. Presumed eradication was defined as absence of material to culture in a participant who is assessed as having partial improvement, or clinical cure. In the event of multiple baseline pathogens, the least favorable microbiological response from all possible baseline pathogens was used.
Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Eradication at the TOC VisitUp to approximately 39 daysThe percentage of participants who achieved either eradication or presumed eradication of each baseline infecting pathogen by the time of the TOC visit is presented. Eradication was defined as absence of the baseline pathogen(s) in a postbaseline specimen appropriately obtained from the original site of infection. Presumed eradication was defined as absence of material to culture in a participant who is assessed as having partial improvement, or clinical cure. In the event of multiple baseline pathogens, the least favorable microbiological response from all possible baseline pathogens was used.

Countries

Brazil, Hungary, Lithuania, Malaysia, Mexico, Romania, Russia, South Africa, Spain, Turkey (Türkiye), Ukraine, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Paediatric participants were enrolled from 27 sites in 11 countries.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Ceftolozane/Tazobactam + Metronidazole
Ceftolozane 20 mg/kg and tazobactam 10 mg/kg (maximum 1 g and 0.5 g/dose), plus metronidazole 10 mg/kg (maximum 1.5 g/day) administered intravenously (IV) every 8 to 12 hours for 5 to 14 days.
71
Meropenem
Meropenem 20 mg/kg (maximum 1 g/dose) plus placebo for metronidazole administered IV every 8 hours for 5 to 14 days.
23
Total94

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyDid Not Meet Criteria after Randomization01
Overall StudyDispensing Error10
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up21
Overall StudySite Randomized Participant in Error01
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Parent/Guardian10

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicMeropenemTotalCeftolozane/Tazobactam + Metronidazole
Age, Continuous8.6 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.6
8.7 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.2
8.7 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.4
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
7 Participants25 Participants18 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
16 Participants66 Participants50 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants3 Participants3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
2 Participants5 Participants3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
1 Participants7 Participants6 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
20 Participants81 Participants61 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
15 Participants38 Participants23 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
8 Participants56 Participants48 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 710 / 23
other
Total, other adverse events
46 / 7010 / 21
serious
Total, serious adverse events
8 / 700 / 21

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants Experiencing ≥1 Adverse Events (AEs)

An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered study treatment and which did not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. The number of participants who experienced an AE is presented.

Time frame: Up to approximately 75 days

Population: All randomized participants who received any amount of study treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Ceftolozane/Tazobactam + MetronidazoleNumber of Participants Experiencing ≥1 Adverse Events (AEs)56 Participants
MeropenemNumber of Participants Experiencing ≥1 Adverse Events (AEs)13 Participants
Comparison: Difference in Percentage (C/T+MTZ minus MERO)95% CI: [-2.6, 41.1]
Primary

Number of Participants Who Discontinued Study Therapy Due to AE(s)

An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered study treatment and which did not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. The number of participants who discontinued study treatment due to an AE is presented.

Time frame: Up to approximately 18 days

Population: All randomized participants who received any amount of study treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Ceftolozane/Tazobactam + MetronidazoleNumber of Participants Who Discontinued Study Therapy Due to AE(s)2 Participants
MeropenemNumber of Participants Who Discontinued Study Therapy Due to AE(s)0 Participants
Comparison: Difference in Percentage (C/T+MTZ minus MERO)95% CI: [-12.9, 9.9]
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With a Clinical Response of Cure at the End of Treatment (EOT) Visit

The percentage of participants who had a clinical outcome of cure at the time of the EOT visit is presented. The cure clinical outcome was defined as complete resolution or marked improvement in signs and symptoms of the complicated intra-abdominal infection (cIAI) or return to pre-infection signs and symptoms such that no further antibiotic therapy (intravenous or oral) or surgical or drainage procedure is required for treatment of the cIAI. Participants who were missing clinical response data were considered treatment failures.

Time frame: Up to approximately 27 days

Population: All randomized participants who received any amount of study treatment. Participants were included in the IV study treatment group to which they were randomized, irrespective of what treatment they actually received.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Ceftolozane/Tazobactam + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With a Clinical Response of Cure at the End of Treatment (EOT) Visit80.0 Percentage of participants
MeropenemPercentage of Participants With a Clinical Response of Cure at the End of Treatment (EOT) Visit95.2 Percentage of participants
Comparison: Difference in Percentage (C/T+MTZ minus MERO)95% CI: [-26.67, 4.93]
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With a Clinical Response of Cure at the Test of Cure (TOC) Visit

The percentage of participants who had a clinical outcome of cure at the time of the TOC visit is presented. The cure clinical outcome was defined as complete resolution or marked improvement in signs and symptoms of the complicated intra-abdominal infection (cIAI) or return to pre-infection signs and symptoms such that no further antibiotic therapy (intravenous or oral) or surgical or drainage procedure is required for treatment of the cIAI. Participants who were missing clinical response data were considered treatment failures.

Time frame: Up to approximately 39 days

Population: All randomized participants who received any amount of study treatment. Participants were included in the IV study treatment group to which they were randomized, irrespective of what treatment they actually received.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Ceftolozane/Tazobactam + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With a Clinical Response of Cure at the Test of Cure (TOC) Visit80.0 Percentage of participants
MeropenemPercentage of Participants With a Clinical Response of Cure at the Test of Cure (TOC) Visit100.0 Percentage of participants
Comparison: Difference in Percentage (C/T+MTZ minus MERO)95% CI: [-30.18, -2.89]
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Eradication at the EOT Visit

The percentage of participants who achieved either eradication or presumed eradication of each baseline infecting pathogen by the time of the EOT visit is presented. Eradication was defined as absence of the baseline pathogen(s) in a postbaseline specimen appropriately obtained from the original site of infection. Presumed eradication was defined as absence of material to culture in a participant who is assessed as having partial improvement, or clinical cure. In the event of multiple baseline pathogens, the least favorable microbiological response from all possible baseline pathogens was used.

Time frame: Up to approximately 27 days

Population: All randomized participants who received any amount of study treatment and had at least 1 pathogen identified from the baseline intra-abdominal culture, regardless of susceptibility to study treatment. Participants were included in the IV study treatment group to which they were randomized, irrespective of what treatment they actually received.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Ceftolozane/Tazobactam + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Microbiological Eradication at the EOT Visit84.1 Percentage of participants
MeropenemPercentage of Participants With Microbiological Eradication at the EOT Visit94.7 Percentage of participants
Comparison: Difference in Percentage (C/T+MTZ minus MERO)95% CI: [-23.66, 9.61]
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Eradication at the TOC Visit

The percentage of participants who achieved either eradication or presumed eradication of each baseline infecting pathogen by the time of the TOC visit is presented. Eradication was defined as absence of the baseline pathogen(s) in a postbaseline specimen appropriately obtained from the original site of infection. Presumed eradication was defined as absence of material to culture in a participant who is assessed as having partial improvement, or clinical cure. In the event of multiple baseline pathogens, the least favorable microbiological response from all possible baseline pathogens was used.

Time frame: Up to approximately 39 days

Population: All randomized participants who received any amount of study treatment and had at least 1 pathogen identified from the baseline intra-abdominal culture, regardless of susceptibility to study treatment. Participants were included in the IV study treatment group to which they were randomized, irrespective of what treatment they actually received.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Ceftolozane/Tazobactam + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Microbiological Eradication at the TOC Visit84.1 Percentage of participants
MeropenemPercentage of Participants With Microbiological Eradication at the TOC Visit100 Percentage of participants
Comparison: Difference in Percentage (C/T+MTZ minus MERO)95% CI: [-27.59, 1.39]

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 14, 2026