Skip to content

Artificial Intelligence for Optimal Anemia Management in End-stage Renal Disease: The Anemia Control Model (ACM) Trial

ANEMEX UK Trial: Artificial Intelligence for Optimal Anemia Management in End-stage Renal Disease: The Anemia Control Model (ACM) Trial

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03214627
Acronym
ANEMEX
Enrollment
88
Registered
2017-07-11
Start date
2018-12-10
Completion date
2019-05-21
Last updated
2020-01-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Anemia, End Stage Renal Disease

Brief summary

Fresenius Medical Care has developed a computer software programme called the Anaemia Control Management (ACM) software to assist in the anaemia management of patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) undergoing hemodialysis. This trial is designed to assess the effectiveness of this ACM software on anaemia management in routine clinical practice. However, all ultimate decisions on therapeutic or diagnostic procedures, treatments, management of the disease, or resource utilisation will be at the discretion of the Investigator. The trial consists of a retrospective (historical) control period and a prospective (going forward) period. During the prospective period, the ACM will be used to assist the Investigators' decision making and will help the Investigators to administer a personalised intravenous (IV) iron and red blood cell stimulating agent (ESA) therapy, whereas treatment according to standard of care will be documented retrospectively for the same patients during the retrospective period of the trial. Thus, patients can serve as their own control.

Detailed description

Fresenius Medical Care has developed an algorithm that uses a data-driven computational intelligence model based on an artificial neural network architecture (ACM) to generate individualised ESA dose recommendations from a history of dose and response information and specific patient demographic characteristics. The ACM has been validated and complies with the European requirements for medical devices. The ACM was classified as a Class I medical device in accordance with Directive 93/42/EEC. A proof of concept trial was conducted in 3 NephroCare dialysis clinics (managed by Fresenius) in the Czech Republic, Portugal, and Spain. It could be shown that the introduction of ACM-guided therapy led to a significant decrease in median darbepoetin doses and to a significant increase in on-target haemoglobin (Hb) values along with a decrease in Hb fluctuation. Moreover, a retrospective trial conducted in NephroCare clinics in Portugal, suggested that ACM is able to reliably predict the long-term response to ESA and iron therapy in patients undergoing haemodialysis. The current trial will test the applicability of the ACM outside of Fresenius clinics in a public hospital setting in the UK. Both intravenous (IV) iron and ESA doses will be recommended by the algorithm. The effectiveness of ACM-guided therapy on several anaemia outcomes will be assessed in adult patients with End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD).This trial will be conducted at 1 main unit and 5 satellite units at King's College Hospital, London, UK, in patients with ESRD who are routinely undergoing haemodialysis. This trial is designed to assess the effectiveness of the ACM software on anaemia management in routine clinical practice. However, all ultimate decisions on therapeutic or diagnostic procedures, treatments, management of the disease, or resource utilisation will be at the discretion of the Investigator. The trial will consist of a retrospective control period and a prospective period. During the prospective period, the ACM will be used to facilitate the Investigators' decision making and will help the Investigators to administer a personalised IV iron and ESA therapy, whereas treatment according to standard of care will be documented retrospectively for the same patients during the retrospective period of the trial. Thus, patients can serve as their own control. The planned overall duration of the trial is 18 months (12 months recruitment period + 6 months until last patient last visit). The planned duration of prospective treatment for an individual patient will be 6 months. The collection of retrospective data from medical records covering a period of 6 months will take place as soon as the Informed Consent Form (ICF) is signed but at the latest at baseline. Data will be collected at designated time Points (monthly) throughout the Trial once the ICF is signed: at the latest at baseline (collection of retrospective data), at baseline (start of prospective documentation), and for the observation time points (Month 1 to Month 6). However, examinations will follow routine clinical practice at the site according to the Investigator's decision.

