Skip to content

Clinical Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Neuronox and Botox With Essential Blepharospasm

A Multicenter, Double-blind, Randomized, Parallel, Active-controlled, Phase III Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of NEURONOX® vs. BOTOX® in Patients With Essential Blepharospasm

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03216473
Enrollment
140
Registered
2017-07-13
Start date
2016-05-25
Completion date
2017-07-04
Last updated
2017-07-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Essential Blepharospasm

Brief summary

This clinical study evaluates the efficacy and safety of Neuronox compared with Botox in adults with essential blepharospasm.

Detailed description

Subjects are randomly assigned into the two groups at the ratio of 1:1. The purpose of study is to confirm the non-inferiority of Neuronox to Botox in terms of the efficacy and safety in subjects with essential blepharospasm.

Interventions

Clostridium Botulinum Toxin A 100 U

DRUGBotox

Clostridium Botulinum Toxin A 100 U

Sponsors

Medy-Tox
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Adults aged 18 to 75 * Subjects had to have a confirmed clinical diagnosis of essential blepharospasm requiring treatment by injection

Exclusion criteria

* Subjects who underwent surgical operation * Subjects with Neuroleptic induced blepharospasm

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
JRS (Jankovic Rating Scale) sum-scoreFrom baseline at 4 weekChange from baseline at 4 week for the JRS (Jankovic Rating Scale) sum-score

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026