Skip to content

Comparison Between Novel Flower-type Covered Stent and Conventional Covered Stent

Comparison Between Novel Flower-type Covered Stent and Conventional Covered Stent in Malignant Extrahepatic Biliary Obstruction: Prospective Randomized Multicenter Study

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03215108
Enrollment
256
Registered
2017-07-12
Start date
2017-07-12
Completion date
2019-12-31
Last updated
2017-07-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Malignant Biliary Obstruction

Brief summary

The aim of this animal study is determining the technical feasibility of the novel flower-type covered self-expandable metal stent (F-CSEMS) and investigating whether the novel flower-type covered self-expandable metal stent (F-CSEMS) could prevent cholecystitis and pancreatitis, comparing with conventional covered self-expandable metal stent (C-CSEMS).

Detailed description

Covered self-expandable metal stent (C-CSEMS) has the risk of obstruction of the cystic duct, and the main and branch pancreatic ducts due to strong radial force and covering material, which results in cholecystitis and pancreatitis. A flower-type covered self-expandable metal stent (F-CSEMS) having a five-petal-shaped design with side grooves was constructed to prevent the obstruction of the cystic duct orifice. This study investigated the value of the F-CSEMS in protection for cholecystitis and pancreatitis. The investigators will enroll patients with distal MBO (Malignant Biliary Obstruction) who received placement at the Samsung Medical Center. Transpapillary flower-type covered self-expandable metal stent (F-CSEMS) placements will be included in this study. The diagnosis of MBO will be based on imaging and/or pathological findings. Malignancy was proved by histopathological confirmation obtained by endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA), bile duct biopsy (cytology), pancreatic duct cytology, or liver biopsy. The investigators will evaluate the frequency of pancreatitis and cholecystitis. Furthermore, the investigators will evaluate various parameters to clarify the predictive factors of pancreatitis and cholecystitis. The following 10 variables will be evaluated in pancreatitis by univariate analysis: \[1\] sex, \[2\] age, \[3\] primary disease, \[4\] Covered type (partially or fully), \[5\] SEMS with high AF, \[6\] F-CSEMS with high RF, \[7\] EST before F-CSEMS, \[8\] previous biliary stent, \[9\] contrast injection into the pancreatic duct (pancreatogram), and \[10\] the position of the distal stent edge. The following 11 variables will be evaluated in cholecystitis by univariate analysis: \[1\] sex, \[2\] age, \[3\] regions of stricture, \[4\] F-CSEMS with high AF AF (axial force), \[5\] F-CSEMS with high RF, \[6\] previous biliary stent, \[7\] gallbladder stone, \[8\] contrast injection into the gallbladder (GB injection), \[9\] involvement to the orifice of the cystic duct (OCD), \[10\] position of distal stent edge, and \[11\] cystic duct occlusion by F-CSEMS. \-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- software: nQuery + nTerim (version 4.0) \- One-sided Chi-square test for proportion comparison H0: p1=p2 vs H1: p1\>p2 (The incidence of complications in the flower-type covered stent is smaller than in the conventional stent.) p1 = incident rate of complication in full covered stent group p2 = incident rate of complication in flower-type covered stent group * Set p1(incident rate of complication in full covered stent group) = 15% = 0.15 * expected % decrement in incidence rate = 40%, 50%, 60%, 70% --\> p2 = 0.09, 0.075, 0.06, 0.045 * Significance level (alpha) = 0.05 * Maximum number of patients who can be enrolled = 10 per month at SMC = 120 per year * Expected enroll period = 1 year = 12 months 1. Sample size calculation with targeted power of 80% Expected % decrement in incidence rate 70% p2 4.5% Required n per group 116 Required total sample size 232 Required enroll period (year) 1.9 2. Power calculation with a total sample size of 232 (116 per group) Expected % decrement in incidence rate 40% 50% 60% 70% p2 9.0% 7.5% 6.0% 4.5% Expected power (%) 32 48 64 80 3. Minimum % decrement to be detected with power of 80% Planned enroll period (year) 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 Enroll-able n per group 60 90 120 150 180 Enroll-able total sample size 120 180 240 300 360 Minimum % decrement to be detected 93.33% 78.70% 68.70% 62.70% 58.00% Expected p2 1.0% 3.2% 4.7% 5.6% 6.3%

Interventions

DEVICEEndoscopic Retrograde CholangioPancreatography(ERCP)

This study is prospective randomized multicenter study by using Endoscopic Retrograde CholangioPancreatography(ERCP). Comparison between Novel flower-type covered stent and Conventional covered stent in malignant extrahepatic biliary obstruction will be conducted after stent insertion by using Endoscopic Retrograde CholangioPancreatography(ERCP).

Sponsors

Samsung Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Intervention model description

Flower-CSEMS vs. Conventional-CSEMS

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
19 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adults from 19 to 85 years of age who have voluntarily agreed to the clinical trial and signed a written agreement * Patients with malignant extrahepatic bile duct obstruction without surgery

Exclusion criteria

* Patients who had already undergone surgical biliary drainage * Patients who previously underwent percutaneous spinal cholecystectomy (PTGBD) * Patients who underwent conventional metal-on-metal self-expandable metal stents (C-CSEMS) * Patients who underwent biliary plastic stent implantation for more than 15 days * Patients with malignant stricture of the intrahepatic bile duct and patients with stenosis within 2 cm of the liver * Patients whose expected life expectancy is less than 3 months * Pregnant patient * Patients who can not undergo endoscopic procedures based on the judgment of the researcher

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pancreatitis, Cholecystitis - Occurrence rate : %3 months after procedureThe incidence of pancreatitis is calculated using percentiles.
Pancreatitis, Cholecystitis - Severity3 months after procedureThe extent of each side effect is described in the Adverse Reactions Report according to the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria (NCI-CTCAE) Rating System version 4.0.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Stent-related adverse events6 months after procedurePost -ERCP pancreatitis, Severity of pancreatitis, Bleeding, Microperforation
Stent patency6 months after procedureWe followed up the stent patency until the time of patient death or stent occlusion.

Countries

South Korea

Contacts

Primary ContactJong Kyun Lee, MD PhD
jongk.lee@samsung.com+82-2-3410-3409
Backup ContactJae Keun Park, MD
jaekeunjaekeun.park@samsung.com+82-2-3410-3409

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026