Interventions

DEVICEAnemia Control Model (ACM)

The ACM is mainly composed of 2 sub-Systems - predictor model which, depending on the input data, forecasts the response to anaemia drug therapy for a specific patient. The predictor model is implemented as a feed-forward artificial neural network. The ACM is an algorithm that extracts the optimal policy to achieve the established clinical outcome for anaemia management using the predictor model.

IV iron given monthly as required - dose determined by the ACM and as agreed by the investigator

ESA given monthly as required over 6 months - dose determined by the ACM and as agreed by the investigator

Sponsors

Worldwide Clinical Trials
CollaboratorOTHER
Fresenius Medical Care Deutschland GmbH
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Vifor Fresenius Medical Care Renal Pharma
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

The trial will consist of a retrospective control period and a prospective period. During the prospective period, the ACM will be used to facilitate the Investigators' decision making and will help the Investigators to administer a personalised IV iron and ESA therapy, whereas treatment according to standard of care will be documented retrospectively for the same patients during the retrospective (historical) period of the trial. Thus, patients can serve as their own control.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
19 Years to 90 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age 19 to 90 years * On haemodialysis for the past 18 months prior to baseline * Treatment with IV iron sucrose during the past 6 months according to the respective Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC) * Treatment with epoetin beta during the past 6 months according to the respective SmPC * Regular Hb measurements and at least 5 (standard of care, approximately monthly) Hb measurements during the past 6 months * Ferritin measurements during the past 6 months (at least 2 measurements) * Signed informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Life expectancy \<6 months * One or more Hb measurements \<8 g/dl during the control period * Living-donor transplant scheduled within the next 6 months * Scheduled for switch to peritoneal dialysis or home haemodialysis * Blood transfusion during the past 9 months * Pregnancy or breast feeding * Active infection * Current malignancy or haematological disorder * Previous severe hypersensitivity reaction to IV iron sucrose * Serious allergic reactions to darbepoetin alfa or epoetin alfa/beta/zeta, respectively * Current treatment with PEGylated erythropoietin * Surgery in the past 6 months * Surgery scheduled within the next 6 months * Participation in a clinical trial in the past 7 months

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in the proportion of patients with haemoglobin within the target range as compared to the historical control period (non-inferiority testing)Month -6 to Month -1 compared with Month +1 to Month +6The proportion of patients with at least 5 (standard of care, approximately monthly) Hb measurements and with 80% of these measurements within the target range of 10 to 12 g/dl from Month -6 to Month -1 will be compared with the proportion of patients with at least 5 measurements and with 80% of these measurements within target range of 10 to 12 g/dl from Month 1 to Month 6 (non-inferiority testing).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in the proportion of patients with haemoglobin within the target range as compared to historical control period (superiority testing)Month -6 to Month -1 compared with Month +1 to Month +6The proportion of patients with at least 5 (standard of care, approximately monthly) Hb measurements and with 80% of these measurements within the Hb target range of 10 to 12 g/dl from Month -6 to Month -1 will be compared with the proportion of patients with at least 5 measurements and with 80% of these measurements within target range of 10 to 12 g/dl from Month 1 to Month 6 (superiority testing).
Change in haemoglobin fluctuations as compared to historical control periodMonth -6 to Month -1 compared with Month +1 to Month +6The Hb fluctuation in patients with at least 5 (standard of care, approximately monthly) Hb measurements from Month -6 to Month -1 and from Month 1 to Month 6 as measured by Hb, Coefficient of Variation (CV), and Standard Deviation (SD) from Month -6 to Month -1 period versus Month 1 to Month 6.
Change in cumulative ESA dose as compared to historical control periodMonth -6 to Month -1 compared with Month +1 to Month +6Cumulative ESA dose from Month -6 to Month -1 versus cumulative ESA dose from Month 1 to Month 6.
Change in cumulative IV iron dose as compared to historical control periodMonth -6 to Month -1 compared with Month +1 to Month +6Cumulative IV iron dose from Month -6 to Month -1 versus cumulative IV iron dose from Month +1 to Month +6.

Countries

United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026